RESUMEN
Risk stratification of pediatric febrile neutropenia (FN) is an established concept, yet clinical risk tools misclassify nearly 5% of clinical standard-risk episodes with severe outcomes. The internal evaluation of a clinical risk tool before implementation has not been well-described. In this noninterventional cohort study, we evaluated a study decision rules (SDR) tool; a clinical risk tool with serial procalcitonin. The study standard-risk (SSR) group met clinical standard-risk criteria with two serial procalcitonin <0.4 ng/mL. The study high-risk (SHR) group met clinical high-risk criteria or clinical standard-risk with a procalcitonin ≥0.4 ng/mL. Descriptive and bivariate statistics compared the groups and outcomes. Clinical criteria alone identified 39.1% (238/608) standard-risk episodes; 5.9% (14/238) had severe events. Prospectively using the SDR, the SHR group encompassed 76.6% (92/120) of episodes; severe events occurred in 20% (3/15) of standard-risk episodes included due to elevated procalcitonin ≥0.4 ng/mL. The SHR group had more blood stream infections [21.7% (20/92) vs. 0% (0/28); P = 0.007] and intensive care admissions [13% (12/92) vs. 3.6% (1/28); P = 0.158]. In conclusion, the SDR with serial procalcitonin aided in identifying severe events in clinical standard-risk episodes, but analysis was limited. Institutions may consider similar internal evaluation methodology before FN episode risk stratification.
Asunto(s)
Neutropenia Febril , Neoplasias , Comportamiento del Uso de la Herramienta , Humanos , Niño , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo , Neutropenia Febril/diagnóstico , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Delta granule storage pool deficiency (δ-SPD) is a rare platelet disorder in which a deficiency of platelet granules leads to poor aggregation, resulting in varying clinical bleeding phenotypes. Children with δ-SPD have variable laboratory results, making the proper diagnosis and evaluation controversial. OBJECTIVES: To describe the demographic and laboratory trends of this population and to assess the value of electron microscopy in diagnostic evaluation and its correlation to bleeding symptoms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 109 pediatric patients diagnosed with δ-SPD. We collected demographic information and bleeding scores using a validated bleeding assessment tool. A descriptive and exploratory analysis was performed. RESULTS: The majority of patients were female, with an average age at diagnosis of 11.61 years. Females were diagnosed at a significantly older age presenting most often with menorrhagia, while males presented most commonly with epistaxis. The majority showed normal lumiaggregometry, the mean platelet electron microscopy (PEM) value was 2.37, and the mean bleeding score was 6. Bleeding assessment tool and PEM had a significantly weak correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more dense granules per platelet had higher bleeding scores than those with fewer dense granules per platelet. The current body of evidence does not favor the use of PEM in routine clinical practice, and results are difficult to interpret. In patients with severe mucocutaneous bleeding symptoms and normal platelet aggregation studies, consideration should be given to an alternative diagnosis and further evaluation is warranted.