RESUMEN
Antibody incompatible transplantation (AIT) may be an only option for highly sensitized patients. Severe form of early antibody mediated rejection (AMR) adversely affects graft survival after AIT. The aim of this study was to identify individuals at risk of AMR. We analyzed 213 living donor AITs performed at our center. Among 120 ABOi, 58 HLAi and 35 DSA + FCXM-negative cases, the rates of early AMR were 6%, 31%, and 9%, respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis for graft loss, early AMR had a HR of 3.28 (p < 0.001). The HLAi group had worse death-censored graft survival (p = 0.003). In the HLAi group, Patients with aggressive variant AMR (AAMR) had greater percentage of C3d complement fixing DSA, higher baseline class I and total DSA MFI levels and B-cell FCXM RMF. C1q and C3d complement fixing DSA and strong positivity of baseline B- or T-cell FXCM as predictors of AAMR had 100% sensitivity. Early AMR is of significant clinical concern in AIT as it results in poor graft survival and is not well described in literature. An aggressive variant is characterized by massive rise in DSA levels at rejection. Baseline DSA, C1q, and C3d and baseline FCXM values can be used to risk-stratify candidates for AIT.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Isoanticuerpos , Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Humanos , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Isoanticuerpos/inmunología , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Complemento C1q/inmunología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complemento C3d/inmunología , Anciano , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO/inmunología , Incompatibilidad de Grupos Sanguíneos/inmunología , Antígenos HLA/inmunología , Análisis MultivarianteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with the combination of radical surgical excision and intestinal transplantation in patients with recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) not amenable to further cytoreductive surgery (CRS). BACKGROUND: CRS and heated intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy are effective treatments for many patients with PMP. In patients with extensive small bowel involvement or nonresectable recurrence, disease progression results in small bowel obstruction, nutritional failure, and fistulation, with resulting abdominal wall failure. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2022, patients with PMP who had a nutritional failure and were not suitable for further CRS underwent radical debulking and intestinal transplantation at our centre. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent radical exenteration of affected intra-abdominal organs and transplantation adapted according to the individual case. Eight patients had isolated small bowel transplantation and 7 patients underwent modified multivisceral transplantation. In addition, in 7 patients with significant abdominal wall tumor involvement, a full-thickness vascularized abdominal wall transplant was performed. Two of the 15 patients died within 90 days due to surgically related complications. Actuarial 1-year and 5-year patient survivals were 79% and 55%, respectively. The majority of the patients had significant improvement in quality of life after transplantation. Progression/recurrence of disease was detected in 91% of patients followed up for more than 6 months. CONCLUSION: Intestinal/multivisceral transplantation enables a more radical approach to the management of PMP than can be achieved with conventional surgical methods and is suitable for patients for whom there is no conventional surgical option. This complex surgical intervention requires the combined skills of both peritoneal malignancy and transplant teams.
Asunto(s)
Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Seudomixoma Peritoneal , Humanos , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/cirugía , Seudomixoma Peritoneal/patología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Peritoneo/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia CombinadaRESUMEN
Simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation, in uremic women with insulin-dependent diabetes, increases the chance of a successful pregnancy and minimizes the risk to infants. The aim of this study was to document pregnancy and explore the challenges in this cohort of women. Retrospective analysis of women who underwent pancreas transplantation between January 1, 1998 and 8 January, 2019 was conducted. Seventeen pregnancies were identified in 13 women. Mean transplant-to-pregnancy interval was 4.6 years (range, 1.1-10.2 years). Eleven pregnancies resulted in live birth (65%), and six (35%) ended in miscarriage/fetal loss at a median gestational age of 8.5 weeks. Mean gestational age at delivery was 34.9 weeks (SD ±3 weeks). Preeclampsia and C-section rates were 77% and 67%, respectively. Adverse fetal and graft outcomes were observed in 100% of unplanned pregnancies, compared to 10% of planned pregnancies (P < .001). One kidney allograft was lost during pregnancy; one pancreas and two kidney allografts were lost within 3 years of pregnancy. This is a high-risk group for grafts and offspring. Pre-pregnancy planning is vital. A multidisciplinary approach by obstetric and transplant teams is important pre-pregnancy, antenatally, and peripartum. This is the largest published series of pregnancies in SPK recipients from a single center.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Lactante , Páncreas , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Living kidney donors are at risk of long-term end-stage renal disease, and obesity is an independent risk factor. In our centre, predonation counselling of obese donors concentrates on lifestyle modifications, particularly weight loss and exercise. Whether these recommendations have a sustainable effect after donation remains unknown. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all donors who proceeded to donation between 2012 and 2016. Donors' body mass index (BMI) was compared between predefined time points using matched pair analysis. Among 303 donors included, 15% were obese at initial assessment. Obese donors were observed to lose weight by the time of donation (mean BMI difference 1.32 kg/m2 , P < 0.001), but bounced back to their initial weight at one-year postdonation (mean BMI difference + 1.47 kg/m2 , P < 0.001), which was maintained at two-year postdonation. While 71% of obese donors lost weight by the time of donation, 56% of them gained that weight back at one year. Our findings underline the success of predonation counselling on lifestyle modification in highly motivated obese donors, although additional strategies are required to sustain weight loss. The impact of weight gain on long-term risk needs further evaluation. Living donor programmes should provide continued support with lifestyle modifications after donation.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Consejo , Humanos , Nefrectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
Background: Variation in donation after circulatory death (DCD) organ recovery and liver transplant practices exist among transplant centers. This study aimed to evaluate these practices among centers in the United States. Methods: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data were accessed to identify centers that performed liver transplantation in 2021 and 2022. Surveys were sent to transplant centers that consistently performed ≥5 DCD liver transplants per year. Results: DCD liver transplants were performed by 95 centers (65.1%) of the 146 liver transplant centers in the United States. Survey results were recorded from 42 centers that consistently performed ≥5 DCD liver transplants per year, with a 59.5% response rate. Withdrawal-to-asystole and agonal time were used to define donor warm ischemia time (WIT) in 16% and 84% centers, respectively. Fifty-six percent of the centers did not use oxygen saturation to define donor WIT. Systolic blood pressure cutoffs used to define agonal time varied between 50 and 80 mm Hg, donor age cutoffs ranged between 55 and 75 y, and cold ischemia times varied between 4 and 10 h. Seventy-six percent of centers used normothermic machine perfusion for DCD liver transplantation. Conclusions: This study highlights the wide variation in use, recovery, and definition of donor WIT. Using national data to rigorously define best practices will encourage greater utilization of this important donor resource.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) or hepatitis C virus (HCV+) liver grafts are underused among transplant centers in the United States. The study aimed to evaluate organ utilization and outcomes of liver grafts from DCD donors with HCV infection. METHODS: National registry and local center data of all deceased donor liver transplants performed between November 2016 and December 2021 were analyzed. All transplants were divided into 4 groups: HCV- DCD, HCV- donation after brain death [DBD], HCV+ DCD, and HCV+ DBD. The outcome of interest was 1-y graft survival. RESULTS: Out of 146 liver transplant centers in the United States, liver transplants were not performed from DCD donors, HCV+ donors, and a combination of DCD and HCV+ donors by 28.7%, 27%, and 70%-72% of centers, respectively. In multivariate analysis, increasing center acceptance ratio was associated with increased utilization of liver grafts from DCD HCV- and DCD HCV antibody-positive nucleic acid test negative donors. Nationally, 1-y graft survival of HCV- DCD liver grafts was lower compared with other groups (89% versus 92% HCV+ DCD versus 93% HCV+ DBD versus 92% HCV- DBD, log rank Pâ <â 0.0001). There was no difference in 1-y graft survival among groups locally. CONCLUSIONS: Liver grafts from HCV+ DCD donors have 1-y patient and graft survival comparable with DBD liver grafts from donors with or without HCV infection. These results encourage the widespread use of liver grafts from DCD and HCV+ donors and standardization of practice in DCD donation to expand the donor pool without compromising short-term outcomes.