Assays of CFTR Function In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo.

Cystic fibrosis, a multi-organ genetic disease, is characterized by abnormal function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, a chloride channel at the apical membrane of several epithelia. In recent years, therapeutic strategies have been developed to correct the CFTR defect. To evaluate CFTR function at baseline for diagnosis, or the efficacy of CFTR-restoring therapy, reliable tests are needed to measure CFTR function, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. In vitro techniques either directly or indirectly measure ion fluxes; direct measurement of ion fluxes and quenching of fluorescence in cell-based assays, change in transmembrane voltage or current in patch clamp or Ussing chamber, swelling of CFTR-containing organoids by secondary water influx upon CFTR activation. Several cell or tissue types can be used. Ex vivo and in vivo assays similarly evaluate current (intestinal current measurement) and membrane potential differences (nasal potential difference), on tissues from individual patients. In the sweat test, the most frequently used in vivo evaluation of CFTR function, chloride concentration or stimulated sweat rate can be directly measured. Here, we will describe the currently available bio-assays for quantitative evaluation of CFTR function, their indications, advantages and disadvantages, and correlation with clinical outcome measures.

Rectal organoid morphology analysis (ROMA) as a promising diagnostic tool in cystic fibrosis.

Diagnosing cystic fibrosis (CF) when sweat chloride is not in the CF range and less than 2 disease-causing CFTR mutations are found requires physiological CFTR assays, which are not always feasible or available. We developed a new physiological CFTR assay based on the morphological differences between rectal organoids from subjects with and without CF. In organoids from 167 subjects with and 22 without CF, two parameters derived from a semi-automated image analysis protocol (rectal organoid morphology analysis, ROMA) fully discriminated CF subjects with two disease-causing mutations from non-CF subjects (p<0.001). ROMA, feasible at all ages, can be centralised to improve standardisation.

Butyrate Does Not Protect Against Inflammation-induced Loss of Epithelial Barrier Function and Cytokine Production in Primary Cell Monolayers From Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In vitro studies using immortalised cancer cell lines showed that butyrate has an overall positive effect on epithelial barrier integrity, but the physiological relevance of cancer cell lines is limited. We developed epithelial monolayers from human tissue samples of patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] to assess the effect of butyrate on epithelial barrier function. METHODS: A protocol to establish monolayers from primary epithelial cells of UC patients [n = 10] and non-UC controls [n = 10] was optimised. The monolayers were treated with 8 mM sodium butyrate ± tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNFα] and type II interferon [IFNγ] for 48 h. Changes in transepithelial electrical resistance were monitored. Barrier gene expression levels were measured. Inflammatory proteins in the supernatant of the cells were quantified with OLINK. RESULTS: We demonstrated that primary monolayer cultures can be grown within 1 week of culture with robust resistance values and polarised tight junction expression. Butyrate treatment of the cultures increased resistance but was detrimental in combination with TNFα and IFNγ. The combined treatment further induced even higher IL8 mRNA and inflammatory protein secretion than for the inflammatory mediators alone. The observed effects were similar in cultures from patients and non-UC controls, suggesting that there were no patient-specific responses responsible for these findings. CONCLUSIONS: We found that butyrate does not protect against inflammation-induced barrier dysfunction and even worsens its effects in primary epithelial monolayers of UC patients and controls. The basic mechanisms of butyrate should therefore be reconsidered in future studies, in particular in patients with active inflammation and pre-existing barrier defects as is known for UC.