Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Dev Med Child Neurol ; 60(10): 1052-1058, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29572821

RESUMEN

AIM: To assess the impact of perioperative neonatal brain injury and brain volumes on neurodevelopment throughout school-age children with critical congenital heart disease (CHD). METHOD: Thirty-four survivors of neonatal cardiac surgery (seven females, 27 males) were included. Neonatal preoperative and postoperative cerebral magnetic resonance imaging was performed and neurodevelopment was assessed at 24 months (SD 0.7, n=32, using Bayley Score of Infant and Toddler Development, Child Behavior Checklist) and 6 years (mean age 5y 11mo; SD 0.3, n=30, using Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Child Behavior Checklist, Teacher Report Form). Brain injury, brain volumes, and cortical measures were related to outcome with adjustment for maternal educational level. RESULTS: Two-year cognitive score and 6-year Full-scale IQ were poorer in children with neonatal white matter injury (n=21, all p<0.05), with higher teacher-reported attention problems (p=0.03). Five of six children with involvement of the posterior limb of the internal capsule showed motor problems (p=0.03). Children with a below-average Fulll-scale IQ (<85, n=9) showed smaller volumes of basal ganglia thalami (-8%, p=0.03) and brain stem (-7%, p=0.03). INTERPRETATION: Our findings provide evidence of unfavourable outcome in school-age children with critical CHD who acquire perioperative neonatal brain injury. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: This paper extends knowledge about neonatal brain injury and long-term outcome in congenital heart disease. Children with white matter injury show lower IQ and more attention problems at school age. Injury of the posterior limb of the internal capsule increases the risk of motor problems. This study provides evidence for worse outcomes in neonates acquiring brain injury around cardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/fisiopatología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Desarrollo Infantil/fisiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Inteligencia/fisiología , Cápsula Interna/patología , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/fisiopatología , Lesiones Encefálicas/etiología , Lesiones Encefálicas/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/etiología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Escalas de Wechsler
2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 160(1): 59-75, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29127655

RESUMEN

OBJECT: In the past decade, the endonasal transsphenoidal approach (eTSA) has become an alternative to the microsurgical transcranial approach (mTCA) for tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSMs) and olfactory groove meningiomas (OGMs). The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate which approach offered the best surgical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature from 2004 and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Pooled incidence was calculated for gross total resection (GTR), visual improvement, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, intraoperative arterial injury, and mortality, comparing eTSA and mTCA, with p-interaction values. RESULTS: Of 1684 studies, 64 case series were included in the meta-analysis. Using the fixed-effects model, the GTR rate was significantly higher among mTCA patients for OGM (eTSA: 70.9% vs. mTCA: 88.5%, p-interaction < 0.01), but not significantly higher for TSM (eTSA: 83.0% vs. mTCA: 85.8%, p-interaction = 0.34). Despite considerable heterogeneity, visual improvement was higher for eTSA than mTCA for TSM (p-interaction < 0.01), but not for OGM (p-interaction = 0.33). CSF leak was significantly higher among eTSA patients for both OGM (eTSA: 25.1% vs. mTCA: 10.5%, p-interaction < 0.01) and TSM (eTSA: 19.3%, vs. mTCA: 5.81%, p-interaction < 0.01). Intraoperative arterial injury was higher among eTSA (4.89%) than mTCA patients (1.86%) for TSM (p-interaction = 0.03), but not for OGM resection (p-interaction = 0.10). Mortality was not significantly different between eTSA and mTCA patients for both TSM (p-interaction = 0.14) and OGM resection (p-interaction = 0.88). Random-effect models yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, eTSA was not shown to be superior to mTCA for resection of both OGMs and TSMs.


Asunto(s)
Craneotomía/métodos , Endoscopía/métodos , Meningioma/cirugía , Microcirugia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Base del Cráneo/cirugía , Seno Esfenoidal/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA