Preventive and Therapeutic Proximal Sealing: A 3.5-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of proximal sealing for avoiding the development of new caries lesions or arresting incipient caries lesions on the mesial surface of first permanent molars (6m) abutting lesions on the distal surface of second primary molars (05d) in children at high caries risk. METHODS: A total of 61 children 8-10 years old were selected based on the caries status of the proximal sites of 05d and 6m. Children with caries on 05d and caries-free 6m were placed in the preventive sealing group and children with caries on both 05d and 6m in the therapeutic group. The children in each group had one 6m surface pair and in each pair one 6m surface was randomly allocated to receive a preventive or therapeutic sealing. Using a split-mouth design, the other 6m surface in the pair served as control. RESULTS: After 3.5 years, standardized follow-up radiographs were obtained for the 45 children who remained. In the preventive sealing group, 4 out of 30 (13.3%) sealed and 16 out of 30 (53.3%) unsealed sound 6m surfaces had developed new caries lesions (p = 0.004, McNemar test). In the therapeutic sealing group, the progression of the carious lesions on 6m was observed in 3 out of 15 sealed (20.0%) and 8 out of 15 (53.3%) unsealed caries control surfaces (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Preventive sealing on sound 6m surfaces abutting 05d lesions in children at high caries risk efficaciously prevents the development of caries lesions. Therapeutically sealing active non-cavitated caries lesions reduces the progression.

A 5-year clinical follow-up of the efficacy of proximal sealing in high caries risk children.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate, after 5 years, the efficacy of proximal microinvasive sealing of permanent teeth on the risk for caries lesion development. METHODS: Children aged 8 to 10 y at baseline, at high caries risk, were studied. In the preventive (P) group the children had caries lesions on the distal surface of primary second molars (05d) but sound mesial surfaces of the approximating permanent first molars (6m). In the therapeutic (T) group the children had initial caries lesions on 6m that abutted lesions on 05d. Each child in the two groups had one 05d/6m pair. Using a split-mouth design, one 6m surface in each pair was randomly assigned to receive sealing while the other pair served as an unsealed control. RESULTS: Of the 61 children at baseline 42 could be blindly examined clinically and radiographically both at baseline and after 5 years. In the P group, 8 of 28 (28.6%) sealed and 15 of 28 (53.6 %) unsealed sound 6m surfaces had developed caries lesions (p = 0.04). In the T group, the progression of the carious lesions on 6m was observed in 4 of 14 sealed (28.6%) and 8 of 14 (57.1%) unsealed caries control surfaces (p = 0.29). Pooling the data from the two groups, the difference between sealed and non-sealed surfaces was significant (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Both preventive and therapeutic sealant to 6m adjacent to a lesion on 05d has effectiveness in caries reduction in high caries risk children CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The beneficial effect of sealing is observed for at least 5 years after a single sealant treatment.