Introduction to the National Cancer Imaging Translational Accelerator (NCITA): a UK-wide infrastructure for multicentre clinical translation of cancer imaging biomarkers.

The National Cancer Imaging Translational Accelerator (NCITA) is creating a UK national coordinated infrastructure for accelerated translation of imaging biomarkers for clinical use. Through the development of standardised protocols, data integration tools and ongoing training programmes, NCITA provides a unique scalable infrastructure for imaging biomarker qualification using multicentre clinical studies.

A phase I pharmacokinetic and safety analysis of epothilone folate (BMS-753493), a folate receptor targeted chemotherapeutic agent in humans with advanced solid tumors.

Background The folate receptor alpha is selectively over-expressed in a number of human cancers. BMS-753493 is a folate conjugate of the epothilone analog BMS-748285 that was designed to selectively target folate receptor expressing cancer cells. Methods BMS-753493 was investigated in two parallel multi-institutional first-in-human phase I/IIa studies in patients with advanced solid tumors. In Study 1, patients were treated on a schedule of once daily dosing of BMS-753493 administered on Days 1, 4, 8 and 11 every 21 days with a starting dose of 5 mg daily and in Study 2, patients were treated once daily on Days 1-4 every 21 days, with a starting dose of 2.5 mg daily. Results A total of 65 patients were treated across the two studies. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 26 mg in Study 1 and 15 mg in Study 2. Fatigue, transaminitis, gastrointestinal toxicity, and mucositis were dose-limiting toxicities. One patient in Study 2 developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome attributed to BMS-753493. Plasma exposures of both the conjugated and free epothilone increased in a dose related fashion in both studies and the half-life of the conjugated epothilone was 0.2-0.6 h across dose levels. No objective tumor responses were seen in either study. Conclusions BMS-753493 was generally tolerable and toxicities known to be associated with epothilone class of anticancer agents were common, although peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia appear to have been less frequent and less severe as compared to epothilones. Antitumor activity was not demonstrated and further development of BMS-753493 has been discontinued.

Tumour cell retention of rucaparib, sustained PARP inhibition and efficacy of weekly as well as daily schedules.

BACKGROUND: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) exploit tumour-specific defects in homologous recombination DNA repair and continuous dosing is most efficacious. Early clinical trial data with rucaparib suggested that it caused sustained PARP inhibition. Here we investigate the mechanism of this durable inhibition and potential exploitation. METHODS: Uptake and retention of rucaparib and persistence of PARP inhibition were determined by radiochemical and immunological assays in human cancer cell lines. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rucaparib were determined in tumour-bearing mice and the efficacy of different schedules of rucaparib was determined in mice bearing homologous recombination DNA repair-defective tumours. RESULTS: Rucaparib accumulation is carrier mediated (Km=8.4±1.2 µM, Vmax=469±22 pmol per 10(6) cells per 10 min), reaching steady-state levels >10 times higher than the extracellular concentration within 30 min. Rucaparib is retained in cells and inhibits PARP ≥50% for ≥72 h days after a 30-min pulse of 400 nM. In Capan-1 tumour-bearing mice rucaparib accumulated and was retained in the tumours, and PARP was inhibited for 7 days following a single dose of 10 mg kg(-1) i.p or 150 mg kg(-1) p.o. by 70% and 90%, respectively. Weekly dosing of 150 mg kg(-1) p.o once a week was as effective as 10 mg kg(-1) i.p daily for five days every week for 6 weeks in delaying Capan-1 tumour growth. CONCLUSIONS: Rucaparib accumulates and is retained in tumour cells and inhibits PARP for long periods such that weekly schedules have equivalent anticancer activity to daily dosing in a pre-clinical model, suggesting that clinical evaluation of alternative schedules of rucaparib should be considered.

Central nervous system penetration and enhancement of temozolomide activity in childhood medulloblastoma models by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor AG-014699.

BACKGROUND: Temozolomide shows activity against medulloblastoma, the most common malignant paediatric brain tumour. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors enhance temozolomide activity in extracranial adult and paediatric human malignancies. METHODS: We assessed the effect of AG-014699, a clinically active PARP inhibitor, on temozolomide-induced growth inhibition in human medulloblastoma models. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and toxicity assays were performed in tumour-bearing mice. RESULTS: Sensitivity to temozolomide in vitro was consistent with methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status; MGMT(+) MMR(+) D384Med cells (temozolomide GI(50)=220 µM), representative of most primary medulloblastomas, were sensitised fourfold by AG-014699; MGMT⁻ MMR(+) D425Med cells were hypersensitive (GI(50)=9 µM) and not sensitised by AG-014699, whereas MGMT(+) MMR⁻ temozolomide-resistant D283Med cells (GI50=807 µM) were sensitised 20-fold. In xenograft models, co-administration of AG-014699 produced an increase in temozolomide-induced tumour growth delay in D384Med xenografts. Consistent with the in vitro data, temozolomide caused complete tumour regressions of D425Med xenografts, whereas D283Med xenografts were relatively resistant. AG-014699 was not toxic, accumulated and reduced PARP activity ≥75% in xenograft and brain tissues. CONCLUSION: We show for the first time central nervous system penetration and inhibition of brain PARP activity by AG-014699. Taken together with our in vitro chemosensitisation and toxicity data, these findings support further evaluation of the clinical potential of AG-014699-temozolomide combinations in intra-cranial malignancies.

The role of folate receptor alpha (FRalpha) in the response of malignant pleural mesothelioma to pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of choice for malignant pleural mesothelioma is chemotherapy with pemetrexed and platinum, but the clinical outcome is poor. This study investigates the response to pemetrexed in a panel of eight mesothelioma cell lines and the clinical outcome for patients treated with pemetrexed in relation to folate receptor alpha (FRalpha). METHODS: Cell lines were treated with pemetrexed to determine the concentration that reduced growth to 50% (GI(50)). FRalpha expression was determined by western blotting and that of FRalpha, reduced folate carrier (RFC) and proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT) by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry for FRalpha was carried out on 62 paraffin-embedded samples of mesothelioma from patients who were subsequently treated with pemetrexed. RESULTS: A wide range of GI(50) values was obtained for the cell lines, H2452 cells being the most sensitive (GI(50) 22 nM) and RS5 cells having a GI(50) value greater than 10 microM. No FRalpha protein was detected in any cell line, and there was no relationship between sensitivity and expression of folate transporters. FRalpha was detected in 39% of tumour samples, generally in a small percentage of cells. There was no correlation between the presence of FRalpha and the outcome of pemetrexed treatment, and no significant difference between histological subtypes. CONCLUSION: Response to treatment with pemetrexed does not depend on the presence of FRalpha.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 polymorphisms, expression and activity in selected human tumour cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is a DNA-binding enzyme activated by DNA breaks and involved in DNA repair and other cellular processes. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity can be higher in cancer than in adjacent normal tissue, but cancer predisposition is reported to be greater in individuals with a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) V762A (T2444C) in the catalytic domain that reduces PARP-1 activity. METHODS: To resolve these divergent observations, we determined PARP-1 polymorphisms, PARP-1 protein expression and activity in a panel of 19 solid and haematological, adult and paediatric human cancer cell lines. RESULTS: There was a wide variation in PARP activity in the cell line panel (coefficient of variation, CV=103%), with the lowest and the highest activity being 2460 pmol PAR/10(6) (HS-5 cells) and 85 750 pmol PAR/10(6) (NGP cells). Lower variation (CV=32%) was observed in PARP-1 protein expression with the lowest expression being 2.0 ng microg(-1) (HS-5 cells) and the highest being 7.1 ng microg(-1) (ML-1 cells). The mean activity in the cancer cells was 45-fold higher than the mean activity in normal human lymphocytes and the PARP-1 protein levels were 23-fold higher. CONCLUSIONS: Surprisingly, there was no significant correlation between PARP activity and PARP-1 protein level or the investigated polymorphisms, T2444C and CA.

Seminoma metastatic to the prostate resulting in a rectovesical fistula.

We report an unusual presentation of metastatic seminoma within the prostate gland. Histological diagnosis was obtained using trans-rectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsy. The patient developed a rectovesical fistula after ten weeks of chemotherapy, which healed following a complete radiological response to treatment

Defective homologous recombination in human cancers.

Homologous recombination (HR) is a process by which DNA double strand breaks are repaired through the alignment of homologous sequences of DNA. Interest continues to increase in HR pathway function due to the development of new therapeutic agents which selectively exploit DNA damage repair pathways. Currently the most promising of these new agents are inhibitors of poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP). The response of cancers known to be deficient in HR, due to BRCA1 or 2 mutations has been demonstrated, and a wider use of PARP inhibitors in cancers with mutations of other HR pathway genes has been suggested. With ongoing clinical studies into the use of PARP inhibitors, further understanding of the HR pathway, to allow patient selection by cancer biology, is now essential. Numerous studies have investigated individual aberrations of genes involved in the HR pathway. Here we collate this evidence to give an overview of the role of the HR pathway in human cancer.

PARP inhibitors and cancer therapy - early results and potential applications.

Polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are emerging as an exciting new class of agents for treating cancer. There is pre-clinical evidence for their use to potentiate both chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy, and also as single agents. This paper discusses the early clinical work published showing their use in combination with temozolomide in malignant melanoma, and in familial (BRCA-related) cancers.

Phase I study of temozolomide plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced malignant melanoma and associated in vitro investigations.

The purpose of this study was to determine activity of temozolomide combined with paclitaxel or epothilone B in vitro, and to investigate the combination of temozolomide with paclitaxel in a Phase I clinical trial. Melanoma cell lines A375P and DX3 were treated with temozolomide and either paclitaxel or epothilone B. Combination indices were determined to assess the degree of synergism. In a clinical study, 21 patients with malignant melanoma were treated with increasing doses of temozolomide (orally, days 1-5), in combination with a fixed dose of paclitaxel (i.v. infusion day 1), followed by dose escalation of the latter drug. Cycles of treatment were repeated every 3 weeks. Pharmacokinetics of both agents were determined on day 1, with temozolomide pharmacokinetics also assessed on day 5. All three compounds were active against the melanoma cell lines, with epothilone B being the most potent. There was a strong degree of synergism between temozolomide and either paclitaxel or epothilone B. In the clinical study, no pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between temozolomide and paclitaxel. Dose escalation of both drugs to clinically active doses was possible, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed at 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) temozolomide and 225 mg m(-2) day(-1) paclitaxel. There were two partial responses out of 15 evaluable patients. One patient remains alive and symptom-free at 4 years after treatment. Temozolomide and paclitaxel may be administered safely at clinically effective doses. Further evaluation of these combinations in melanoma is warranted.