EAACI guidelines on environmental science for allergy and asthma: The impact of short-term exposure to outdoor air pollutants on asthma-related outcomes and recommendations for mitigation measures.

The EAACI Guidelines on the impact of short-term exposure to outdoor pollutants on asthma-related outcomes provide recommendations for prevention, patient care and mitigation in a framework supporting rational decisions for healthcare professionals and patients to individualize and improve asthma management and for policymakers and regulators as an evidence-informed reference to help setting legally binding standards and goals for outdoor air quality at international, national and local levels. The Guideline was developed using the GRADE approach and evaluated outdoor pollutants referenced in the current Air Quality Guideline of the World Health Organization as single or mixed pollutants and outdoor pesticides. Short-term exposure to all pollutants evaluated increases the risk of asthma-related adverse outcomes, especially hospital admissions and emergency department visits (moderate certainty of evidence at specific lag days). There is limited evidence for the impact of traffic-related air pollution and outdoor pesticides exposure as well as for the interventions to reduce emissions. Due to the quality of evidence, conditional recommendations were formulated for all pollutants and for the interventions reducing outdoor air pollution. Asthma management counselled by the current EAACI guidelines can improve asthma-related outcomes but global measures for clean air are needed to achieve significant impact.

The impact of outdoor pollution and extreme temperatures on asthma-related outcomes: A systematic review for the EAACI guidelines on environmental science for allergic diseases and asthma.

Air pollution is one of the biggest environmental threats for asthma. Its impact is augmented by climate change. To inform the recommendations of the EAACI Guidelines on the environmental science for allergic diseases and asthma, a systematic review (SR) evaluated the impact on asthma-related outcomes of short-term exposure to outdoor air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, O3, and CO), heavy traffic, outdoor pesticides, and extreme temperatures. Additionally, the SR evaluated the impact of the efficacy of interventions reducing outdoor pollutants. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E tools and the certainty of the evidence by using GRADE. Short-term exposure to PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 probably increases the risk of asthma-related hospital admissions (HA) and emergency department (ED) visits (moderate certainty evidence). Exposure to heavy traffic may increase HA and deteriorate asthma control (low certainty evidence). Interventions reducing outdoor pollutants may reduce asthma exacerbations (low to very low certainty evidence). Exposure to fumigants may increase the risk of new-onset asthma in agricultural workers, while exposure to 1,3-dichloropropene may increase the risk of asthma-related ED visits (low certainty evidence). Heatwaves and cold spells may increase the risk of asthma-related ED visits and HA and asthma mortality (low certainty evidence).

The impact of exposure to tobacco smoke and e-cigarettes on asthma-related outcomes: Systematic review informing the EAACI guidelines on environmental science for allergic diseases and asthma.

To inform the clinical practice guidelines' recommendations developed by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology systematic reviews (SR) assessed using GRADE on the impact of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and active smoking on the risk of new-onset asthma/recurrent wheezing (RW)/low lung function (LF), and on asthma-related outcomes. Only longitudinal studies were included, almost all on combustion cigarettes, only one assessing e-cigarettes and LF. According to the first SR (67 studies), prenatal ETS increases the risk of RW (moderate certainty evidence) and may increase the risk of new-onset asthma and of low LF (low certainty evidence). Postnatal ETS increases the risk of new-onset asthma and of RW (moderate certainty evidence) and may impact LF (low certainty evidence). Combined in utero and postnatal ETS may increase the risk of new-onset asthma (low certainty evidence) and increases the risk of RW (moderate certainty evidence). According to the second SR (24 studies), ETS increases the risk of severe asthma exacerbations and impairs asthma control and LF (moderate certainty evidence). According to the third SR (25 studies), active smoking increases the risk of severe asthma exacerbations and of suboptimal asthma control (moderate certainty evidence) and may impact asthma-related quality-of-life and LF (low certainty evidence).

The impact of indoor pollution on asthma-related outcomes: A systematic review for the EAACI guidelines on environmental science for allergic diseases and asthma.

Systematic review using GRADE of the impact of exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs), cleaning agents, mould/damp, pesticides on the risk of (i) new-onset asthma (incidence) and (ii) adverse asthma-related outcomes (impact). MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched for indoor pollutant exposure studies reporting on new-onset asthma and critical and important asthma-related outcomes. Ninety four studies were included: 11 for VOCs (7 for incidenceand 4 for impact), 25 for cleaning agents (7 for incidenceand 8 for impact), 48 for damp/mould (26 for incidence and 22 for impact) and 10 for pesticides (8 for incidence and 2 for impact). Exposure to damp/mould increases the risk of new-onset wheeze (moderate certainty evidence). Exposure to cleaning agents may be associated with a higher risk of new-onset asthma and with asthma severity (low level of certainty). Exposure to pesticides and VOCs may increase the risk of new-onset asthma (very low certainty evidence). The impact on asthma-related outcomes of all major indoor pollutants is uncertain. As the level of certainty is low or very low for most of the available evidence on the impact of indoor pollutants on asthma-related outcomes more rigorous research in the field is warranted.

Tolerance of peanuts and tree nuts in Spanish children with exclusive sensitization to lipid transfer proteins.

BACKGROUND: Allergy to peanuts and tree nuts is a common cause of food allergy in Spain, with lipid transfer proteins (LTP) being the most frequently recognized panallergen. LTP sensitization often leads to multiple food group sensitivities, resulting in overly restrictive diets that hinder patient's quality of life. This study aimed to assess the tolerance of peanuts and tree nuts (hazelnuts and walnuts) in children sensitized to LTP, potentially mitigating the need for such diets. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled individuals diagnosed with allergy to peanuts, hazelnuts, or walnuts. Data were collected from medical records, including demographics and clinical history. Allergological assessment comprised skin prick tests using commercial extracts and the nuts in question, alongside measurements of total and specific IgE to nuts and their primary molecular components. Participants showing positive LTP sensitization without sensitization to seed storage proteins underwent open oral nut challenges. RESULTS: A total of 75 individuals labeled as allergic to peanuts, 44 to hazelnuts, and 51 to walnuts were included. All of them underwent an open oral provocation test with the incriminated nut, showing a high tolerance rate. Peanut was tolerated by 98.6% of patients, 97.72% tolerated hazelnut, and 84.3% tolerated walnut. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the majority of patients allergic to peanuts, hazelnuts, or walnuts, due to LTP sensitization and lacking IgE reactivity to seed storage proteins, can tolerate these nuts. This supports the need for personalized nut tolerance assessments to avoid unnecessary dietary restrictions.

Anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5R biologics for severe asthma. Are there any differences in their effects?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective multicentre study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma receiving anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα therapies and to compare their effectiveness. METHODS: We collected and analysed results separately for anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα therapies from January 2016 until December 2021 in multidisciplinary severe asthma units. We collected demographic and clinical data, treatment with previous anti-IgE and/or anti-IL-5 agents, and comorbidities. We compared the number of exacerbations and admissions to the hospital, daily oral corticosteroid intake, pulmonary function tests, and Asthma Control Test scores before and after 12 months of therapy. 261 patients were included: 176 patients in the anti-IL-5 group and 85 in the anti-IL-5Rα group. RESULTS: Both groups led to statistically significant reductions in asthma exacerbations, hospital admissions, and visits to the Emergency Room. Although both groups showed a significant reduction in blood eosinophiliccount, we found a difference, although not significant, in the magnitude of reduction as benralizumab was able to decrease eosinophil counts to zero. Patients in the anti-IL-5 group achieved higher ACT scores after treatment, although this improvement was seen in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5Rα biologics have shown similar effectiveness despite having different mechanisms of action. The anti-IL-5 group appeared to be better than benralizumab at improving ACT scores and FEV1/FVC and at reducing the number of inhalers. Although these differences were not statistically significant, it is not clear whether they may have clinical relevance and they might highlight the need for further head-to-head studies comparing these treatments.

Global influence of dupilumab on Quality of Life in a severe asthma patient with T2 multimorbidities: a case report on atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, and eosinophilic esophagitis.

INTRODUCTION: Interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 are considered key drivers of type 2 inflammatory diseases. Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for IL-4 and IL-13, thus inhibiting signaling of both cytokines. CASE STUDY: We report a case of a patient with uncontrolled severe asthma and other T2 inflammatory diseases (atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and eosinophilic esophagitis) treated with dupilumab. RESULTS: After one year of treatment, dupilumab improved asthma control together with lung function parameters and airway inflammation. Additionally, a positive impact on quality of life (QoL), evaluated by validated questionnaires, across all the diseases was observed. CONCLUSION: In this case report, a positive and objectively measurable of global improvement on QoL across all four T2 comorbidities was observed after treatment with dupilumab, demonstrating the important role of IL-4 and IL-13 and the existence of a unifying pathological mechanism in T2 diseases.

Respiratory Diseases Associated With Organic Dust Exposure.

Organic dusts are complex bioaerosol mixtures comprised of dust and par ticulate matter of organic origin. These include components from bacteria, fungi, pollen, and viruses to fragments of animals and plants commonplace to several environmental/occupational settings encompassing agriculture/farming, grain processing, waste/recycling, textile, cotton, woodworking, bird breeding, and more. Organic dust exposures are linked to development of chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, asthma-like syndrome, byssinosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Risk factors of disease development include cumulative dust exposure, smoking, atopy, timing/duration, and nutritional factors. The immunopathogenesis predominantly involves Toll-like receptor signaling cascade, T-helper 1/T-helper 17 lymphocyte responses, neutrophil influx, and potentiation of manifestations associated with allergy. The true prevalence of airway disease directly attributed to organic dust, especially in a workplace setting, remains challenging. Diagnostic confirmation can be difficult and complicated by hesitancy from workers to seek medical care, driven by fears of potential labor-related consequence. Clinical respiratory and systemic presentations coupled with allergy testing, lung function patterns of obstructive versus restrictive disease, and radiological characteristics are typically utilized to delineate these various organic dust-associated respiratory diseases. Prevention, risk reduction, and management primarily focus on reducing exposure to the offending dust, managing symptoms, and preventing disease progression.

Spanish Consensus on Remission in Asthma (REMAS).

The concept of "remission" in asthma has been around for a long time and it has been a controversial topic. Despite the attempts of some studies to characterize this entity, the discussion continues. In the case of asthma there is still no clear definition, either in terms of its meaning or the parameters that should be included or whether it should be divided into clinical or complete remission. To help defining these controversial concepts, SEPAR has advocated the multidisciplinary working group REMAS (REMission in ASthma). Following the Delphi methodology and with the involvement of more than 120 specialists in asthma management, this group has arrived at a consensus on the definitions of remission in asthma and establishing the criteria and characteristics that will be of use in future studies evaluating the efficacy or effectiveness of treatments.

Phenotyping of Severe Asthma in the Era of Broad-Acting Anti-Asthma Biologics.

Severe asthma is associated with significant morbidity and mortality despite the maximal use of inhaled corticosteroids and additional controller medications, and has a high economic burden. Biologic therapies are recommended for the management of severe, uncontrolled asthma to help to prevent exacerbations and to improve symptoms and health-related quality of life. The effective management of severe asthma requires consideration of clinical heterogeneity that is driven by varying clinical and inflammatory phenotypes, which are reflective of distinct underlying disease mechanisms. Phenotyping patients using a combination of clinical characteristics such as the age of onset or comorbidities and biomarker profiles, including blood eosinophil counts and levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and serum total immunoglobulin E, is important for the differential diagnosis of asthma. In addition, phenotyping is beneficial for risk assessment, selection of treatment, and monitoring of the treatment response in patients with asthma. This review describes the clinical and inflammatory phenotypes of asthma, provides an overview of biomarkers routinely used in clinical practice and those that have recently been explored for phenotyping, and aims to assess the value of phenotyping in severe asthma management in the current era of biologics.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Specific IgE Against Wheat and Rye in Flour-Induced Occupational Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of IgE-mediated sensitization to flour allergens is widely used to investigate flour-induced occupational asthma. The diagnostic efficiency of detecting specific IgE antibodies (sIgEs) against wheat and rye flour, however, has not been thoroughly compared with other diagnostic procedures. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sIgE against wheat and rye compared with specific inhalation challenge (SIC) with flour as the reference standard. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 264 subjects who completed an SIC with flour in eight tertiary centers, of whom 205 subjects showed a positive SIC result. RESULTS: Compared with SIC, sIgE levels of 0.35 kUA/L or greater against wheat and rye provided similar sensitivities (84% to 85%, respectively), specificities (71% to 78%), positive predictive values (91% to 93%), and negative predictive values (56% to 61%). Increasing the threshold sIgE value to 5.10 kUA/L for wheat and to 6.20 kUA/L for rye provided a specificity of 95% or greater and further enhanced the positive predictive value to 98%. Among subjects with a positive SIC, those who failed to demonstrate sIgE against wheat and rye (n = 26) had significantly lower total serum IgE level and blood and sputum eosinophil counts and a lesser increase in postchallenge FeNO compared with subjects with a detectable sIgE. CONCLUSION: High levels of sIgE against wheat and/or rye flour strongly support a diagnosis of flour-induced occupational asthma without the need to perform an SIC. The absence of detectable sIgE against wheat and rye in subjects with a positive SIC seems to be associated with lower levels of TH2 biomarkers.

Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Severe Asthma-A Retrospective Study of Two Cohorts: Asthma Type T2 Treated with Biologics and Non-Type T2.

Background: The prevalence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients with asthma varies amongst studies, with little evidence as to their prevalence in patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In this retrospective, observational study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of CVEs in patients with T2 and non-T2 asthma and to identify risk factors associated with CVEs. Methods: A total of 206 patients with severe asthma were included. Demographic variables, respiratory comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors were collected, along with respiratory function, laboratory parameters and respiratory pharmacotherapy, including treatment with mAbs. Results: A total of 10.7% of the patients had any CVE from the date of asthma diagnosis, with a higher risk in those patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR] = 5.36, 95% CI 1.76-16.31; p = 0.003), arterial hypertension (OR = 2.71, 95% CI 1.13-6.55; p = 0.026) and dyslipidaemia (OR = 9.34, 95% CI 3.57-24.44; p < 0.001). No association between mAb treatment and a CVE or between time of mAb treatment and the event was found. No significant differences were observed between the T2 and non-T2 cohort. After a multivariate analysis, dyslipidaemia was identified as an independent risk factor (OR = 13.33, 95% CI 4.49-39.58; p < 0.001), whereas regular use of inhaled corticosteroids was associated with a reduced risk of a CVE (OR = 0.103, 95% CI 0.021-0.499; p = 0.005). Further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between severe asthma and CVEs. Conclusions: This study suggests that patients with severe asthma experience a higher percentage of CVEs compared with the general population.

Successful Long-Term Treatment Combining Omalizumab and Anti-IL-5 Biologics in Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis

No disponible

Adherencia a los inhaladores en pacientes con asmagrave tratados con biológicos anti interleucina 5 / Adherence to inhalers in patients with severe asthma treated with anti-interleukin-5 biologics

Objetivo: Dado que la mala adherencia a la medicación en el asma gravees difícil de evaluar en la práctica diaria, se recomienda utilizar al menos dosmétodos simultáneamente. El objetivo es determinar la prevalencia de la faltade adherencia a los inhaladores mediante el cuestionario Test de Adherenciaa los Inhaladores y la ratio de posesión de la medicación obtenida a partirde los datos de dispensación de la farmacia en pacientes con asma gravetratados con biológicos anti interleucina 5 y evaluar su concordancia.Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo transversal de 53 pacientescon asma grave reclutados en la unidad de asma grave de un hospital terciario de Madrid de junio a diciembre de 2020. Se registraron datos demográficos, comorbilidades y el tratamiento concomitante para el asma. La faltade adherencia se definió como una ratio de posesión de la medicación< 80% y/o un valor en los resultados del cuestionario Test de Adherencia alos Inhaladores < 50. La concordancia se evaluó con el coeficiente kappade Cohen.Resultados: La mediana de edad fue de 61 años (rango intercuartílico51,8-67,0), y 33 (61%) eran mujeres. Según la ratio de posesión de lamedicación, la falta de adherencia al inhalador primario fue del 58,5%.Sin embargo, al utilizar el cuestionario Test de Adherencia a los Inhaladores, ésta fue del 22,6%. Combinando ambos métodos, se consideróque el 17% de los pacientes presentaban no adherencia a los inhaladores. Asimismo, al identificar la no adherencia por cualquiera de estos métodos, se alcanzó una prevalencia del 64,2%. El cuestionario Test deAdherencia a los Inhaladores y la ratio de posesión de la medicacióncoincidieron en el 53,1% y discreparon en el 46,9% de los pacientes(k = 0,137; intervalo de confianza del 95% –0,057 a 0,331; p = 0,318).Conclusiones: Se observó una alta prevalencia de no adherencia a losinhaladores en los pacientes con asma grave tratados con biológicos antiinterleucina 5. (AU)

Objective: Given poor medication adherence in severe asthma is difficult to evaluate in daily practice, using at least two methods concurrently isrecommended. We aimed to determine the prevalence of nonadherenceto inhalers using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers questionnaire and themedication possession ratio obtained from the pharmacy refill data inpatients with severe asthma treated with anti-interleukin-5 biologics and toevaluate their concordance.Method: This was a cross-sectional retrospective observational study of53 patients with severe asthma recruited from the severe asthma unit of atertiary hospital in Madrid from June to December 2020. We registereddemographic data, comorbidities and concomitant therapy for asthma.Nonadherence was defined as pharmacy refill data < 80% and/or Testof Adherence to Inhalers questionnaire results < 50. Concordance wasassessed by determining the Cohen’s kappa statistic.Results: The median age was 61 years (interquartile range 51.8-67.0),and 33 (61%) were women. According to the pharmacy refill data lackof adherence to the primary inhaler was 58.5%. However, when usingthe Test of Adherence to Inhalers questionnaire, it was 22.6%. Combiningboth methods, 17% of patients were considered to have nonadherenceto inhalers. Likewise, when identifying nonadherence by either of thesemethods, it reached a prevalence of 64.2%. The pharmacy refill data andTest of Adherence to Inhalers questionnaire agreed in 53.1% and disagreed in 46.9% of patients (k = 0.137; 95% confidence interval −0.057to 0.331; p = 0.318). (AU)

Food allergy as an asthma comorbidity in children and adolescents: a practical approach through a real-world study

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown interactions between food allergy (FA) and asthma, but the influence of FA in asthma traits has been scarcely studied. METHODS: A real-world retrospective observational study was conducted among patients between 3 and 18 years old referred to our Asthma Clinic from November 2014 to November 2017. Data were obtained from daily clinical practice. Only patients properly diagnosed with asthma and FA were included. RESULTS: 815 patients were included: 483 asthmatics and 332 non-asthmatics and 180 FA and 635 no FA. Food allergy was statistically more prevalent among asthma patients (p = 0.014). In a high pollen exposure area, Madrid, among subjects with asthma (121 FA, 362 no-FA), sensitiza­tion to lipid transfer protein (LTP) (p = 0.016, OR: 3.064, RR: 2.512) and pollen (p = 0.016, OR: 3.064, RR: 2.512) are risk factors to have a concomitant FA diagnosis, whereas sensitization to profilin is not. Peripheral blood eosinophils were higher in subjects with asthma and FA (≥450 eos/μL) than in asthmatics without FA (≤300 eos/μL) (p = 0.031). Blood eosinophilia, using a cut-off >300 eos/μL, was only present in the FA group. Therefore, this trait should be considered when phenotyping a patient as eosinophilic asthma. Sex had an impact on several variables: height, weight, BMI, blood eosinophils count, sensitization profile, and early-onset asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma and FA are closely related and the presence of FA should be investigated in every asthma patient. This study shows an association between asthma with concomitant FA and sensitization to pollen and LTP, blood eosinophilia, and growth alterations. Differences between boys and girls were also described, so a sex-specific approach is recommended

No disponible

Selection of biologics in severe asthma: a multifaceted algorithm

No disponible

Papel de la medición de la FENO en el diagnóstico y control del asma. Debate del grupo multidisciplinar de expertos de la reunión Asma Meeting Point 2017 / The Role of FENO in the Diagnosis and Control of Asthma. Expert Multidisciplinary Group Debate during the Asthma Meeting Point 2017

No disponible

Estudio de los mecanismos implicados en la génesis y evolución del asma (proyecto MEGA): creación y seguimiento a largo plazo de una cohorte de pacientes asmáticos / The MEGA Project: A Study of the Mechanisms Involved in the Genesis and Disease Course of Asthma. Asthma Cohort Creation and Long-Term Follow-Up

El objetivo general del estudio es la creación de una cohorte de pacientes con asma con distintos grados de gravedad, que permita incrementar los conocimientos sobre los mecanismos subyacentes a la génesis y evolución de esta patología. Los objetivos específicos se centran en llevar a cabo diferentes estudios en términos de imagen, de función pulmonar, inflamación e hiperrespuesta bronquial, para determinar los eventos relevantes que dan forma a esta población asmática, los parámetros a largo plazo que pueden determinar los cambios en la gravedad de los pacientes y que tratamientos pueden influir en la progresión de la enfermedad. El estudio también tratará de identificar las causas de las exacerbaciones y cómo esto afecta a la evolución de la enfermedad. Los pacientes serán contactados a través de las consultas externas de las 8instituciones participantes en el marco del CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias. En la visita de inclusión, se realizará una historia clínica estandarizada, un examen clínico exhaustivo, incluyendo la presión arterial, el índice de masa corporal, las pruebas funcionales respiratorias completas y la medición de la FENO, y se administrarán los cuestionarios Test de control del asma (ACT), Morisky Green, Cuestionario de calidad de vida en pacientes con asma (Mini AQLQ), el Cuestionario sino-nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) y la escala de ansiedad y depresión (HAD). Para la recogida de los datos se ha diseñado una base de datos electrónica específica. Se recogerán también muestras de aire exhalado condensado, orina y sangre. Al inicio del estudio y cada 24 meses, se realizará una prueba de hiperrespuesta bronquial inespecífica con metacolina y se recogerá una muestra de esputo inducido. Al inicio del estudio se realizarán prick test a neumoalérgenos y una tomografía computarizada torácica que se repetirá a los 5 años

The general aim of this study is to create a cohort of asthma patients with varying grades of severity in order to gain greater insight into the mechanisms underlying the genesis and course of this disease. The specific objectives focus on various studies, including imaging, lung function, inflammation, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, to determine the relevant events that characterize the asthma population, the long-term parameters that can determine changes in the severity of patients, and the treatments that influence disease progression. The study will also seek to identify the causes of exacerbations and how this affects the course of the disease. Patients will be contacted via the outpatient clinics of the 8 participating institutions under the auspices of the Spanish Respiratory Diseases Networking System (CIBER). In the inclusion visit, a standardized clinical history will be obtained, a clinical examination, including blood pressure, body mass index, complete respiratory function tests, and FENO will be performed, and the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Morisky-Green test, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini AQLQ), the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) will be administered. A specific electronic database has been designed for data collection. Exhaled breath condensate, urine and blood samples will also be collected. Non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness testing with methacholine will be performed and an induced sputum sample will be collected at the beginning of the study and every 24 months. A skin prick test for airborne allergens and a chest CT will be performed at the beginning of the study and repeated every 5 years

Consenso sobre el solapamiento de asma y EPOC (ACO) entre la Guía española de la EPOC (GesEPOC) y la Guía Española para el Manejo del Asma (GEMA) / Consensus on the Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) Between the Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) and the Spanish Guidelines on the Management of Asthma (GEMA)

A instancias de la Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR), promotora de la Guía española de la EPOC (GesEPOC) y de la Guía Española para el Manejo del Asma (GEMA), autores de ambas guías han unificado criterios diagnósticos del solapamiento asma y EPOC (Asthma-COPD Overlap [ACO]). Este consenso define al ACO como la coexistencia en un mismo paciente de tres elementos: tabaquismo, limitación crónica al flujo aéreo y asma. La confirmación diagnóstica se establece cuando un paciente ( 35 años) fumador o exfumador ( 10 paquetes-año) presenta obstrucción o limitación crónica al flujo aéreo (FEV1/FVC post-broncodilatador < 70%), que persiste tras tratamiento broncodilatador y esteroideo inhalado (incluso oral en casos seleccionados) y diagnóstico objetivo de asma actual (según criterios GEMA). En los casos en los que este último no se pueda establecer, se aceptará una prueba broncodilatadora espirométrica muy positiva (FEV1 15% y 400 ml) o una elevada eosinofilia en sangre ( 300 eosinófilos/ l). Se solicitó la opinión (mediante encuesta Delphi modificada) a otros 33 expertos que no habían participado en la elaboración del consenso. Un 80% de estos lo valoró positivamente, incluso superior a otras propuestas recientes. El consenso GesEPOC-GEMA sobre ACO proporciona una visión unitaria del problema, con una propuesta conceptual sencilla y un algoritmo diagnóstico pragmático, aplicable en cualquier nivel sanitario de nuestro ámbito (AU)

Following a proposal by the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR), sponsor of the Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) and the Spanish Guidelines on the Management of Asthma (GEMA), authors of both papers have unified the criteria for the diagnosis of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS). This consensus defines ACOS as the presence in a given patient of three elements: significant smoking exposure, chronic airflow limitation and asthma. Diagnosis is confirmed when a patient (35 years of age or older), smoker or ex-smoker of more than 10 pack-years, presents airflow limitation (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7) that persists after treatment with bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids (even after systemic corticosteroids in selected cases), and an objective current diagnosis of asthma (according to GEMA criteria). In cases in which the diagnosis of asthma cannot be demonstrated, marked positive results on a bronchodilator test (FEV1 15% and 400 mL) or elevated blood eosinophil count ( 300 eosinophils/ L) will also be diagnostic of ACOS. The opinion of another 33 experts who had not participated in the consensus was sought using a modified Delphi survey. Up to 80% of respondents gave a very positive opinion of the consensus, and declared that it was better than other previous proposals. The GesEPOC-GEMA consensus on ACOS provides a unique perspective of the diagnostic problem, using a simple proposal and a pragmatic diagnostic algorithm that can be applied at any healthcare level (AU)