Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Allergol Int ; 73(3): 416-421, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38296769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low-dose oral food challenge (LD-OFC) is an approach to avoid complete elimination in high-risk patients with wheat allergy (WA). We examined the 3-year prognosis after LD-OFC among patients who passed and failed LD-OFC. METHODS: Children with immediate-type WA aged ≤6 years with a history of reaction to ≤390 mg of wheat protein underwent their first LD-OFC with 52 mg (baseline LD-OFC). After passing the LD-OFC, children stepped up to 390, 1300, and 5200 mg step-by-step every 3-6 months. After failing LD-OFC, children repeated LD-OFC every 6-12 months. We assessed wheat tolerance defined as consuming 5200 mg without symptoms for 3 years after baseline LD-OFC. RESULTS: The median age of 124 children was 2.4 years, and the wheat- and ω-5-gliadin-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels (kUA/L) were 23.6 and 2.1, respectively. Upon baseline LD-OFC, 57% passed (LD-tolerant), whereas 43% failed (LD-reactive). Within 3 years, 38% of the LD-reactive group passed re-administered LD-OFC, and 70% of all participants avoided complete elimination. The percentage of the participants who became capable of consuming 390 mg (87% vs. 18%), 1300 mg (78% vs. 13%), and acquired tolerance (70% vs. 13%) was significantly higher in the LD-tolerant group than in the LD-reactive group (p < 0.001). Predictors of persistent WA in the LD-tolerant group were older age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63), ω-5-gliadin-specific IgE level (1.62 per 10-fold increase), and other food allergies (1.94). CONCLUSIONS: LD-tolerant patients frequently acquired wheat tolerance within 3 years. Even if once positive, one-third could pass the re-administered LD-OFC within 3 years.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Inmunoglobulina E , Hipersensibilidad al Trigo , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad al Trigo/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad al Trigo/diagnóstico , Preescolar , Femenino , Masculino , Pronóstico , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Alérgenos/inmunología , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Administración Oral , Niño , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Triticum/inmunología , Gliadina/inmunología , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Antígenos de Plantas/administración & dosificación
2.
Cancer Sci ; 114(1): 211-220, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36082616

RESUMEN

EP4, a prostaglandin E2 receptor, has shown an immunosuppressive activity on cancer cells. This first-in-human study evaluated ONO-4578, a highly selective EP4 antagonist, as monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. A daily dose ranging from 30 mg to 100 mg of ONO-4578 monotherapy and that ranging from 2 mg to 60 mg of ONO-4578 with biweekly nivolumab 240 mg were administered. A total of 31 patients were enrolled, 10 receiving monotherapy and 21 receiving combination therapy. Overall, 26 patients experienced treatment-related adverse events. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in three patients; one of six patients receiving 100 mg monotherapy developed grade 3 duodenal ulcer and two of six patients receiving 60 mg combination therapy developed either grade 3 erythema multiforme or grade 3 increased amylase and grade 4 increased lipase. One patient with small-cell lung cancer who received 40 mg combination therapy had a partial response, and three patients with monotherapy and six patients with combination therapy had stable disease. Pharmacodynamics analyses showed that ONO-4578 had EP4 antagonistic activity at doses as low as 2 mg. In conclusion, the maximum tolerated dose of ONO-4578 alone or in combination with nivolumab was not reached. ONO-4578 was well tolerated at the tested doses and showed signs of antitumor activity. Considering safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics results, ONO-4578 40 mg daily with nivolumab 240 mg biweekly was selected as the recommended dose for future clinical trials. (Registration: JapicCTI-173,496 and NCT03155061).


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Subtipo EP4 de Receptores de Prostaglandina E , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Prostaglandinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos
3.
Arerugi ; 72(10): 1240-1247, 2023.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092400

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP), a new core outcome of the atopic dermatitis trial, was translated into Japanese and linguistically validated. METHODS: Translation into Japanese was accomplished according to the ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research) guidelines and the basic guidelines for scale translation. The translation process included two forward translations, reconciliation with native English speakers, third-party back translation, cognitive debriefing, review and harmonization by the original authors. Twenty-seven atopic dermatitis and pediatric specialists from 21 centers in Japan participated in the translation process. Cognitive debriefing was conducted through face-to-face interviews using a think-aloud method with the interview guide including questions about comprehensibility, relevance, comprehensiveness, recall period and suggested improvements, based on the COSMIN methodology. RESULTS: No linguistic or cultural problems were encountered in the translation into Japanese. Cognitive debriefings were conducted with 10 adult patients and 10 parents of pediatric patients. Some minor modifications were made following discussion and approval by the research team and the original authors. The Japanese version of RECAP was considered to be understandable, comprehensive and relevant for adult patients and families of pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: The Japanese version of the RECAP, which has been validated as linguistically equivalent to the original version, is now available. Further evaluation of the measurement properties is needed in the future.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Adulto , Humanos , Niño , Japón , Dermatitis Atópica/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lingüística , Traducciones
4.
Invest New Drugs ; 40(4): 841-849, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35404018

RESUMEN

In first-in-human (FIH) trials, sequential tumor biopsies, i.e., two consecutive tumor biopsies, the first performed at baseline (pretreatment) and the second during the early treatment period (on-treatment), provide proof of concept in investigational new drugs. We evaluated the success of sequential tumor biopsies in FIH trials, and explored approaches for improved success rates. We retrospectively reviewed the sequential tumor biopsies required in 17 of 52 FIH trials conducted from 2015 to 2020. One hundred and thirty-eight patients were identified. Success of either pretreatment or on-treatment biopsy alone, and of sequential tumor biopsies, was defined as the acquisition of viable tumor cells and as obtaining tumor cells from both biopsy specimens, respectively. The success rates of pretreatment and on-treatment biopsy were 98.6% and 94.2%, respectively, and of sequential tumor biopsies was 70.3%. Adverse events associated with the pretreatment biopsies (33.3% positive; 72.0% negative) and timing of the first imaging assessment (before on-treatment biopsy = 40.0%; after on-treatment biopsy = 82.7%) correlated with successful sequential tumor biopsies. The reasons for unsuccessful sequential tumor biopsies could be categorized into two groups: 1) patient refusal of the on-treatment biopsy (most frequently due to early disease progression); and 2) absence of tumor cells in the pretreatment or on-treatment biopsy specimen. We propose an approach to achieving greater success in sequential tumor biopsies in FIH trials; the first imaging assessment during the study should be scheduled after on-treatment biopsy. (Registration number UMIN000042487, Date of registration November 18, 2020).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Biopsia/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 33(11): e13873, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36433852

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Food allergy is a disease with a diverse and variable natural history, and some patients may react to two or more food antigens. This study aimed to classify and characterize the long-term prognosis of infantile-onset, immediate-type food allergies, focusing on three major antigens in Japan: egg, milk, and wheat. METHODS: All children who visited our hospital with food allergies, including suspected cases, were prospectively registered in our medical database. Among the children in this database, subjects registered by the age of 1 year with immediate-type symptoms or sensitization to the above three antigens were included. The course of the subjects up to the age of 6 years was analyzed. Cox regression analysis and repeated-measures latent class analysis (LCA) were performed to reveal risk factors and tolerance patterns for food allergies. RESULTS: We included 915 patients with immediate-type food allergy symptoms and 276 sensitized asymptomatic patients in this study. The number of patients with immediate-type symptoms to egg, milk, and wheat was 609, 443, and 235, respectively. The number of patients with multiple food allergies was 302. The proportion of patients with tolerance to egg, milk, and wheat at 6 years of age was 74%, 69%, and 75%, respectively. LCA revealed 7 classes of prognosis for food allergies. The largest class was transient egg allergy alone (19.6%), and there were severe cases of multiple food allergies (6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the prognosis of food allergy classes in Japan, including multiple food allergies, with 7 classes with its own characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad al Huevo , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Niño , Humanos , Animales , Análisis de Clases Latentes , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad al Huevo/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad al Huevo/epidemiología , Alérgenos , Leche/efectos adversos , Triticum
6.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 33(12): e13895, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36564880

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children with hen's egg (HE) allergy and a positive initial oral food challenge (OFC) require rechallenge to assess for tolerance. However, the risk factors for a positive repeat OFC remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 243 preschool children who failed an initial OFC with half a heated HE and repeated the same OFC after 6-24 months. Logistic regression models were used to determine risk factors for a positive repeat OFC, including factors that were ascertainable immediately after the initial OFC and at the repeat OFC as variables. RESULTS: The median age, egg white-, and ovomucoid-specific IgE (sIgE) were 3.5 years, 12.7, and 7.2 kUA /L, respectively. The median interval between OFCs was 12.4 months and repeat OFCs were positive in 132 (54%) patients. One multivariate analysis model indicated that risk factors for a positive repeat OFC included cumulative dose (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]:0.58), anaphylaxis (aOR: 3.09), total serum IgE (aOR: 0.41), ovomucoid-sIgE (aOR: 3.21), and age (aOR: 1.68) at the initial OFC. Another model indicated that the risk factors were cumulative dose (aOR: 0.59) and anaphylaxis (aOR: 3.41) at initial OFC and total serum IgE (aOR: 0.36), ovomucoid-sIgE (aOR: 4.93), and age (aOR: 1.30) at repeat OFC. CONCLUSION: Low threshold dose and severe symptoms at initial OFC, and low total serum IgE, high ovomucoid-sIgE and higher age at initial and repeat OFCs are risk factors for the persistence of HE allergy and they may be useful when deciding the rechallenge interval for heated HE in preschool children.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad al Huevo , Preescolar , Femenino , Animales , Humanos , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Ovomucina , Pollos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Alérgenos , Inmunoglobulina E
7.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 32(4): 734-741, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33393118

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of cow's milk (CM) low-dose oral immunotherapy (LOIT) at one-year follow-up have been previously reported. We investigated the outcome of fixed long-term LOIT in children with severe CM allergy. METHODS: Children with positive reactions to oral food challenge (OFC) with 3 mL CM were included. The LOIT group (n = 33) ingested up to 3 mL CM for 1 year. After a two-week CM avoidance, 3 and 25 mL OFCs were performed. Children with positive reactions continued with 3 mL ingestion, with OFCs repeated yearly. Regular home consumption of 25 mL CM after passing the OFCs was defined as 25 mL short-term unresponsiveness (25 mL STU). The historical control group (n = 16) with reactions to 3 mL OFC eliminated daily CM ingestion. RESULTS: The proportion of 25 mL STU in the LOIT group was 27%, 52%, and 61% after 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, and the 3-year percentage was significantly higher than that in the historical control group (13%, P = .002). In the LOIT group, only one child developed severe symptoms. Furthermore, in this group, CM- and casein-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels decreased significantly and casein-specific IgG and IgG4 levels increased significantly after 3 years, whereas the historical control group presented no significant change in these parameters. Baseline sIgE levels were significantly low in children achieving 25 mL STU. CONCLUSION: Continued fixed LOIT yields immunologic improvement and may be effective and safe for severe CM allergy.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a la Leche , Alérgenos , Animales , Bovinos , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E , Inmunoterapia , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/terapia
8.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 32(1): 161-169, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32869399

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe reactions may develop during cow's milk (CM) oral immunotherapy (OIT). We investigated the safety and efficacy of low-dose OIT with heated milk (HM) or unheated milk (UM) in children with anaphylaxis. METHODS: Children with symptom onset after ingestion of 3-mL HM on a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge were randomly assigned to the HM (n = 17) or UM (n = 16) group. HM group ingested milk powder heated at 125°C for 30 seconds, whereas the UM group used UM. Patients were hospitalized for 5 days; the HM or UM was gradually increased to 3 mL/day; 3-mL/day ingestion was continued at home. One year later, the patients underwent 2-day consecutive 3- and 25-mL HM-oral food challenges (OFCs) after 2-week avoidance. RESULTS: At baseline, milk- and casein-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were 56.0 and 51.4 kUA/L in the HM group, and 55.2 and 65.6 kUA/L in the UM group, respectively. One year later, 35% and 18% in the HM group and 50% and 31% in UM group passed the 3 and 25 mL OFCs, respectively. Rates of moderate or severe symptoms and respiratory symptoms per home dose were significantly lower in the HM than in the UM group (0.7% and 1.2% vs 1.4% and 2.6%, respectively, P < .001). ß-lactoglobulin-specific IgG4 levels significantly increased from baseline only in the UM group, whereas casein-specific IgG4 levels significantly increased from baseline in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: HM-OIT induced immunological changes more safely than the UM-OIT. The possibility of lower treatment efficacy with HM-OIT needs to be evaluated in larger studies.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche , Administración Oral , Anafilaxia/terapia , Animales , Bovinos , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Femenino , Humanos , Leche , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/terapia
9.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 31(4): 371-379, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31976576

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) use in patients with wheat anaphylaxis is not well studied. We assessed the efficacy of low-dose OIT for patients with wheat-induced anaphylaxis. METHODS: Eligible subjects were aged 5-18 years with a history of wheat anaphylaxis and confirmed symptoms during oral food challenge (OFC) to 53 mg of wheat protein. After admission to the hospital for a 5-day buildup phase, patients in the OIT group gradually increased wheat ingestion to 53 mg/day and then ingested 53 mg daily at home. One year later, they underwent 53- and 400-mg OFCs after OIT cessation for 2 weeks. The historical control group was defined as patients who avoided wheat during the same period. RESULTS: Median wheat- and ω-5 gliadin-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) levels were 293 and 7.5 kUA /L, respectively, in the OIT group (16 children). No patients dropped out. Within 1 year, 88% of patients in the OIT group reached 53 mg. After 1 year, 69% and 9% patients passed the 53-mg OFC and 25% and 0% passed the 400-mg OFC in the OIT and control groups (11 children), respectively (P = .002 and 0.07, respectively). In the OIT group, wheat- and ω-5 gliadin-sIgE levels significantly decreased to 154 and 4.1 kUA /L, respectively, at 1 year, and wheat- and ω-5 gliadin-specific IgG and IgG4 levels significantly increased at 1 month. Anaphylaxis developed 7 times and promptly improved without adrenaline. CONCLUSION: For patients with wheat anaphylaxis, low-dose OIT safely induces immunologic changes, achieves low-dose desensitization, and may allow for a 400 mg dose.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/terapia , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad al Trigo/terapia , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Alérgenos/inmunología , Anafilaxia/etiología , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Niño , Preescolar , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Gliadina/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Masculino , Proteínas de Plantas/administración & dosificación , Proteínas de Plantas/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triticum/efectos adversos , Triticum/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad al Trigo/inmunología
10.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(12): 5953-5961, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32281031

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Incorporation of patient-generated health data (PGHD) into clinical research requires an investigation of the validity of outcomes and feasibility of implementation. This single-arm pilot trial investigated the feasibility of using a commercially available activity tracking wearable device in cancer patients to assess adherence to the device and real-time PGHD collection in a clinical research setting. METHODS: From July to November 2017, enrolled adult patients were asked to wear a wristband-style device. Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) were assessed at baseline and on day 29. Furthermore, 29-day Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, global impression of the devices, and NCI CTCAE v4 were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 30 patients (mean age, 58.6 years; male, 21 [70%]), 15 (50%) and 11 (36.7%) had gastrointestinal and lung cancer, respectively, and 27 (90%, 95% CI: 0.74-0.98) were well adhered (> 70%) to the device for 28 days. The mean adherence was 84.9% (range: 41.7-95.2%). More frequent PGHD synchronization tended to show better device adherence, with moderate correlation (r = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80, p < 000.1). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of using a wearable activity tracker was confirmed in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy for a month. For future implementation in clinical trials, there is a need for further comprehensive assessment of the validity and reliability of wearable activity trackers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN: UMIN000027575.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Monitores de Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Recolección de Datos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
11.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 175(3): 181-188, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29339650

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reports on oral immunotherapy (OIT) for anaphylactic food allergy are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of peanut OIT for anaphylactic patients. METHODS: We enrolled 22 peanut anaphylactic patients who underwent OIT between 2011 and 2013, all of whom demonstrated anaphylaxis during a baseline double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. After starting in-hospital OIT, participants gradually increased ingestion to 795 mg of peanut protein per day at home and then took a maintenance dose (795 mg) daily. After 3 asymptomatic months, participants underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) of 795 mg after 2 weeks of peanut avoidance to confirm sustained unresponsiveness. The historical control group consisted of 11 patients with anaphylaxis by OFC and underwent the second OFC after 2 years. RESULTS: All patients (22/22) achieved desensitization by 8 months after starting OIT and completed the protocol within 2 years. Two years later, 15/22 patients (68.1%) in the OIT group achieved sustained unresponsiveness, whereas only 2 (18.1%) in the control group passed the second OFC. After 2 years, the median peanut-specific IgE had significantly decreased (from 38.5 to 12.4 kUA/L) in the OIT group, but not in the control group. Median peanut- and Ara h 2-specific IgG4 in the OIT group had significantly increased from baseline after 1 month. The adverse reaction rate per ingestion was 43% in hospital and 5% at home. Three patients received adrenaline at the hospital and 2 at home. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that for patients with peanut anaphylaxis, OIT can increase the threshold and support achieving sustained unresponsiveness with relative safety.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/terapia , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/terapia , Adolescente , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 175(1-2): 99-106, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29342459

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cashew nuts (CN) are capable of causing severe allergic reactions. However, little has been reported about the details of CN oral food challenges (OFC). METHODS: CN-specific IgE (sIgE) levels were measured for 1 year in 66 patients who underwent an OFC with >3 g CN for diagnosis or confirmation of tolerance acquisition between June 2006 and August 2014. We retrospectively analyzed the OFC and patient background. RESULTS: The median (IQR) age of the 66 patients (48 boys/men and 18 girls/women) was 7.0 years (5.7-8.8). Twelve patients (18.2%) had a positive OFC result; 6 of 8 (75%) patients with a history of an immediate reaction to CN failed the OFC. Anaphylaxis was experienced by 5 of these 12 (42%) patients. A history of an immediate reaction to CN and the CN sIgE levels were significantly different for patients with a positive or negative OFC result (p < 0.01). Among patients without a previous immediate reaction to CN, the 95% positive predictive value (PPV) for the CN sIgE level for a positive OFC result was 66.1 kUA/L. CONCLUSIONS: A history of an immediate reaction to CN and high CN sIgE were risk factors for a positive OFC result. The number of positive OFC results was relatively low, but there was a high probability of anaphylaxis. We should consider the indication of OFC carefully for patients with a history of immediate reactions to CN and avoid OFC for patients without such a history whose CN sIgE values are >66.1 kUA/L (95% PPV).


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/prevención & control , Inmunización/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a la Nuez/diagnóstico , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Alérgenos/inmunología , Anacardium/inmunología , Anafilaxia/etiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Masculino , Anamnesis , Hipersensibilidad a la Nuez/complicaciones , Selección de Paciente , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
14.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 29(5): 512-518, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29603410

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising treatment for persons with allergy; however, it can also cause adverse allergic reactions. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of low-dose OIT for anaphylactic peanut allergy. METHODS: Twenty-four children (median age, 9.6 years) with anaphylaxis to peanuts were hospitalized for 5 days and then gradually fed increasing amounts of peanut powder up to 133 mg/day. One year later, they underwent an oral food challenge after 2 weeks of peanut avoidance. Those who were asymptomatic after ingesting 795 mg of peanut protein were defined as having achieved sustained unresponsiveness. We measured peanut- and Ara h2-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E, IgG, and IgG4 levels at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months in the OIT group and at 0 and 12 months in the control group. RESULTS: At baseline, all children in the OIT group and 8 in the control group had a history of anaphylaxis. The median peanut-/Ara h2-specific IgE levels in the OIT and control groups were 55.4/48.6 and 58.2/38.1 kUa/L, respectively. One year later, 8 (33.3%) children in the OIT group exhibited sustained unresponsiveness, while none in the control group did. In the OIT group, the median peanut-specific IgE levels significantly increased to 194.0 kUa/L, after 1 month and then significantly decreased to 57.5 kUa/L at 12 months. Meanwhile, the median peanut- and Ara h2-specific IgG and IgG4 levels increased significantly after 1 month. CONCLUSION: Low-dose OIT induces immunological changes and has the capability of achieving sustained unresponsiveness in children with peanut anaphylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/uso terapéutico , Anafilaxia/terapia , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/terapia , Administración Oral , Alérgenos/inmunología , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Arachis/inmunología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/metabolismo , Japón , Masculino , Hipersensibilidad al Cacahuete/inmunología
15.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 172(2): 89-98, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28226319

RESUMEN

Food allergy is a common health problem worldwide, with increasing prevalence during recent decades. The only approved treatments for food allergy are food avoidance and administration of emergency medications in case of accidental exposure, which negatively affects patients' quality of life, so new treatments are highly desirable. Different food immunotherapy modalities have recently been used, with variable success rates in the induction of desensitization and tolerance, and different numbers and types of adverse reactions. Adverse reactions, especially intolerable gastrointestinal symptoms, are the most important causes of immunotherapy withdrawal. Eosinophilic esophagitis has been reported as a complication of milk, egg, and peanut oral immunotherapies and sublingual immunotherapy for respiratory allergies, but not for food allergies. Eosinophilic gastritis and eosinophilic colitis also rarely happened following egg and milk oral immunotherapies. The patients undergoing oral and sublingual immunotherapies should be closely followed up for a long time, and those with gastrointestinal symptoms should be evaluated by endoscopy of the gastrointestinal tract. These complications are usually reversible after early diagnosis and stopping the immunotherapy protocol.


Asunto(s)
Desensibilización Inmunológica/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/terapia , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Administración Sublingual , Alérgenos/inmunología , Animales , Endoscopía , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Humanos , Privación de Tratamiento
19.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 27(1): 44-9, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26360640

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little has been reported regarding provocation tests for the diagnosis of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA), especially in children and adolescents. Hence, we here aimed to examine the usefulness and safety of such tests for FDEIA. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 41 patients with 184 provocation tests. The patients underwent ergometer stress tests after ingesting the suspected foods along with aspirin. When one or more allergic symptoms appeared, we judged the provocation test as positive. RESULTS: Based on 30 positive test results (16%), we diagnosed 20 patients (49%) as FDEIA. The major causative foods were as follows: wheat alone (five patients), combination of wheat and shrimp (three patients), combination of wheat and apple (two patients), and peach alone (two patients). The symptoms appeared within 45 min after initiating exercise in 29 tests (97%). The most frequent symptoms were cutaneous symptoms, which appeared in 25 tests (83%). Of the 30 positive tests, 6 (20%) required administration of adrenaline. After discharge, the patients with negative test results had no episodes of FDEIA due to the suspected foods that they had been tested for. CONCLUSION: Provocation tests enabled us to confirm the diagnosis of FDEIA when positive and to exclude the diagnosis when negative. However, as severe symptoms may appear, these tests should be performed in a hospital under constant supervision of a physician.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Ejercicio Físico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/complicaciones , Pruebas Inmunológicas , Pulmón/inmunología , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Alérgenos/inmunología , Anafilaxia/sangre , Anafilaxia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Anafilaxia/fisiopatología , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Biomarcadores/sangre , Niño , Preescolar , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/sangre , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Pruebas Intradérmicas , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Ápice del Flujo Espiratorio , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas Serológicas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA