RESUMEN
During July 2021, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.617.2 variant infections, including vaccine breakthrough infections, occurred after large public gatherings in Provincetown, Massachusetts, USA, prompting a multistate investigation. Public health departments identified primary and secondary cases by using coronavirus disease surveillance data, case investigations, and contact tracing. A primary case was defined as SARS-CoV-2 detected <14 days after travel to or residence in Provincetown during July 3-17. A secondary case was defined as SARS-CoV-2 detected <14 days after close contact with a person who had a primary case but without travel to or residence in Provincetown during July 3-August 10. We identified 1,098 primary cases and 30 secondary cases associated with 26 primary cases among fully and non-fully vaccinated persons. Large gatherings can have widespread effects on SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and fully vaccinated persons should take precautions, such as masking, to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission, particularly during substantial or high transmission.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , Massachusetts , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
In August 2022, the Florida Department of Health (FDOH) was notified of a suspected case of monkeypox in an infant aged <2 months who was admitted to a Florida hospital with a rash and cellulitis. This case report highlights findings from the related epidemiologic investigation and describes the public health actions taken. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.* This is the youngest patient with confirmed monkeypox infection in Florida to date.
Asunto(s)
Exantema , Mpox , Florida/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
Monkeypox, a zoonotic infection caused by an orthopoxvirus, is endemic in parts of Africa. On August 4, 2022, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services declared the U.S. monkeypox outbreak, which began on May 17, to be a public health emergency (1,2). After detection of the first U.S. monkeypox case), CDC and health departments implemented enhanced monkeypox case detection and reporting. Among 2,891 cases reported in the United States through July 22 by 43 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia (DC), CDC received case report forms for 1,195 (41%) cases by July 27. Among these, 99% of cases were among men; among men with available information, 94% reported male-to-male sexual or close intimate contact during the 3 weeks before symptom onset. Among the 88% of cases with available data, 41% were among non-Hispanic White (White) persons, 28% among Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) persons, and 26% among non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) persons. Forty-two percent of persons with monkeypox with available data did not report the typical prodrome as their first symptom, and 46% reported one or more genital lesions during their illness; 41% had HIV infection. Data suggest that widespread community transmission of monkeypox has disproportionately affected gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men and racial and ethnic minority groups. Compared with historical reports of monkeypox in areas with endemic disease, currently reported outbreak-associated cases are less likely to have a prodrome and more likely to have genital involvement. CDC and other federal, state, and local agencies have implemented response efforts to expand testing, treatment, and vaccination. Public health efforts should prioritize gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, who are currently disproportionately affected, for prevention and testing, while addressing equity, minimizing stigma, and maintaining vigilance for transmission in other populations. Clinicians should test patients with rash consistent with monkeypox, regardless of whether the rash is disseminated or was preceded by prodrome. Likewise, although most cases to date have occurred among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, any patient with rash consistent with monkeypox should be considered for testing. CDC is continually evaluating new evidence and tailoring response strategies as information on changing case demographics, clinical characteristics, transmission, and vaccine effectiveness become available.§.
Asunto(s)
Exantema , Infecciones por VIH , Mpox , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Etnicidad , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Masculino , Grupos Minoritarios , Mpox/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
On December 23, 2014, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) was notified of adverse health events in two patients who had been inadvertently administered nonsterile, simulation 0.9% sodium chloride intravenous (IV) fluids at an urgent care facility. Simulation saline is a nonsterile product not meant for human or animal use; it is intended for use by medical trainees practicing IV administration of saline on mannequins or other training devices. Both patients experienced a febrile illness during product administration and were hospitalized; one patient developed sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Neither patient died. Staff members at the clinic reported having ordered the product through their normal medical supply distributor and not recognizing during administration that it was not intended for human use.
Asunto(s)
Coagulación Intravascular Diseminada/etiología , Contaminación de Medicamentos , Sepsis/etiología , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Cloruro de Sodio/efectos adversos , Soluciones/administración & dosificación , Soluciones/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Maniquíes , New York , Simulación de Paciente , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
During SeptemberNovember 2014, the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) was notified of five New York state residents who had tested seropositive for Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Q fever. All five patients had symptoms compatible with Q fever (e.g., fever, fatigue, chills, and headache) and a history of travel to Germany to receive a medical treatment called "live cell therapy" (sometimes called "fresh cell therapy") in May 2014. Live cell therapy is the practice of injecting processed cells from organs or fetuses of nonhuman animals (e.g., sheep) into human recipients. It is advertised to treat a variety of health conditions. This practice is unavailable in the United States; however, persons can travel to foreign locations to receive injections. Local health departments interviewed the patients, and NYSDOH notified CDC and posted a report on CDC's Epidemic Information Exchange to solicit additional cases. Clinical and exposure information for each patient was reported to the Robert Koch Institute in Germany, which forwarded the information to local health authorities. A Canada resident who also received live cell therapy in May 2014 was diagnosed with Q fever in July 2014. Clinicians should be aware of health risks, such as Q fever and other zoonotic diseases, among patients with a history of receiving treatment with live cell therapy products.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células/efectos adversos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Turismo Médico , Fiebre Q/epidemiología , Zoonosis/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Canadá/epidemiología , Coxiella burnetii/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Fiebre Q/transmisión , Fiebre Q/veterinaria , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/transmisión , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Zoonosis/transmisiónRESUMEN
Since 2016, the United States has experienced a resurgence in the number of hepatitis A virus (HAV) cases and outbreaks. These outbreaks have been sustained by person-to-person transmission with cases occurring predominantly in high-risk populations including intravenous drug users, individuals experiencing homelessness, and men who have sex with men. To investigate HAV transmission, a molecular-surveillance system consisting of real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) for detection, and a conventional RT-PCR assay for genotyping of HAV, was established in New York State (NYS) in 2019. Since then, a total of 271 HAV-positive serum samples collected from cases across NYS between 2019 and 2021 were identified by rRT-PCR. To rapidly and efficiently generate HAV whole-genome sequences, a custom AmpliSeq™ panel was designed in collaboration with Thermo Fisher. To streamline the process, sample preparation was performed on an Ion Chef and sequencing on an Ion S5XL. Of the 271 HAV-positive samples, the whole-genome sequencing (WGS) assay successfully generated 134 near-complete, high-quality HAV sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the VP1-2A region identified 216 IB, 48 IA, and 2 IIIA genotypes, while 5 were unable to be typed due to poor sequence in this key region. The HAV whole-genome sequencing approach provided a more efficient and streamlined approach for genotyping HAV compared to previous methods and resulted in phylogenetic trees with enhanced resolution compared to the HAV VP1-2A region alone.
Asunto(s)
Virus de la Hepatitis A , Hepatitis A , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Masculino , Humanos , Virus de la Hepatitis A/genética , Hepatitis A/diagnóstico , Filogenia , Homosexualidad Masculina , Genotipo , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , ARN Viral/genéticaRESUMEN
Brucellosis is a highly infectious zoonotic disease of global significance due to its adverse impact on public health, economics, and trade. Despite being one of the most prevalent zoonoses worldwide, attention given to global brucellosis control and prevention has been inadequate. Brucella species of greatest one-health relevance in the US include those infecting dogs (Brucella canis), swine (Brucella suis), and cattle and domestic bison (Brucella abortus). Although not endemic in the US, Brucella melitensis warrants awareness as it poses a risk to international travelers. While brucellosis has been eradicated from domestic livestock in the US, its detection in US companion animals (B canis) and US wildlife reservoirs (B suis and B abortus) and enzootic presence internationally pose a threat to human and animal health, warranting its spotlight on the one-health stage. The challenges of B canis diagnosis in humans and dogs is addressed in more detail in the companion Currents in One Health by Guarino et al, AJVR, April 2023. Human consumption of unpasteurized dairy products and occupational exposure of laboratory diagnosticians, veterinarians, and animal care providers are responsible for human exposures reported to the US CDC. Diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis is challenging due to the limitations of diagnostic assays and the tendency of Brucella spp to produce nonspecific, insidious clinical signs and evade antimicrobial therapy, making prevention essential. This review will focus on zoonotic considerations for Brucella spp found within the US along with their epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, treatment, and control strategies.
Asunto(s)
Bison , Brucelosis , Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Enfermedades de los Perros , Salud Única , Enfermedades de los Porcinos , Bovinos , Animales , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Perros , Porcinos , Brucelosis/epidemiología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Zoonosis/epidemiología , Brucella abortus , Animales SalvajesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although many people who are incarcerated have risk factors for hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection, the proportion of hepatitis A cases among people with a recent incarceration is unknown. We examined the relationship between recent incarceration and HAV infection during community-based, person-to-person outbreaks to inform public health recommendations. METHODS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveyed health departments in 33 jurisdictions reporting person-to-person HAV outbreaks during 2016-2020 on the number of outbreak-associated cases, HAV-infected people recently incarcerated, and HAV-associated hospitalizations and deaths. RESULTS: Twenty-five health departments reported 18 327 outbreak-associated hepatitis A cases during January 11, 2016-January 24, 2020. In total, 2093 (11.4%) HAV-infected people had been recently incarcerated. Of those with complete data, 1402 of 1462 (95.9%) had been held in a local jail, and 1513 of 1896 (79.8.%) disclosed hepatitis A risk factors. Eighteen jurisdictions reported incarceration timing relative to the exposure period. Of 9707 cases in these jurisdictions, 991 (10.2%) were among recently incarcerated people; 451 of 688 (65.6%) people with complete data had been incarcerated during all (n = 55) or part (n = 396) of their exposure period. CONCLUSIONS: Correctional facilities are important settings for reaching people with risk factors for HAV infection and can also be venues where transmission occurs. Providing HAV vaccination to incarcerated people, particularly people housed in jails, can be an effective component of community-wide outbreak response.
Asunto(s)
Virus de la Hepatitis A , Hepatitis A , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Vacunación , Brotes de Enfermedades , Instalaciones CorreccionalesRESUMEN
Melioidosis is caused by the gram-negative bacillus Burkholderia pseudomallei, endemic to northern Australia and Southeast Asia. We present a patient who traveled to Mexico, returned to the United States, and developed progressive manifestations of melioidosis, culminating as central nervous system disease. Standard therapy was contraindicated, and a prolonged intensive phase was employed.
RESUMEN
Zoonotic infections with swine influenza A viruses are reported sporadically. Triple reassortant swine influenza viruses have been isolated from pigs in the United States since 1998. We report a human case of upper respiratory illness associated with swine influenza A (H1N1) triple reassortant virus infection that occurred during 2005 following exposure to freshly killed pigs.
Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Gripe Humana/virología , Virus Reordenados , Adolescente , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/clasificación , Masculino , WisconsinRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In March 2004, the OraQuick rapid HIV antibody test became the first rapid HIV test approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use on oral fluid specimens. Test results are available in 20 minutes, and the oral fluid test is non-invasive. From August 2004-June 2005, we investigated a sudden increase in false-positive results occurring in a performance study of OraQuick oral-fluid rapid HIV tests in Minnesota. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In a field investigation, we reviewed performance study data on oral-fluid and whole-blood OraQuick rapid HIV test device lots and expiration dates and assessed test performance and interpretation with oral-fluid and whole-blood specimens by operators who reported false-positive results. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate client demographic and risk characteristics associated with false-positive results. Next, we conducted an incidence study of false-positive OraQuick rapid HIV tests in nine US cities and tested both oral-fluid and finger-stick whole-blood specimens from clients; reactive tests were confirmed with Western blot. Sixteen (4.1%) false-positive oral-fluid results occurred in the performance study from April 15, 2004 through August 31, 2004 with unexpired devices from six test lots among 388 HIV-uninfected clients (specificity, 95.9%; 95% CI: 93.4-97.6). Three test operators who had reported false-positive results performed and interpreted the test according to package-insert instructions. In multivariate analysis, only older age was significantly associated with false-positive results (adjusted odds ratio = 4.5, 95% CI: 1.2-25.7). In the incidence study, all valid oral-fluid and whole-blood results from 2,268 clients were concordant and no false-positive results occurred (100% specificity). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The field investigation did not identify a cause for the increase in false-positive oral-fluid results, and the incidence study detected no false-positive results. The findings suggest this was an isolated cluster; the test's overall performance was as specified by the manufacturer.