Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 47
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv19676, 2024 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551376

RESUMEN

Allergic contact dermatitis is reported among individuals using continuous glucose monitoring systems and insulin pumps. The aim of this study was to describe contact allergy patterns for allergens in the Swedish baseline series and medical device-related allergens among users. Contact allergy to baseline series allergens and isobornyl acrylate was compared between diabetes patients and dermatitis patients patch-tested at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology during 2017 to 2020. Fifty- four diabetes patients and 2,567 dermatitis patients were included. The prevalence of contact allergy to fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix was significantly higher in diabetes patients compared with dermatitis patients. Of the diabetes patients 13.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.5% tested positive to sesquiterpene lactone mix (p < 0.001). Of the diabetes patients 7.4% and of the dermatitis patients 2.3% tested positive to fragrance mix II (p = 0.041). Of the diabetes patients 70.4% tested positive to medical device-related allergens. Of the diabetes patients 63.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.2% were allergic to isobornyl acrylate (p < 0.001). In conclusion, not only medical device-related contact allergies, but also contact allergy to baseline series allergens (fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix), is overrepresented in diabetes patients who use medical devices.


Asunto(s)
Acrilatos , Canfanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Diabetes Mellitus , Sesquiterpenos , Humanos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia/epidemiología , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Glucemia , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Pruebas del Parche , Lactonas
2.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv23513, 2024 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436432

RESUMEN

Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, goes beyond visible symptoms and affects the general well-being of patients. The aim of this study is to understand how patients with psoriasis perceive their skin characteristics and reactivity to allergens. The study population includes 11,283 participants within the European Dermato-Epidemiology Network (EDEN) Fragrance study, covering several European regions. The study compared perceptions of skin dryness, sensitivity, product avoidance and reactivity to allergens between patients with psoriasis and controls, evaluating the potential influence of psoriasis severity. The results showed that subjects with psoriasis reported dry skin (71.1%) and sensitive skin (49.4%) more often than did controls (51.6% and 38.5%, respectively). Psoriasis patients were more likely to avoid specific products. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in patch-test results between the 2 groups and the severity of psoriasis did not have a consistent impact on these perceptions. In conclusion, people with psoriasis tend to perceive their skin as drier and more sensitive. Notably, the severity of psoriasis did not consistently influence these perceptions and objective reactivity to allergens did not align with subjective perception. Understanding these aspects is crucial for tailoring treatments to improve the well-being of patients with psoriasis, which warrants further research to explore subjective perceptions of skin well-being in patients with psoriasis.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis , Psoriasis , Humanos , Alérgenos , Odorantes , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche
3.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(6): 574-584, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Professional ice hockey players may contract irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. AIMS: To investigate the presence of contact allergy (CA) in professional ice hockey players in Sweden. METHODS: Ten teams from the two top leagues were assessed for potential occupational exposure to sensitizers. Exactly 107 players were patch tested with an extended baseline series and a working series, in total 74 test preparations. The CA rates were compared between the ice hockey players and controls from the general population and dermatitis patients. RESULTS: One out of 4 players had at least one contact allergy. The most common sensitizers were Amerchol L 101, nickel and oxidized limonene. CA was as common in the ice hockey players as in dermatitis patients and significantly more common than in the general population. Fragrances and combined sensitizers in cosmetic products (fragrances + preservatives + emulsifier) were significantly more common in ice hockey players compared with the general population. CONCLUSION: The possible relationship between CA to fragrances and cosmetic products on the one hand and the presence of dermatitis on the other should be explored further.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Hockey , Pruebas del Parche , Humanos , Suecia/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Adulto , Masculino , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Níquel/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Persona de Mediana Edad , Limoneno/efectos adversos
4.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(11): 2349-2354, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37432043

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema severity index (HECSI) is a widely used tool for assessment of hand eczema (HE) severity. Generally, HECSI has been used by health care providers, and a validation of the HECSI tool when used by patients is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the construct validity and reliability of HECSI as a tool for patients based on comparison to HECSI assessments by physicians. METHODS: Patients with HE, enrolled from the dermatological outpatient clinic, Bispebjerg Hospital, assessed HE severity with a patient version of HECSI (patient-HECSI). Afterwards, HECSI was assessed by a trained physician (physician-HECSI). RESULTS: This study found a strong correlation and very good absolute agreement between patient-HECSI and physician-HECSI assessments with a correlation coefficient of 0.756 and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.844. Cronbach's alpha was 0.861 indicating very good internal consistency. CONCLUSION: With a strong construct validity and reliability, the patient-HECSI may be used by patients as a patient-reported outcome assessing their personal HE severity.


Asunto(s)
Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Médicos , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Dermatosis de la Mano/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Eccema/diagnóstico
5.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(1): 104-113, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36018078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contact allergy can manifest in a variety of ways clinically. Systemic contact allergy may occasionally present with pain in muscles and joints. Fibromyalgia is a chronic rheumatic disease characterized by pain and with virtually unknown aetiology. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the contact allergy rates to the sensitizers in a baseline series and compare with corresponding rates in dermatitis patients and the general population. METHODS: Patch testing with the Swedish baseline series was performed in 120 individuals with fibromyalgia. Fisher's exact test was used for pair-wise comparisons of contact allergy rates between the fibromyalgia group and two control groups, dermatitis patients and individuals in the general population. RESULTS: Contact allergy was significantly more common in the fibromyalgia group compared to the general population concerning nickel and the fragrance markers Myroxolon pereirae and fragrance mix I. There were fewer allergic reactions to preservatives in the fibromyalgia group compared with the dermatitis group. CONCLUSIONS: Myroxolon pereirae and fragrance mix I represent besides fragrance allergy also allergy to flavouring substances which indicate that oral exposure to flavouring substances and hygiene products might be important for sensitization and possibly elicitation of systemic contact allergy symptoms in fibromyalgia individuals.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Fibromialgia , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune , Perfumes , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversos , Odorantes , Suecia/epidemiología , Fibromialgia/complicaciones , Fibromialgia/epidemiología , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dolor , Alérgenos
6.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(6): 1199-1206, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36695080

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema (HE) is a common skin disease characterized by itch, pain and visible skin changes such as fissures, erythema and vesicles. It is not yet clear which outcome domains are most important for patients. The Hand Eczema Core Outcome Set (HECOS) initiative is developing a consented set of core domains and suitable measurement instruments for the future application in all HE trials. This includes an online Delphi survey about core domains, which requires a 'Long List' of all domains that might be important to measure. OBJECTIVES: To compile a 'Long List' of candidate outcome domains for therapeutic HE trials with suggestions from patients and experts. METHODS: First, 60 patients with chronic HE were interviewed at seven study sites in Croatia, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Spain. Patients were asked about domains that were important from their perspectives. Second, 185 HE experts were invited by email to complete an online survey. With an open question, they were asked to suggest up to six domains. RESULTS: Suggestions were provided by 58 patients and 82 experts. Most patients and experts suggested to measure the domains 'signs', 'symptoms' and 'HE-related quality of life'. Specifically, >25% of patients said that less itch, pain or fissures indicated a successful treatment. Among experts, >25% suggested 'itch' and 'ability to work' as core sub-domains. Further outcomes from the domains 'HE control over time', 'patient-reported treatment experience' and 'skin barrier function' were mentioned. CONCLUSION: 'Itch' was rated high among patients with HE and professional HE experts. While patients emphasized fissures as important, experts underlined the ability to work. This investigation allowed us to define a 'Long List' of 7 candidate outcome domains with 58 sub-domains. From this list, a panel of stakeholders will select core domains during an online Delphi survey.


Asunto(s)
Eccema , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Eccema/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor , Predicción , Técnica Delphi , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Contact Dermatitis ; 89(2): 95-102, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37218587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Eugenol is a known contact sensitiser included in fragrance mix I. OBJECTIVE: To assess the allergic reactivity to eugenol in different concentrations using patch test as well as repeated open application test (ROAT). METHODS: Overall 67 subjects from 6 European dermatology clinics participated in the study. The ROAT was performed for 21 days twice a day, applying 3 dilutions of eugenol (2.7%-0.5%) and a control. Before and after the ROAT, patch testing with 17 dilutions of eugenol (2.0%-0.00006%) and controls was performed. RESULTS: Out of the 34 subjects with contact allergy to eugenol, 21 (61.8%) showed a positive patch test before ROAT was performed, the lowest positive concentration was 0.031%. The ROAT was positive in 19 (55.9%) of the 34 subjects, the time until a positive reaction occurred was negatively associated with the concentration of the ROAT solution, as well as with the allergic reactivity of the subjects as defined by patch testing. In the patch test after ROAT, 20 of the 34 test subjects (58.8%) showed a positive reaction. In 13 (38.2%) of the 34 test subjects, the patch test result was not reproduceable, still 4 (31.0%) of these 13 subjects developed a positive ROAT. CONCLUSION: Eugenol can provoke a positive patch test reaction in a very low dose; besides, this hypersensitivity may persist even if a former positive patch test is not reproduceable.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Perfumes , Humanos , Eugenol/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga
8.
Contact Dermatitis ; 2021 Mar 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33656746

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: How changes in hand eczema (HE) severity correlate with the single scores on the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) is sparsely investigated and particularly needed in clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To find the minimal important change (MIC) for HECSI based on patient's and physician's assessments using different methods. METHODS: In this prospective follow-up study, three different anchors were used: two anchor questions for patients and physician, respectively, and the Physician Global Assessment (PGA) with a photographic guide. MIC was estimated by mean change in patients with a one-step increase to anchor-questions, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plot, and smallest detectable change (SDC). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients with HE (63.8% female) were included at baseline (89% completed follow-up). The mean change, ROC cutoff, and SDC values were 7.1, 4.5, 21.4 (patient-rating), 8.2, 4.5, 8.3 (physician-rating), and 16.6, 6.5, 27.1 points (PGA), respectively. SDC stratified by baseline severity was 2.9 and 11 points for mild and moderate-severe HE (physician-rating), respectively. CONCLUSION: Identification of the MIC for the HECSI is important in relation to evaluation of treatment, intervention, and sample-size calculations. An improvement of 8.3 points on the HECSI is recommended as the MIC. MIC values may differ according to baseline severity, and this variation should be clarified in future studies.

9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 85(5): 563-571, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34184275

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The contact allergy prevalences in patch-tested patients are usually higher than those in the population, owing to morbidity-driven selection. OBJECTIVES: To examine the differences between two samples, one from the population, one from the patch test clinic, in one area of Germany (Jena, Thuringia). METHODS: Between August 2008 and October 2011, a total of 519 participants of the population-based european dermato-epidemiology network (EDEN) fragrance study were patch tested in Jena using a TRUE Test baseline series extended with some pet.-based (fragrance) allergen preparations. Between 2007 and 2012 (inclusive), 1906 routine patients were patch tested for suspected allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in the Jena University Hospital Department; of these 1694 (83.2%) with the German baseline series using pet./aq.-based, investigator-loaded allergens. RESULTS: In the population (clinical) sample, 19.6% (41.1%) were sensitized to at least one of the allergens considered. The most common baseline series allergens in the population/clinical sample were nickel (10.5%/13.2%), fragrance mix (FM) II (2.9%/6.7%), FM I (2.3%/8.3%), and cobalt (1.6%/5%). The clinical sample was slightly older (71.5% vs 55.9% age 40+) and included less males (36% vs 49.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Results are quite similar, although prevalences are usually higher in the clinical setting, with the exception of p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de la Población , Adulto , Cobalto/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Níquel/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Prevalencia
10.
Contact Dermatitis ; 84(6): 385-394, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33576005

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fragrances are widely used in scented products used in daily life with the potential to induce skin sensitization. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate exposure to scented products and to explore associations between exposure and fragrance contact allergy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study on individuals from 18 to 74 years of age, who were randomly selected from the general population in five European countries. A random sample (N = 3119) was patch tested and interviewed on exposure to scented products. RESULTS: Female participants were strongly associated with exposure to scented products relative to male participants. Participants age 40 years and older showed an inverse association with exposure to scented products. Compared to Sweden, The Netherlands followed by Germany showed the highest overall exposure to scented products. Sensitive skin was associated with exposure to scented products and with fragrance allergy. In univariable regression analysis, exposure to leave-on products and to specific scented product subgroups was significantly associated with fragrance allergy. CONCLUSION: Exposure to scented products depends primarily on sex and age. Female sex and sensitive skin are relevant indicators for developing fragrance allergy. Because aggregate exposure, especially to scented leave-on products, may enhance the prevalence of contact allergy to fragrances, further investigations into exposure amounts and frequencies is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Productos Domésticos/efectos adversos , Odorantes , Perfumes/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Higiene , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Crema para la Piel/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
11.
Hautarzt ; 72(4): 354-357, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33655344

RESUMEN

A cohort of occupational dermatology patients will be set up at the University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. In a 3-year prospective cohort study, the so-called molecular classifier will be applied in 262 patients to better differentiate between eczema and psoriasis. A retrospective cohort of 282 occupational health patients with the same suspected diagnosis but no molecular classifier designation was used as a control group. In 5 follow-up visits during 3 years, data will be obtained on diagnoses, disease course and severity, absence from work, occupation and quality of life. The research questions address whether early diagnoses will help to better identify the efficient treatment, disease course, absence from work and continuance of occupation. The study is sponsored by the public statutory employers' liability insurance (Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung [DGUV]).


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Psoriasis , Estudios de Cohortes , Eccema/diagnóstico , Eccema/genética , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/genética , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(3): 189-195, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32419133

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ) is a disease-specific instrument used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with hand eczema according to the domains of (a) symptoms, (b) emotions, (c) functioning, and (d) treatment/prevention. Today it is not clear what a single score of the QOLHEQ in its German-language version means to a patient. OBJECTIVES: It was the aim of this study to band the QOLHEQ score to an anchor question (AQ) in order to obtain meaningful categories of the QOLHEQ to aid its interpretation. In addition, we assessed the minimal important change (MIC) by using anchor- and distribution-based methods. METHODS: Overall n = 440 hand eczema patients were included in the study. Mean age was 47.5 years (SD 11.9); 38.4% of the sample were female. RESULTS: With a weighted kappa of 0.62, the total QOLHEQ score showed the best agreement for the following band: QOLHEQ of <17 = no impairment; QOLHEQ of 18-28 = slight impairment; QOLHEQ of 29-41 = moderate impairment; QOLHEQ of 42-79 = severe impairment; and QOLHEQ of >79 = very severe impairment. The MIC for the total score was found to be 16.5 points. CONCLUSION: This banding represents a standardized means of interpreting the QOLHEQ total score. Our results indicate that a banding study should be performed for each language version of the QOLHEQ.


Asunto(s)
Eccema/psicología , Dermatosis de la Mano/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
13.
Contact Dermatitis ; 82(4): 201-210, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31883127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recurrent vesicular hand eczema frequently has a chronic course and needs long-term treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL), treatment satisfaction, and adherence in patients with vesicular hand eczema. METHODS: Patients using one main treatment for at least three months were included. Data on HRQoL (Quality of Life in Hand Eczema Questionnaire [QOLHEQ]), treatment satisfaction (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, version II), and treatment adherence (4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale) were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were used to predict variables associated with HRQoL. RESULTS: HRQoL was moderately impaired, with the highest impact in the QOLHEQ subdomain symptoms. Female sex, more severe hand eczema, and lower treatment satisfaction were associated with more impairment in HRQoL. Patients with severe/very severe hand eczema had significant lower "global satisfaction" scores compared with the other severity groups. The "global satisfaction" and treatment adherence in patients using systemic treatment were significantly higher compared with those with only topical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with vesicular hand eczema disease severity affects both HRQoL and treatment satisfaction. Systemic treatment of severe hand eczema could improve the severity and as a result also HRQoL, treatment satisfaction, and medication adherence.


Asunto(s)
Eccema/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatosis de la Mano/tratamiento farmacológico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Administración Cutánea , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Eccema/psicología , Femenino , Dermatosis de la Mano/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia , Análisis de Regresión , Terapia Ultravioleta
14.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 99(4): 423-428, 2019 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30673111

RESUMEN

The GEHIS (German Epidemiological Hemodialysis Itch Study) is a representative cohort study started in 2013 with 860 haemodialysis (HD) patients in 25 German dialysis units. Chronic itch (CI) has been reported to be a poor prognostic marker for patients on HD; however, this has not been investigated in a representative patient cohort. In 2017, all HD patients were contacted again to investigate mortality in those with and without CI and to identify its determinants. Patients' characteristics, study instruments and CI were assessed, as in 2013. The response rate was 84.2% (n = 724). One-year mortality was 15.3%. Mortality was significantly higher in those with secondary scratch lesions compared with those with non-affected skin. This was also true after controlling for age and sex in a multivariate model. This study demonstrates a high mortality in HD patients; however, mortality depends on itch intensity, not on the occurrence of CI itself.


Asunto(s)
Prurito/mortalidad , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Prurito/diagnóstico , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 99(3): 309-314, 2019 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30426137

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between socioeconomic status and the prevalence of self-reported skin and atopic diseases in the general population of 5 European countries. A random sample was drawn from the general population aged 18-74 years, based on electoral precincts. Socioeconomic status was estimated by combining net household income with the highest education of respondents. A total of 7,904 subjects were included in this analysis. The lifetime prevalence of "contact dermatitis" ranged from 13.1% (95% confidence interval (95% CI 11.8-14.4%) in subjects with low socioeconomic status, to 19.1% (95% CI 17.5-20.8%) in those with high socio-economic status. In younger subjects skin cancer was more prevalent in the middle or high socioeconomic status groups compared with the low socioeconomic status group (odds ratio 2.4; 95% CI 1.4-4.3); however, this effect was not found in elderly subjects. The lifetime prevalence for at least one atopic disease was 61.2% (95% CI 59.4-63.0%) in the low and 82.8% (95% CI 81.1-84.3%) in the high socioeconomic status group. Individuals with middle or high socioeconomic status reported an overall higher prevalence of skin and atopic diseases compared with those with low socioeconomic status. These findings may reflect differences in reporting, which are likely to result in an underdiagnoses, especially for skin cancer in the younger age groups with low socioeconomic status.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
16.
Contact Dermatitis ; 81(4): 280-287, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31116435

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Not performing a day (D) 7 patch test reading might result in positive patch test reactions being missed. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the added value of the D7 patch test reading for individual allergens, and to identify patient characteristics and allergen groups associated with new positive D7 reactions. METHODS: Data from patients patch tested between 2008 and 2018 with the extended European baseline series were analysed. Patch test readings were performed on D3 and D7. Positive reactions were categorized into positive on D3 or new positive on D7. RESULTS: A total of 3292 patients were consecutively patch tested with at least 43 allergens of the TRUE Test panels 1 and 2 supplemented with investigator-loaded allergens. In total, 447 (13.6%) patients showed new positive D7 reactions. In univariable regression analysis, age between 18 and 30 years showed a negative association with new positive D7 reactions. Significantly more D7 positive reactions were seen for topicals (odds ratio [OR] 2.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.92-3.51) and corticosteroids (OR 1.87, 95%CI: 1.09-3.21). No associations were found between sex, atopic dermatitis and occupational dermatitis and a new positive D7 reaction. CONCLUSION: A D7 reading to identify new positive patch test reactions is of added value, especially for topicals and corticosteroids.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
17.
Contact Dermatitis ; 81(2): 104-109, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30810228

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A fragrance mix consisting of eight separate fragrance ingredients (fragrance mix I [FM I]) is present in most baseline patch test series. Patch testing with the TRUE Test technique is considered to detect less contact allergy to FM I than testing with the Finn Chamber technique. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible significance of batch and patch test method in establishing contact allergy to FM I. METHODS: Three thousand one hundred and nineteen individuals representing a sample of the general population were patch tested with two batches of FM I with two patch test techniques at six dermatology clinics in five European countries. The TRUE Test technique and the Finn Chamber technique with pet. preparations were used. McNemar's test was used for statistical calculations. RESULTS: The contact allergy prevalences varied between 0.7% and 2.6%. The patch tests with the mixes containing Evernia prunastri (oak moss) with a high content of chloratranol/atranol resulted in substantially more positive reactions than the corresponding tests with the mixes containing oak moss with a low content of chloratranol/atranol. The Finn Chamber technique detected significantly more contact allergic reactions than the TRUE Test technique (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Finn Chamber technique detects more contact allergy to FM I than the TRUE Test technique.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Odorantes , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia
18.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(1): 45-53, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30246346

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The CARPE registry was set up in 2009 to prospectively investigate the management of patients with chronic hand eczema (CHE). OBJECTIVES: To report comprehensive follow-up data from the CARPE registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, provision of medical care, physician-assessed outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Data were collected between 2009 and 2016, with up to 5 years of follow-up, and are reported descriptively. RESULTS: Overall, 1281 patients were included in the registry (53.7% female). Mean age was 47.0 years. Of the patients, 793 and 231 completed the 2-year follow-up and 5-year follow-up, respectively. At baseline, 5.4% had changed or given up their job because of CHE, the average duration of CHE was 6.1 years, and, in 22.4%, the CHE was severe according to physician global assessment. Systemic treatment (alitretinoin, acitretin, and methotrexate) was prescribed at least once to 39.0% of the patients during the course of the follow-up. Disease severity, quality of life and treatment satisfaction improved over time, and the proportion of patients receiving systemic treatments decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Under continued dermatological care, substantial improvements in disease severity and PROs over time was achieved during the course of the CARPE registry, even in patients with long-standing and severe hand eczema.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/fisiopatología , Dermatosis de la Mano/fisiopatología , Sistema de Registros , Acitretina/uso terapéutico , Administración Cutánea , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alitretinoína/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/terapia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Eccema/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Dermatosis de la Mano/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Terapia PUVA , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Terapia Ultravioleta , Urea/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
19.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(4): 201-207, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30632613

RESUMEN

The considerable heterogeneity of outcomes and measurement instruments in hand eczema trials substantially limits the evidence synthesis concerning therapeutic and preventive interventions. Therefore, the Hand Eczema Core Outcome Set (HECOS) initiative is developing a core outcome set for future trials. The first objective was to identify outcomes that were measured in previous trials, to group them in domains, and to identify their measurement instruments. We conducted a systematic review of controlled and randomized controlled hand eczema trials published since 2000. Sixty-one eligible studies were identified. Each assessed one or more of 47 outcomes in the "skin" domain. Eighteen trials (30%) additionally focused on preventive behaviour in risk occupations. Quality of life was measured in 13 studies (21%). Thirty-two distinct named instruments were applied, but 223 measurements (62%) were conducted with unnamed instruments. Only 32 studies (52%) defined a primary outcome. Twenty-nine trials (48%) provided some information on adverse events, but none gave any references concerning relevant methods. Our review confirms the need to harmonize outcome measurements in hand eczema trials. The findings form the basis for a consensus process to generate a core outcome set to improve the explanatory power and comparability of future hand eczema studies.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Dermatología/normas , Eccema , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados como Asunto , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Evaluación de Síntomas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA