Circulating sCD36 levels in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and controls.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: CD36 is implicated in fatty-acid uptake in multiple tissues, including hepatocytes and adipocytes. Circulating CD36 (sCD36) is increased in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We explored this association further by investigating correlations between sCD36 levels, intrahepatic lipid content and markers of obesity in NAFLD patients and controls. METHODS: In total, 111 NAFLD patients and 33 normal/overweight controls were included. Intrahepatic lipid content was measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy; and subgroups of participants had a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (n=99), magnetic resonance imaging (n=94, subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue) and liver biopsy (n=28 NAFLD patients) performed. Plasma sCD36 was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: NAFLD patients had elevated sCD36 levels compared with controls (0.68 (0.12-2.27) versus 0.43 (0.10-1.18), P<0.01). sCD36 correlated with intrahepatic lipid (rs=0.30), alanine transaminase (ALT) (r=0.31), homeostasis model assessment index-insulin resistance (r=0.24), high-density lipoprotein (r=-0.32) and triglyceride (r=0.44, all P<0.01). Intrahepatic lipid and plasma triglyceride were independent predictors of sCD36 levels in a multiple regression analysis. Further, sCD36 and body mass index were weakly correlated (r=0.17, P=0.04); yet, we found no correlations between sCD36 and other measures of fat distribution except an inverse relation to visceral adipose tissue (rs=-0.21, P<0.05). We observed a trend for correlation between sCD36 and hepatic CD36 mRNA expression (r=0.37, P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: sCD36 levels increased with the level of intrahepatic lipid, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia. The weak association with markers of obesity and the association with hepatic CD36 mRNA expression suggest that excess sCD36 in NAFLD patients is derived from the hepatocytes, which may support that CD36 is involved in NAFLD development. An unhealthy and unbalanced CD36 expression in adipose and hepatic tissue may shift the fatty-acid load to the liver.

Comparison of bone turnover markers in peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate.

BACKGROUND: Bone remodeling takes place in the bone marrow environment. We investigated if levels of bone turnover markers (BTMs) differ between bone marrow and peripheral blood, if the bone marrow is an independent compartment, and how well the measurements in bone marrow correlate with bone mineral density. METHODS: Sixty-six men participated in a placebo controlled study designed to evaluate the effect of 16 weeks supplementation with resveratrol on bone mineral density and BTM. Bone marrow aspirates and blood samples were drawn at baseline and at week 16. Procollagen I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), osteocalcin, bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), and osteoprogeterin (OPG) were analyzed. Bland-Altman analysis was used to compare measurements across compartment to detect possible systematic or proportional differences. Paired t-test was performed if no proportional difference was revealed at the difference vs concentration plot. RESULTS: Measurements of PINP, CTx, and BAP differed proportionally between compartments depending on concentration; at low concentrations absolute values were only slightly different, while at higher average concentrations the levels were much higher in bone marrow than blood. Osteocalcin measures in bone marrow were systematically and significantly lower than in blood (mean ±â€¯SD; 14.4 µg/L ±â€¯5.3 µg/L versus 21.7 µg/L ±â€¯6.0 µg/L respectively, p < 0.001). OPG measures were comparable between compartments (p = 0.69). CTx and OPG measured in blood were negatively associated with lumbar spine BMD (ß = -0.22, p = 0.05 and ß = -0.02, p = 0.02, respectively), whereas both markers measured in bone marrow were not (p = 0.60 and p = 0.50 respectively). None of the BTMs, bone marrow or blood, were associated with total hip BMD. DISCUSSION: The levels of most BTMs differed significantly between bone marrow and peripheral blood, while OPG was comparable. Levels of PINP, CTx, and BAP differed between compartments depending on concentration, suggesting bone marrow to represent a compartment separate from the general circulation. Unexpectedly, osteocalcin was lower in the marrow, a gradient that was independent of concentration. BTMs measured in bone marrow did not show any association with bone mineral density. Although further studies are needed to investigate potential explanatory causes of the differences, BTMs in bone marrow do not seem to contribute further to fracture risk assessment.