RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Testing positive for COVID-19 was associated with higher rates of detrimental psycho-social and physical health outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented disruption to everyday life. This included major reconfiguration of maternal, child, and perinatal mental health and care services and provision. This study aimed to investigate the experiences of those who tested positive for COVID-19 during pregnancy, labour and birth, or the early postnatal period. METHODS: National on-line recruitment from across the United Kingdom resulted in sixteen mothers being invited to qualitative semi-structured interviews to understand the experiences of mothers who had been infected by COVID-19 during pregnancy, labour and birth, or the early postnatal period. Interviews were conducted, recorded, and transcribed using video-conferencing software. A Grounded Theory approach was used to analyse the data gathered pertaining to women's experiences of their positive COVID-19 diagnosis during pregnancy, labour and birth, or the early postnatal period. RESULTS: The theory of 'Oscillating Autonomy - Losing and Seeking to Regain Control by Striving for Agency' was developed, comprising three main themes: 'Anxious Anticipation: The fear of infection was worse than COVID-19 itself'; 'Fluctuating Agency: What changed when COVID-19 took control'; and 'Reclaiming Control: Seeking reassurance during COVID-19 positivity'. Testing positive for COVID-19 whilst pregnant, during labour or birth, or in the early postnatal period was associated with a perceived loss of control. Those who were able to regain that control felt more secure in their situation. CONCLUSIONS: Support was paramount to manage increased vulnerability, as was reassurance achieved by information seeking and positive action including increased health monitoring and COVID-19 vaccination.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Teoría Fundamentada , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Embarazo , Adulto , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/psicología , Reino Unido , Investigación Cualitativa , SARS-CoV-2 , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Madres/psicología , Parto/psicología , Autonomía Personal , Miedo/psicologíaRESUMEN
AIM: To identify antenatal features associated with foetal micrognathia that can predict a challenging postnatal management, including difficult airway at delivery, feeding problems and impaired neurological outcomes. METHODS: Single-centre retrospective observational study. Data for antenatally diagnosed cases of micrognathia over 11 years were obtained and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 38 cases were identified, 20 were live births. Of the 16 inborn infants, all had associated congenital anomalies: 14 were diagnosed antenatally, two postnatally. Six of the 16 infants had difficult intubation at birth and three required a tracheostomy. Three died in the neonatal period. The risk of requiring respiratory support at discharge or death was increased if any anomaly was diagnosed antenatally (p = 0.05). There were no differences in respiratory or gastrointestinal morbidities for infants where polyhydramnios was detected antenatally. Of the 13 survivors, two were orally fed, five required a gastrostomy and six were fed by nasogastric/nasojejunal tube. Ten infants were followed up after discharge and seven had normal neurological outcomes. CONCLUSION: There remains no predictive tool available antenatally to anticipate neonatal outcomes. Our associated mortality rate was 64%. Foetal micrognathia rarely occurs in isolation and each case should be referred to a specialist centre for optimal counselling and careful planning.
Asunto(s)
Micrognatismo , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Prenatal , TraqueostomíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Woody plants (trees and shrubs) play an important role in terrestrial ecosystems, but their size and longevity make them difficult subjects for traditional experiments. In the last 20 years functional-structural plant models (FSPMs) have evolved: they consider the interplay between plant modular structure, the immediate environment and internal functioning. However, computational constraints and data deficiency have long been limiting factors in a broader application of FSPMs, particularly at the scale of forest communities. Recently, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), has emerged as an invaluable tool for capturing the 3-D structure of forest communities, thus opening up exciting opportunities to explore and predict forest dynamics with FSPMs. SCOPE: The potential synergies between TLS-derived data and FSPMs have yet to be fully explored. Here, we summarize recent developments in FSPM and TLS research, with a specific focus on woody plants. We then evaluate the emerging opportunities for applying FSPMs in an ecological and evolutionary context, in light of TLS-derived data, with particular consideration of the challenges posed by scaling up from individual trees to whole forests. Finally, we propose guidelines for incorporating TLS data into the FSPM workflow to encourage overlap of practice amongst researchers. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that TLS is a feasible tool to help shift FSPMs from an individual-level modelling technique to a community-level one. The ability to scan multiple trees, of multiple species, in a short amount of time, is paramount to gathering the detailed structural information required for parameterizing FSPMs for forest communities. Conventional techniques, such as repeated manual forest surveys, have their limitations in explaining the driving mechanisms behind observed patterns in 3-D forest structure and dynamics. Therefore, other techniques are valuable to explore how forests might respond to environmental change. A robust synthesis between TLS and FSPMs provides the opportunity to virtually explore the spatial and temporal dynamics of forest communities.
Asunto(s)
Ecosistema , Bosques , Rayos Láser , Plantas , ÁrbolesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks' gestation, is a major obstetric challenge and is associated with serious long-term complications in those infants that survive. Preventative management includes cervical cerclage, either as an elective procedure or performed following transvaginal ultrasound surveillance and shortening of the cervix (≤25 mm). Significant questions remain regarding the optimal management, target population and technique. Therefore, this study aimed to assess differences in risk factors and pregnancy outcomes for women who received an elective cerclage versus ultrasound surveillance, following one prior premature event (spontaneous preterm birth/second trimester loss). STUDY DESIGN: Women were retrospectively identified from St Thomas's Hospital Preterm Birth Clinical Network Database. Women who had one prior premature event (between 14+0 and 36+6 weeks' gestation) were included and they were separated into those that an elective cerclage and those who underwent ultrasound surveillance to assess differences in demographics, pregnancy risk factors and preterm birth outcomes. We excluded women who received other preventative therapies. We also separately analysed those women who required an ultrasound-indicated cerclage, comparing the differences between women that delivered preterm and term. RESULTS: We collected data from 1077 women who had a prior preterm event. 66 women received an elective cerclage. 11.4% of women who had ultrasound surveillance received an ultrasound indicated cerclage. Women with a prior history of mid-trimester loss, instead of preterm birth, were more likely to receive an elective cerclage. The mean gestational age of delivery was similar between those women who received an elective cerclage and those who had ultrasound surveillance with and without an ultrasound-indicated cerclage (38+1 vs 37+1), however, preterm birth rates <37 weeks' were twice as high in this ultrasound group (OR 2.3 [1.1-4.5], p = 0.02). In those women that do require an ultrasound-indicated cerclage, 50.4% deliver preterm. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study shows that in women with one prior preterm event, both history-indicated cerclage and ultrasound surveillance are appropriate management options. The majority of women undergoing ultrasound surveillance did not require a cerclage and so avoided the potential perioperative complications of cerclage insertion. However, those that did require an ultrasound-indicated cerclage were at high risk of preterm birth so should be followed up closely to enable adequate preterm birth preparation. Further prospective studies comparing history indicated cerclage and US surveillance in women with one prior preterm event are necessary.
Asunto(s)
Cerclaje Cervical , Nacimiento Prematuro , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Nacimiento Prematuro/prevención & control , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Embarazo , Cerclaje Cervical/métodos , Cuello del Útero/cirugía , Medición de Longitud CervicalRESUMEN
Fertility Sparing Surgery (FSS) appears to be a safe means of treating early-stage ovarian cancer based on relatively limited evidence. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to aid women in counselling about their potential fertility outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the reproductive outcomes and prognosis of women who have undergone FSS for ovarian malignancy. Between 1 June 2008 and 1 June 2018, a retrospective review of a clinical database was conducted to identify all consecutive patients who underwent FSS in a central London gynaecological oncology centre. All patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian malignancy (excluding borderline ovarian tumours) were eligible. All identified patients were then prospectively called into a follow up and asked to complete a questionnaire about their fertility outcomes. A total of 47 women underwent FSS; 36 were included in this study. The mean age was 30.3 years (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 27.6 to 33.0 years). During the study period, 17/36 (47.2%) of the women had attempted to conceive following surgery, with a successful live birth rate of 52.9% (9/17). The mean time of recurrence was 125.3 months (95% CI: 106.5−144.1 months). The mean time to death was 139.5 months (95% CI: 124.3−154.8). The cancer grade, tumour stage and use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) were the main factors significantly associated with the risk of recurrence and death. In conclusion, this study suggests that a large proportion of women will not attempt to conceive following FSS. For those who do attempt to conceive, the likelihood of achieving a live birth is high. However, careful counselling about the higher risk of recurrence and worse survival for women with high grade cancer, disease Stage > IA and potentially those who undergo ART is essential before contemplating FFS.