RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To collect real-world data to demonstrate the safety and performance of Arrowg+ard Blue® /Arrowg+ard Blue Plus® (AGB/AGB+) central venous catheters (CVCs). METHODS: This observational, retrospective study involved patients who required AGB/AGB+ CVCs at designated general hospitals in USA (22), UK (19) and Germany (2). Data were extracted from electronic medical records. There were no specific inclusion/exclusion criteria. Primary endpoint was successful treatment without an adverse event (AE). Secondary endpoint was rate of AEs. RESULTS: In total, 384 cases were included from 43 centres and most patients (74%) were >35 years of age. A success rate of 99%, and an overall AE rate of 0.8% were observed. Moreover, the overall infection rate was lower than typically reported for standard catheters. In addition, power injection of contrast media was successful in all 51 cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates the AGB/AGB+ CVCs perform as intended with a high success rate and few AEs. Further large-scale, controlled studies are required to confirm our findings.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Humanos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Anciano , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adolescente , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Historically, intraosseous (IO) vascular access devices cleared to market by the US FDA have been restricted to 24-h use. An observational study was conducted to determine the safety of IO access for a period up to 48 h in adult volunteers. METHODS: A 2-arm randomized, stratified, parallel assignment, prospective interventional study was conducted at ICON Early Phase Services in San Antonio, Texas, United States. Study subjects were adult volunteers who were healthy or with a history of mild to moderate renal disease and/or controlled diabetes. Subjects were randomized to receive IO access (Arrow EZ-IO Vascular Access System, Teleflex Medical Incorporated, Morrisville, NC, USA) in the proximal humerus or the proximal tibia and maintain the indwelling catheter for 48 h. Subjects were monitored for the entire dwell time. A culture specimen was drawn from the indwelling catheter tip before removal and insertion site x-rays were taken. RESULTS: 121 subjects were randomized: 79 healthy, 39 with diabetes, and three with diabetes and renal insufficiency. The mean catheter dwell time was 48.0 ± 0.2 h. Overall first attempt success rate was 98.4%. Infusion pain was the most commonly reported adverse event. There were no serious complications or unanticipated adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known study examining the safety of IO access over a 48-h dwell time. The study corroborates the literature findings, demonstrates device safety, and provides evidence supporting the extended indication for a dwell time to 48 h in adult patients. IO placement and infusion best practices/guidelines were confirmed or established.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Tibia , Adulto , Humanos , Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Infusiones Intraóseas/efectos adversos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report clinical performance and longitudinal assessment of hemodialysis adequacy with the Arrow-Clark VectorFlow catheter, a symmetrical-tip device with a distal lumen configuration designed to reduce platelet shear stress and catheter thrombosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We prospectively enrolled patients who required de novo placement of a chronic tunneled catheter for hemodialysis or exchange of a dysfunctional catheter as part of an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocol. Catheter patency, Kt/V, mean blood-flow (Qb), and pump pressures were obtained at baseline and at monthly intervals to 90 days. RESULTS: Forty-six subjects were enrolled into the study. During the 90-day observation period, maximum blood-flow rate averaged 355-398 mL/minute; mean Qb averaged 333-392 mL/minute. Mean Kt/V values were consistently ≥1.5. Dwell-time was 15-114 days, for a total of 2997 catheter days (mean 71.4 days). Excluding patients who died during the study and those receiving surgical access, overall intervention-free catheter patency rate was 94.9%, 92.2% and 88.8% at days 30, 60, 90, respectively. There were no acute complications. During the follow-up period, three patients developed complications (6.5%). Two catheter infections occurred (0.7/1000 catheter days) and one catheter malfunctioned; a rate of 1.0/ 1000 catheter days for all complications. CONCLUSIONS: The VectorFlow catheter produced safe, effective hemodialysis with Kt/V ≥1.5. A single catheter occlusion occurred and a low rate of infection was seen. Results support the hypothesis that the VectorFlow design reduces thrombogenic risk during clinical performance.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Anciano , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Obstrucción del Catéter/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Texas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Studies show that kinetic therapy (KT) reduces the incidence of early pneumonia and other complications, and shortens hospital length of stay. Using decision-tree software in a retrospective analysis of one investigator's clinical data, the authors sought to determine if KT is cost effective for preventing nosocomial pneumonia and other complications in patients with critical illnesses. This analysis revealed that KT yielded 202 fewer infections per 1,000 patients suffering trauma--a cost savings of $6,695 per patient compared with standard care. On this basis, they conclude that prophylactic KT is cost effective and should be considered for at-risk patients in the critical care setting.
Asunto(s)
Lechos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Drenaje Postural/economía , Drenaje Postural/métodos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Infección Hospitalaria/complicaciones , Árboles de Decisión , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Tiempo de Internación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are often placed to resuscitate unstable emergency department (ED) patients. In an observational study, we assessed intraosseous (IO) vascular access in the hospital, and compared results to published experiences with CVC placement. â© METHODS: Patients who would typically receive a CVC were considered for the study. Vascular access was gained using a powered IO device. Data collection included placement success, placement time, ease-of-use, satisfaction with flow rates, complications and subsequent CVC placement. â© RESULTS: A total of 105 cases were studied from six centers. Mean age was 48.0±28.0 years and 53% were men; 85% of the patients were medical cases, and 53% were in cardiac/respiratory arrest. Of those, 48% returned to spontaneous circulation. A total of 94% of placements were successful on the first attempt. Mean time to IO access was 103.6±96.2 seconds. There was one serious complication - a lower extremity compartment syndrome. IO access costs $100/patient.â© CONCLUSIONS: The data revealed faster and more successful IO catheter placement than reported for CVCs, few complications and high user satisfaction. For simple placements, cost savings for IO access vs. CVCs was $195/procedure. If 20% of the 3.5 million CVCs placed annually were replaced with IO catheters, cost savings could approach $650 million/year. We conclude that IO access in place of CVCs delivers high value in terms of being a safe, fast and effective mode of vascular access for patients in the hospital setting, with potentially substantial cost savings. These data indicate that IO access is a cost effective and viable alternative to problematic CVC lines.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/economía , Infusiones Intraóseas/economía , Infusiones Intravenosas/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Niño , Preescolar , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Lactante , Infusiones Intraóseas/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intraóseas/instrumentación , Infusiones Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intravenosas/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Bone marrow sampling remains essential in the evaluation of hematopoietic and many non-hematopoietic disorders. One common limitation to these procedures is the discomfort experienced by patients. To address whether a Powered biopsy system could reduce discomfort while providing equivalent or better results, we performed a randomized trial in adult volunteers. Twenty-six subjects underwent bilateral biopsies with each device. Core samples were obtained in 66.7% of Manual insertions; 100% of Powered insertions (P=0.002). Initial mean biopsy core lengths were 11.1±4.5 mm for the Manual device; 17.0±6.8 mm for the Powered device (P<0.005). Pathology assessment for the Manual device showed a mean length of 6.1±5.6 mm, width of 1.0±0.7 mm, and volume of 11.0±10.8 mm(3). Powered device measurements were mean length of 15.3±6.1 mm, width of 2.0±0.3 mm, and volume of 49.1±21.5 mm(3) (P<0.001). The mean time to core ejection was 86 seconds for Manual device; 47 seconds for the Powered device (P<0.001). The mean second look overall pain score was 33.3 for the Manual device; 20.9 for the Powered (P=0.039). We conclude that the Powered biopsy device produces superior sized specimens, with less overall pain, in less time.
RESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to compare a novel bone marrow device with the standard marrow needle in a prospective, randomized study in a teaching hospital employing hematologists-in-training. The new device, the OnControl Bone Marrow (OBM) Biopsy System, utilizes a battery-powered drill to insert the needle. Fifty-four bone marrows (27 standard and 27 OBM) were performed by 11 fellows under the observation and supervision of 3 attending hematologists and 1 research technologist. The primary endpoint of the study, the mean length of the marrow biopsy specimens, a surrogate for marrow quality, was determined by a pathologist in a blinded manner. The mean length of the marrow biopsy specimens was significantly longer (56%) for the OBM group (15.3 mm) than for the standard bone marrow (SBM) group (9.8 mm), P<0.003. An objectively determined secondary endpoint; mean procedure time, skin-to-skin; also favored the OBM group (175 s) versus the SBM group (292 s), P<0.007. Several subjective secondary endpoints also favored the OBM group. Only minor adverse events were encountered in the OBM and SBM study groups. It was concluded that bone marrow procedures (BMPs) performed by hematologists-in-training were significantly faster and superior in quality when performed with the OBM compared to the SBM. These data suggest that the OBM may be considered a new standard of care for adult hematology patients. OBM also appears to be a superior method for training hematology fellows.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Intraosseous (IO) blood is frequently used to establish a blood chemistry profile in critically ill patients. Questions remain regarding the reliability of IO blood for laboratory analysis and established criteria regarding the amount of marrow/blood to waste before taking an IO sample are not available. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate IO-derived blood for routine laboratory blood tests needed in the care of critically ill patients and to determine the amount of marrow/blood to waste before drawing blood from the IO space for laboratory analysis. DESIGN: Blood samples were drawn from peripheral veins of 10 volunteers. Within 5 minutes, 2 IO blood samples were obtained; one following 2 mL of waste and another following 6 mL of waste. Samples were analyzed for complete blood count and chemistry profile. Values were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients. Levels of significance were determined using the t distribution. Mean values for the draws were calculated and compared, with the intravenous blood sample serving as a control for the IO samples. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between intravenous and IO samples for red blood cell counts and hemoglobin and hematocrit levels but not for white blood cell counts and platelet counts. There was a significant correlation between intravenous and IO samples for glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, chloride, total protein, and albumin concentrations but not for sodium, potassium, CO(2), and calcium levels. CONCLUSIONS: When venous blood cannot be accessed, IO blood aspirate may serve as a reliable alternate, especially for hemoglobin and hematocrit levels and most analytes in a basic blood chemistry profile. Exceptions are CO(2) levels and platelet counts, which may be lower, and white blood cell counts, which may appear elevated.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Químico de la Sangre/métodos , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/métodos , Médula Ósea/irrigación sanguínea , Pruebas Hematológicas/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Recently, a new FDA-cleared battery powered bone marrow biopsy system was developed to allow operators access to the bone marrow space quickly and efficiently. A pre-clinical evaluation of the device (OnControl, Vidacare Corporation, San Antonio, TX, USA) on anesthetized pigs was conducted, in addition to a clinical evaluation in hematology clinic patients requiring a bone marrow biopsy. Twenty-six samples were collected from the swine model. No cellular artifact or thermal damage was reported in any of the samples obtained. For the clinical evaluation of the device, 16 patients were recruited. Mean time from needle contact with skin to needle removal was 38.5 +/- 13.94 seconds. No complications were reported. In this study, the manual and powered samples were equivalent in specimen quality. In the patients evaluated, the device was safe, easy to use and the mean procedural time was significantly faster than previously reported with a manual technique.