RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of human acellular dermal matrices (HADMs) in breast reconstruction has become routine practice for many reconstructive surgeons. Comparative studies between 2 more common iterations of human acellular dermis are scarce. Our study evaluated reconstructive outcomes of cryopreserved and prehydrated HADMs in comparative fashion. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 369 consecutive tissue expander breast reconstructions performed by 2 board-certified plastic surgeons whose practice focuses on breast reconstruction. Data were collected independently by 2 reviewers, and a comparative analysis for statistical significance of outcomes was performed using the Fisher exact test, 2-tailed independent t tests, and regression analysis where appropriate. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period, 255 patients (369 breasts) underwent breast reconstruction utilizing either cryopreserved or prehydrated HADM. Of the total, 136 breasts received cryopreserved and 233 breasts received prehydrated HADMs. The total complication rates for cryopreserved and prehydrated HADMs were 19.1% and 19.3% (P = 1.0), respectively. Additional complication rates were calculated for flap necrosis (8.1% vs 9.0%, P = 0.849), infection requiring intravenous antibiotics (10.3% vs 5.2%, P = 0.09), hematoma (2.9% vs 1.3%, P = 0.431), seroma (2.2% vs 1.0%, P = 1.0), expander exposure/dehiscence (5.9% vs 6.4%, P = 1.0), and number of breasts requiring autologous reconstruction after a complication (4.4% vs 6.4%, P = 0.491). On regression analysis, HADM type was not an independent risk factor for any complication subtype. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that there are no significant differences in complication rates between cryopreserved and prehydrated HADMs.
Asunto(s)
Dermis Acelular , Colágeno , Criopreservación , Mamoplastia/métodos , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Expansión de Tejido , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Mamoplastia/instrumentación , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are many products approved for aesthetic soft tissue augmentation. Despite this abundance, there is limited objective data regarding safety, longevity, and complication rates. Instead, most reports rely on subjective measures to report volume changes and outcomes, making product comparison difficult. OBJECTIVES: The authors developed and validated a mathematical model to prospectively calculate and analyze three-dimensional (3D) volumetric changes associated with nasolabial fold augmentation based on human acellular dermis. METHODS: Seven consecutive patients were included in this prospective review. The patients underwent nasolabial fold treatment with BellaDerm (Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Edison, NJ), administered by a single surgeon. 3D photographs were obtained and analyzed with a novel mathematical model to determine absolute volumetric changes and objective longevity. RESULTS: Mean preoperative nasolabial fold volume was 0.17 mL. The mean one-, three-, and six-month postoperative fill volumes were 0.35, 0.19, and 0.07 mL, respectively. Fill volumes and contour changes returned to baseline by 24 weeks postoperatively in the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The mathematical model utilized in this study provided prospective and objective data regarding longevity and volumetric changes associated with nasolabial fold augmentation. The analysis demonstrated minimal objective filler permanence beyond six months, with peak volume enhancement between one and three months. Adoption of objective 3D mathematical metrics into the assessment of soft tissue filler outcomes is critical to obtaining more accurate product-to-product comparisons.
Asunto(s)
Surco Nasolabial/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Surco Nasolabial/anatomía & histología , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Compression therapy is the mainstay of treatment for patients with venous ulcer disease. There exists a lack of certainty as to the safety of compression therapy in patients with congestive heart failure. METHODS: A retrospective review of 95 patients with the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (systolic, diastolic, or combined), who underwent compression therapy at the wound care center of a large teaching hospital between January 2013 and June 2019, was performed. Patient outcomes including mortality, weight gain, admission for heart failure decompensation, and requirement for diuretic dose increase were compared to the general congestive heart failure population as well as to the registry data. RESULTS: In the compression cohort, with a mean compression period of 310 days, seven patients (7.3%) were admitted for congestive heart failure exacerbation and six (6.3%) underwent diuretic dosage increase. Two patients (2.1%) died during the compression period. These endpoints were not significantly higher than within the general congestive heart failure population. CONCLUSIONS: Compression therapy appears safe amongst patients with stable congestive heart failure.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Úlcera Varicosa , Estudios de Cohortes , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalización , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Úlcera Varicosa/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Human acellular dermal matrix has become an increasingly used adjunct to traditional submuscular tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction, but there is no strong consensus regarding complication outcomes. This study stratified outcomes based on a meta-analysis of complications. METHODS: A query of the MEDLINE database for articles on human acellular dermal matrix and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction yielded 901 citations. Two levels of screening identified 48 relevant studies. The DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was used to perform the meta-analysis. Risk ratios and pooled complication rates were calculated for each outcome of interest. RESULTS: Nineteen studies reporting human acellular dermal matrix (n = 2037) and 35 reporting submuscular outcomes (n = 12,847) were used to estimate complication rates. Rates were generally higher in acellular dermis patients: total complications, 15.4 versus 14.0 percent; seroma, 4.8 versus 3.5 percent; infection, 5.3 versus 4.7 percent; and flap necrosis, 6.9 versus 4.9 percent. Six studies reporting both acellular dermis and submuscular outcomes were used to estimate relative risks. There was an increased risk of total complications (relative risk, 2.05; 95 percent CI, 1.55 to 2.70), seroma (relative risk, 2.73; 95 percent CI, 1.67 to 4.46), infection (relative risk, 2.47; 95 percent CI, 1.71 to 3.57), and reconstructive failure (relative risk, 2.80; 95 percent CI, 1.76 to 4.45) in acellular dermis patients. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis suggests that the use of human acellular dermal matrix increases complication rates vis-à-vis submuscular expander/implant reconstruction. This must be weighed against its reported advantages in enhancing cosmesis and ameliorating contracture. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : Therapeutic, III.