Sequential hybrid ablation vs. surgical CryoMaze alone for treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of multicentre randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: Data on the hybrid atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment are lacking in patients with structural heart disease undergoing concomitant CryoMaze procedures. The aim was to assess whether the timely pre-emptive catheter ablation would achieve higher freedom from AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) and be associated with better clinical outcomes than surgical ablation alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: The trial investigated patients with non-paroxysmal AF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve repair/replacement with mandatory concomitant CryoMaze procedure who were randomly assigned to undergo either radiofrequency catheter ablation [Hybrid Group (HG)] or no further treatment (Surgery Group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the first recurrence of AF/AT without class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs as assessed by implantable cardiac monitors. The primary clinical endpoint was a composite of hospitalization for arrhythmia recurrence, worsening of heart failure, cardioembolic event, or major bleeding. We analysed 113 and 116 patients in the Hybrid and Surgery Groups, respectively, with a median follow-up of 715 (IQR: 528-1072) days. The primary efficacy endpoint was significantly reduced in the HG [41.1% vs. 67.4%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26-0.57, P < 0.001] as well as the primary clinical endpoint (19.9% vs. 40.1%, HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.86, P = 0.012). The trial groups did not differ in all-cause mortality (10.6% vs. 8.6%, HR = 1.17, 95%CI: 0.51-2.71, P = 0.71). The major complications of catheter ablation were infrequent (1.9%). CONCLUSION: Pre-emptively performed catheter ablation after the CryoMaze procedure was safe and associated with higher freedom from AF/AT and improved clinical outcomes.

Practical guide on left atrial appendage closure for the non-implanting physician: an international consensus paper.

A significant proportion of patients who suffer from atrial fibrillation (AF) and are in need of thromboembolic protection are not treated with oral anticoagulation or discontinue this treatment shortly after its initiation. This undertreatment has not improved sufficiently despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants which are associated with less major bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Multiple reasons account for this, including bleeding events or ischaemic strokes whilst on anticoagulation, a serious risk of bleeding events, poor treatment compliance despite best educational attempts, or aversion to drug therapy. An alternative interventional therapy, which is not associated with long-term bleeding and is as effective as vitamin K anticoagulation, was introduced over 20 years ago. Because of significant improvements in procedural safety over the years, left atrial appendage closure, predominantly achieved using a catheter-based, device implantation approach, is increasingly favoured for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients who cannot achieve effective anticoagulation. This management strategy is well known to the interventional cardiologist/electrophysiologist but is not more widely appreciated within cardiology or internal medicine. This article introduces the devices and briefly explains the implantation technique. The indications and device follow-up are more comprehensively described. Almost all physicians who care for adult patients will have many with AF. This practical guide, written within guideline/guidance boundaries, is aimed at those non-implanting physicians who may need to refer patients for consideration of this new therapy, which is becoming increasingly popular.

Catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A review.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The higher mortality is due to the risk of heart failure and cardioembolic events. This in-depth review focuses on the strategies and efficacy of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The main medical databases were searched for contemporary studies on catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Catheter ablation is currently proven to be the most effective treatment for AF and consists of pulmonary vein isolation as the cornerstone plus additional ablations. In terms of SR maintenance, it is less effective in non-paroxysmal AF than in paroxysmal patients. but the clinical benefit in non-paroxysmal patients is substantially higher. Since pulmonary vein isolation is ineffective, a variety of techniques have been developed, e.g. linear ablations, ablation of complex atrial fractionated electrograms, etc. Another paradox consists in the technique of catheter ablation. Despite promising results in early observation studies, further randomized studies have not confirmed the initial enthusiasm. Recently, a new approach, pulsed-field ablation, appears promising. This is an in-depth summary of current technologies and techniques for the ablation of non-paroxysmal AF. We discuss the benefits, risks and implications in the treatment of patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Significant hemolysis is present during irreversible electroporation of cardiomyocytes in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a new method in clinical practice. Despite a favorable safety profile of PFA in AF ablation, rare cases of renal failure, probably due to hemolysis, have been recently reported. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of hemolysis and cardiac cell death during in vitro PFA with different electric field intensities. METHODS: Blood samples from healthy volunteers and mouse HL-1 cardiomyocyte cell lines were subjected to in vitro irreversible electroporation (IRE) using 216 bipolar pulses, each lasting 2 µs with 5 µs intervals, repeated 20 times at a frequency of 1 Hz. These pulses varied in from 500 to 1500 V. Cell-free hemoglobin levels were assessed spectrophotometrically, and red blood cell microparticles (RBCµ) were evaluated using flow cytometry. Cardiomyocyte death was quantified using propidium iodide. RESULTS: PF energy (1000 V/cm, 1250 V/cm, and 1500 V/cm) was associated with a significant increase in cell-free hemoglobin (0.31 ± 0.16 g/l, 2.33 ± 0.90 g/l, and 5.7 ± 0.20 g/l, p< 0.05), and similar increase in the concentration of RBCµ. Significant rates of cardiomyocyte death were observed at electric field strengths of 750 V/cm, 1000 V/cm, 1250 V/cm and 1500 V/cm (26.5 ± 5.9%, 44.3 ± 6.2%, 55.5 ± 6.9% and 74.5 ± 17.8% of cardiomyocytes, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The most effective induction of cell death in vitro was observed at 1500 V/cm. This intensity was also associated with a significant degree of hemolysis.

Periprocedural Intravascular Hemolysis During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Comparison of Pulsed Field With Radiofrequency Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Hemolysis-related renal failure has been described after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with pulsed-field ablation (PFA). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the potential for hemolysis during PVI with PFA vs radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: In consecutive patients, PVI was performed with PFA or RFA. Blood samples were drawn at baseline, immediately postablation, and 24 hours postablation. Using flow cytometry, the concentration of red blood cell microparticles (RBCµ) (fragments of damaged erythrocytes) in blood was assessed. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), haptoglobin, and indirect bilirubin were measured at baseline and 24 hours. RESULTS: Seventy patients (age: 64.7 ± 10.2 years; 47% women; 36 [51.4%] paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) were enrolled: 47 patients were in the PFA group (22 PVI-only and 36.4 ± 5.5 PFA applications; 25 PVI-plus, 67.3 ± 12.4 pulsed field energy applications), and 23 patients underwent RFA. Compared to baseline, the RBCµ concentration increased ∼12-fold postablation and returned to baseline by 24 hours in the PFA group (median: 70.8 [Q1-Q3: 51.8-102.5] vs 846.6 [Q1-Q3: 639.2-1,215.5] vs 59.3 [Q1-Q3: 42.9-86.5] RBCµ/µL, respectively; P < 0.001); this increase was greater with PVI-plus compared to PVI-only (P = 0.007). There was also a significant, albeit substantially smaller, periprocedural increase in RBCµ with RFA (77.7 [Q1-Q3: 39.2-92.0] vs 149.6 [Q1-Q3: 106.6-180.8] vs 89.0 [Q1-Q3: 61.2-123.4] RBCµ/µL, respectively; P < 0.001). At 24 hours with PFA, the concentration of LDH and indirect bilirubin increased, whereas haptoglobin decreased significantly (all P < 0.001). In contrast, with RFA, there were only smaller changes in LDH and haptoglobin concentrations (P = 0.03) and no change in bilirubin. CONCLUSIONS: PFA was associated with significant periprocedural hemolysis. With a number of 70 PFA lesions, the likelihood of significant renal injury is uncommon.

Lesion durability found during mandated percutaneous catheter ablation after surgical cryo-ablation for treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: Current recommendations support surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients indicated for cardiac surgery. These procedures are referred to as concomitant and may be carried out using radiofrequency energy or cryo-ablation. This study aimed to assess the electrophysiological findings in patients undergoing concomitant cryo-ablation. METHODS: Patients with non-paroxysmal AF undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve repair/replacement were included in the trial if concomitant cryo-ablation was part of the treatment plan according to current guidelines. The patients reported in this study were assigned to undergo staged percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation (PRFCA), i.e., hybrid treatment, as a part of the SURHYB trial protocol. RESULTS: We analyzed 103 patients who underwent PRFCA 105 ± 35 days after surgery. Left and right pulmonary veins (PVs) were found isolated in 65 (63.1%) and 63 (61.2%) patients, respectively. The LA posterior wall isolation and mitral isthmus conduction block were found in 38 (36.9%) and 18 (20.0%) patients, respectively. Electrical reconnections (gaps) in the left PVs were more often localized superiorly than inferiorly (57.9% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.005) and anteriorly than posteriorly (65.8% vs. 31.6%, P = 0.003). Gaps in the right PVs were more equally distributed anteroposteriorly but dominated in superior segments (72.5% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.003). There was a higher number of gaps on the roof line compared to the inferior line (131 (67.2%) vs. 67 (42.2%), P < 0.001). Compared to epicardial cryo-ablation, endocardial was more effective in creating PVs and LA posterior wall isolation (P < 0.05). Cryo-ablation using nitrous oxide (N20) or argon (Ar) gas as cooling agents was similarly effective (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of surgical cryo-ablation in achieving transmural and durable lesions in the left atrium is surprisingly low. Gaps are located predominantly in the superior and anterior portions of the PVs and on the roof line. Endocardial cryo-ablation is more effective than epicardial ablation, irrespective of the cooling agent used.

LVSP and LBBP Result in Similar or Improved LV Synchrony and Hemodynamics Compared to BVP.

BACKGROUND: The effect of left ventricular septal myocardial pacing (LVSP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) on ventricular synchrony and left ventricular (LV) hemodynamic status is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of LVSP and LBBP vs biventricular pacing (BVP) on ventricular electrical synchrony and hemodynamic status in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. METHODS: In cardiac resynchronization therapy candidates with LV conduction disease, ventricular synchrony was assessed by measuring QRS duration (QRSd) and using ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography. LV electrical dyssynchrony was assessed as the difference between the first activation in leads V1 to V8 to the last from leads V4 to V8. LV hemodynamic status was estimated using invasive systolic blood pressure measurement during multiple transitions between LBBP, LVSP, and BVP. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients with a mean LV ejection fraction of 29% and a mean QRSd of 168 ± 24 ms were included. Thirteen had ischemic cardiomyopathy. QRSd during BVP, LVSP, and LBBP was the same, but LBBP provided shorter LV electrical dyssynchrony than BVP (-10 ms; 95% CI: -16 to -4 ms; P = 0.001); the difference between LVSP and BVP was not significant (-5 ms; 95% CI: -12 to 1 ms; P = 0.10). LBBP was associated with higher systolic blood pressure than BVP (4%; 95% CI: 2%-5%; P < 0.001), whereas LVSP was not (1%; 95% CI: 0%-2%; P = 0.10). Hemodynamic differences during LBBP and LVSP vs BVP were more pronounced in nonischemic than ischemic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-high-frequency electrocardiography allowed the documentation of differences in LV synchrony between LBBP, LVSP, and BVP, which were not observed by measuring QRSd. LVSP provided the same LV synchrony and hemodynamic status as BVP, while LBBP was better than BVP in both.

Atrial fibrillation therapy and stroke prevention in hemodialysis patients.

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially on hemodialysis (HD) is higher compared to the general population without CKD and reaches ~20%. The risk of ischemic stroke in CKD patients is also significantly increased. However, since the risk of bleeding is also significantly increased in CKD patients and the number of bleeding events exceeds the number of thrombotic events, there are great concerns regarding the routine use of anticoagulation in this patient population. No randomized studies were performed to compare anticoagulation with placebo in patients with advanced CKD and AF. This lack of knowledge is reflected in international guidelines which refrain from clear recommendations. The use of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in HD patients with AF should be strictly individualized for each patient. Anticoagulation for stroke prevention in HD patients with AF seems justified only in selected patients with high stroke and low bleeding risk. Reduced-dose direct oral anticoagulants (especially apixaban) may prove beneficial. In patients with high thrombotic and bleeding risk, left atrial appendage closure could be considered. In this article, the results of the most relevant observational studies with anticoagulation in CKD/HD patients with AF have been presented and discussed. Furthermore, results of randomized studies comparing vitamin K antagonists with non-vitamin K antagonists in CKD patients have been discussed in detail. Finally, ongoing randomized studies with reduced doses of apixaban, factor XI inhibitors, and left atrial appendage closure in CKD patients are mentioned. A brief summary of rhythm control strategies in AF is given.