Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 187, 2018 02 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29439670

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is now a renewed interest in cancer vaccines. Patients responding to immune checkpoint blockade usually bear tumors that are heavily infiltrated by T cells and express a high load of neoantigens, indicating that the immune system is involved in the therapeutic effect of these agents; this finding strongly supports the use of cancer vaccine strategies. Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is a low grade, incurable disease featuring an abnormal proliferation of Immunoglobulin (Ig)-producing malignant cells. Asymptomatic patients are currently managed by a "watchful waiting" approach, as available therapies provide no survival advantage if started before symptoms develop. Idiotypic determinants of a lymphoma surface Ig, formed by the interaction of the variable regions of heavy and light chains, can be used as a tumor-specific marker and effective vaccination using idiotypes was demonstrated in a positive controlled phase III trial. METHODS: These variable region genes can be cloned and used as a DNA vaccine, a delivery system holding tremendous potential for streamlining vaccine production. To increase vaccination potency, we are targeting antigen-presenting cells (APCs) by fusing the antigen with a sequence encoding a chemokine (MIP-3α), which binds an endocytic surface receptor on APCs. Asymptomatic phase LPL is an excellent model to test our vaccine since patients have not received chemotherapeutics that interfere with innate immune function and have low tumor burden. We are evaluating the safety of this next-generation DNA vaccine in a first-in-human clinical trial currently enrolling asymptomatic LPL patients. To elucidate the mode of action of this vaccine, we will assess its ability to generate tumor-specific immune responses and examine changes in the immune profile of both the peripheral blood and bone marrow. DISCUSSION: This vaccine could shift the current paradigm of clinical management for patients with asymptomatic LPL and inform development of other personalized approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01209871; registered on September 24, 2010.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Activa/métodos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Vacunas de ADN/uso terapéutico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Antígenos/genética , Antígenos/inmunología , Antígenos/metabolismo , Quimiocina CCL20/genética , Quimiocina CCL20/inmunología , Quimiocina CCL20/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Vacunas de ADN/inmunología , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/inmunología , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/patología
2.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 6874, 2024 Aug 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39128904

RESUMEN

Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) is an incurable low-grade lymphoma with no standard therapy. Nine asymptomatic patients treated with a first-in-human, neoantigen DNA vaccine experienced no dose limiting toxicities (primary endpoint, NCT01209871). All patients achieve stable disease or better, with one minor response, and median time to progression of 72+ months. Post-vaccine single-cell transcriptomics reveal dichotomous antitumor responses, with reduced tumor B-cells (tracked by unique B cell receptor) and their survival pathways, but no change in clonal plasma cells. Downregulation of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II molecules and paradoxical upregulation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) by the latter suggest resistance mechanisms. Vaccine therapy activates and expands bone marrow T-cell clonotypes, and functional neoantigen-specific responses (secondary endpoint), but not co-inhibitory pathways or Treg, and reduces protumoral signaling by myeloid cells, suggesting favorable perturbation of the tumor immune microenvironment. Future strategies may require combinations of vaccines with agents targeting plasma cell subpopulations, or blockade of IGF-1 signaling or myeloid cell checkpoints.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström , Humanos , Masculino , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/inmunología , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/terapia , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/genética , Anciano , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Vacunas de ADN/inmunología , Vacunas de ADN/uso terapéutico , Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Linfocitos B/inmunología
3.
J Immunother Cancer ; 9(5)2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34021033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has demonstrated robust efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients. Tumor antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DCs) are believed to optimally activate antigen-specific T lymphocytes. We hypothesized that the combined transfer of TIL, containing a melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) specific population, with MART-1-pulsed DC will result in enhanced proliferation and prolonged survival of transferred MART-1 specific T cells in vivo ultimately leading to improved clinical responses. DESIGN: We tested the combination of TIL and DC in a phase II clinical trial of patients with advanced stage IV melanoma. HLA-A0201 patients whose early TIL cultures demonstrated reactivity to MART-1 peptide were randomly assigned to receive TIL alone or TIL +DC pulsed with MART-1 peptide. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the persistence of MART-1 TIL in the two arms. Secondary endpoints were to evaluate clinical response and survival. RESULTS: Ten patients were given TIL alone while eight patients received TIL+DC vaccine. Infused MART-1 reactive CD8+ TIL were tracked in the blood over time by flow cytometry and results show good persistence in both arms, with no difference in the persistence of MART-1 between the two arms. The objective response rate was 30% (3/10) in the TIL arm and 50% (4/8) in the TIL+DC arm. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TIL +DC showed no difference in the persistence of MART-1 TIL compared with TIL therapy alone. Although more patients showed a clinical response to TIL+DC therapy, this study was not powered to resolve differences between groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00338377.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Células Dendríticas/trasplante , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Depleción Linfocítica , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/trasplante , Melanoma/terapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Linfocitos T/trasplante , Adolescente , Adulto , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Depleción Linfocítica/efectos adversos , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/inmunología , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/metabolismo , Antígeno MART-1/inmunología , Antígeno MART-1/metabolismo , Masculino , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/metabolismo , Melanoma/secundario , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA