Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 95
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nurs Scholarsh ; 53(4): 428-438, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33885222

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic capacity of the clinical indicators of a delayed surgical recovery nursing diagnosis throughout the hospital stay of patients having cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A prospective cohort design was adopted. A sample of inpatients undergoing elective cardiac surgery was followed during the immediate preoperative period and hospitalization. This research was conducted in the southeast region of Brazil at a national reference institution that treats highly complex diseases and performs cardiac surgeries. Data were collected from July 2017 to July 2018. METHODS: At the end of 1 year of data collection, 181 patients were followed in this study. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival time related to delayed surgical recovery. In addition, an extended Cox model of time-dependent covariates was adjusted to identify the clinical signs that influenced the change in the nursing diagnosis status. RESULTS: A delayed surgical recovery nursing diagnosis was present in 23.2% of the sample studied. With an expected length of stay of 8 to 10 days, most new cases of delayed surgical recovery were observed on the 10th postoperative day, and the survival rate after this day was decreased until the 29th postoperative day, when the nursing diagnosis no longer appeared. Interrupted healing of the surgical area, loss of appetite, and atrial flutter were indicators related to an increased risk for delayed surgical recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Timely recognition of selected clinical indicators demonstrates a promising prognostic capacity for delayed surgical recovery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate identification of prognostic factors allows nurses to identify early signs of postoperative complications. Consequently, the professional can develop an individualized plan of care, aiming at the satisfactory clinical recovery of the patient.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 35(5): 435-444, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32511111

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Caregivers can contribute enormously to the self-care of patients with heart failure (HF). The Caregiver Contribution to Self-care of Heart Failure Index (CC-SCHFI) measures these contributions across 3 scales: self-care maintenance, which evaluates caregiver contributions to symptom monitoring and treatment adherence; self-care management, which evaluates caregiver contributions in dealing with symptoms; and caregiver confidence, which assesses caregiver self-efficacy in managing all contributions to self-care. Although the CC-SCHFI has been used in several investigations, only 1 study has evaluated its psychometric characteristics. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the CC-SCHFI in Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used in this study. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess construct validity, and factor score determinacy coefficients were computed to evaluate internal consistency reliability. RESULTS: The sample comprised 99 caregivers of patients with HF. Most were women (73%), with a mean age of 48 ± 14 years; 57% were patients' spouses. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the original factor structure of the instrument, with supportive fit indices for all 3 scales (comparative fit index, 0.95-1.00; root-mean-square error of approximation, 0.00-0.057). Reliability estimates were adequate for each CC-SCHFI scale (0.77-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The CC-SCHFI is a valid and reliable scale to measure caregiver contributions to self-care maintenance, caregiver contributions to self-care management, and caregiver confidence in HF.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Autocuidado , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Muestreo
3.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 35(2): 217-222, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31904695

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of 2 hemostasis devices on the incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO) after transradial cardiac catheterization. BACKGROUND: Radial artery occlusion is the most prevalent ischemic complication after radial artery catheterization. There is still no predictive pattern of vessel patency assessment, and the comparative effectiveness of different hemostasis techniques has yet to be established. METHODS: This study used a randomized clinical trial of adult patients undergoing transradial cardiac catheterization. Participants were randomized into an intervention group (hemostasis with the TR Band device) and a control group (hemostasis with a conventional pressure dressing). The primary end point was the incidence of RAO (at discharge and at 30 days post catheterization). RESULTS: Among the 600 patients included (301 in the intervention group and 299 controls), immediate RAO occurred in 24 (8%) in the TR Band group and 19 (6%) in the pressure-dressing group; at 30 days, RAO was present in 5 patients (5%) in the TR Band group and 7 (6%) in the pressure-dressing group. On multivariate analysis, peripheral vascular disease was the only independent predictor of RAO at discharge and at 30 days. ConclusionsThe incidence of RAO was similar in patients who received hemostasis with a TR Band versus a pressure dressing after transradial cardiac catheterization.


Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/etiología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Técnicas Hemostáticas/efectos adversos , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Arteria Radial , Anciano , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Simple Ciego
4.
J Clin Nurs ; 28(23-24): 4367-4378, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31410897

RESUMEN

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To test the validity and reliability of Nursing Outcomes Classification outcomes and their clinical indicators for patients with the nursing diagnosis 'Risk for perioperative positioning injury'. BACKGROUND: Surgical positioning is an essential part of perioperative nursing practice. The use of a standardised language values the clinical evaluation of the perioperative nurse, reinforcing its contribution to surgical patient care. DESIGN: Longitudinal concept validation cohort study. METHODS: Patients were selected based on the operating room surgical schedule. The sample included adult patients who underwent elective surgical procedures requiring anaesthesia, classified as surgical class 2, 3 or 4. Outcomes were measured with an instrument, which included 33 clinical indicators for eight outcomes. The patients were assessed at five distinct time points in the perioperative phases. This study followed the STROBE guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included. Each underwent five clinical assessments, for a total of 250 documented assessments. Differences in evaluations were mostly related to reduced scores of clinical indicators in the immediate postsurgical time points, which recovered to the highest score at the end of the fifth (and last) evaluation. The results of factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha calculations suggested a new configuration for this nursing outcomes, consisting of five outcomes-Circulation Status, Tissue Perfusion: peripheral, Neurological Status: peripheral, Tissue Integrity: skin and mucous membranes and Thermoregulation-and 13 clinical indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing Outcomes Classification outcomes and clinical indicators for the nursing diagnosis at 'Risk for perioperative positioning injury' are sensitive to patient states during the perioperative period. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Use of nursing taxonomies during the perioperative period may contribute to the discussion on the role of perioperative nurses and their relevance in patient care.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico de Enfermería/normas , Posicionamiento del Paciente/efectos adversos , Enfermería Perioperatoria/métodos , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Vocabulario Controlado
5.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 33(3): 289-295, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28731915

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lifestyle changes and treatment adherence still constitute a challenge to healthcare providers involved in the care of persons with hypertension. The lack of validated instruments measuring the ability of hypertensive patients to manage their disease has slowed research progress in this area. The Self-care of Hypertension Inventory, originally developed in the United States, consists of 23 items divided across 3 scales: Self-care Maintenance, Self-care Management, and Self-care Confidence. These scales measure how well patients with hypertension adhere to treatment and manage elevated blood pressure, as well as their confidence in their ability to perform self-care. A rigorous cross-cultural adaptation and validation process is required before this instrument can be used in other countries. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to translate the Self-care of Hypertension Inventory into Brazilian Portuguese with cross-cultural adaptation and to evaluate interobserver reliability and temporal stability. METHODS: This methodological study involved forward translation, synthesis of forward translations, back-translation, synthesis of back-translations, expert committee review, and pretesting. Interobserver agreement and the temporal stability of the scales were assessed. RESULTS: The expert committee proposed semantic and cultural modifications to some items and the addition of guidance statements to facilitate administration of the scale. Interobserver analysis demonstrated substantial agreement. Analysis of temporal stability showed near-perfect agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-cultural adaptation of the Self-care of Hypertension Inventory successfully produced a Portuguese-language version of the instrument for further evaluation of psychometric properties. Once that step is completed, the scale can be used in Brazil.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/etnología , Hipertensión/terapia , Autocuidado , Traducciones , Anciano , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
6.
Rev Gaucha Enferm ; 38(4): e68716, 2018 Jun 07.
Artículo en Portugués, Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29933427

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To map the production of knowledge on vascular access complications in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures in hemodynamic laboratories. METHODS: Scoping review study. The search strategy was developed in three stages, considering the period from July 2005 to July 2015 in the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and LILACS databases. The collected data were analyzed and summarized in a narrative form. RESULTS: One-hundred twenty-eight publications that made it possible to map the contexts of study of complications, occurrence according to access routes, as well as an understanding of diagnosis and clinical management, were included. Three theme categories were identified: complications; predictive factors; and diagnosis/treatment. CONCLUSION: Vascular access site complications range according to the access route used. Knowledge of factors that permeate the occurrence of these events may contribute to early detection, planning, and monitoring of the care implemented.


Asunto(s)
Hemodinámica , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Especificidad de Órganos , Punciones/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de Heridas/etiología
7.
Rev Gaucha Enferm ; 39: e20170292, 2018 Oct 22.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30365756

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the precipitating factors of heart failure decompensation between adherent and non-adherent patients to treatment. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of a multicenter cohort study. Patients over 18 years of age with decompensated heart failure (functional class III/IV) were eligible. The structured questionnaire was used to collect the data and evaluate the reasons for decompensation. The irregular use of medication prior to hospitalization and inadequate salt and fluid intake were considered as poor adherence to treatment. RESULTS: A total of 556 patients were included, mean age 61 ± 14 years old, 362 (65%) male. The main factor of decompensation was poor adherence, representing 55% of the sample. Patients who reported irregular use of medications in the last week had a 22% greater risk of being hospitalized due to poor adherence than the patients who adhered to treatment. CONCLUSION: The EMBRACE study showed that in patients with heart failure, poor adherence was the main factor of exacerbation.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Desencadenantes , Autoinforme
8.
Rev Esc Enferm USP ; 52: e03389, 2018 Dec 13.
Artículo en Portugués, Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30570080

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reports of occupational events recorded by nursing professionals during the periods of reuse and single use of the dialyzer. METHOD: Retrospective longitudinal study with electronic medical records from nursing technicians of a hemodialysis service. Data were analyzed descriptively and Rate ratio. RESULTS: During the reuse of the dialyzer, there were seven events from five professionals reporting musculoskeletal disorders, ocular allergies and dermatosis. During single use, two professionals reported low back pain. The rate ratio of medication use was 6.7 days for every 1000 professionals during the reuse period and 1.52 days in the single use period (RR=4.4; 95% CI 2.182-9.805). Anti-inflammatory drugs were the most prescribed, and sick leaves were similar in both periods. CONCLUSION: Dialyzer reuse was associated with musculoskeletal disorders, ocular irritation, dermatosis and increased use of medications by professionals. Sick leaves were similar on the periods of dialyzer reuse and single use.


Asunto(s)
Asistentes de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Adulto , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Equipo Reutilizado/estadística & datos numéricos , Oftalmopatías/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología
9.
Rev Gaucha Enferm ; 39: e20170257, 2018 Aug 02.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30088607

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Randomized clinical trial protocol to evaluate the incidence of radial artery occlusion with two different arterial compression devices after transradial procedures. METHODS: Barbeau's test will be performed in adults scheduled to undergo transradial interventional procedures. Those with A, B, or C plethysmographic patterns will be selected. At the end of the procedure, patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive patent haemostasis with TR Band™ device or conventional haemostasis with an elastic adhesive bandage. The primary outcome is the incidence of radial artery occlusion. Secondary outcomes are Barbeau's test curve change, additional time to achieve haemostasis, incidence of bleeding at the puncture site, pain severity, development of arteriovenous fistula, radial pseudo aneurysm, any access-site complication requiring vascular surgery intervention and costs between the two devices. DISCUSSION: The results of this trial should provide valuable additional information on the best approach for haemostasis after transradial percutaneous cardiovascular interventions.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Vendajes de Compresión , Hemorragia/terapia , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Arteria Radial , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Brasil , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Protocolos Clínicos , Circulación Colateral , Mano/irrigación sanguínea , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Oximetría , Selección de Paciente , Punciones , Arteria Radial/lesiones , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/ética
10.
J Clin Nurs ; 26(3-4): 379-387, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27192041

RESUMEN

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of the advanced nursing process in nursing documentation in two hospitals. BACKGROUND: Various standardised terminologies are employed by nurses worldwide, whether for teaching, research or patient care. These systems can improve the quality of nursing records, enable care continuity, consistency in written communication and enhance safety for patients and providers alike. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A total of 138 records from two facilities (69 records from each facility) were analysed, one using the NANDA-International and Nursing Interventions Classification terminology (Centre 1) and one the International Classification for Nursing Practice (Centre 2), by means of the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes instrument. Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes scores range from 0-58 points. Nursing records were dated 2012-2013 for Centre 1 and 2010-2011 for Centre 2. RESULTS: Centre 1 had a Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes score of 35·46 (±6·45), whereas Centre 2 had a Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes score of 31·72 (±4·62) (p < 0·001). Centre 2 had higher scores in the 'Nursing Diagnoses as Process' dimension, whereas in the 'Nursing Diagnoses as Product', 'Nursing Interventions' and 'Nursing Outcomes' dimensions, Centre 1 exhibited superior performance; acceptable reliability values were obtained for both centres, except for the 'Nursing Interventions' domain in Centre 1 and the 'Nursing Diagnoses as Process' and 'Nursing Diagnoses as Product' domains in Centre 2. CONCLUSION: The quality of nursing documentation was superior at Centre 1, although both facilities demonstrated moderate scores considering the maximum potential score of 58 points. Reliability analyses showed satisfactory results for both standardised terminologies. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nursing leaders should use a validated instrument to investigate the quality of nursing records after implementation of standardised terminologies.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico de Enfermería/normas , Proceso de Enfermería/normas , Registros de Enfermería/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Terminología Normalizada de Enfermería , Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Diagnóstico de Enfermería/clasificación , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Proceso de Enfermería/clasificación , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Vocabulario Controlado
11.
Rev Gaucha Enferm ; 37(4): e53280, 2017 Feb 09.
Artículo en Portugués, Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28198941

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of life (QOL) between wait-listed patients and heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 56 adult patients at two institutions in Southern Brazil, 9(16%) wait-listed patients and 47(84%) transplant recipients. Data were collected from August to December 2012. QOL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), with scores ranging from zero to 100. RESULTS: There was statistically significant difference between the two groups in the overall QOL score (p=0.010) and in four dimensions. The mean rank was 16.9 in wait-listed patients and 30.7 in transplant recipients. Wait-listed patients presented the lowest for general health (9.1) and the highest scores for role-emotional (24.8). Transplant recipients obtained the highest scores for general health (32.2) and the lowest scores for bodily pain (29.1). CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing a transplant has a positive impact on the QOL of recipients compared to that of patients awaiting transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Calidad de Vida , Listas de Espera , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
12.
Rev Esc Enferm USP ; 51: e03229, 2017 May 25.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28562747

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe how pain is assessed (characteristic, location, and intensity) and managed in clinical practice in patients undergoing endovascular procedures in the catheterization laboratory setting. METHOD: Cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection. RESULTS: Overall, 345 patients were included; 116 (34%) experienced post-procedural pain; in 107 (92%), pain characteristics were not recorded; the location of pain was reported in 100% of patients, and its intensity in 111 (96%); management was largely pharmacologic; of the patients who received some type of management (n=71), 42 (59%) underwent reassessment of pain. CONCLUSION: The location and intensity of pain are well reported in clinical practice. Pharmacologic pain management is still prevalent. Additional efforts are needed to ensure recording of the characteristics of pain and its reassessment after interventions. OBJETIVO: Describir cómo se evalúa el dolor (características, localización e intensidad) y su manejo en la práctica clínica en pacientes sometidos a procedimientos endovasculares en el laboratorio de cateterización. MÉTODO: Estudio transversal con recolección retrospectiva de datos. RESULTADOS: En total, se incluyeron 345 pacientes; 116 (34%) experimentaron dolor post-procedimiento; en 107 (92%), no se registraron las características del dolor; la localización del dolor se informó en el 100% de los pacientes, y su intensidad en 111 (96%); el manejo fue en gran medida farmacológico; de los pacientes que recibieron algún tipo de tratamiento (n=71), 42 (59%) fueron sometidos a reevaluación del dolor. CONCLUSIÓN: La ubicación y la intensidad del dolor se informan bien en la práctica clínica. El manejo farmacológico del dolor sigue siendo frecuente. Se necesitan esfuerzos adicionales para asegurar el registro de las características del dolor y su reevaluación después de las intervenciones.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor/etiología , Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Rev Gaucha Enferm ; 37(2): e61554, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27410675

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the clinical applicability of the Nursing Outcomes Classification in patients with decompensated heart failure and the nursing diagnosis of fluid volume excess. METHODS: This is a longitudinal study conducted in two stages at a university hospital, in 2013. During the first stage the consensus of experts was used to select the nursing outcomes and the indicators related to diagnosing fluid volume excess. The longitudinal study was conducted in the second stage to clinically evaluate the patients using the instrument containing the results and indicators produced in the consensus. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were assessed. The nursing outcomes were measured during the clinical evaluation by analysing their indicators. The scores increased in six of the results, in comparison with the average results of the first and last assessment. The Nursing Outcomes Classification during medical practice revealed a clinical improvement among the patient who were admitted following decompensated heart failure. CONCLUSION: The Nursing Outcomes Classification managed to detect changes in the clinical status of patients.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/enfermería , Evaluación en Enfermería/métodos , Terminología Normalizada de Enfermería , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico/enfermería , Anciano , Brasil , Consenso , Femenino , Corazón/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/clasificación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diagnóstico de Enfermería , Resultado del Tratamiento , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico/clasificación , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico/dietoterapia , Desequilibrio Hidroelectrolítico/etiología
14.
Rev Gaucha Enferm ; 36(3): 28-35, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26486896

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: this study aimed to using the Nursing Activities Score to assess nursing workload in a coronary care unit, to assess the distribution of workload between shifts, and to compare the current staff of the care unit with that recommended by the instrument. METHOD: this was a longitudinal study, conducted in a teaching hospital in Southern Brazil, between April to June 2012. RESULTS: A total of 604 NAS measures were obtained from the 61 patients included. The mean workload per shift was 47% (±12), with the greatest workload being reported in the afternoon shifts. CONCLUSION: according to the NAS, a mean of two and a maximum of 2.4 nursing professionals would be required per shift to meet all patient demands, suggesting that the current staff size in the CCU is adequate. The NAS was successful in assessing nursing workload and changes in patient demands over time.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería Cardiovascular/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo , Anciano , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital , Femenino , Unidades Hospitalarias , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Carga de Trabajo/clasificación
15.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 41: 123-130, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401289

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) compared with centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs). METHODS: Prospective cohort study was followed by an economic analysis over a 30-day time horizon. Propensity score matching was used to select hospitalized adults with similar indications for PICC or CICC. The composite outcome was device removal or replacement because of complications before the end of treatment. The economic evaluation was based on a decision tree model for cost-effectiveness analysis, with calculation of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per catheter removal avoided. All costs are presented in Brazilian reais (BRL) (1 BRL = 0.1870 US dollar). RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were followed in each group; 172 (79.3%) of those receiving a PICC and 135 (62.2%) of those receiving a CICC had no device-related complication, respectively. When comparing the events leading to device removal, the risk of composite endpoint was significantly higher in the CICC group (hazard ratio 0.20; 95% CI 0.11-0.35). The cost of PICC placement was BRL 1290.98 versus BRL 467.16 for a CICC. In the base case, the ICER for placing a PICC instead of a CICC was BRL 3349.91 per removal or replacement avoided. On univariate sensitivity analyses, the model proved to be robust within an ICER range of 2500.00 to 4800.00 BRL. CONCLUSIONS: PICC placement was associated with a lower risk of complications than CICC placement. Although the cost of a PICC is higher, its use avoided complications and need for catheter replacement before the end of treatment.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Cateterismo Periférico/economía , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Brasil , Cateterismo Venoso Central/economía , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adulto , Puntaje de Propensión , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad
16.
J Infus Nurs ; 47(3): 190-199, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744244

RESUMEN

This study aimed to compare patients' experience of pain during ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral venipuncture versus conventional peripheral venipuncture. This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a public university hospital in 2021. Adult patients with indication for intravenous therapy compatible with peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) were included: intervention group (IG), US peripheral venipuncture executed by specialist nurses; control group (CG), conventional peripheral venipuncture executed by clinical practice nurses. The primary outcome was patient experience of pain during the procedure and patient experience related to the PIVC placement method. Sixty-four patients were included, 32 for each group. The pain experienced was none-to-mild in the IG for 25 patients (78.1%) and moderate-to-severe in the CG for 21 patients (65.7%; P < .001). The overall pain rating was 2 (1-3) in the IG and 4 (3-6) in the CG (P < .001). The recommendation of the procedure in IG (net promoter score [NPS] + 90.6%) versus CG (NPS + 18.8%) was considered excellent and good, respectively (P < .001). Patients had less pain and significantly recommended the US-guided procedure. Patient experience with US-guided PIVC, performed by a specialist nurse, was superior to that of conventional peripheral venipuncture.


Asunto(s)
Flebotomía , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Flebotomía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Adulto , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor/prevención & control , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Anciano
17.
JAMA Cardiol ; 9(2): 105-113, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38055237

RESUMEN

Importance: Readmissions after an index heart failure (HF) hospitalization are a major contemporary health care problem. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an intensive telemonitoring strategy in the vulnerable period after an HF hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in 30 HF clinics in Brazil. Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% and access to mobile phones were enrolled up to 30 days after an HF admission. Data were collected from July 2019 to July 2022. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to a telemonitoring strategy or standard care. The telemonitoring group received 4 daily short message service text messages to optimize self-care, active engagement, and early intervention. Red flags based on feedback messages triggered automatic diuretic adjustment and/or a telephone call from the health care team. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to 180 days. A hierarchical win-ratio analysis incorporating blindly adjudicated clinical events (cardiovascular deaths and HF hospitalization) and variation in NT-proBNP was also performed. Results: Of 699 included patients, 460 (65.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 61.2 (14.5) years. A total of 352 patients were randomly assigned to the telemonitoring strategy and 347 to standard care. Satisfaction with the telemonitoring strategy was excellent (net promoting score at 180 days, 78.5). HF self-care increased significantly in the telemonitoring group compared with the standard care group (score difference at 30 days, -2.21; 95% CI, -3.67 to -0.74; P = .001; score difference at 180 days, -2.08; 95% CI, -3.59 to -0.57; P = .004). Variation of NT-proBNP was similar in the telemonitoring group compared with the standard care group (telemonitoring: baseline, 2593 pg/mL; 95% CI, 2314-2923; 180 days, 1313 pg/mL; 95% CI, 1117-1543; standard care: baseline, 2396 pg/mL; 95% CI, 2122-2721; 180 days, 1319 pg/mL; 95% CI, 1114-1564; ratio of change, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77-1.11; P = .39). Hierarchical analysis of the composite outcome demonstrated a similar number of wins in both groups (telemonitoring, 49 883 of 122 144 comparisons [40.8%]; standard care, 48 034 of 122 144 comparisons [39.3%]; win ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.86-1.26). Conclusions and Relevance: An intensive telemonitoring strategy applied in the vulnerable period after an HF admission was feasible, well-accepted, and increased scores of HF self-care but did not translate to reductions in NT-proBNP levels nor improvement in a composite hierarchical clinical outcome. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04062461.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalización
18.
Appl Nurs Res ; 26(4): 239-44, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24050914

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of nursing interventions (NIC) using nursing outcomes (NOC) and based on NANDA-I nursing diagnoses in patients with heart failure in home care. METHOD: In this longitudinal study, 23 patients with heart failure were followed for 6 months, in four home visits. During the visits, nursing diagnoses were established, outcomes assessed, and interventions implemented. RESULTS: Of the 11 NIC interventions implemented, eight proved effective, that is, showed significant improvement between the first and the fourth visit, according to scores obtained for six outcomes: knowledge: treatment regimen, knowledge: medication, compliance behavior, symptom control, activity tolerance, and energy conservation. CONCLUSION: NIC interventions health education, self-modification assistance, behavior modification, teaching: prescribed medication, teaching: disease process, nutritional counseling, telephone consultation, and energy conservation showed effective outcomes based on NOC scores, suggesting that the NANDA-I, NIC, and NOC linkage is useful in patients with heart failure in home care.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/enfermería , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Visita Domiciliaria , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
19.
Rev Esc Enferm USP ; 47(5): 1084-90, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24346447

RESUMEN

Using a sample of patients with coronary artery disease, this methodological study aimed to conduct a cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a questionnaire on knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors (Q-FARCS), lifestyle changes, and treatment adherence for use in Brazil. The questionnaire has three scales: general knowledge of risk factors (RFs); specific knowledge of these RFs; and lifestyle changes achieved. Cross-cultural adaptation included translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, and pretesting. Face and content validity, reliability, and construct validity were measured. Cronbach's alpha for the total sample (n = 240) was 0.75. Assessment of psychometric properties revealed adequate face and content validity, and the construct revealed seven components. It was concluded that the Brazilian version of Q-FARCS had adequate reliability and validity for the assessment of knowledge of cardiovascular RFs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Brasil , Características Culturales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo
20.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 137: 104364, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36399944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hemostasis control after percutaneous endovascular procedures through the femoral approach remains challenging for catheterization laboratory nurses, given method variability. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available evidence on vascular devices efficacy dedicated to hemostasis control compared to the extrinsic compression after percutaneous procedures in the femoral vein or artery. METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was conducted. We compared different hemostasis methods in adult patients who underwent diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures through femoral access. The databases searched were PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL, and updated on 03/2022. The outcomes included hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, bleeding, minor and major vascular complication, time to hemostasis, device failure, and manual compression repetition. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 1.0. Pooled effect sizes on continuous, categorical and proportion variables were estimated with the random effects model. The continuous variables were summarized as the difference between means weighted by the inverse of variance (WMD), and the categorical ones by the summary of relative risks (RR), estimated by the DerSimonian and Laird method. The Freeman-Tukey method was used to estimate the summary effect of proportions. RESULTS: Fifty articles were included in the systematic review. When compared to extrinsic compression, vascular closure devices resulted in a relative risk reduction (RRR) for hematoma: RR 0.82 [95%CI 0.72 to 0.94] and in shorter time to hemostasis WMD -15.06 min [95%CI -17.56 to -12.56]; no association was observed between interventions with vascular closure devices and extrinsic compression for pseudoaneurysm, bleeding, minor and major vascular complications. Compared to extrinsic compression, sealant or gel type devices were compatible with a RRR for hematoma: RR 0.73 [95%CI 0.59 to 0.90]; and metal clip or staple type devices for pseudoaneurysm: RR 0.48 [95%CI 0.25 to 0.90]; and major vascular complication: RR 0.33 [95%CI 0.17 to 0.64]. For each 100 observations, the device failure rate for metal clip or staple was 3.28% [95%CI 1.69 to 6.27]; for suture 6.84% [95%CI 4.93 to 9.41]; for collagen 3.15% [95%CI 2.24 to 4.41]; and for sealant or gel 7.22% [95% CI 5.49 to 9.45]. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular closure devices performed better in hemostasis control. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low to moderate. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019140794.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso , Dispositivos de Cierre Vascular , Adulto , Humanos , Aneurisma Falso/etiología , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Dispositivos de Cierre Vascular/efectos adversos , Hemostasis , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Hematoma/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA