Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 25(6): 1066-1074, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31107222

RESUMEN

Lassa fever (LF) is endemic to Nigeria, where the disease causes substantial rates of illness and death. In this article, we report an analysis of the epidemiologic and clinical aspects of the LF outbreak that occurred in Nigeria during January 1-May 6, 2018. A total of 1,893 cases were reported; 423 were laboratory-confirmed cases, among which 106 deaths were recorded (case-fatality rate 25.1%). Among all confirmed cases, 37 occurred in healthcare workers. The secondary attack rate among 5,001 contacts was 0.56%. Most (80.6%) confirmed cases were reported from 3 states (Edo, Ondo, and Ebonyi). Fatal outcomes were significantly associated with being elderly; no administration of ribavirin; and the presence of a cough, hemorrhaging, and unconsciousness. The findings in this study should lead to further LF research and provide guidance to those preparing to respond to future outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Fiebre de Lassa/diagnóstico , Fiebre de Lassa/epidemiología , Virus Lassa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Geografía Médica , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Fiebre de Lassa/historia , Fiebre de Lassa/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Nigeria/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Prevalencia , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Estaciones del Año , Evaluación de Síntomas , Adulto Joven
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 25(5): 1026-1027, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30807268

RESUMEN

We reviewed data pertaining to the massive wave of Lassa fever cases that occurred in Nigeria in 2018. No new virus strains were detected, but in 2018, the outbreak response was intensified, additional diagnostic support was available, and surveillance sensitivity increased. These factors probably contributed to the high case count.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Fiebre de Lassa/epidemiología , Animales , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Incidencia , Fiebre de Lassa/diagnóstico , Fiebre de Lassa/historia , Fiebre de Lassa/virología , Virus Lassa/clasificación , Virus Lassa/genética , Virus Lassa/aislamiento & purificación , Nigeria/epidemiología , Vigilancia en Salud Pública , Estaciones del Año
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(39): 867-72, 2014 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25275332

RESUMEN

On July 20, 2014, an acutely ill traveler from Liberia arrived at the international airport in Lagos, Nigeria, and was confirmed to have Ebola virus disease (Ebola) after being admitted to a private hospital. This index patient potentially exposed 72 persons at the airport and the hospital. The Federal Ministry of Health, with guidance from the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC), declared an Ebola emergency. Lagos, (pop. 21 million) is a regional hub for economic, industrial, and travel activities and a setting where communicable diseases can be easily spread and transmission sustained. Therefore, implementing a rapid response using all available public health assets was the highest priority. On July 23, the Federal Ministry of Health, with the Lagos State government and international partners, activated an Ebola Incident Management Center as a precursor to the current Emergency Operations Center (EOC) to rapidly respond to this outbreak. The index patient died on July 25; as of September 24, there were 19 laboratory-confirmed Ebola cases and one probable case in two states, with 894 contacts identified and followed during the response. Eleven patients with laboratory-confirmed Ebola had been discharged, an additional patient was diagnosed at convalescent stage, and eight patients had died (seven with confirmed Ebola; one probable). The isolation wards were empty, and 891 (all but three) contacts had exited follow-up, with the remainder due to exit on October 2. No new cases had occurred since August 31, suggesting that the Ebola outbreak in Nigeria might be contained. The EOC, established quickly and using an Incident Management System (IMS) to coordinate the response and consolidate decision making, is largely credited with helping contain the Nigeria outbreak early. National public health emergency preparedness agencies in the region, including those involved in Ebola responses, should consider including the development of an EOC to improve the ability to rapidly respond to urgent public health threats.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/epidemiología , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , Práctica de Salud Pública , Trazado de Contacto , Ebolavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Nigeria/epidemiología , Viaje
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA