Pediatric subspecialty telemedicine use from the patient and provider perspective.

BACKGROUND: To characterize telemedicine use among pediatric subspecialties with respect to clinical uses of telemedicine, provider experience, and patient perceptions during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods study of telemedicine visits across pediatric endocrinology, nephrology, orthopedic surgery, and rheumatology at a large children's hospital. We used deductive analysis to review observational data from 40 video visits. Providers and patients/caregivers were surveyed around areas of satisfaction and communication. RESULTS: We found adaptations of telemedicine including shared-screen use and provider-guided parent procedures among others. All providers felt that it was safest for their patients to conduct visits by video, and 72.7% reported completing some component of a clinical exam. Patients rated the areas of being respected by the clinical staff/provider and showing care and concern highly, and the mean overall satisfaction was 86.7 ± 19.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine has been used to deliver care to pediatric patients during the pandemic, and we found that patients were satisfied with the telemedicine visits during this stressful time and that providers were able to innovate during visits. Telemedicine is a tool that can be successfully adapted to patient and provider needs, but further studies are needed to fully explore its integration in pediatric subspecialty care. IMPACT: This study describes telemedicine use at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic from both a provider and patient perspective, in four different pediatric subspecialties. Prior to COVID-19, pediatric telehealth landscape analysis suggested that many pediatric specialty practices had pilot telehealth programs, but there are few published studies evaluating telemedicine performance through the simultaneous patient and provider experience as part of standard care. We describe novel uses and adaptations of telemedicine during a time of rapid deployment in pediatric specialty care.

Development of Autoimmune Diseases Among Children With Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome.

Importance: Epidemiologic studies indicate a high rate of autoimmune conditions among patients with obsessive-complusive disorder and other psychiatric conditions. Furthering the understanding of the inflammatory diatheses of psychiatric conditions may open doors to new treatment paradigms for psychiatric disorders. Objectives: To evaluate whether pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS) is associated with an inflammatory diathesis by assessing signs of immune activation and vasculopathy during a psychiatric symptom exacerbation (flare), estimating the risk of developing arthritis and other autoimmune diseases, and characterizing subtypes of arthritis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used longitudinal clinical data on 193 consecutive patients with PANS followed up within the Stanford Immune Behavioral Health Clinic from September 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Medical records were reviewed, and a predefined set of immune markers that were measured during a flare and the features and imaging findings of arthritis and other autoimmune diseases were collected. Immune activation markers included (1) autoimmunity signs (antinuclear antibody, antihistone antibody, antithyroglobulin antibody, C1q binding assay, and complement levels [C3 and C4]); (2) immune dysregulation or inflammation signs (leukopenia, thrombocytosis, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate); and (3) vasculopathy signs (livedo reticularis, periungual redness and swelling, abnormally prominent onychodermal band, palatal petechiae, high von Willebrand factor antigen, and high d-dimer). Last, the cumulative risk of developing arthritis and autoimmune diseases was estimated using product limit (Kaplan-Meier) survival probability. Results: The study included data from 193 children (112 boys [58.0%]) who had PANS at a mean (SD) age of 7.5 (3.5) years. They were followed up for a mean (SD) of 4.0 (2.1) years. Among those tested for immune activation markers, 54.2% (97 of 179) had nonspecific markers of autoimmunity, 12.0% (22 of 184) had nonspecific signs of immune dysregulation or inflammation, and 35.8% (69 of 193) had signs of vasculopathy. By 14 years of age, the estimated cumulative incidence of arthritis was 28.3% (95% CI, 20.8%-36.3%), and the estimated cumulative incidence of another autoimmune disease was 7.5% (95% CI, 4.0%-12.4%). Novel findings in the subgroup with arthritis include joint capsule thickening (55.0% [22 of 40]), distal interphalangeal joint tenderness (81.8% [45 of 55]), and spinous process tenderness (80.0% [44 of 55]). Among the 55 patients with arthritis, the most common subtypes of arthritis included enthesitis-related arthritis (37 [67.3%]), spondyloarthritis (27 [49.1%]), and psoriatic arthritis (10 [18.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that patients with PANS show signs of immune activation and vasculopathy during psychiatric symptom flares and have an increased risk of developing arthritis and other autoimmune diseases compared with the general pediatric population. The most common arthritis subtype was enthesitis-related arthritis. These findings suggest that PANS may be part of a multisystem inflammatory condition rather than an isolated psychiatric or neuroinflammatory disorder.

The Emerging Telehealth Landscape in Pediatric Rheumatology.

This article provides an in-depth review of telemedicine and its use in pediatric rheumatology. Historical barriers to the use of telemedicine in pediatric chronic care are described, and recent policy changes that have supported the use of telemedicine are discussed. Future directions and suggestions for the evaluation of telemedicine in pediatric rheumatology care are provided with a special focus on clinical outcomes, its use in research, patient acceptability, and health equity.

Implementation Science in Pediatric Rheumatology: A Path to Health Equity.

Implementation science is the study of processes that promote reliable uptake of evidence-based practices into clinical care. The integration of implementation science and health disparities research approaches has been proposed as a method to reduce health inequity through detection, understanding, and implementation of health equity-focused interventions. In this review, we provide an argument for the study of implementation science in pediatric rheumatology in light of previously observed health disparities, present a framework for the study of health equity and implementation science in pediatric rheumatology, and propose next steps to accelerate action.

Translating research into practice-implementation recommendations for pediatric rheumatology; Proceedings of the childhood arthritis and rheumatology research alliance 2020 implementation science retreat.

The translation of research findings into clinical practice is challenging, especially fields like in pediatric rheumatology, where the evidence base is limited, there are few clinical trials, and the conditions are rare and heterogeneous. Implementation science methodologies have been shown to reduce the research- to- practice gap in other clinical settings may have similar utility in pediatric rheumatology. This paper describes the key discussion points from the inaugural Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Implementation Science retreat held in February 2020. The aim of this report is to synthesize those findings into an Implementation Science Roadmap for pediatric rheumatology research. This roadmap is based on three foundational principles: fostering curiosity and ensuring discovery, integration of research and quality improvement, and patient-centeredness. We include six key steps anchored in the principles of implementation science. Applying this roadmap will enable researchers to evaluate the full range of research activities, from the initial clinical design and evidence acquisition to the application of those findings in pediatric rheumatology clinics and direct patient care.

Telemedicine use by pediatric rheumatologists during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: To characterize various aspects of telemedicine use by pediatric rheumatology providers during the recent pandemic including provider acceptability of telehealth practices, clinical reliability, and clinical appropriateness. METHODS: An electronic survey was generated and disseminated amongst the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) listserv (n = 547). Survey items were analyzed via descriptive statistics by question. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 40.8% (n = 223) with the majority of respondents in an attending-level role. We observed that musculoskeletal components of the exam were rated as the most reliable components of a telemedicine exam and 86.5% of survey respondents reported engaging the patient or patient caregiver to help conduct the virtual exam. However, 65.7% of providers reported not being able to elicit the information needed from a telemedicine visit to make a complete clinical assessment. We also noted areas of disagreement regarding areas of patient engagement and confidentiality. We found that approximately one-third (35.8%) of those surveyed felt that their level of burnout was increased due to telemedicine. CONCLUSION: In general, providers found exam reliability (specifically around focused musculoskeletal elements) in telemedicine visits but overall felt that they were unable to generate the information needed to generate a complete clinical assessment. Additionally, there were suggestions that patient engagement and confidentiality varied during telemedicine visits when compared to in-person clinical visits. Further qualitative work is needed to fully explore telemedicine use in pediatric rheumatology.

Exploring Pediatric Tele-Rheumatology Practices During COVID-19: A Survey of the PRCOIN Network.

Healthcare providers were rapidly forced to modify the way they practiced medicine during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Many providers transitioned from seeing their patients in person to virtually using telemedicine platforms with limited training and experience using this medium. In pediatric rheumatology, this was further complicated as musculoskeletal exams typically require hands-on assessment of patients. The objective of this study was to examine the adoption of telemedicine into pediatric rheumatology practices, to assess its benefits and challenges, and to gather opinions on its continued use. A survey was sent to the lead representatives of each Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN) site to collect data about their center's experience with telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Responses were received from the majority [19/21 (90%)] of PR-COIN sites. All respondents reported transitioning from in-person to primarily virtual patient visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. All centers reported seeing both new consultations and follow-up patients over telemedicine. Most centers reported using both audio and video conferencing systems to conduct their telemedicine visits. The majority of respondents [13/19 (68%)] indicated that at least 50% of their site's providers consistently used pediatric Gait Arms Legs and Spine (pGALS) to perform active joint count assessments over telemedicine. Over half of the centers [11/19 (58%)] reported collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs), but the rate of reliably documenting clinical components varied. A few sites [7/19 (37%)] reported performing research-related activity during telemedicine visits. All centers thought that telemedicine visits were able to meet providers' needs and support their continued use when the pandemic ends. Benefits reported with telemedicine visits included convenience and continuity of care for families. Conversely, challenges included limited ability to perform physical exams and varying access to technology. Pediatric rheumatology providers were able to transition to conducting virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare providers recognize how telemedicine can enhance their practice, but challenges need to be overcome in order to ensure equitable, sustainable delivery of quality and patient-centered care.

Building a Viable Telemedicine Presence in Pediatric Rheumatology.

This article describes the present state of telemedicine in pediatric rheumatology. Specifically, it addresses the potential use of telemedicine to increase patient-provider access as well as its potential clinical limitations. The work also briefly describes the next steps with respect to telemedicine research as well as some new research findings specifically for pediatric rheumatology.