Profiles of Burnout and Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Among General Surgery Residents at a Large Academic Training Program.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has placed demands on General Surgery residents, who are already at high risk of burnout. This study examined the pandemic's impact on burnout and wellness among General Surgery residents at a large training program. METHODS: General Surgery residents at our institution completed a survey focused on self-reported burnout, mental health, perceptions of wellness resources, and changes in activities during the pandemic. Burnout was measured using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Unsupervised machine learning (k-means clustering) was used to identify profiles of burnout and comparisons between profiles were made. RESULTS: Of 82 eligible residents, 51 completed the survey (62% response rate). During COVID-19, 63% of residents had self-described burnout, 43% had depression, 18% acknowledged binge drinking/drug use, and 8% had anxiety. There were no significant differences from pre-pandemic levels (p all >.05). Few residents perceived available wellness resources as effective (6%). Based on MBI scores, the clustering analysis identified three clusters, characterized as "overextended", "engaged", and "ineffective". Engaged residents had the least concerning MBI scores and were significantly more likely to exercise, retain social contact during the pandemic, and had less self-reported anxiety or depression. Research residents were overrepresented in the ineffective cluster (46%), which had high rates of self-reported burnout (77%) and was characterized by the lowest personal accomplishment scores. Rates of self-reported burnout for overextended and engaged residents were 73% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Surgical residents have high rates of self-reported burnout and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clusters of burnout may offer targets for individualized intervention.

Water-soluble contrast in the management of adhesive small-bowel obstruction: a Canadian centre's experience with guideline development and implementation.

BACKGROUND: Orally administered water-soluble contrast (WSC) can track resolution of small-bowel obstruction (SBO), but no universal pathway for its use exists. We developed and implemented an evidence-based guideline for the use of WSC in the management of adhesive SBO, to be implemented across hospitals affiliated with the University of Toronto. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and created a clinical practice guideline for WSC use in the management of adhesive SBO. The guideline was approved through consensus by an expert panel and implemented in 2018. We performed a prospective cohort study of guideline implementation at 1 pilot site (a large academic tertiary care centre), facilitated by the centre's acute care general surgery service. Primary outcomes included compliance with the guideline and hospital length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included rates of failure of nonoperative management, morbidity, mortality and readmission for recurrence of SBO within 1 year. Patients with adhesive SBO admitted in 2016 served as a control cohort. RESULTS: We analyzed the data for 152 patients with adhesive SBO admitted to the centre, 65 in 2016 (historical cohort), 56 in January-June 2018 (transitional cohort) and 31 in July-December 2018 (implementation cohort). There was a significant increase in compliance with the WSC protocol in 2018, with the proportion of patients receiving WSC increasing from 45% (n = 25) in the transitional cohort to 71% (n = 22) in the implementation cohort (p < 0.001). The median LOS did not differ across the cohorts (p = 0.06). There was a significantly lower readmission rate in the transitional and implementation cohorts (13 [23%] and 9 [29%], respectively) than in the historical cohort (29 [45%]) (p = 0.04). Among patients assigned to nonoperative management initially, a significantly higher proportion of those who received WSC than those who did not receive WSC went on to undergo surgery (14.6% v. 3.6%, p = 0.01), with no difference in median time to surgery (p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: An evidence-based guideline for WSC use in SBO management was successfully developed and implemented; no difference in LOS or time to surgery was seen after implementation, but rates of immediate operation increased and readmission rates decreased. Our experience shows that implementation of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline is feasible through multidisciplinary efforts and coordination.

Longer Trials of Non-operative Management for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction Are Associated with Increased Complications.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction suggest a limited trial of non-operative management, often of 3-5 days. A longer delay to operation may worsen post-operative outcomes in patients who ultimately require operation. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of time to operation on post-operative outcomes in patients who undergo operation following a trial of non-operative management for adhesive small bowel obstruction. METHODS: We used health administrative data to identify patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction who underwent operative management following a trial of non-operative management from 2005 to 2014 in the province of Ontario, Canada. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between the time from admission to operation with rates of 30-day mortality, serious complication, and bowel resection. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred sixty-three patients underwent operation after a trial of non-operative management for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Older patients, patients with a high comorbidity burden, and patients with a lower socioeconomic status were more likely to experience a longer pre-operative period. After adjusting for covariates, each additional day from admission to operation increased odds of serious complication (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.03-1.11) and bowel resection (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.98). Longer times to operation were not associated with greater adjusted odds of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Each additional day from admission to operation is associated with greater odds of adverse outcomes. Clinical practice guidelines should emphasize strategies that identify patients who will ultimately require operation.

Electrical Stimulation to Promote Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.

Peripheral nerve injury afflicts individuals from all walks of life. Despite the peripheral nervous system's intrinsic ability to regenerate, many patients experience incomplete functional recovery. Surgical repair aims to expedite this recovery process in the most thorough manner possible. However, full recovery is still rarely seen especially when nerve injury is compounded with polytrauma where surgical repair is delayed. Pharmaceutical strategies supplementary to nerve microsurgery have been investigated but surgery remains the only viable option. Brief low-frequency electrical stimulation of the proximal nerve stump after primary repair has been widely investigated. This article aims to review the currently known biological basis for the regenerative effects of acute brief low-frequency electrical stimulation on axonal regeneration and outline the recent clinical applications of the electrical stimulation protocol to demonstrate the significant translational potential of this modality for repairing peripheral nerve injuries. The review concludes with a discussion of emerging new advancements in this exciting area of research. The current literature indicates the imminent clinical applicability of acute brief low-frequency electrical stimulation after surgical repair to effectively promote axonal regeneration as the stimulation has yielded promising evidence to maximize functional recovery in diverse types of peripheral nerve injuries.