Patient-reported outcomes of adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination in Nigeria: A mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Adverse events following immunization (AEFIs), especially if serious, may impact vaccine recipients' quality of life and financial well-being and fuel vaccine hesitancy. Nigeria rolled out COVID-19 vaccination in 2021 with little known about the impact of AEFIs on an individual's quality of life. No study in Africa has explored the health and financial impact of AEFIs. We explored patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination and documented the lived experiences of those with serious AEFIs to understand the effect on their health, financial well-being, and attitude to future vaccinations. METHODS: We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study using the RAND 36-item health survey and in-depth interviews to collect PROs on vaccine recipients in Nigeria. Eight health scale scores and two summary composite scores were used to measure the health-related quality of life outcomes from the survey and inductive analysis was used to identify themes from the interview scripts. The results of both studies were integrated in a joint display to highlight areas of concordance. RESULTS: In total, 785 survey responses were analyzed (53% females, 68% aged 18-30 years). Responders reporting an AEFI were 58%, of whom 62% received the first dose only. Younger age and first vaccine dose (p < .001 respectively) were associated with experiencing an AEFI. Not reporting an AEFI was associated with better quality of life, measured as higher scores on all eight SF-36 Health scales and the physical and mental component summary scores. All six interviewees with serious AEFIs experienced physical, mental, and financial distress. Some expressed a strong negative attitude toward future COVID-19 vaccinations but not toward vaccines for routine immunization. CONCLUSION: AEFIs negatively impact the health and financial well-being of affected individuals and their attitude to future vaccinations, especially if serious. Understanding the impact of AEFIs on people is important and should inform future policies and interventions. The results of our study can inform policy and planning for future mass vaccination campaigns in LMICs.

Adverse Events to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines and Policy Considerations that Inform the Funding of Safety Surveillance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Mixed Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Rapid global approval of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and concurrent introduction in high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) highlights the importance of equitable safety surveillance of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs). We profiled AEFIs to COVID-19 vaccines, explored reporting differences between Africa and the rest of the world (RoW), and analyzed policy considerations that inform strengthening of safety surveillance in LMICs. METHODS: Using a convergent mixed-methods design we compared the rate and profile of COVID-19 vaccines' AEFIs reported to VigiBase by Africa versus the RoW, and interviewed policymakers to elicit considerations that inform the funding of safety surveillance in LMICs. RESULTS: With 87,351 out of 14,671,586 AEFIs, Africa had the second-lowest crude number and a reporting rate of 180 adverse events (AEs) per million administered doses. Serious AEs (SAEs) were 27.0%. Death accounted for about 10.0% of SAEs. Significant differences were found in reporting by gender, age group, and SAEs between Africa and the RoW. AstraZeneca and Pfizer BioNTech vaccines were associated with a high absolute number of AEFIs for Africa and RoW; Sputnik V contributed a considerably high rate of AEs per 1 million administered doses. Funding decisions for safety surveillance in LMICs were not based on explicit policies but on country priorities, perceived utility of data, and practical implementation issues. CONCLUSION: African countries reported fewer AEFIs relative to the RoW. To enhance Africa's contribution to the global knowledge on COVID-19 vaccine safety, governments must explicitly consider safety monitoring as a priority, and funding organizations need to systematically and continuously support these programs.

Impact of comorbidity on adverse drug reaction profile in a cohort of patients treated with Artemisinin combination therapies for uncomplicated malaria in Nigeria.

Artemisinin-based combination antimalarial therapy (ACTs), is still highly effective in uncomplicated falciparum malaria, however, there remain some concerns in relation to its safety and tolerability. Comorbid disease conditions may influence susceptibility to adverse drug reactions (ADRs) as the presence of multiple disease conditions may predisposes patients to ADRs due to the use of many medicines. There is therefore need to assess the impact of comorbidities on the ADR profile of malaria patients treated with ACTs. The study was carried out in health care facilities spread across Nigeria. From the database of over 10,000 patients recruited into an initial cohort, data for 1000 patients with comorbidities was extracted and matched with a control group of 1000 randomly selected patients with no comorbidity. There were 1105 adverse drug reactions in all, of which 66.2% were recorded in patients with comorbidity, and 34% are patients without comorbidity. The mean age of patients with comorbidities was 38.3 ± 17.5 years and 23.8 ± 17.2 for those without comorbidity. Out of the 979 patients with comorbidity, 36% were hypertensive, 2.2% hypertensive-diabetes, 16.4% peptic ulcer disease, 10.4% HIV/AIDS, 4.4% diabetes and 4.3% were asthmatic. Patients with comorbidity were three times more likely to have adverse drug reaction than those without comorbidity (Odds ration = 2.96; 95% CI = 2.23-3.93). HIV/AIDS and osteoarthritis were significantly associated with development of adverse drug reactions. Probability was <0.0001. Age, weight, and height of patients were also found to be risk factor for development of adverse drug reactions.