Evaluation of the impact of short term manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) training program on trainees with varying prior surgical experience using international council of ophthalmology-ophthalmology surgical competency assessment rubrics (ICO-OSCAR).

PURPOSE: To assess the learning curve of MSICS in three different groups of trainees with varying prior MSICS experience. To evaluate the effectiveness of ICO OSCAR for objective assessment of surgical skill transfer. METHODS: Ninety-five MSICS trainees were divided into three groups as 1st year resident, fellow and external trainee. Each group were evaluated for their surgical skill acquisition during one month MSICS training program using ICO-OSCAR. Each trainee performed an average of 19 surgeries. The progress in the learning curve of the three groups of trainees was analyzed by evaluating the mean scores in sets of five consecutive cases. Complications during the training period were also noted. RESULTS: The study evaluated a total of 1842 cases. The fellows and external trainees, with prior MSICS experience, had an initial mean score of 57.57 ± 16.16 and 56.86 ± 17.82 respectively, whereas the 1st year resident group had a relatively low initial mean score of 45.91(p = 0.009). The difference in mean scores between the 1st year resident group and other groups significantly reduced towards the end of training. The most common complications made by 1st year residents were in sclero-corneal tunnel construction. The external trainee group had statistically significant higher rates of zonular dialysis in the study. CONCLUSIONS: ICO-OSCAR is an effective tool for assessing MSICS training program. Structured short term MSICS surgical training program is effective in surgical skill transfer, especially in novice surgeons.

Nucleus drop following phacoemulsification surgery: Incidence, risk factors and clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence, risk factors and clinical outcomes in patients with nucleus drop (ND) following phacoemulsification surgery at a tertiary care ophthalmic institute. METHODS: Medical records of patients with ND during phacoemulsification between January'2019 and December'2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Incidence of ND was calculated overall, and according to surgical expertise levels and surgical steps. Associated pre- and intra-operative risk factors were assessed. Clinical outcome parameters [best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP)] were compared with respect to timing of PPV (immediate vs early vs delayed), location (sulcus vs scleral fixated-IOL) and timing of IOL placement (primary vs secondary). RESULTS: Among 93,760 phacoemulsifications, ND was noted in 130 patients (0.1%). Significant direct and associated pre-operative risk factors were advanced cataract, glaucoma, posterior polar cataract, and diabetes mellitus. Junior medical consultants had 40 ND (mostly in non-complex cases), whereas senior medical consultants had 90 ND (mostly in complex cases). ND most frequently occurred during emulsification of nuclear fragments. Sulcus placement of IOL during primary surgery yielded significantly better visual outcome compared to secondary procedures, although timing of PPV had insignificant effect. 77.1% had BCVA of 6/12 or better at final follow-up. Timing of IOL implantation, PPV, and type of IOL did not have any significant effect on IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Though the incidence of ND is low, it is a dreaded complication. Accurate pre-operative evaluation, risk stratification, distribution of cases among surgeons based on their surgical expertise, and immediate or early management of ND yields better anatomical and functional outcomes.

Visual outcomes and risk factors of uveitis cataract eyes after phacoemulsification and manual small-incision cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To examine the visual outcomes and risk factors of uveitis cataract eyes after phacoemulsification and manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS). SETTING: Tertiary-care eye hospital in southern India. DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series. METHODS: Of the uveitis eyes operated for cataract surgery between 2017 and 2020, eyes with a minimum of 6 months postoperative follow-up were included. Eyes with ocular trauma, lens subluxation, lens-induced uveitis, or retinal detachment-induced uveitis were excluded. Demography, visual acuity, intraoperative and postoperative records, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: 191 eyes of 191 patients with a mean age of 51.7 ± 14.4 years were included. Phacoemulsification was performed in 134 eyes, and 57 eyes underwent MSICS. Synechiolysis and pupil-expanding maneuvers were required in 74 eyes (38.7%). No differences were noted in the rates of complications between phacoemulsification and MSICS eyes, except at 1 year, where higher rates of posterior capsular opacification and vitritis were noted in MSICS eyes ( P = .018). The visual outcomes of eyes that underwent MSICS and phacoemulsification were comparable ( P = .463). In 12 eyes (13.5%), improvement in vision was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows phacoemulsification may be a preferred technique in uveitis cataracts, given the lesser incidence of postoperative complications. Patients should be counseled for realistic expectations.

Accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based mobile application for detecting cataracts: Results from a field study.

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of e-Paarvai, an artificial intelligence-based smartphone application (app) that detects and grades cataracts using images taken with a smartphone by comparing with slit lamp-based diagnoses by trained ophthalmologists. Methods: In this prospective diagnostic study conducted between January and April 2022 at a large tertiary-care eye hospital in South India, two screeners were trained to use the app. Patients aged >40 years and with a best-corrected visual acuity <20/40 were recruited for the study. The app is intended to determine whether the eye has immature cataract, mature cataract, posterior chamber intra-ocular lens, or no cataract. The diagnosis of the app was compared with that of trained ophthalmologists based on slit-lamp examinations, the gold standard, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was estimated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were computed. Results: The two screeners used the app to screen 2,619 eyes of 1,407 patients. In detecting cataracts, the app showed high sensitivity (96%) but low specificity (25%), an overall accuracy of 88%, a PPV of 92.3%, and an NPV of 57.8%. In terms of cataract grading, the accuracy of the app was high in detecting immature cataracts (1,875 eyes, 94.2%), but its accuracy was poor in detecting mature cataracts (73 eyes, 22%), posterior chamber intra-ocular lenses (55 eyes, 29.3%), and clear lenses (2 eyes, 2%). We found that the area under the curve in predicting ophthalmologists' cataract diagnosis could potentially be improved beyond the app's diagnosis based on using images only by incorporating information about patient sex and age (P < 0.0001) and best-corrected visual acuity (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Although there is room for improvement, e-Paarvai app is a promising approach for diagnosing cataracts in difficult-to-reach populations. Integrating this with existing outreach programs can enhance the case detection rate.

Comparison of two phacoemulsification system handpieces: prospective randomized comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of Active Sentry handpiece with Ozil handpiece for Centurion phacoemulsification system. SETTING: Tertiary eye center, South India. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: 204 eyes of 204 patients with uncomplicated cataract who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery with Centurion Vision System were randomized into 2 groups: Ozil handpiece (n = 101) and Active Sentry handpiece (n = 103). Intraoperative factors such as patient pain perception, surgeon comfort level, amount of phacoemulsification energy and aspiration fluid used, and frequency of activation of active surge mitigation (ASM) were analyzed, and postoperatively, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and corneal edema on day 1 were compared. RESULTS: A total of 204 eyes of 204 patients were included among which 101 underwent surgery with ozil hand piece and 103 with Active Sentry handpiece. Patient pain perception was comparable between the groups with no statistically significant differences in patients who had pain-free surgery (66% vs 61.3%) and those who experienced moderate pain (24.3% vs 28.7%). Surgeons were more comfortable using Ozil handpiece during entry into anterior chamber and emulsification of hard nuclei (48.5% vs 28.6%). The mean cumulative dissipated energy for soft and hard cataracts was 5.6 and 4.8 and 9.3 and 9.4 for Ozil and Active Sentry groups, respectively. ASM was activated for 53 eyes (51.5%), of which 42 eyes (79.2%) had soft cataract and 11 eyes (20.7%) hard cataract. Postoperative CDVA and incidence of corneal edema were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: For Centurion Vision System, Active Sentry handpiece was as safe and efficacious as the Ozil handpiece with added benefit of operating at lower intraocular pressure levels.