Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neuroimage Clin ; 42: 103596, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554485

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) and Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) show heterogeneous brain atrophy patterns which group-average analyses fail to capture. Neuroanatomical normative modelling overcomes this by comparing individuals to a large reference cohort. Patient-specific atrophy patterns are measured objectively and summarised to index overall neurodegeneration (the 'total outlier count'). We aimed to quantify patterns of neurodegenerative dissimilarity in participants with PD and DLB and evaluate the potential clinical relevance of total outlier count by testing its association with key clinical measures in PD and DLB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 108 participants with PD and 61 with DLB. PD participants were subclassified into high and low visual performers as this has previously been shown to stratify those at increased dementia risk. We generated z-scores from T1w-MRI scans for each participant relative to normative regional cortical thickness and subcortical volumes, modelled in a reference cohort (n = 58,836). Outliers (z < -1.96) were aggregated across 169 brain regions per participant. To measure dissimilarity, individuals' Hamming distance scores were calculated. We also examined total outlier counts between high versus low visual performance in PD; and PD versus DLB; and tested associations between these and cognition. RESULTS: There was significantly greater inter-individual dissimilarity in brain-outlier patterns in PD poor compared to high visual performers (W = 522.5; p < 0.01) and in DLB compared to PD (W = 5649; p < 0.01). PD poor visual performers had significantly greater total outlier counts compared to high (ß = -4.73 (SE = 1.30); t = -3.64; p < 0.01) whereas a conventional group-level GLM failed to identify differences. Higher total outlier counts were associated with poorer MoCA (ß = -0.55 (SE = 0.27), t = -2.04, p = 0.05) and composite cognitive scores (ß = -2.01 (SE = 0.79); t = -2.54; p = 0.02) in DLB, and visuoperception (ß = -0.67 (SE = 0.19); t = -3.59; p < 0.01), in PD. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroanatomical normative modelling shows promise as a clinically informative technique in PD and DLB, where patterns of atrophy are variable.


Asunto(s)
Atrofia , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Neuroimagen , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad por Cuerpos de Lewy/patología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Parkinson/patología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Atrofia/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroimagen/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología
2.
Genome Med ; 12(1): 18, 2020 02 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32075696

RESUMEN

The European Union (EU) initiative on the Digital Transformation of Health and Care (Digicare) aims to provide the conditions necessary for building a secure, flexible, and decentralized digital health infrastructure. Creating a European Health Research and Innovation Cloud (HRIC) within this environment should enable data sharing and analysis for health research across the EU, in compliance with data protection legislation while preserving the full trust of the participants. Such a HRIC should learn from and build on existing data infrastructures, integrate best practices, and focus on the concrete needs of the community in terms of technologies, governance, management, regulation, and ethics requirements. Here, we describe the vision and expected benefits of digital data sharing in health research activities and present a roadmap that fosters the opportunities while answering the challenges of implementing a HRIC. For this, we put forward five specific recommendations and action points to ensure that a European HRIC: i) is built on established standards and guidelines, providing cloud technologies through an open and decentralized infrastructure; ii) is developed and certified to the highest standards of interoperability and data security that can be trusted by all stakeholders; iii) is supported by a robust ethical and legal framework that is compliant with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR); iv) establishes a proper environment for the training of new generations of data and medical scientists; and v) stimulates research and innovation in transnational collaborations through public and private initiatives and partnerships funded by the EU through Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Nube Computacional , Difusión de Innovaciones , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Unión Europea , Difusión de la Información/legislación & jurisprudencia , Difusión de la Información/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA