Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Matern Child Health J ; 25(8): 1326-1335, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33945079

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In low-resource settings, a social autopsy tool has been proposed to measure the effect of delays in access to healthcare on deaths, complementing verbal autopsy questionnaires routinely used to determine cause of death. This study estimates the contribution of various delays in maternal healthcare to subsequent neonatal mortality using a social autopsy case-control design. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Sierra Leone site (Makeni City and surrounding rural areas). Cases were neonatal deaths in the catchment area, and controls were sex- and area-matched living neonates. Odds ratios for maternal barriers to care and neonatal death were estimated, and stratified models examined this association by neonatal age and medical complications. RESULTS: Of 53 neonatal deaths, 26.4% of mothers experienced at least one delay during pregnancy or delivery compared to 46.9% of mothers of stillbirths and 18.6% of control mothers. The most commonly reported delay among neonatal deaths was receiving care at the facility (18.9%). Experiencing any barrier was weakly associated (OR 1.68, CI 0.77, 3.67) and a delay in receiving care at the facility was strongly associated (OR 19.15, CI 3.90, 94.19) with neonatal death. DISCUSSION: Delays in healthcare are associated with neonatal death, particularly delays experienced at the healthcare facility. Heterogeneity exists in the prevalence of specific delays, which has implications for local public health policy. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Asunto(s)
Salud Infantil , Mortalidad Infantil , Autopsia , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Causas de Muerte , Niño , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Sierra Leona/epidemiología
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(4): 693-698, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28333794

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe delivery management of singleton stillbirths in a population-based, multicenter case series. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 611 women with singleton stillbirths at 20 weeks of gestation or greater from March 2006 to September 2008. Medical and delivery information was abstracted from medical records. Both antepartum and intrapartum stillbirths were included; these were analyzed both together and separately. The primary outcome was mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included induction of labor and indications for cesarean delivery. Indications for cesarean delivery were classified as obstetric (abnormal fetal heart tracing before intrapartum demise, abruption, coagulopathy, uterine rupture, placenta previa, or labor dystocia) or nonobstetric (patient request, repeat cesarean delivery, or not documented). RESULTS: Of the 611 total cases of stillbirth, 93 (15.2%) underwent cesarean delivery, including 43.0% (46/107) of women with prior cesarean delivery and 9.3% (47/504) of women without prior cesarean delivery. No documented obstetric indication was evident for 38.3% (18/47) of primary and 78.3% (36/46) of repeat cesarean deliveries. Labor induction resulted in vaginal delivery for 98.5% (321/326) of women without prior cesarean delivery and 91.1% (41/45) of women with a history of prior cesarean delivery, including two women who had uterine rupture. Among women with a history of prior cesarean delivery who had spontaneous labor, 74.1% (20/27) delivered vaginally, with no cases of uterine rupture. CONCLUSION: Women with stillbirth usually delivered vaginally regardless of whether labor was spontaneous or induced or whether they had a prior cesarean delivery. However, 15% underwent cesarean delivery, often without a documented obstetric indication.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico , Distocia/cirugía , Trabajo de Parto Inducido , Mortinato/epidemiología , Rotura Uterina/cirugía , Adulto , Cesárea/métodos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Demografía , Distocia/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Rotura Uterina/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA