Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 131
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Cancer ; 152(2): 203-213, 2023 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36043555

RESUMEN

Opium use was recently classified as a human carcinogen for lung cancer by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. We conducted a large, multicenter case-control study evaluating the association between opium use and the risk of lung cancer. We recruited 627 cases and 3477 controls from May 2017 to July 2020. We used unconditional logistic regression analyses to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and measured the association between opium use and the risk of lung cancer. The ORs were adjusted for the residential place, age, gender, socioeconomic status, cigarettes, and water pipe smoking. We found a 3.6-fold risk of lung cancer for regular opium users compared to never users (95% CI: 2.9, 4.6). There was a strong dose-response association between a cumulative count of opium use and lung cancer risk. The OR for regular opium use was higher for small cell carcinoma than in other histology (8.3, 95% CI: 4.8, 14.4). The OR of developing lung cancer among opium users was higher in females (7.4, 95% CI: 3.8, 14.5) than in males (3.3, 95% CI: 2.6, 4.2). The OR for users of both opium and tobacco was 13.4 (95% CI: 10.2, 17.7) compared to nonusers of anything. The risk of developing lung cancer is higher in regular opium users, and these results strengthen the conclusions on the carcinogenicity of opium. The association is stronger for small cell carcinoma cases than in other histology.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Adicción al Opio , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adicción al Opio/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Opio/efectos adversos , Irán/epidemiología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/epidemiología , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología
2.
Acta Oncol ; 62(12): 1661-1668, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934078

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Opium use has been associated with an increased risk of cancers of the lung, oesophagus, and pancreas, and it was recently classified by the International Agency for Cancer Research as carcinogenic to humans. It is not clear whether opium also increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of our study was to assess the association between various metrics of opium use and the risk of CRC. METHODS: This case-referent study from seven provinces in Iran comprised 848 CRC cases and 3215 referents. Data on opium use (duration, amount, frequency) and potential confounders were collected by trained interviewers. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression models were used to measure odds ratios (OR) adjusted for age, gender, province, marital status, family history of CRC-linked cancers, consumption of red meat, fruits and vegetables, body shape, occupational physical activity, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Regular opium consumption was not associated with the risk of CRC (OR 0.9, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.7, 1.2) compared to subjects who never used opium. However, frequent opium use more than twice a day was associated with an increased risk of CRC compared to non-users of opium (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.1, 3.8; p for quadratic trend 0.008). CONCLUSION: There seems to be no overall association between opium use and CRC, but the risk of CRC might be increased among persons who use opium many times a day.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Adicción al Opio , Humanos , Adicción al Opio/epidemiología , Adicción al Opio/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Opio/efectos adversos , Irán/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles
3.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 38(4): 373-389, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36773182

RESUMEN

The carcinogenicity of opium consumption was recently evaluated by a Working Group convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). We supplement the recent IARC evaluation by conducting an extended systematic review as well as a quantitative meta-analytic assessment of the role of opium consumption and risk for selected cancers, evaluating in detail various aspects of study quality on meta-analytic findings. We searched the published literature to identify all relevant studies on opium consumption and risk of selected cancers in humans through 31 October, 2022. Meta-relative risks (mRRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models for studies of cancer of the urinary bladder, larynx, lung, oesophagus, pancreas, and stomach. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. We assessed study quality and conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the impact of potential reverse causation, protopathic bias, selection bias, information bias, and confounding. In total, 2 prospective cohort studies and 33 case-control studies were included. The overall pooled mRR estimated for 'ever or regular' versus 'never' use of opium ranged from 1.50 (95% CI 1.13-1.99, I2 = 0%, 6 studies) for oesophageal cancer to 7.97 (95% CI 4.79-13.3, I2 = 62%, 7 studies) for laryngeal cancer. Analyses of cumulative opium exposure suggested greater risk of cancer associated with higher opium consumption. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses excluding studies prone to potential methodological sources of biases and confounding. Findings support an adverse association between opium consumption and cancers of the urinary bladder, larynx, lung, oesophagus, pancreas and stomach.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Opio , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Opio/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/etiología
4.
BMC Psychiatry ; 23(1): 518, 2023 07 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37464337

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The pattern of substance use in Iran is characterized by a high prevalence of opioid use and opioid use disorder (OUD). Although opioid maintenance therapy (OMT) has been introduced in Iran, approximately 50% of people with opioid use disorder remain unreached. Moreover, psychosocial treatment of OUD and common mental health symptoms during OMT is limited. Digital interventions have been shown to improve psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms. In addition, providing psychoeducation and risk reduction counseling to prevent communicable diseases like HIV and infectious hepatitis is common via the Internet. However, despite these promising advances, no smartphone intervention in OMT has been investigated for the treatment of OUD and common comorbid mental health symptoms. OBJECTIVE: We examine the effectiveness of adding a blended smartphone intervention based on community reinforcement approach, motivational interviewing- and cognitive behavioral therapy compared to OMT as usual that aims to improve OMT outcomes and addresses common mental health symptoms in OMT patients in Iran. METHOD: Adults with opioid dependence entering 8 treatment centers in Tehran, Iran will be randomly assigned to receive either OMT plus a smartphone intervention or OMT as usual. The primary outcomes will be the percentage of negative urine tests for illicit, non-prescribed use of opioids (opium, heroin, tramadol) and treatment retention. Secondary outcomes will include the longest period of abstinence from the illicit, non-prescribed use of opioids (opium, heroin, and tramadol) confirmed by urine samples, changes in communicable disease risk-taking behaviors, changes in stress and common mental health symptoms, and client satisfaction. Data analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle and employ (generalized) linear mixed models. DISCUSSION: This study will provide substantial knowledge for designing effective blended interventions for OUD. Moreover, it will investigate if treatment retention and OMT-related outcomes and common mental health symptoms can be improved by adding a smartphone intervention to OMT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://en.irct.ir/trial/53578 .


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Tramadol , Adulto , Humanos , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Heroína/uso terapéutico , Opio/uso terapéutico , Irán , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
5.
BMC Psychiatry ; 23(1): 958, 2023 12 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38129791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Number of opiate users worldwide has doubled over the past decade, but not all of them are diagnosed with opioid use disorder. We aimed to identify the prevalence and risk factors for OUD after ten years of follow-up. METHODS: Among 8,500 chronic opiate users at Golestan Cohort Study baseline (2004-2008), we recalled a random sample of 451 subjects in 2017. We used three questionnaires: a questionnaire about current opiate use including type and route of use, the drug use disorder section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview lifetime version, and the validated Kessler10 questionnaire. We defined opioid use disorder and its severity based on the DSM-5 criteria and used a cutoff of 12 on Kessler10 questionnaire to define psychological distress. RESULTS: Mean age was 61.2 ± 6.6 years (84.7% males) and 58% were diagnosed with opioid use disorder. Starting opiate use at an early age and living in underprivileged conditions were risk factors of opioid use disorder. Individuals with opioid use disorder were twice likely to have psychological distress (OR = 2.25; 95%CI: 1.44-3.52) than the users without it. In multivariate regression, former and current opiate dose and oral use of opiates were independently associated with opioid use disorder. Each ten gram per week increase in opiate dose during the study period almost tripled the odds of opioid use disorder (OR = 3.18; 95%CI: 1.79-5.63). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic opiate use led to clinical opioid use disorder in more than half of the users, and this disorder was associated with psychological distress, increasing its physical and mental burden in high-risk groups.


Asunto(s)
Alcaloides Opiáceos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Alcaloides Opiáceos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Prevalencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos
6.
Int J Cancer ; 148(5): 1066-1076, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32895947

RESUMEN

Scant evidence exists to support the association of opium use with head and neck cancer, limited to the larynx and oral cavity. In a multicenter case-control study-Iran Opium and Cancer study, we recruited 633 cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (254 lip and oral cavity, 54 pharynx, 327 larynx and 28 other subsites within the head and neck) and 3065 frequency-matched controls from April 2016 to April 2019. Odds ratios (ORs) for opium use and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were obtained using mixed-effects logistic regression because of heterogeneity among centers. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for regular opium use was 3.76 (2.96-4.79) for all HNSCC combined. Strong dose-response effects were observed by frequency or amount of use, and duration of use. Regular opium uses significantly increased the risk of HNSCC of the pharynx, larynx and other subsites within the head and neck with OR (95% CI) of 2.90 (1.40-6.02), 6.55 (4.69-9.13) and 5.95 (2.41-14.71), respectively. The observed associations were significant even among never tobacco smokers (including cigarette and water-pipe smoking). Moreover, by the multiplicative interaction scale, the effect of opium use could be varied by cigarette smoking on HNSCC, 8.16 (6.20-10.74). For the first time, the current study showed opium users have an increased risk of several anatomic subsites of HNSCC.


Asunto(s)
Adicción al Opio/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Riesgo
7.
Med J Islam Repub Iran ; 35: 60, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34268248

RESUMEN

Background: There are relatively scant data to determine whether hospital visitors could serve as a proper source of controls in case-control studies of illicit drug use. The aim of this study was to evaluate using neighborhood versus hospital visitor controls in reporting opium use. Methods: We used data from 2 independent case-control studies of cancer in Iran. In the first study, controls were selected from neighborhoods of the patients. For the second one, controls were selected from among hospital visitors. In the latter study, hospital visitors were companions of the patients or others visiting the hospital for reasons other than disease treatment. We used stata (version 12; Stata Corp( for all analyses and with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Data from 616 of neighborhood controls and 414 of hospital visitor controls were analyzed. Opium point prevalence among men was significantly higher in hospital visitors than neighborhood controls (43.3% vs 32.2%; P = 0.047), while the prevalence of cigarette smoking was very similar in both control groups (46.3% vs 47.2%; P =.847). Using a logistic regression analysis, in an unadjusted analysis, neighborhood controls were less likely to report opium use in both genders, with (unadjusted OR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.59,1). After adjusting for potential confounders, the differences of opium use between the 2 control groups became more pronounced (Adjusted OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.69). Conclusion: Because of the similarity of reporting cigarette smoking among neighborhood controls but substantially lower reporting of opium use among them, we concluded that neighborhood controls underreport opium use-a sensitive question- and that using neighborhood control biases the findings in case-control studies. Hospital visitor controls may be more appropriate than neighborhood controls for case-control studies of illicit drugs.

8.
Lancet ; 394(10208): 1560-1579, 2019 10 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31657732

RESUMEN

We summarise the evidence for medicinal uses of opioids, harms related to the extramedical use of, and dependence on, these drugs, and a wide range of interventions used to address these harms. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study estimated that in 2017, 40·5 million people were dependent on opioids (95% uncertainty interval 34·3-47·9 million) and 109 500 people (105 800-113 600) died from opioid overdose. Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) can be highly effective in reducing illicit opioid use and improving multiple health and social outcomes-eg, by reducing overall mortality and key causes of death, including overdose, suicide, HIV, hepatitis C virus, and other injuries. Mathematical modelling suggests that scaling up the use of OAT and retaining people in treatment, including in prison, could avert a median of 7·7% of deaths in Kentucky, 10·7% in Kiev, and 25·9% in Tehran over 20 years (compared with no OAT), with the greater effects in Tehran and Kiev being due to reductions in HIV mortality, given the higher prevalence of HIV among people who inject drugs in those settings. Other interventions have varied evidence for effectiveness and patient acceptability, and typically affect a narrower set of outcomes than OAT does. Other effective interventions focus on preventing harm related to opioids. Despite strong evidence for the effectiveness of a range of interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of people who are dependent on opioids, coverage is low, even in high-income countries. Treatment quality might be less than desirable, and considerable harm might be caused to individuals, society, and the economy by the criminalisation of extramedical opioid use and dependence. Alternative policy frameworks are recommended that adopt an approach based on human rights and public health, do not make drug use a criminal behaviour, and seek to reduce drug-related harm at the population level.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Analgésicos Opioides/envenenamiento , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Salud Global , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Lancet ; 393(10184): 1984-2005, 2019 05 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043324

RESUMEN

Being the second-largest country in the Middle East, Iran has a long history of civilisation during which several dynasties have been overthrown and established and health-related structures have been reorganised. Iran has had the replacement of traditional practices with modern medical treatments, emergence of multiple pioneer scientists and physicians with great contributions to the advancement of science, environmental and ecological changes in addition to large-scale natural disasters, epidemics of multiple communicable diseases, and the shift towards non-communicable diseases in recent decades. Given the lessons learnt from political instabilities in the past centuries and the approaches undertaken to overcome health challenges at the time, Iran has emerged as it is today. Iran is now a country with a population exceeding 80 million, mainly inhabiting urban regions, and has an increasing burden of non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, malignancies, mental disorders, substance abuse, and road injuries.


Asunto(s)
Historia de la Medicina , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/epidemiología , Transición de la Salud , Historia Antigua , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Persia , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
10.
Compr Psychiatry ; 100: 152180, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32422427

RESUMEN

As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many governments have introduced steps such as spatial distancing and "staying at home" to curb its spread and impact. The fear resulting from the disease, the 'lockdown' situation, high levels of uncertainty regarding the future, and financial insecurity raise the level of stress, anxiety, and depression experienced by people all around the world. Psychoactive substances and other reinforcing behaviors (e.g., gambling, video gaming, watching pornography) are often used to reduce stress and anxiety and/or to alleviate depressed mood. The tendency to use such substances and engage in such behaviors in an excessive manner as putative coping strategies in crises like the COVID-19 pandemic is considerable. Moreover, the importance of information and communications technology (ICT) is even higher in the present crisis than usual. ICT has been crucial in keeping parts of the economy going, allowing large groups of people to work and study from home, enhancing social connectedness, providing greatly needed entertainment, etc. Although for the vast majority ICT use is adaptive and should not be pathologized, a subgroup of vulnerable individuals are at risk of developing problematic usage patterns. The present consensus guidance discusses these risks and makes some practical recommendations that may help diminish them.


Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Ansiedad/psicología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Consenso , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Juegos de Video
11.
Harm Reduct J ; 17(1): 81, 2020 10 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087141

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People who use drugs (PWUD) are considered as one of the main at-risk populations for Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We conducted a systematic review on the prevalence of HBV infection among PWUD in Iran. METHODS: Consistent with PRISMA guideline, international (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase) and national (Scientific Information Database) databases were searched using a comprehensive search strategy up to September 2019. The retrieved records were reviewed, and experts were contacted for unpublished studies. Studies on Iranian PWUD reporting HBV surface Antigen (HBsAg) prevalence among people who inject drugs (PWID) and non-injecting PWUD were included. HBsAg prevalence was pooled for PWID and non-injecting PWUD and for other subgroups using random-effects model meta-analysis. The trend of HBV prevalence over time was investigated using meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 35 studies reported data on HBV infection among PWID (33 studies) and non-injecting PWUD (11 studies). The pooled prevalence of HBsAg among PWID was 4.8% (95% CI 3.7-6.2). The only risk factor significantly associated with the odds of positive HBsAg in PWID was the previous history of imprisonment (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.29-2.30, p value = 0.000). The pooled estimate of HBsAg among non-injecting PWUD was 2.9% (95% CI 2.5-3.2). Time trend analyses showed significant decrease in HBV prevalence among PWID reaching from 8.2% (95% CI 3.9-16.5) in 2004-2006 to 3.1% (95% CI 2.3-4.1) in 2016 and later (b = -0.07; p value = 0.05). No significant trend was detected for non-injecting PWUD. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HBV infection among non-injecting PWUD and even PWID was not considerably higher than the Iranian general population. This might be the result of extensive harm reduction interventions in Iran. However, it seems that there are subgroups of PWID, who do not adequately benefit from existing harm reduction interventions. Future programs should more specifically target these high-risk groups.


Asunto(s)
Reducción del Daño , Virus de la Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Prevalencia
12.
Subst Use Misuse ; 54(4): 601-611, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30595063

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nonrandomized response (NRR) models are a new generation of surveys for sensitive issues. This study aims to evaluate the validity of estimates from the crosswise model (as one of the efficient models) through employing different response probabilities of nonsensitive questions. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted during October and November 2015 among 1777 students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Estimates of monthly alcohol consumption, and at least one instance of illicit drug use and extramarital sex over the last year were determined using direct questioning (DQ) and the Crosswise model (CM). In the last model, the probability of positive response to the nonsensitive questions was determined by using five different methods: uniform distribution (I), Benford's law (II), and estimations based on data from three other studies (III, IV, V). RESULTS: Crosswise estimates of sensitive behaviors with different probabilities of a positive response to nonsensitive questions differed significantly. For example, estimates of history of using illegal opioids at least once in the last year among men varied significantly from 5.0% to 16.1% with different crosswise models based on the probability of being born in Spring using method I (0.250), III (0.287), IV (0.248), and V (0.310). The model based on Benford's law (II) was applied to estimate alcohol and cannabis consumption, and its estimates showed significant discrepancy with results of crosswise models I and V. CONCLUSION: Estimates from crosswise model is highly sensitive to the response probability of nonsensitive questions. It seems that if this question is not selected carefully, the mentioned models will provide overestimates or underestimates, and the more-is-better hypothesis is not always valid. To achieve valid estimates, the exact probability of a positive response to the nonsensitive question must be known for the studied population.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Relaciones Extramatrimoniales , Modelos Estadísticos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Universidades , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Proyectos de Investigación
13.
J Ethn Subst Abuse ; 18(2): 309-318, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28820664

RESUMEN

Introduction and Aims: Socioeconomic Status (SES) is considered as one of the important factors associated with use of various drugs. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of SES on cigarette smoking, alcohol use, drug use, and passive exposure to opium and cigarette smoke. Design and Methods: In this study, which is part of a multicenter case-control study, the research hypothesis was checked among controls who had referred to hospitals. Data were collected through a questionnaire and laboratory tests to determine the actual consumers of opium and other illicit drugs. Then, the data were analyzed using STATA 13. Result: This study was performed on 364 individuals within the age range of 30 to 75 years. More than 55% of the participants had a history of life-time consumption of cigarettes and hookah as well as alcohol and drugs. The results revealed an inverse relationship between SES and life-time consumption of hookah and alcohol. Furthermore, individuals with higher SES were more likely to deny their drug use. Discussion and Conclusions: The results revealed little robust evidence supporting the assumption that SES level can have an important effect on illicit drug use. On the other hand, the participants' characteristics could have a prominent effect on precise evaluation of the relationship between SES and drug use. Further multicenter studies are needed with samples diversified in terms of age and ethnicity to identify these confounding relationships.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Adicción al Opio/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clase Social , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología
14.
Am J Epidemiol ; 187(4): 647-655, 2018 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29145581

RESUMEN

Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) account for 76% of deaths in Iran, and this number is on the rise, in parallel with global rates. Many risk factors associated with NCDs are preventable; however, it is first necessary to conduct observational studies to identify relevant risk factors and the most appropriate approach to controlling them. Iran is a multiethnic country; therefore, in 2014 the Ministry of Health and Medical Education launched a nationwide cohort study-Prospective Epidemiological Research Studies in Iran (PERSIAN)-in order to identify the most prevalent NCDs among Iran's ethnic groups and to investigate effective methods of prevention. The PERSIAN study consists of 4 population-based cohorts; the adult component (the PERSIAN Cohort Study), described in this article, is a prospective cohort study including 180,000 persons aged 35-70 years from 18 distinct areas of Iran. Upon joining the cohort, participants respond to interviewer-administered questionnaires. Blood, urine, hair, and nail samples are collected and stored. To ensure consistency, centrally purchased equipment is sent to all sites, and the same team trains all personnel. Routine visits and quality assurance/control measures are taken to ensure protocol adherence. Participants are followed for 15 years postenrollment. The PERSIAN study is currently in the enrollment phase; cohort profiles will soon emerge.


Asunto(s)
Diseño de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/etnología , Adulto , Anciano , Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Pesos y Medidas Corporales , Conducta Cooperativa , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Etnicidad , Femenino , Cabello/química , Sistemas de Información en Salud/organización & administración , Pruebas Hematológicas , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Uñas/química , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Urinálisis
15.
BMC Psychiatry ; 18(1): 261, 2018 08 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30126386

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It has been shown in the past two decades that anxiety disorders are the most common mental disorders in general population across the world. This study sought to assess the prevalence of major anxiety disorders, their sociodemographic correlates and mental health service utilization as part of the Iranian Mental Health Survey (IranMHS). METHODS: A national household face-to-face survey was carried out on a representative sample of Iranian adults from January to June 2011 using Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1). A total of 7886 subjects between 15 and 64 years who can understand Persian language were included. The 12-month prevalence of anxiety disorders according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), their socio-demographic correlates, health service use and days out of role were measured in this study. RESULTS: The 12-month prevalence of anxiety disorders (not including specific phobias) was 15.6%. The prevalence was 12.0% in males and 19.4% in females. The three most prevalent anxiety disorders were generalized anxiety disorder (5.2%), obsessive-compulsive disorder (5.1%) and social phobia (3.2%), respectively. Factors found to be significantly associated with anxiety disorders were: female gender (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.09-1.23), middle (OR = 1.23, 95%CI: 1.01-1.50) or low (OR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.31-2.10) socioeconomic status, unemployment (OR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.49-2.62), and urban residence (OR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.10-1.57). Comorbidity with non-anxiety disorders significantly increased service utilization. In all subgroups, service utilization was higher among females while the number of days out of role was higher among males. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety disorders are common conditions with a higher prevalence among the female gender, unemployed individuals, and people with low socioeconomic conditions living in urban areas. Comorbidity of anxiety disorders with other psychological disorders aggravates the disability and significantly increases the number of days out of role.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/epidemiología , Trastornos Fóbicos/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Distribución por Sexo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
16.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 6: CD007522, 2018 06 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29929212

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pharmacologic therapies for management of heroin withdrawal have been studied and reviewed widely. Opium dependence is generally associated with less severe dependence and milder withdrawal symptoms than heroin. The evidence on withdrawal management of heroin might therefore not be exactly applicable for opium. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of various pharmacologic therapies for the management of the acute phase of opium withdrawal. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following sources up to September 2017: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, regional and national databases (IMEMR, Iranmedex, and IranPsych), main electronic sources of ongoing trials, and reference lists of all relevant papers. In addition, we contacted known investigators to obtain missing data or incomplete trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled clinical trials and randomised controlled trials on pharmacological therapies, compared with no intervention, placebo, other pharmacologic treatments, different doses of the same drug, and psychosocial intervention, to manage acute withdrawal from opium in a maximum duration of 30 days. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included 13 trials involving 1096 participants. No pooled analysis was possible. Studies were carried out in three countries, Iran, India, and Thailand, in outpatient and inpatient settings. The quality of the evidence was generally very low.When the mean of withdrawal symptoms was provided for several days, we mainly focused on day 3. The reason for this was that the highest severity of opium withdrawal is in the second to fourth day.Comparing different pharmacological treatments with each other, clonidine was twice as good as methadone for completion of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.69 to 2.38; 361 participants, 1 study, low-quality evidence). All the other results showed no differences between the considered drugs: baclofen versus clonidine (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.80; 66 participants, 1 study, very low-quality evidence); clonidine versus clonidine plus amantadine (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.24; 69 participants, 1 study); clonidine versus buprenorphine in an inpatient setting (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.20; 1 study, 35 participants, very low-quality evidence); methadone versus tramadol (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.37; 1 study, 72 participants, very low-quality evidence); methadone versus methadone plus gabapentin (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.43; 1 study, 40 participants, low-quality evidence), and tincture of opium versus methadone (1 study, 74 participants, low-quality evidence).Comparing different pharmacological treatments with each other, adding amantadine to clonidine decreased withdrawal scores rated at day 3 (mean difference (MD) -3.56, 95% CI -5.97 to -1.15; 1 study, 60 participants, very low-quality evidence). Comparing clonidine with buprenorphine in an inpatient setting, we found no difference in withdrawal symptoms rated by a physician (MD -1.40, 95% CI -2.93 to 0.13; 1 study, 34 participants, very low-quality evidence), and results in favour of buprenorpine when rated by participants (MD -11.80, 95% CI -15.56 to -8.04). Buprenorphine was superior to clonidine in controlling severe withdrawal symptoms in an outpatient setting (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.64; 1 study, 76 participants). We found no difference in the comparison of methadone versus tramadol (MD 0.04, 95% CI -2.68 to 2.76; 1 study, 72 participants) and in the comparison of methadone versus methadone plus gabapentin (MD -2.20, 95% CI -6.72 to 2.32; 1 study, 40 participants).Comparing clonidine versus buprenorphine in an outpatient setting, more adverse effects were reported in the clonidine group (1 study, 76 participants). Higher numbers of participants in the clonidine group experienced hypotension at days 5 to 8, headache at days 1 to 8, sedation at days 5 to 8, dizziness and dry mouth at days 1 to 10, and nausea at days 1 to 9. Sweating was reported in a significantly higher number of participants in the buprenorphine group at days 1 to 10. We found no difference between groups for all the other comparisons considering this outcome.Comparing different dosages of the same pharmacological detoxification treatment, a high dose of clonidine (1 to 1.2 mg/day) did not differ from a low dose of clonidine (0.5 to 0.6 mg/day) in completion of treatment in an inpatient setting (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.19; 1 study, 68 participants), however a higher number of participants with hypotension was reported in the high-dose group (RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.77 to 5.98). Gradual reduction of methadone was associated with more adverse effects than abrupt withdrawal of methadone (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.94; 1 study, 20 participants, very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Results did not support using any specific pharmacological approach for the management of opium withdrawal due to generally very low-quality evidence and small or no differences between treatments. However, it seems that opium withdrawal symptoms are significant, especially at days 2 to 4 after discontinuation of opium. All of the assessed medications might be useful in alleviating symptoms. Those who receive clonidine might experience hypotension.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Opio/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Amantadina/uso terapéutico , Aminas/uso terapéutico , Baclofeno/uso terapéutico , Buprenorfina/efectos adversos , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Clonidina/efectos adversos , Clonidina/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Ciclohexanocarboxílicos/uso terapéutico , Gabapentina , Humanos , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Opio/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/uso terapéutico
17.
Eur Addict Res ; 24(2): 60-70, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29627821

RESUMEN

AIMS: Addiction science has made great progress in the past decades. We conducted a scientometric study in order to quantify the number of publications and the growth rate globally, regionally, and at country levels. METHODS: In October 2015, we searched the Scopus database using the general keywords of addiction or drug-use disorders combined with specific terms regarding 4 groups of illicit drugs - cannabis, opioids, cocaine, and other stimulants or hallucinogens. All documents published during the 20-year period from 1995 to 2014 were included. RESULTS: A total of 95,398 documents were retrieved. The highest number of documents were on opioids, both globally (60.1%) and in each of 5 continents. However, studies on cannabis showed a higher growth rate in the last 5-year period of the study (2010-2014). The United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Australia, France, Spain, Italy, China, and Japan - almost all studies were from high-income countries - occupied the top 10 positions and produced 81.4% of the global science on drug addiction. CONCLUSION: As there are important socio-cultural differences in the epidemiology and optimal clinical care of addictive disorders, it is suggested that low- and more affected middle-income countries increase their capacity to conduct research and disseminate the knowledge in this field.


Asunto(s)
Bibliometría , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Bases de Datos Bibliográficas/estadística & datos numéricos , Drogas Ilícitas , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Conducta Adictiva , Humanos
18.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 53(12): 1339-1348, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30145626

RESUMEN

PURPOSES: (1) Cluster analysis of psychiatric disorders and partitioning the youth; (2) determining socio-demographic correlates and parental histories for each one of the clusters; and (3) comparing clusters based on the extent and type of using psychotherapeutic services. METHODS: The current cross-sectional study is a part of the first phase of PERSIAN Youth Cohort. The sample of the study includes 2991 participants aged 15-34 (27 ± 5.1 years, 55.6% female) from Ravansar district in western Iran. Enrollment and data collection for this phase were performed from October, 2014 to January, 2017. The data were collected through structured interviews, including the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI; version 2.1), mental health-related Sheehan Disability Scale, and Service Use Questionnaire. The obtained data were analyzed using two-step cluster analysis, multinomial logistic regression, and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Our model proposed three clusters: a clinical cluster with significant mental disability; a healthy cluster with significant disability; and a healthy cluster with mild disability. There is a direct relationship between widow/divorced marital status and psychiatric maternal history with the clinical cluster (P < 0.05). Clinical and non-clinical clusters with medium to severe disability used services for mental health more often that the healthy cluster with mild functional disability (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study show that 28.7% of the youth in the general population of western Iran are suffering from psychiatric disorders and nearly two-thirds of the total population reported a medium-severe functional disability. Considering the wide range of mental disorders and the functional disability levels created by these disorders, cluster analysis could provide invaluable information regarding the partitioning of the youth population.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Adulto Joven
19.
East Mediterr Health J ; 23(3): 173-181, 2017 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28493264

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to assess drop-out rates and associated reasons among patients at the Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS) clinic. In a one-year period (April 2014 to March 2015), all patients with drug dependence who had been referred for treatment and attended for a first assessment were included in this study (N=242). Those who received treatment were followed until March 2016. Survival analysis showed that 70.2% had dropped out from treatment. Log rank test showed that treatment drop-out rates differed between the different approaches used (P < 0.001), with the lowest slope inbuprenorphine maintenance treatment and the highest in the detoxification programme. Drop-out rates within the first three months was 62% (SE= 0.05) and 82.4% (SE=0.03) for opioids and stimulants dependence, respectively. Analyses were performed using SPSS (Version 21.0) and STATA software, (version 13.0). From the patients' perspective, motivational inconsistencies were considered as the main reason for not starting or leaving treatment. The findings of this study could give service providers a better grasp of drop-out rates and the associated reasons.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
East Mediterr Health J ; 23(3): 150-160, 2017 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28493261

RESUMEN

Drug abuse has significant cost to the individual, the family and the society. This study aimed to assess out of-pocket costs of consequences of drug use disorder. Data were drawn from the Iranian Mental Health Survey (IranMHS) through face-to-face interviews with 7841 respondents aged 15-64 years. We used a bottom-up cost-ofillness method for economic analysis. Out-of-pocket costs for treatment of mental and drug problems, treatment of medical illnesses, as well as costs of crimes were assessed. The average of total annual expense was US$ 2120.6 for those with drug use disorder, which was 23.5% of annual income of an average Iranian family in the year 2011. The average of total out-of-pocket cost was US$ 674.6 for those with other mental disorder and US$ 421.9 for those with no mental disorder. Catastrophic payment was reported in 47.6% of the patients with drug use disorder and 14.4% of those with other mental disorder. Thus, considerable amount of family resources are spent on the consequences of drug use.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Costo de Enfermedad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA