Bladder Neck Surgery is not Routinely Needed to Achieve Urinary Continence in Patients with Primary Epispadias.

BACKGROUND: This study aims at investigating the continence outcome in primary epispadias patients treated at a tertiary center. The authors hypothesized that additional continence procedures following primary epispadias repair is not routinely needed. METHODS: Patients treated for primary epispadias at the authors' institution between 2007 and 2019 and toilet trained, were identified from a prospective maintained database. Males underwent chordee correction, urethroplasty and glanuloplasty. Females underwent genitoplasty with reduction urethroplasty. If continence was not achieved by 4-5 years of age, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) biofeedback therapy was performed. Other continent procedures were discussed with family/patient if still incontinent. PRIMARY OUTCOME: urinary continence. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: PFM biofeedback therapy, continence surgery, hydronephrosis. Type of epispadias, age at repair and follow-up presented as median was also reported. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (29 males) were included. Twelve had penopubic epispadias, 13 glanular/penile, 4 duplicated urethra, 4 females. Median age at repair: 2 years (IQR 1-3), at follow-up: 8 years (IQR 6-10). Daytime continence: 100 % in penile/glanular; 33 % in penopubic and 75 % in duplicated urethra. Nighttime continence: respectively 92 %, 50 % and 100 %. 24 % of males were intermittently incontinent. All patients except one voided urethrally. One patient underwent bladder neck closure, ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff. One girl achieved daytime continence, 2 were intermittently incontinent, one continuously incontinent. All were enuretic. 38 % of boys and 100 % of girls had biofeedback therapy. None had hydronephrosis/renal impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Most children with primary epispadias can achieve social urinary continence spontaneously or with the support of PFM biofeedback therapy. Other continence procedures should be reserved for patients who do not attain satisfactory continence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment study - level IV.

Study protocol for clinical trial of the FIT Families multicomponent obesity intervention for African American adolescents and their caregivers: Next step from the ORBIT initiative.

INTRODUCTION: This study will test the effectiveness of FIT Families (FIT), a multicomponent family-based behavioural intervention, against a credible attention control condition, Home-Based Family Support (HBFS). This protocol paper describes the design of a randomised clinical trial testing the efficacy of the FIT intervention. The protocol will assess the efficacy of FIT to improve health status in African American adolescents with obesity (AAAO) and their primary caregivers on primary (percent body fat) and secondary (physical activity, metabolic control, weight loss) outcomes and its cost-effectiveness. METHODS: 180 youth/caregiver dyads are randomised into FIT or HBFS, stratified by age, gender and baseline per cent overweight. The proposed study follows a two condition (FIT, HBFS) by four assessment time points. Tests will be conducted to identify potential relationship of baseline demographic and clinical variables to our dependent variables and see whether they are balanced between groups. It is hypothesised that youth/caregiver dyads randomised to FIT will show significantly greater reductions in percent body fat over a 12-month follow-up period compared with AAAO receiving HBFS. Preliminary findings are expected by November 2023. ETHICS: This protocol received IRB approval from the Medical University of South Carolina (Pro00106021; see 'MUSC IRB 106021 Main Approval.doxc' in online supplemental materials). DISSEMINATION: Dissemination activities will include summary documents designed for distribution to the broader medical community/family audience and submission of manuscripts, based on study results, to relevant peer-reviewed scientific high-impact journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04974554.