RESUMEN
Background: Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor shown to improve survival in advanced solid cancers. We evaluated the role of adjuvant bevacizumab in melanoma patients at high risk of recurrence. Patients and methods: Patients with resected AJCC stage IIB, IIC and III cutaneous melanoma were randomised to receive either adjuvant bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg i.v. 3 weekly for 1 year) or standard observation. The primary end point was detection of an 8% difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) rate; secondary end points included disease-free interval (DFI) and distant metastasis-free interval (DMFI). Tumour and blood were analysed for prognostic and predictive markers. Results: Patients (n=1343) recruited between 2007 and 2012 were predominantly stage III (73%), with median age 56 years (range 18-88 years). With 6.4-year median follow-up, 515 (38%) patients had died [254 (38%) bevacizumab; 261 (39%) observation]; 707 (53%) patients had disease recurrence [336 (50%) bevacizumab, 371 (55%) observation]. OS at 5 years was 64% for both groups [hazard ratio (HR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.16, P = 0.78). At 5 years, 51% were disease free on bevacizumab versus 45% on observation (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.99, P = 0.03), 58% were distant metastasis free on bevacizumab versus 54% on observation (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.78-1.07, P = 0.25). Forty four percent of 682 melanomas assessed had a BRAFV600 mutation. In the observation arm, BRAF mutant patients had a trend towards poorer OS compared with BRAF wild-type patients (P = 0.06). BRAF mutation positivity trended towards better OS with bevacizumab (P = 0.21). Conclusions: Adjuvant bevacizumab after resection of high-risk melanoma improves DFI, but not OS. BRAF mutation status may predict for poorer OS untreated and potential benefit from bevacizumab. Clinical Trial Information: ISRCTN 81261306; EudraCT Number: 2006-005505-64.
Asunto(s)
Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Melanoma/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Espera Vigilante , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Androgen deprivation therapy is widely used in a number of different settings in the treatment of prostate cancer. This overview will look at the current evidence for the potential development of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease as a consequence of this therapy, and highlight strategies aimed at their prevention. The relationship between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer development will also be examined.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Metabólico/etiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Humanos , Masculino , Orquiectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismoRESUMEN
AIMS: This audit provides a comprehensive overview of UK prostate brachytherapy practice in the year 2012, measured against existing standards, immediately before the introduction of new Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) guidelines. This audit allows comparison with European and North American brachytherapy practice and for the impact of the RCR 2012 guidelines to be assessed in the future. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based data collection tool was developed by the RCR Clinical Audit Committee and sent to audit leads at all cancer centres in the UK. Standards were developed based on available guidelines in use at the start of 2012 covering case mix and dosimetry. Further questions were included to reflect areas of anticipated change with the implementation of the 2012 guidelines. Audit findings were compared with similar audits of practice in Europe, the USA and Latin America. RESULTS: Forty-nine of 59 cancer centres submitted data. Twenty-nine centres reported carrying out prostate brachytherapy; of these, 25 (86%) provided data regarding the number of implants, staffing, dosimetry, medication and anaesthesia and follow-up. Audit standards achieved excellent compliance in most areas, although were low in post-implant dosimetry and in post-implant scanning at 30 days. CONCLUSION: This audit provides a comprehensive picture of prostate brachytherapy in the UK in 2012. Patterns of care of prostate brachytherapy are similar to practice in the USA and Europe. The number of prostate brachytherapy implants carried out in the UK has grown significantly since a previous RCR audit in 2005 and it is important that centres maintain minimum numbers of cases to ensure that experience can be maintained and compliance to guidelines achieved.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/normas , Auditoría Médica , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Radiología , Radiometría , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Factores de Tiempo , Reino UnidoAsunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Control de Infecciones/normas , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Neoplasias Cutáneas/radioterapia , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias Cutáneas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Cutáneas/virología , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
A total of 1200 patients had undergone I-125 prostate brachytherapy (BXT) in our centre. We present prospective outcome data for the first 400 treated patients. Data were analysed from a prospective database of 400 consecutive patients treated with permanent prostate BXT between March 1999 and December 2003. Patients were stratified into low (49%), intermediate (36%) and high (15%) risk as defined by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Prognostic Index. Patients received 145 Gy BXT alone (41%), BXT with 3 months neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (NAAD) (39%), 45 Gy external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with 110 Gy BXT (3%) or a combination of NAAD, 45 Gy EBRT and 110 Gy BXT (17%). Biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadirs were analysed for treatment received in each risk group. Median follow-up was 54 months (range, 38-96 months) with a mean patient age of 63 years. Prostate cancer-specific survival was 99.5%. Twenty-eight patients (7%) experienced biochemical failure according to the 2006 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (RTOG-ASTRO) Phoenix Consensus definition (PSA nadir plus >or=2 ng ml(-1)): nine low-, fourteen intermediate- and five high-risk patients. When stratified by treatment group for low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, the 5-year actuarial bRFS was 98, 89 and 100% for BXT; 91, 87 and 88% for NAAD and BXT; 100, 80 and 100% for EBRT and BXT; and 100, 92 and 88% for NAAD, EBRT and BXT, respectively. Overall 4- and 5-year PSA Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia
, Radioisótopos de Yodo/uso terapéutico
, Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad
, Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia
, Adulto
, Anciano
, Anciano de 80 o más Años
, Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico
, Terapia Combinada
, Supervivencia sin Enfermedad
, Humanos
, Estimación de Kaplan-Meier
, Masculino
, Persona de Mediana Edad
, Terapia Neoadyuvante
, Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre
, Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico
RESUMEN
This article on low dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy reviews long-term results, patient selection and quality of life issues. Mature results from the United States and United Kingdom are reported and issues regarding definitions of biochemical failure are discussed. Latest data comparing brachytherapy with radical prostatectomy or no definitive treatment and also the risk of secondary malignancies after prostate brachytherapy are presented. Urological parameters of patient selection and quality of life issues concerning urinary, sexual and bowel function are reviewed. The position of prostate brachytherapy next to surgery as a first-line treatment modality is demonstrated.