Evaluation of transfusion reactions in patients following transfusion of blood components containing antibodies to HLA class I - An attempt to prevent TRALI in patients.

In an attempt to mitigate transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), the Oslo Blood Center screened 1369 thrombapheresis donors for human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies. Anti-HLA antibodies were found in 200 donors who were deferred from donation of plasma-rich products. In a retrospective study, 2562 transfusions of thrombocytes (both apheresis and whole blood-derived) from 150 of these donors were subject to a thorough look back-investigation. Reports of 14 transfusion reactions were identified, none of which were classified as TRALI. Our study supports previous data indicating that the risk of TRALI is low. The value of screening for anti-HLA antibodies and subsequent deferral of donors with high levels of such antibodies remains questionable.

DNase analysed by a novel competitive assay in patients with complications after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination and in normal unvaccinated blood donors.

Increased levels of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have been detected in individuals with vaccine complications after the ChAdOx1 nCov vaccine with a correlation between the severity of vaccine side effects and the level of NETosis. DNases may disrupt NETs by degrading their content of DNA, and a balance has been reported between NETs and DNases. Because of this and since the inflammatory marker NETs may be used as a confirmatory test in diagnosing VITT, it is of interest to monitor levels of DNase in patients with increased NETs levels. The current novel rapid DNase ELISA was tested in blood samples of patients with known increased levels of NETs with or without VITT after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. DNase levels in VITT patients were significantly increased compared with normal unvaccinated blood donors and compared with patients with post-vaccination symptoms but not VITT. However, since EDTA was found to inhibit DNase, serum and not EDTA-plasma samples should be applied for DNase testing. The novel DNase assay may serve as a supplementary test to the NETs test when analysing samples from patients with suspected increased NETs levels.

Efforts to recruit and enhance blood donor return probability: A point of view from Oslo, Norway.

Transfusion of human blood remains irreplaceable in human medicine and we need to pave the ground for continued and sustainable action in the decades to come. Blood and transfusion services around the world currently experience challenges and need to increase donor recruitment and retention. This invited commentary focuses on the foundation and maintenance of a functional transfusion service for the coming years as it is imperative to develop and continuously reappraise the blood supply and transfusion service, based on evidence, experience and expertise, to meet expected and unexpected requirements of the future. Several of the greatest national blood and transfusion services in the world lead the way with innovative developments based on research and data from large donor cohorts. This is the context in which, for the last six years, the Oslo Blood Center has scrutinized and reappraised our working processes and use of resources with the aim of increasing the number of active donors. To achieve this objective, we have implemented technological and practical improvements in work processes, donor eligibility, recruitment and donation routines, and launched several projects to increase donor retention.

Effects of storage on quality and function of acid-treated platelets with reduced HLA Class I surface expression.

BACKGROUND: Refractory patients need to be provided with HLA-matched platelets (PLTs), which require time-consuming cross-matching. Treatment of PLTs with citric acid leads to denaturation of the HLA Class I complexes without significant damage to the PLTs. HLA Class I depleted PLTs could alternatively be used to HLA-matched PLTs for transfusion. These PLTs have verified normal function up to 4-6 h after acid treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Buffy coat (BC) PLT concentrates were depleted of HLA Class I complexes by incubation in citric acid. The days after acid-treatment, surface expression of HLA Class I complexes, CD62P and CD63 were determined by flow cytometry, in addition to viability and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). Thromboelastography (TEG) tested PLT functionality. RESULTS: Expression of HLA Class I complexes was reduced by 70%-75% in acid-treated PLTs compared to untreated PLTs from day 1 through day 7. Controls and acid-treated PLTs showed insignificant loss of MMP stored for 4 days. Analysis of the residual PLT activation and viability showed no significant differences for 4 days of storage. However, the residual PLT activation potential and viability were significantly decreased in acid-treated PLTs and control PLTs after 7 days of storage. Acid treatment caused a significant decrease in the TEG variable, reaction time (R time), for acid-treated PLTs as compared to control PLTs from days 1 through day 3. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that extended storage of acid-treated PLTs is possible and will improve flexibility when planning for transfusion of patients with alloimmune PLT refractoriness caused by anti-HLA-antibodies.

Assessing IgE sensitization profiles to birch and timothy grass pollen allergens in birch pollen allergic blood donors using an oligoplex specific IgE assay.

IgE sensitization profiles to single birch allergens in birch-sensitized patients differ among European countries. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of specific IgE antibodies to major and minor birch pollen allergens in a population of allergic Norwegian individuals by using a birch allergic blood donor population as a surrogate sample. Sixty blood donors were recruited and sampled based on birch allergy symptoms such as rhinitis, rhinoconjunctivitis and/or mild asthma in previous seasons. All sera were collected before start of the pollen season and tested using a line blot assay (Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany) for IgE to birch and timothy pollen. Both extracts, single allergens, and cross-reacting carbohydrate determinants (CCD) were analysed. Only donors with specific IgE to birch and/or timothy grass were further evaluated. Specific IgE to birch pollen extract was found in 52 sera, and sensitization to timothy grass in 40 sera. Specific IgE to Bet v 1 was predominant in contrast to Bet v 4 which was absent. However, sensitization to the minor allergens Bet v 2 and 6 was always found together with high levels of IgE to Bet v 1. Subjects sensitized to the profilin Bet v 2 from birch were also sensitized to Phl p 12 from timothy grass. In conclusion, there was predominantly Bet v 1 sensitization in this cohort and low sensitization to minor allergens and cross-reactive allergens (Bet v 2, Bet v 4, Phl p 7 and Phl p 12).

COVID-19 patients treated with convalescent plasma. / Covid-19-pasienter behandlet med rekonvalesensplasma.

BACKGROUND: In Norway, treatment with COVID-19 convalescent plasma has been given through the NORPLASMA project. The treatment was initially offered to critically ill patients after an individual assessment, but from December 2020, the indication was limited to critically ill, immunocompromised patients. In this article we describe clinical characteristics, comorbidity and mortality in patients who received convalescent plasma in these two periods. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From 22 April 2020 to 30 March 2022, a total of 79 patients were included in the observational studies NORPLASMA MONITOR and the Norwegian SARS-CoV-2 study. The patients had received a total of 193 units of convalescent plasma at 15 Norwegian hospitals/nursing homes; 62 in South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, 8 in Western Norway Regional Health Authority and 9 in Central Norway Regional Health Authority. Information on immune status, comorbidity and course of infection was retrieved from the patient records after informed written consent was obtained. RESULTS: Of 79 patients with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range 51-⁠73) who were treated with convalescent plasma, 31 (39 %) died during hospitalisation. A total of 59 patients were immunocompromised, and of these, 20 died in hospital compared to 11 of 20 who were assumed to be immunocompetent. Median number of comorbidities was 2 (interquartile range 1-4). The patients received a median of two plasma units (min.-max. 1-21). Two of the patients developed mild allergic skin reactions. INTERPRETATION: Convalescent plasma was well tolerated by patients with COVID-19. Immunocompromised patients may have benefitted from the treatment, with lower mortality than for those assumed to be immunocompetent.

Convalescent plasma from Norwegian blood donors to treat COVID-19. / Rekonvalesensplasma mot covid-19 fremstilt fra norske blodgivere.

BACKGROUND: At the start of the pandemic, the Norwegian Directorate of Health and Norwegian blood banks initiated the production of COVID-19 convalescent plasma within the framework of clinical studies. In this article we describe the blood donors who participated. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Blood donors who had recovered from COVID-19 were recruited to donate single donor plasma for the purpose of patient treatment. Data on the course of infection, leukocyte antibodies and antibody level against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) per plasma unit were registered after informed consent was obtained. We calculated a disease score defined as the total number of self-reported symptoms/findings and hospitalisation where relevant (score 0-⁠11). RESULTS: A total of 1644 plasma units were collected from 266 plasma donors at 12 blood banks. Median disease score was 5 (interquartile range 3-⁠6), and 15 donors had recovered from pneumonia and/or been hospitalised. A total of 599/1644 plasma units from 106/266 donors met our requirement for SARS-CoV-2 antibody content (> 60 % inhibition of virus binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)) or positive virus neutralisation test. The antibody level in donors waned over time following infection, and showed no clear correlation with disease score. INTERPRETATION: The number of symptoms and findings in blood donors could not predict antibody response at individual level, and antibody testing was crucial for the production of effective convalescent plasma.

Rituximab-treated patients with lymphoma develop strong CD8 T-cell responses following COVID-19 vaccination.

B-cell depletion induced by anti-cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy of patients with lymphoma is expected to impair humoral responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, but effects on CD8 T-cell responses are unknown. Here, we investigated humoral and CD8 T-cell responses following two vaccinations in patients with lymphoma undergoing anti-CD20-mAb therapy as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy or other anti-neoplastic agents during the last 9 months prior to inclusion, and in healthy age-matched blood donors. Antibody measurements showed that seven of 110 patients had antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein 3-6 weeks after the second dose of vaccination. Peripheral blood CD8 T-cell responses against prevalent human leucocyte antigen (HLA) class I SARS-CoV-2 epitopes were determined by peptide-HLA multimer analysis. Strong CD8 T-cell responses were observed in samples from 20/29 patients (69%) and 12/16 (75%) controls, with similar median response magnitudes in the groups and some of the strongest responses observed in patients. We conclude that despite the absence of humoral immune responses in fully SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated, anti-CD20-treated patients with lymphoma, their CD8 T-cell responses reach similar frequencies and magnitudes as for controls. Patients with lymphoma on B-cell depleting therapies are thus likely to benefit from current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, and development of vaccines aimed at eliciting T-cell responses to non-Spike epitopes might provide improved protection.

COVID-19 convalescent plasma: current status, lessons from the past and future perspectives.

When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, blood transfusion services worldwide started collection of convalescent plasma as early as possible, as exemplified by the response in Norway. There were challenges related to donor selection, donor safety, testing for relevant antibodies and indications for and dosing of the convalescent plasma. As more knowledge became available, the product quality was more standardised. Multiple case reports, observational studies and some randomized studies were published during the pandemic, as well as laboratory studies reporting different approaches to antibody testing. The results were conflicting and the importance of convalescent plasma was disputed. Even though there has been strong international collaboration with involvement of many key organisations, we may better prepare for the next pandemic. An even stronger, more formalised collaboration between these organisations could provide more clear evidence of the importance of convalescent plasma, based on the principles of passive immunisation.

Screening for antibodies to HLA class I in apheresis donors following Covid-19 or SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Transfusion of HLA-specific antibodies may play a role in induction of TRALI, the transfusion complication responsible for most transfusion-related deaths. In Oslo, we screen our apheresis donors and defer HLA-immunized donors from donation of plasma-rich blood components. During the second year of the Covid-19 pandemic and following the first months of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, both the virus itself and the vaccines were suspected of inducing de novo production of antibodies to HLA class I in patients. For the blood center, the possibility of finding HLA-antibodies in an increased number of blood donors has serious implications. We therefore conducted a study to map the extent of de novo HLA-specific antibodies in representative donor groups. 106 apheresis donors were screened for antibodies to HLA class I/II following Covid-19 or vaccination with either mRNA or adenovirus-vector vaccines, and the findings were compared to pre-Covid blood samples from the same donors. In addition, we analyzed pre-Covid samples from 11 HLA-antibody-positive donors of Covid convalescence plasma. Only three established thrombapheresis donors were deferred due to vaccine-induced HLA-antibodies. In short, our findings did not support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 virus or vaccination cause de novo HLA immunization in healthy blood donors. However, some donors with pre-existing antibodies showed increased antibody expression, confirming a general boost of the immune response following infection or vaccination.

Inflammatory markers calprotectin, NETs, syndecan-1 and neopterin in COVID-19 convalescent blood donors.

Persisting inflammation has been discovered in lungs and other parenchymatous organs of some COVID-19 convalescents. Calprotectin, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), syndecan-1 and neopterin are general key inflammatory markers, and systemically enhanced levels of them may remain after the COVID-19 infection. These inflammatory markers were therefore measured in serum samples of 129 COVID-19 convalescent and 27 healthy blood donors or employees at Oslo Blood bank, Norway. Also antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen were measured, and timing of sampling and severity of infection noted. Whereas neopterin and NETs values remained low and those for syndecan-1 were not raised to statistically significant level, concentrations for calprotectin, as measured by a novel mixed monoclonal assay, were significantly increased in the convalescents. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen were elevated, but did not correlate with levels of inflammatory markers. Difference between the groups in only one biomarker makes evaluation of ongoing or residual inflammation in the convalescents difficult. If there is a low-grade inflammation, it would in that case involve neutrophils.

Immune complexes, innate immunity, and NETosis in ChAdOx1 vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia.

AIMS: We recently reported five cases of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) 7-10 days after receiving the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 adenoviral vector vaccine against corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to investigate the pathogenic immunological responses operating in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed circulating inflammatory markers by immune assays and immune cell phenotyping by flow cytometry analyses and performed immunoprecipitation with anti-platelet factor (PF)4 antibody in plasma samples followed by mass spectrometry from all five patients. A thrombus was retrieved from the sinus sagittal superior of one patient and analysed by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Precipitated immune complexes revealed multiple innate immune pathway triggers for platelet and leucocyte activation. Plasma contained increased levels of innate immune response cytokines and markers of systemic inflammation, extensive degranulation of neutrophils, and tissue and endothelial damage. Blood analyses showed activation of neutrophils and increased levels of circulating H3Cit, dsDNA, and myeloperoxidase-DNA complex. The thrombus had extensive infiltration of neutrophils, formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and IgG deposits. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that anti-PF4/polyanion IgG-mediated thrombus formation in VITT patients is accompanied by a massive innate immune activation and particularly the fulminant activation of neutrophils including NETosis. These results provide novel data on the immune response in this rare adenoviral vector-induced VITT.

HLA class I depletion by citric acid, and irradiation of apheresis platelets for transfusion of refractory patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients can form antibodies to foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I antigens after exposure to allogeneic cells. These anti-HLA class I antibodies can bind transfused platelets (PLTs) and mediate their destruction, thus leading to PLT refractoriness. Patients with PLT refractoriness need HLA-matched PLTs, which require expensive HLA typing of donors, antibody analyses of patient sera and/or crossmatching. An alternative approach is to reduce PLT HLA Class I expression using a brief incubation in citric acid on ice at low pH. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Apheresis PLT concentrates were depleted of HLA Class I complexes by 5 minutes incubation in ice-cold citric acid, at pH 3.0. Surface expression of HLA Class I complexes, CD62P, CD63, phosphatidylserine, and complement factor C3c was analyzed by flow cytometry. PLT functionality was tested by thromboelastography (TEG). RESULTS: Acid treatment reduced the expression of HLA Class I complexes by 71% and potential for C3c binding by 11.5-fold compared to untreated PLTs. Acid-treated PLTs were significantly more activated than untreated PLTs, but irrespective of this increase in steady-state activation, CD62P and CD63 were strongly upregulated on both acid-treated and untreated PLTs after stimulation with thrombin receptor agonist peptide. Acid treatment did not induce apoptosis over time. X-ray irradiation did not significantly influence the expression of HLA Class I complexes, CD62P, CD63, and TEG variables on acid treated PLTs. CONCLUSION: The relatively simple acid stripping method can be used with irradiated apheresis PLTs and may prevent transfusion-associated HLA sensitization and overcome PLT refractoriness.

The story of an extraordinary year: Challenges and opportunities in responding to Covid-19.

Little more than a year after the first reports of a new coronavirus in Wuhan, China, the world is in the middle of a pandemic that has brought dramatic changes in societies all over the world. This is our story, as seen from the Department of Immunology and Transfusion at Oslo University Hospital (OUH).

Sero-prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in blood donors during the third wave of infection in Norway, winter/spring 2021.

Cross-sectional studies of the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 in representative groups are routinely used for surveillance of public health in Norway. The group of blood donors is easily accessible to provide an estimate over the infection prevalence. Repeated testing of returning donors also generates data about the duration of the antibody response following infection and vaccination. The aim of the current study was to provide updated information about the development of the pandemic in the blood donor population, and to estimate the number of asymptomatic donors visiting the blood center, in an effort to evaluate the measures to prevent virus spreading between donors and staff. In the two main blood banks in the Oslo area, all blood donors were offered antibody testing for a period of three months. Almost 12,000 donors were tested, and the mean weekly prevalence of antibody positive donors due to infection was 2.7 % (varied from 2.1 to 4.0 %). The number of donors presenting following vaccination was 810 (6.9 %). An average of 38 % of the infections had been asymptomatic, and 31 % of the antibody-positive donors were unaware of having been infected. In conclusion, the proportion of blood donors seropositive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 in our blood centers was stable whereas the number of vaccinated blood donors rapidly increased. This indicates that the virus spreading in the third wave of infection in the Oslo area mainly happened in groups underrepresented as blood donors. Health care workers prioritized for early vaccination may be overrepresented in the study period.

NETs analysed by novel calprotectin-based assays in blood donors and patients with multiple myeloma or rheumatoid arthritis: A pilot study.

Two novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), designed to detect complexes containing DNA, leucocyte calprotectin and S100A12 proteins, were generated for improved specificity and rapid measurement of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). The assays were applied on plasma and serum samples from blood donors for establishment of reference values, and from patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in order to examine putatively increased values in the two different inflammatory conditions. Although NETs were hardly detectable in healthy individuals, NET levels were as expected highly and statistically significantly increased in RA patients. The detection of statistically significantly increased NET levels in MM is a novel finding.

IgE-sensitization to food and inhalant allergens in IBD patients compared with normal blood donors at Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Objectives: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) have been regarded as autoimmune Th-1/Th-17- and Th-2-associated conditions, respectively. The aim of the study was to examine possible differences in allergen sensitization between these diseases and relative to normal blood donors (BD). Materials and methods: Plasma from 29 UC and 37 CD patients with moderate disease activity and 100 healthy age- and gender-matched BD, were analyzed for specific IgE to 22 food- and 28 inhalation allergens using EUROLINE atopy screen. Results: There was significantly higher proportion of allergen sensitized patients in UC compared to BD. Corresponding mean percentages for UC, CD and BD were 8.5, 8.9 (p = .2) and 5.9 (p = .04). There was no intergroup difference in sensitization to food allergens. Most prominent result was the double level of sensitization to inhalants in CD (15%) compared to BD (8%) (p = .03). Overall highest levels of sensitization to inhalants were for grass pollens. Interestingly, the number of allergens (n = 50) the subjects were sensitized to, was significantly lower among UC (n = 20; 40%) (p = .0005) than CD (n = 31; 62%) and BD (n = 38; 76%). Conclusions: The percentage of individuals sensitized to inhalants in CD and to inhalants and foods in UC, were higher than corresponding results in BD. However, whereas allergen positive reactions in CD were comparable to those in BD, they were reduced in UC because of the few UC reactions to food allergens. This contrasts previous data and the study also points to sensitization to inhalants as a potential factor in the complex pathogenesis of IBD.

Donor health assessment - When is blood donation safe?

Blood donation is a highly regulated practice in the world, ensuring the safety and efficacy of collected blood and its components whether used as irreplaceable parts of modern transfusion medicine, as a therapeutic modality or additional support to other clinical therapies. In Norway blood donation is regulated by governmental regulations ("Blodforskriften") and further instructed by national guidelines, "Veileder for transfusjonstjenesten" [1], providing an aid for assessment of donor health. This concise review touches upon: definitions of donor health and disease; some important pitfalls; and the handling of some common and less common pathophysiological conditions; with an example from the Blood center of Oslo University Hospital, Norway's largest blood center. I also comment on some medications used by a number of blood donors, although wounds, ulcers and surgery are not included. Considering the panorama of conditions blood donors can suffer from, blood donation can never be completely safe for everybody, as zero risk does not exist, but it is our task through donor evaluation to identify and reduce risk as much as possible.