RESUMEN
Purpose Work ability is commonly measured with self-assessments, in the form of indices or single items. The validity of these assessments lies in their predictive ability. Prospective studies have reported associations between work ability and sickness absence and disability pension, but few examined why these associations exist. Several correlates of work ability have been reported, but their mechanistic role is largely unknown. This study aims to investigate to what extent individual's own prognosis of work ability predicts labor market participation and whether this was due to individual characteristics and/or working conditions. Methods Self-assessed prognosis of work ability, 2 years from "now," in the Stockholm Public Health Questionnaire (2002-2003) was linked to national registers on sickness absence, disability pension and unemployment up to year 2010. Effects were studied with Cox regression models. Results Of a total of 12,064 individuals 1466 reported poor work ability. There were 299 cases of disability pension, 1466 long-term sickness absence cases and 765 long-term unemployed during follow-up. Poor work ability increased the risk of long-term sickness absence (HR 2.25, CI 95 % 1.97-2.56), disability pension (HR 5.19, CI 95 % 4.07-6.62), and long-term unemployment (HR 2.18, CI 95 % 1.83-2.60). These associations were partially explained by baseline health conditions, physical and (less strongly) psychosocial aspects of working conditions. Conclusions Self-assessed poor ability predicted future long-term sickness absence, disability pension and long-term unemployment. Self-assessed poor work ability seems to be an indicator of future labor market exclusion of different kinds, and can be used in public health monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Predicción , Pensiones/estadística & datos numéricos , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Desempleo/tendencias , Absentismo , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The study was part of the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study and aimed to quantify the burden arising from low back pain (LBP) due to occupational exposure to ergonomic risk factors. METHODS: Exposure prevalence was based on occupation distribution; estimates of relative risk came from a meta-analysis of relevant published literature. The work-related burden was estimated as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Estimates were made for each of 21 world regions and 187 countries, separately for 1990 and 2010 using consistent methods. RESULTS: Worldwide, LBP arising from ergonomic exposures at work was estimated to cause 21.7 million DALYs in 2010. The overall population attributable fraction was 26%, varying considerably with age, sex and region. 62% of LBP DALYs were in males-the largest numbers were in persons aged 35-55 years. The highest relative risk (3.7) was in the agricultural sector. The largest number of DALYs occurred in East Asia and South Asia, but on a per capita basis the biggest burden was in Oceania. There was a 22% increase in overall LBP DALYs arising from occupational exposures between 1990 and 2010 due to population growth; rates dropped by 14% over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: LBP arising from ergonomic exposures at work is an important cause of disability. There is a need for improved information on exposure distributions and relative risks, particularly in developing countries.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Agricultura/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Asia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oceanía/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Distribución por Sexo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The objective of this pilot study was to identify if notebook accessories (ergonomic chair, desktop monitor and notebook riser) combined with a wireless keyboard, mouse and participatory ergonomics training would have the greatest impact on reducing self-reported upper extremity musculoskeletal discomfort in university students. In addition to pre-post computing and health surveys, the Ecological Momentary Assessment was used to capture change in discomfort over time using a personal digital assistant (PDA) as the e-diary. The PDA was programmed with a survey containing 45 questions. Four groups of university students were randomised to either intervention (three external computer accessories) or to control. Participants reported less discomfort with the ergonomic chair and notebook riser based on the pre-post survey data and the e-diary/PDA ANOVA analysis. However, the PDA data, adjusted for the effect of hours per day of computer use, showed no benefit of the chair and limited benefit from the riser. Statement of Relevance:University students' use of notebook computers has increased. This study found evidence of a positive effect of an adjustable chair or notebook riser when combined with ergonomic training on reducing discomfort. Daily notebook computer use of 4 h was confirmed as a risk factor. Without some form of ergonomic intervention, these students are likely to enter the workforce with poor computing habits, which places them on the road to future injuries as technology continues to play a dominant role in their lives.
Asunto(s)
Computadoras de Mano , Registros Médicos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Estudiantes , Universidades , Interfaz Usuario-Computador , Adolescente , Análisis de Varianza , Boston , Periféricos de Computador , Ergonomía , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Dolor/etiología , Postura/fisiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Extremidad Superior , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The aims of this study were to quantify and describe the variations in respiratory symptoms and diagnosis prevalence across regions of the world according to national income. In 2002 and 2003, the World Health Organization implemented the World Health Survey (WHS), which used a standardised survey instrument to compile comprehensive baseline information on health and healthcare expenditure. We analysed the WHS data to assess the global patterns of self-reported wheeze and doctor-diagnosed asthma, two commonly reported measures of respiratory health. In total there were 308,218 participants with complete records, from 64 countries. The weighted mean age of the survey population was 43 yrs. Global prevalence of current wheezing symptoms ranged from 2.4% in Vietnam to 24% in Brazil; the prevalence of diagnosed asthma ranged from 1.8% in Vietnam to 32.8% in Australia. Overall, the prevalence of symptoms and diagnosis showed a U-shaped pattern with the largest prevalence reported in low- and high-income countries. The smallest prevalence was consistently found in middle-income countries. These WHS analyses have provided global prevalence estimates of wheeze and doctor-diagnosed asthma using data gathered simultaneously and consistently across six continents. These findings support the need for continued global respiratory illness surveillance for disease prevention, health policy and management.
Asunto(s)
Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Salud Global , Humanos , Renta , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Ruidos Respiratorios , Clase Social , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: A study of whether occupational physical load predicted subsequent chronic shoulder disorders. METHODS: A comprehensive national survey was carried out among a representative sample (n = 7217) of the Finnish adult population in 1977-80. Twenty years later, 1286 participants from the previous survey were invited to be re-examined, and 909 (71%) participated. After excluding those with diagnosed shoulder disorders at baseline, 883 subjects were available for the analyses. RESULTS: At follow-up, a physician diagnosed chronic shoulder disorders in 63 subjects (7%) using a standardised protocol. Work exposure to repetitive movements and vibration at baseline increased the risk of shoulder disorder: adjusted ORs 2.3 (95% CI 1.3 to 4.1) and 2.5 (1.2 to 5.2), respectively. Exposure to several physical factors increased the risk further, the adjusted OR was nearly 4 for at least three exposures. The adverse effects of physical work were seen even among those older than 75 years at follow-up. The statistically significant risk factors differed between genders: for men vibration and repetitive movements, and for women lifting heavy loads and working in awkward postures. Age and body mass index modified the effects of the physical exposures. The results remained similar after excluding those with any shoulder pain at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study in a general population showing that occupational physical loading increases the risk of a subsequent clinical shoulder disorder and the effects seem to be long-term. Early preventive measures at the workplace may have long-lasting health benefits for the shoulder.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Profesionales/rehabilitación , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Dolor de Hombro/fisiopatología , Dolor de Hombro/rehabilitaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe the risk of work injury by socioeconomic status (SES) in hospital workers, and to assess whether SES gradient in injury risk is explained by differences in psychosocial, ergonomic or organisational factors at work. METHODS: Workforce rosters and Occupational Safety and Health Administration injury logs for a 5-year period were obtained from two hospitals in Massachusetts. Job titles were classified into five SES strata on the basis of educational requirements and responsibilities: administrators, professionals, semiprofessionals, skilled and semiskilled workers. 13 selected psychosocial, ergonomic and organisational exposures were assigned to the hospital jobs through the national O*NET database. Rates of injury were analysed as frequency records using the Poisson regression, with job title as the unit of analysis. The risk of injury was modelled using SES alone, each exposure variable alone and then each exposure variable in combination with SES. RESULTS: An overall annual injury rate of 7.2 per 100 full-time workers was estimated for the two hospitals combined. All SES strata except professionals showed a significant excess risk of injury compared with the highest SES category (administrators); the risk was highest among semiskilled workers (RR 5.3, p<0.001), followed by nurses (RR 3.7, p<0.001), semiprofessionals (RR 2.9, p = 0.006) and skilled workers (RR 2.6, p = 0.01). The risk of injury was significantly associated with each exposure considered except pause frequency. When workplace exposures were introduced in the regression model together with SES, four remained significant predictors of the risk of injury (decision latitude, supervisor support, force exertion and temperature extremes), whereas the RR related to SES was strongly reduced in all strata, except professionals. CONCLUSIONS: A strong gradient in the risk of injury by SES was reported in a sample population of hospital workers, which was greatly attenuated by adjusting for psychosocial and ergonomic workplace exposures, indicating that a large proportion of that gradient can be explained by differences in working conditions.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Recolección de Datos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Escolaridad , Empleo , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral , Características de la Residencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In a cross-sectional study of musculoskeletal disorders, women employed in highly repetitive manual work (garment assembly) were found to have approximately double the risk observed in a population with more varied tasks (hospital work). It was suspected that this estimate might be biased if garment workers with musculoskeletal pain were more likely than others to leave employment. METHODS: Retrospective information on date of first onset of symptoms and years employed to date of pain onset, or to survey date (whichever was earlier), was used to calculate age and calendar period-specific rates of onset, conditional on remaining employed until the survey. RESULTS: These rates, and the relative risk for garment work, increased over the 20-year period preceding the year of the survey. The trend was not explained by age or length of employment, or by any known changes in work demands that might have caused a true increase in incidence density. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of longitudinal cohort data, alternative explanations for these results cannot be excluded. However, with specified assumptions, the most plausible appears to be a healthy worker selection effect acting differentially between high and low exposure groups. This effect would have caused the smallest bias in the prevalence in the year immediately before the survey, and a better estimate of the true relative risk would be approximately five. Where date of onset has been obtained, this method may be used in other cross-sectional studies to estimate and reduce the magnitude of selection bias in a survivor population, if longitudinal data cannot be collected.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/epidemiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Dolor/epidemiología , Sesgo , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos de Traumas Acumulados/etiología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Efecto del Trabajador Sano , Humanos , Incidencia , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Dolor/etiología , Prevalencia , TextilesRESUMEN
AIMS: To estimate the one year cumulative incidence and persistence of upper extremity (UE) soft tissue disorders, in a fixed cohort of automotive manufacturing workers, and to quantify their associations with ergonomic exposures. METHODS: At baseline and at follow up, cases of UE musculoskeletal disorders were determined by interviewer administered questionnaire and standardised physical examination of the upper extremities. The interview obtained new data on psychosocial strain and updated the medical and work histories. An index of exposure to ergonomic stressors, obtained at baseline interview, was the primary independent variable. Cumulative incidence and persistence of UE disorders (defined both by symptoms and by physical examination plus symptoms) were analysed in relation to baseline ergonomic exposures, adjusting for other covariates. The incidence of new disorders was modelled using multivariate proportional hazards regression among workers who were not cases in the first year and the prevalence on both occasions was modelled by repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: A total of 820 workers (69% of eligible cohort members) was examined. Follow up varied slightly by department group but not by baseline exposure level or other characteristics. Among the non-cases at baseline, the cumulative incidence of UE disorders was 14% by symptoms and 12% by symptoms plus examination findings. These rates increased with index of physical exposures primarily among subjects who had the same jobs at follow up as at baseline. Increased exposure during follow up increased risk of incidence. The persistence of UE disorders from baseline to follow up examination was nearly 60% and somewhat associated with baseline exposure score. CONCLUSIONS: These longitudinal results confirm the previous cross sectional associations of UE musculoskeletal disorders with exposure to combined ergonomic stressors. The exposure-response relation was similar for incident cases defined by symptoms alone and those confirmed by physical examination.
Asunto(s)
Automóviles , Ergonomía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Brazo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Psicofísica , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Estrés Psicológico/psicologíaRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective nested case-control study. OBJECTIVES: To identify occupational factors related to low back pain, and to study how interactions between psychosocial and physical factors, and between work-related and leisure-related factors affect low back pain in women and men. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A cohort of 484 subjects drawn from the general population was examined in 1969 and 1993, with a focus on occupational working conditions and musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: Information about the physical and psychosocial working conditions and low back pain during the period 1970 to 1993 was collected retrospectively. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated for different potential risk factors. RESULTS: During the 24-year period, 46% of the subjects became patients with low back pain. Among women, heavy physical workload, sedentary work, smoking, and the combination of whole-body vibrations and low influence over work conditions were associated with an excess risk of low back pain. Among men, excess risk for low back pain was seen in heavy physical workload, sedentary work, high perceived load outside work, and the combination of poor social relations and overtime. CONCLUSIONS: Factors at work were seen to be risk indicators for low back pain among both genders. Low influence over work conditions among women and poor social relations at work among men, in combination with other factors, seem to be of high relevance for the occurrence of low back pain.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/fisiopatología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Actitud , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/fisiopatología , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of an ergonomic training program on workstation changes and on the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among video display unit (VDU) users at a large university. METHODS: A pretest-posttest design with a reference group was used with random allocation of administrative and geographic units. In each group, the measurements involved direct observation of the workstations, a self-administered questionnaire, and a physical examination. The measurements were performed 2 weeks before and 6 months after the training in parallel in both groups. The study population was composed of 627 workers (81% of those eligible). RESULTS: The prevalence of all 3 of the postural stressors evaluated decreased in the experimental group after the training. In the reference group, 2 of the 3 stressors decreased in frequency but to a less extent. Some of these beneficial changes were more frequent in workers under 40 years of age. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders decreased among the workers under 40 years of age in the experimental group, from 29% to 13% determined by questionnaire and from 19% to 3% determined by physical examination. In other groups, there was no significant change in the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in postural stressors occurred more frequently in the experimental group, and these beneficial changes tended to be more frequent in workers under 40 years of age. Improvements in musculoskeletal disorders occurred in the experimental group among the workers under 40 years of age.
Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Grabación en Video , Adulto , Humanos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Postura , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
In this cross-sectional investigation of female garment workers the prevalence of soft tissue disorders of the hands and arms was studied. The findings were compared with the prevalence of disorders in a group of female hospital employees not required to use repetitive hand motion. One hundred and eighty-eight garment workers and 76 hospital employees were surveyed by questionnaire and physical examination. The prevalences of persistent shoulder, wrist, and hand pain were significantly greater among the garment workers (rate ratio 2, 4, and 3, respectively). In both groups about 60% of the persistent hand pain was consistent with carpal tunnel syndrome (rate ratio 3). These associations held when the comparisons were stratified by age and by length of employment. Workers whose native language was not English were significantly less likely to report symptoms (rate ratio 0.6). Workers in hand sewing and trimming suffered especially high prevalences of persistent pain in all upper limb sites. Stitchers had elevated rates of pain in the shoulders, wrists, and hands. Workers ironing by hand had a significant elevation in elbow pain rates. Garment assembly tasks appear to be associated with cumulative trauma of the hands and wrists; the biomechanical features of these jobs should be studied in greater detail.
Asunto(s)
Brazo , Enfermedades Óseas/etiología , Enfermedades Musculares/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Industria Textil , Adulto , Enfermedades Óseas/epidemiología , Ergonomía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Movimiento , Enfermedades Musculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , PosturaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: A case-referent study was conducted in an automobile assembly plant to evaluate the risk of shoulder disorders associated with nonneutral postures. METHODS: The cases were workers who reported shoulder pain to the plant clinic during a 10-month period and met symptom criteria (pain frequency or duration in the past year) in an interview; more than one-half also had positive findings in a physical examination. The referents were randomly selected workers who were free of shoulder disorders according to the clinic records, the interview, and the physical examination. For each of the 79 cases and 124 referents, 1 job was analyzed for postural and biomechanical demands by an analyst blinded to the case-referent status. RESULTS: Forty-one percent of the subjects flexed or abducted the right arm "severely" (above 90 degrees) during the job cycle, and 35% did so with the left arm. The peak torques at the shoulder were rather low. Shoulder disorders were associated with severe flexion or abduction of the left [odds ratio (OR) 3.2, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.5-6.5] and the right (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.8) shoulder. The risk increased as the proportion of the work cycle exposed increased. The relationships were similar for the cases with and without physical findings. Use of hand-held tools increased the risk and also modified the association with postural stress, although the joint exposure distributions limited full analysis of this finding. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the conclusion that severe shoulder flexion or abduction, especially for 10% or more of the work cycle, is predictive of chronic or recurrent shoulder disorders.
Asunto(s)
Automóviles , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Postura , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Adulto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ergonomía , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Perfil Laboral , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Profesionales/economía , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
A case-referent study was conducted in an automobile assembly plant to evaluate the health effect of trunk postures, such as bending and twisting, that deviate from anatomically neutral. Cases of back disorders were all those of workers who reported back pain to the medical department in a ten-month period and met the severity criteria of an interview. The referents were randomly selected workers free of back pain according to medical department records, an interview, and an examination. For each of the final 95 cases and 124 referents, the job was analyzed for postural and lifting requirements with a video recording and software analysis system by analysts blinded to the case/referent status. Back disorders were associated with mild trunk flexion [odds ratio (OR) 4.9, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.4-17.4], severe trunk flexion (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.6-20.4), and trunk twist or lateral bend (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.6-21.4). The risk increased with exposure to multiple postures and increasing duration of exposure.
Asunto(s)
Automóviles , Dolor de Espalda/etiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Postura , Distribución Aleatoria , Factores de Riesgo , Grabación de Cinta de VideoRESUMEN
This study examined biomechanical stressor variables (physical work exposures) in relation to job title, gender, and back-belt status in 134 retail store workers. The principal concerns were to quantitatively describe physical work exposures and to determine the degrees to which these quantitative variables correlated with job title and with the use of back belts. An additional objective was to assess the inter-rater reliability of the observation method. The systematic observation method employed was based on a modification of the PATH (Postures, Activities, Tools, and Handling) measurement method. Chi-square analysis indicated that the frequencies of bent or twisted postures followed the pattern of unloaders > stockers > department managers. For weight handled per lift, lower, or carry, the pattern was unloaders > department managers > stockers. The mean lifting frequencies per hour were 35.9 for department managers, 48.8 for stockers, and 137.4 for unloaders. Back-belt-wearing percentages were higher for unloaders (63%) compared with stockers (48%) and department managers (25%). Back-belt-wearing workers had higher levels of biomechanical stressor variables, including arm position, twisting, weight handled, and number of lifts per hour. Kappa statistics ranged from 0.5 to 0.63, a level of adequate or good reliability beyond chance. The method employed in this study is applicable in studies that require only fairly crude distinctions among biomechanical stressor variables. Nevertheless, this level of distinction may be sufficient when implementing intervention studies and control strategies for many material-handling-intensive jobs.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Espalda/prevención & control , Ergonomía , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Postura , Equipos de Seguridad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , West VirginiaRESUMEN
This paper examines the interrater reliability of a quantitative observational method of assessing non-neutral postures required by work tasks. Two observers independently evaluated 70 jobs in an automotive manufacturing facility, using a procedure that included observations of 18 postures of the upper extremities and back. Interrater reliability was evaluated using percent agreement, kappa, intraclass correlation coefficients and generalized linear mixed modeling. Interrater agreement ranged from 26% for right shoulder elevation to 99 for left wrist flexion, but agreement was at best moderate when using kappa. Percent agreement is an inadequate measure, because it does not account for chance, and can lead to inflated measures of reliability. The use of more appropriate statistical methods may lead to greater insight into sources of variability in reliability and validity studies and may help to develop more effective ergonomic exposure assessment methods. Interrater reliability was acceptable for some of the postural observations in this study.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Postura , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Análisis de Varianza , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Exposición Profesional/prevención & controlRESUMEN
While observing six simulated construction tasks in the field, trained analysts recorded arm, trunk and leg postures categorically with two fixed-interval observational protocols. Observations were compared to measurements obtained with an electronic postural assessment system coupled with video analysis. The electronic postural assessment system consisted of electronic inclinometers to measure upper arm posture, knee flexion and trunk flexion, coveralls to house the inclinometer wiring, and an eletrogoniometric system to measure trunk lateral bending and twisting. Video analysis included frozen-frame analysis that corresponded to the moment of observation and simulated real-time analysis. Measurements were made on five male participants who each performed three tasks representative of construction laborers' work. Agreement among the observational and reference methods was generally high, although significant differences in measured frequency of exposure existed for knee flexion, trunk lateral bending and trunk twisting. The results suggest that, under appropriate conditions, discrete observations can be used to obtain reasonably accurate estimates of exposure frequency for broad categories of certain body postures.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Observación , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Postura , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Humanos , Pierna/fisiología , Masculino , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Hombro/fisiología , Tórax/fisiología , Grabación de Cinta de VideoRESUMEN
A high prevalence and incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders have been reported in construction work. Unlike industrial production-line activity, construction work, as well as work in many other occupations (e.g. agriculture, mining), is non-repetitive in nature; job tasks are non-cyclic, or consist of long or irregular cycles. PATH (Posture, Activity, Tools and Handling), a work sampling-based approach, was developed to characterize the ergonomic hazards of construction and other non-repetitive work. The posture codes in the PATH method are based on the Ovako Work Posture Analysing System (OWAS), with other codes included for describing worker activity, tool use, loads handled and grasp type. For heavy highway construction, observations are stratified by construction stage and operation, using a taxonomy developed specifically for this purpose. Observers can code the physical characteristics of the job reliably after about 30 h of training. A pilot study of six construction laborers during four road construction operations suggests that laborers spend large proportions of time in nonneutral trunk postures and spend approximately 20% of their time performing manual material handling tasks. These results demonstrate how the PATH method can be used to identify specific construction operations and tasks that are ergonomically hazardous.