Training to Reconnect with Emotional Awareness Therapy (TREAT): A Randomized Controlled Trial in Participants with Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of an intervention, training to reconnect with emotional awareness therapy (TREAT) at improving alexithymia, emotion dysregulation, anxiety, depression, anger and global positive and negative affect in participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING: Outpatient brain injury rehabilitation center PARTICIPANTS: : Adult participants, who were on average 11.37 years post-complicated mild to severe TBI and also had elevated alexithymia (n=44), who were randomized to immediate treatment (TREAT; n=20) or waitlist control (WLC=24). DESIGN: Randomized, waitlist control trial with 3-month follow-up. INTERVENTION: Eight session, structured training program that teaches emotional awareness and discrete labeling of emotions. OUTCOME MEASURES: Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20), Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS), Difficulty with Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9); State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI), Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS); and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). RESULTS: Thirty-four participants completed the study per protocol. Compared to WLC participants (n=16) who had not yet received the intervention, TREAT participants (n=18) had significantly less alexithymia, emotion dysregulation, anxiety, and depression (all p's<.05) within approximately one week of completing the intervention. Before/after results from the pooled sample (n=34) showed significant improvements, immediately and 3 months after the intervention, on all outcomes except the STAXI and the Positive Affect subscale of the PANAS. On the PGIC, a noticeable change in global emotional function and quality of life was reported by 80%. Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analyses (n=38) revealed similar results to the per protocol sample. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support the efficacy of TREAT for reducing alexithymia and emotion dysregulation in individuals with chronic TBI. While outcomes were also promising for anxiety and depression, more research using attention-control designs are warranted to control for the attention received during treatment.

Rasch Analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory for Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: (1) Reexamine the item structure and reliability of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (4th ed; MPAI-4) through Rasch analysis of admission and discharge scores for a large sample of adults with acquired brain injury (ABI) who participated in various types of posthospital brain injury rehabilitation (PHBIR) programs; (2) compare differential item functioning (DIF) for traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke and other ABI; and (3) explore the viability of more specific subscales in addition to the established indices. SETTING: Data from Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community, Day Treatment, and Outpatient rehabilitation programs serving individuals with ABI. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2154 individuals with TBI, stroke, or other ABI. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of de-identified admission and discharge data from the Foundation to Advance Brain Rehabilitation (FABR) consortium database. MAIN MEASURE: MPAI-4. RESULTS: After adjusting 4 misfitting items and eliminating 20 misfitting persons, the MPAI-4 demonstrated real person reliability/separation = 0.93/3.52 and real item reliability/separation = 1.00/24.02. Independent Rasch analyses by diagnostic category found similar reliabilities and separations. Residual item correlations and principal component analysis of residuals (PCAR) indicated areas of local dependence arranged hierarchically reflecting the full-scale item hierarchy and providing the basis for 3 new subscales of Physical Abilities, Cognitive Abilities, and Autonomy. DIF across diagnostic categories revealed differences in item elevations characteristic of typical patients in each category. Measure means and SDs were very similar across categories. CONCLUSIONS: MPAI-4 items demonstrate very good person and item reliabilities for individuals with TBI, stroke, and other ABI at a level that supports individual evaluation. Variations in item calibrations across diagnostic categories reflect the differential characteristics of typical patients within categories. The entire measure provides an overall assessment of common sequalae of ABI, and standard indices used in combination with newly derived subscales provide more specific assessments of rehabilitation needs for treatment planning.

Distinguishing Characteristics of Admissions to Various Types of Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Describe and compare the demographic characteristics and disability profiles of individuals admitted to 6 types of posthospital brain injury rehabilitation (PHBIR) programs. SETTING: Data from Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation, and Supported Living programs serving individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand twenty-eight individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, or other ABI. MAIN MEASURES: Sex, age, time since injury, and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory, 4th edition (MPAI-4). DESIGN: Retrospective analyses of demographic variables and MPAI-4 Total, Index, and subscale Rasch-derived T-scores on admission comparing diagnostic categories and program types within diagnostic categories. RESULTS: Participants with TBI were predominantly male, and those with stroke were generally older. Admissions to more intensive and supervised programs (residential neurobehavioral and residential neurorehabilitation) generally showed greater disability than admissions to home and community programs who were more disabled than participants in day treatment and outpatient programs. Residential neurobehavioral and supported living program participants generally were male and had TBI. Home and community admissions tended to be more delayed than residential neurorehabilitation admissions. The majority of those with other ABI were admitted to outpatient rather than more intensive programs. Additional analyses demonstrated significant differences in MPAI-4 profiles among the various program types. CONCLUSIONS: Admissions with TBI, stroke, and other ABI to PHBIR differ in demographic factors and disability profiles. When examined within each diagnostic category, demographic features and disability profiles also distinguish among admissions to the various program types. Results provide insights about decision-making in referral patterns to various types of PHBIR programs, although other factors not available for analysis (eg, participant/family preference, program, and funding availability) likely also contribute to admission patterns.

Outcomes of Six Specific Types of Post-Hospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Programs.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate outcomes of intensive posthospital brain injury rehabilitation programs compared to supported living (SL) programs; explore variations in outcome by diagnostic category (traumatic brain injury, stroke, and other acquired brain injury [ABI]) and specific program type. SETTING: Data were obtained from Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation, and SL programs serving individuals with ABI. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2120 individuals with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other ABI participated in this study. MAIN MEASURES: The main measures are sex, age, time since injury, and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (4th edition; MPAI-4). DESIGN: Retrospective analyses of demographic variables and MPAI-4 Total, index, and subscale Rasch-derived T-scores on admission and discharge. RESULTS: Gains on MPAI-4  Total T-scores were significantly greater for the intensive rehabilitation (IR) group in comparison to stable functioning in the SL group (F = 236.69, P < .001, partial η2 = .101) while controlling for admission/time 1 scores; similar results were found for MPAI-4 indices and subscales. For the IR cohort, discharge scores differed by diagnostic category after controlling for admission scores for the Total MPAI-4 T-score (F = 22.65, P < .001, partial η2 = .025), as well as all indices and subscales. A statistically significant interaction between program type and diagnostic group on discharge MPAI-4 Total T-scores (F = 2.55, P = .018, partial η2 = .01) after controlling for admission scores indicated that differing outcomes across diagnoses also varied by program type. Varying significant main effects and interactions were apparent for MPAI-4 indices and subscales with generally small effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: Significant gains on MPAI-4 variables across IR program types compared to no change over a comparable period of time for SL programs supports the effectiveness of posthospital brain injury rehabilitation. This finding in the presence of small effect sizes on outcome variables for program type and for significant interactions between program type and diagnostic category suggests that participants generally were appropriately matched to program type and benefited from interventions provided through specific program types.

Evaluation of Posthospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcomes With Quasi-Experimental Controls.

OBJECTIVE: To further evaluate, using quasi-experimental methodologies, posthospital brain injury rehabilitation outcomes described in an accompanying report of a large observational study (n = 2120). SETTING: Data from Intensive Rehabilitation (IR: Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation) and Supported Living (SL) programs serving individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred twenty-eight individuals with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other ABI in propensity score analysis; 1344 in analysis by extent of recommended treatment completed (TC) rating. MAIN MEASURES: Sex, age, time since injury, Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4th edition (MPAI-4) Rasch-derived T-scores, and TC rating. DESIGN: Analyses of covariance (1) of discharge MPAI-4 Total, index, and subscale T-scores on propensity score-matched samples of IR and SL participants controlling for admission scores and (2) of MPAI-4 T-scores by TC rating and diagnostic category. RESULTS: Propensity score-matched groups showed superior outcomes for IR participants compared to SL participants on MPAI-4 Total T-score (F = 77.21, P < .001; partial η2 = 0.257) and all MPAI-4 index and subscale T-scores controlling for sex, age, and baseline scores. Participants with traumatic brain injury and stroke who completed the recommended course of rehabilitation had superior outcomes on all MPAI-4 T-scores compared to those who completed less than or much less than the recommended treatment. No additional benefit was apparent for those who completed more than the recommended course. The association between TC rating and outcome was not significant for the other ABI group. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses using quasi-experimental controls provide more scientifically rigorous evidence of the benefit of IR provided through posthospital brain injury rehabilitation programs after acute inpatient care, consistent with the results of numerous observational studies. However, improved internal validity limits external validity and generalization. The absence of a significant association between TC rating and outcomes for the other ABI group most likely reflects the difficulty prescribing rehabilitation for this highly heterogeneous group.

Effect of Missed Items on the Reliability of the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum permissible number of missed items on the 10-item Catherine Bergego Scale administered after the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP). Secondary objectives were to determine the frequency, characteristics, and most commonly cited reasons reported for missed items. DESIGN: Retrospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Sixteen inpatient rehabilitation facilities in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive clinical sample of 4256 patients (N=4256) with stroke or other neurologic deficits who were assessed for spatial neglect with the KF-NAP. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Catherine Bergego Scale via KF-NAP. RESULTS: The majority (69.7%) of patients had at least 1 missed item on their KF-NAP. Among those with missed items, it was most common to have 2 missed items (51.4%), and few had more than 3 missed items (11.3%). The most commonly missed items were Collisions (37.2%), Cleaning After Meals (36.1%), Meals (34.0%), and Navigation (19.7%). The most commonly reported reasons for missed items included time constraints, cognitive or communication deficits, and behavior or refusal of the therapy session. These reasons were reported for nearly all item types. Item-specific reasons were also commonly reported, such as a lack of a needed resource for task completion or low functional status of the patient. Prorated scoring of measures with up to 3 missed items maintained an acceptable level of concordance with complete measures (Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient=0.96, 95% CI, 0.9478-0.9626) for the combination of 3 missed items with lowest concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should make every effort to capture all items on the KF-NAP. However, missed items occur in the majority of cases because of patient factors and barriers inherent to the inpatient hospital setting. When missed items are necessary, clinicians can confidently interpret a prorated score when 7 or more items are scored.

The impact of resource facilitation on recidivism for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A pilot, non-randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Research has shown that as many as 60% of adults in the criminal justice system have a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), but the examination of effective interventions to reduce recidivism has only just begun. The present study explored the extent to which resource facilitation (RF) may decrease recidivism among those individuals with TBI. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, a prospective, non-randomized controlled study was conducted that included 1,504 justice-involved individuals exiting the Indiana Department of Corrections (IDOC). Participants were screened for a history of TBI as they entered parole or community corrections, with 211 (14%) offenders screening positive for moderate-to-severe TBI. Thirty-one of the 211 offenders offered RF chose to participate in the intervention, while 180 declined and served as the comparison group. RESULTS: Participants in RF were found to recidivate significantly less often at 6 and 12 months post-release when looking at rearrests or return to incarceration combined between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the increased risk for reincarceration in those individuals with TBI could be mitigated by the use of RF.

Provision of resource facilitation services for individuals with acquired brain injury across the United States: results of a 2018 resource facilitator provider survey.

OBJECTIVE: Resource Facilitation is a lesser-known service line within the field of brain injury rehabilitation and has been described as similar to case management, care coordination, and neuronavigation. The purpose of this project was to evaluate current Resource Facilitation programs and provide a comprehensive summary of program characteristics to work toward a common definition of Resource Facilitation services and inform future program development and evaluation frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was sent to all known Resource Facilitation programs in the US (N = 70). DATA COLLECTION: Completed through Survey Monkey including information related to program history, structure, population served, and outcomes measurement. STATISTICALANALYSIS: Descriptive statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: Twenty-four of the 70 programs completed the survey, resulting in a 34% completion rate. This snapshot of the current definitions and activities demonstrated high variability across programs regarding structure, funding, eligibility, and data collection. Only 33% of programs reported having a program evaluation system. CONCLUSIONS: This project provided a comprehensive summary of Resource Facilitation program characteristics and associated outcome metrics. The findings may be used to begin the formulation of a common definition of Resource Facilitation services, a program evaluation framework, and aid in establishing a common data set across programs.

Investigation of a New Couples Intervention for Individuals With Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to (1) examine the efficacy of a treatment to enhance a couple's relationship after brain injury particularly in relationship satisfaction and communication; and (2) determine couples' satisfaction with this type of intervention. DESIGN: Randomized waitlist-controlled trial. SETTING: Midwestern outpatient brain injury rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=44; 22 persons with brain injury and their intimate partners) were randomized by couples to the intervention or waitlist-controlled group, with 11 couples in each group. INTERVENTIONS: The Couples Caring and Relating with Empathy intervention is a 16-week, 2-hour, manualized small group treatment utilizing psychoeducation, affect recognition, empathy training, cognitive-behavioral and dialectical-behavioral strategies, communication skills training, and Gottman's theoretical framework for couples adjusted for individuals with brain injury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Quality of Marriage Index (QMI), and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse communication questionnaire were implemented. Measures were completed by the person with brain injury and that person's partner at 3 time points: baseline, immediate postintervention, 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: The experimental group showed significant improvement at posttest and follow-up on the Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Horsemen questionnaire compared to baseline and to the waitlist-controlled group which showed no significant changes on these measures. No significant effects were observed on the QMI for either group. Satisfaction scores were largely favorable. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest this intervention can improve couples' dyadic adjustment and communication after brain injury. High satisfaction ratings suggest this small group intervention is feasible with couples following brain injury. Future directions for this intervention are discussed.

Models of brain injury vocational rehabilitation: The evidence for resource facilitation from efficacy to effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Resource Facilitation (RF) is an intervention developed to improve return to work (RTW) following brain injury. RF is an individualized treatment specializing in connecting patients and caregivers with community-based resources and services to mitigate barriers to return to work. OBJECTIVES: Examine the effectiveness of the RHI RF program for a clinical prospective cohort of participants referred to this program from the State Vocational Rehabilitation agency. METHODS: Participants were 243 participants with data drawn from the two sources: 33 from previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) control groups who did not receive RF and 210 from clinical patients discharged from the RHI RF program. RESULTS: At discharge from RF, a greater proportion of the treatment group obtained employment than the control group [X2 (1)  = 5.39, p = 0.018]. When controlling for baseline level of disability, treatment group significantly predicted employment outcome (Wald = 4.52, p = 0.033) and participants in the treatment group were 2.3 times more likely to return to work than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Previous RCTs have studied the RHI RF model and demonstrated significant efficacy. The findings from the present study are consistent with the employment rates found in the previous RCT's following RF, and also provide initial support for the clinical effectiveness of RF.

Replication of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Resource Facilitation to Improve Return to Work and School After Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which previous findings on the effectiveness of resource facilitation to impact return to work and school could be replicated. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients with acquired brain injury (N=44). INTERVENTION: Fifteen months of resource facilitation services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A revised version of the Vocational Independence Scale and the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 Participation Index. RESULTS: Participants randomized to the resource facilitation group demonstrated a significant advantage in terms of rate and timing of return to productive community-based work relative to control participants. When examining only return to competitive work (and not return to school), 69% of the resource facilitation group was able to return compared with 50% of the control participants. Analyses of measures of participation in household and community activities revealed that both groups improved significantly over the 15-month study period, but no significant advantage for either group was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: This study replicates the positive impact of resource facilitation in improving productive community-based activity, including competitive employment and volunteering in the community.

Comparison of a Cognitive-Behavioral Coping Skills Group to a Peer Support Group in a Brain Injury Population.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of 2 group treatments for persons with brain injury (BI) and their caregivers in promoting perceived self-efficacy (PSE) and emotional and neurobehavioral functioning. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient BI rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N=38), including 19 with BI and 19 caregivers, participated in a BI coping skills group or a support group. INTERVENTIONS: BI coping skills is a manualized cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT). CBT was compared with a structurally equivalent support group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Brain Injury Coping Skills Questionnaire (PSE), Brief Symptom Inventory-18 ([BSI-18]; emotional distress), and Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (neurobehavioral functions). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between survivors and caregivers on the Brain Injury Coping Skills Questionnaire and BSI-18; therefore, groups were combined during final analyses. Frontal Systems Behavior Scale caregiver data were used for analysis. Both groups showed significantly improved PSE between baseline and follow-up on repeated-measures analysis of variance, with the CBT group showing greater stabilization of change. There was no significant group by time interaction on measures of neurobehavioral functions, but the CBT group showed significant improvements at 3-month follow-up. No significant effects were found on the BSI-18. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, no studies to date have been published comparing a CBT intervention with a support group in a BI population with caregiver participation. This study showed that given equivalent group structure, individuals with BI and caregivers may benefit from either type of intervention in enhancing PSE or maintaining emotional stability. However, there was a trend for individuals who received CBT to maintain the effects of improved PSE, whereas support group participants showed a trend for decline. This study offers a new conceptualization that with certain group dynamics and support, individuals with BI and caregivers may benefit similarly from either a support group or CBT intervention. However, because our sample did not include individuals in clinically significant emotional distress, we cannot rule out the possibility that those with more significant challenges in PSE or emotional functions may show greater benefits with a CBT group.

A Combined Interventional Approach to Train Interview Skills in Autistic Transition-Age Youth.

BACKGROUND: The job interview can be challenging for autistic adolescents considering the required social communication skills. Further, having decreased awareness of personal strengths may make it difficult to advocate for oneself to a future employer. The purpose of the current pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to examine the preliminary efficacy and feasibility of a combined interventional approach using: the Virtual Interview Tool for Autistic Transition-Age Youth (VIT-TAY) and Kessler Foundation Strength Identification and Expression (KF-STRIDE). METHOD: Twenty autistic transition-age youth (TAY) were randomly assigned to two groups: an intervention group (n = 10) that received 9 h of VIT-TAY (interviewing practice with a virtual human), and three lessons of KF-STRIDE (positive psychology intervention to learn and discuss one's personal character strengths) and a services-as-usual (SAU) group (n = 10). The primary outcome was measured using a video-recorded mock job interview performed at pre- and post-test, which was rated by blinded assessors. Secondary outcomes included self-reports of job interview skill, interview anxiety, work readiness and recent job search behavior. RESULTS: Paired samples t-tests revealed significant differences between pre- and post-test in the intervention group (but not the control group) on the mock interview total score (p = 0.02, d = 0.76) and self-reported job interview skills total score (p = 0.02, d = 0.75). The intervention group (but not the control group) had improvements in work-readiness (p = 0.06, d = 0.53) and job search behavior (p = 0.07, d = 0.52) that were characterized by medium effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that combining VIT-TAY with KF-STRIDE leads to improvements in performance-based and self-reported job interview skills.

Prism Adaptation Treatment for Right-Sided and Left-Sided Spatial Neglect: A Retrospective Case-Matched Study.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of prism adaptation treatment (PAT) between patients with right- and left-sided spatial neglect (SN). Design: Retrospective case-matched design. Setting: Inpatient rehabilitation hospitals and facilities. Participants: A total of 118 participants were selected from a clinical dataset of 4256 patients from multiple facilities across the United States. Patients with right-sided SN (median age: 71.0 [63.5-78.5] years; 47.5% female; 84.8% stroke, 10.1% traumatic/nontraumatic brain injury) were matched 1:1 with patients with left-sided SN (median age: 70.0 [63.0-78.0] years; 49.2% female; 86.4% stroke, 11.8% traumatic/nontraumatic brain injury) based on age, neglect severity, overall functional ability at admission, and number of PAT sessions completed during their hospital stay. Intervention: Prism adaptation treatment. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes were pre-post change on the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Secondary outcomes were whether the minimal clinically important difference was achieved for pre-post change on the FIM. Results: We found greater KF-NAP gain for patients with right-sided SN than those with left-sided SN (Z = 2.38, P=.018). We found no differences between patients with right-sided and left-sided SN for Total FIM gain (Z=-0.204, P=.838), Motor FIM gain (Z=-0.331, P=.741), or Cognitive FIM gain (Z=-0.191, P=.849). Conclusions: Our findings suggest PAT is a viable treatment for patients with right-sided SN just as it is for patients with left-sided SN. Therefore, we suggest prioritizing PAT within the inpatient rehabilitation setting as a treatment to improve SN symptoms regardless of brain lesion side.

Traumatic Brain Injury in Indiana's Correctional System: Prevalence and Recidivism.

This article identified rates of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and recidivism among people incarcerated or exiting incarceration in Indiana using data from different sectors of the incarcerated population. This article was a collaboration between the rehabilitation hospital of Indiana and both the Indiana Department of Correction (IDOC) and the problem-solving courts of Marion County, resulting in two distinct screening samples. Participants in the IDOC sample (N = 2,791) were screened over a period of 2 years and 4 months. Participants in the specialty courts sample (N = 189) were screened between August and October 2016. The rates of moderate-to-severe TBI in the samples were highly variable and ranged from 13% to 86%, higher than in the general population. Recidivism rates for those with TBI were significantly higher than among participants without TBI at 6 and 12 months postrelease. Formerly incarcerated people from the IDOC sample reporting a moderate-to-severe TBI were nearly two times more likely to return to incarceration within 1 year of release.

Impacts of Prism Adaptation Treatment on Spatial Neglect and Rehabilitation Outcome: Dosage Matters.

We examined whether number of prism adaptation treatment (PAT) sessions in regular clinical practice would predict spatial neglect (SN) improvement and rehabilitation outcomes. We reviewed clinical records from 16 U.S. rehabilitation hospitals where neurological patients were assessed for SN using the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) and if SN was detected, and may have received PAT. Multiple linear regression was used to predict CBS Change (indicating SN improvement) in 520 patients who received PAT while considering age, sex, diagnosis, time post diagnosis, CBS at baseline, neglected side of space, and length of stay. Another set of regression models including the same variables and adding Function Independent Measure (FIM®) at admission was used to predict FIM Gains (indicating rehabilitation outcomes) in 1720 patients receiving PAT or not. We found that greater number of PAT sessions predicted greater CBS Change, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe neglect. Number of PAT sessions also positively correlated with Total FIM, Motor FIM, and Cognitive FIM Gains regardless of SN severity classification at baseline. Furthermore, number of PAT sessions predicted CBS Change and FIM Gains among patients completing ≤8 PAT sessions but not among patients with ≥8 sessions, who however, showed greater CBS Change with increased PAT frequency (i.e., fewer days between two consecutive sessions). Receiving more once-daily PAT sessions predicted greater improvement in SN and rehabilitation outcomes. Receiving PAT at a higher frequency for 8 or more sessions predicted better SN improvement. Thus, dosage matters. The study provides practice-based evidence that PAT is appropriate for inpatient rehabilitation.

Prospective randomized controlled trial of resource facilitation on community participation and vocational outcome following brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of resource facilitation (RF) on return to work, participation in home and community activities, and depression. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two people with acquired brain injury (mean age = 43 years; mean education = 13.3 years). DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled trial of RF compared with standard care. All participants received standard follow-up services, but participants in the RF group were also assigned a resource facilitator to assist them in returning to work. RESULTS: Participation increased significantly for both groups (F = 60.65, P < .0001), but the interaction between groups and time demonstrated greater improvement for the RF group relative to controls (F = 9.11, P < .007). Also, 64% of the RF group was employed at follow-up compared with 36% of the control group (Wald-Wolfkowitz z = -3.277, P < .0001). No significant differences were found between groups on measures of depression. CONCLUSION: Resource facilitation services that have a clear focus on return to work may have a substantial impact on participation and unemployment after brain injury.

Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Significant Others' Perceptions of Information Given About the Nature and Possible Consequences of Brain Injury: Analysis of a National Survey.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: An online survey was developed to assess how well individuals with brain injuries and family/friends of those with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (significant others) felt they were informed about the nature and consequences of brain injury. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 117 significant others completed the survey. They were primarily female (84.6%), white (94.9%), and well educated (81.2%). A total of 149 individuals with brain injuries completed the survey and again were primarily female (63.8%), white (88.2%), and well educated (82.9%). RESULTS: More than half of the significant other respondents indicated that they were not provided enough information about TBI (53.5%). Up to 53.8% of the respondents with TBI felt that they were not provided enough information, with 43% reporting dissatisfaction with services. Female survivors and those with mild brain injuries were significantly more likely to feel that they were not provided sufficient rehabilitation or information. Increased satisfaction with services was correlated with decreased time since injury (r = -0.165, p = .049). Qualitative analysis revealed key themes about prognostic information and the adequacy of discharge planning and resources. IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: Given that more than half of all surveyed indicated that they were not well-informed about brain injury and its possible effects, it is evident that case managers and their teams need to be aware of and invested in their efforts to educate both individuals with brain injuries and their significant others (family and friends) about both the nature and consequences of brain injury. Specific recommendations for practice are included.