ERBB2 Amplification and HER2 Expression in Salivary Duct Carcinoma: Evaluation of Scoring Guidelines and Potential for Expanded Anti-HER2 Therapy.

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is aggressive with limited therapeutic options. A subset of SDC display human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry, and some show ERBB2 gene amplification. Guidelines for HER2 scoring are not firmly established. Recent advances in breast carcinoma have established a role for anti-HER2 therapies in lesions with low HER2 expression lacking ERBB2 amplification. Delineating HER2 staining patterns in SDC is critical for evaluating anti-HER2 treatments. In total, 53 cases of SDC resected at our institution between 2004 and 2020 were identified. Androgen receptor (AR) and HER2 immunohistochemistry and ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed in all cases. AR expression was scored for percentage positive cells and categorized as positive (>10% of cells), low positive (1%-10%), or negative (<1%). HER2 staining levels and patterns were recorded, scored using 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines, and categorized into HER2-positive (3+ or 2+ with ERBB2 amplification), HER2-low (1+ or 2+ without ERBB2 amplification), HER2-very low (faint staining in <10% of cells), or HER2-absent types. Clinical parameters and vital status were recorded. Median age was 70 years, with a male predominance. ERBB2-amplified tumors (11/53; 20.8%) presented at lower pT stages (pTis/pT1/pT2; P = .005, Fisher exact test) and more frequently had perineural invasion (P = .007, Fisher exact test) compared with ERBB2 nonamplified tumors; no other pathologic features differed significantly by gene amplification status. In addition, 2+ HER2 staining by 2018 ASCO/CAP criteria was most common (26/53; 49%); only 4 cases (8%) were HER2-absent status; 3+ HER2 staining was found in 9 tumors, and all were ERBB2 amplified. Six patients with HER2-expressing tumors received trastuzumab therapy, including 2 with ERBB2-amplified tumors. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival did not differ significantly based on ERBB2 status. This work suggests that 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 evaluation in breast carcinoma could be applied to SDC. Our findings also show broad overexpression of HER2 in SDC raising the possibility that more patients may benefit from anti-HER2-directed therapies.

Does neck dissection affect post-operative outcomes in parotidectomy? A national study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize post-operative complications in parotidectomy with neck dissection. METHODS: Patients age ≥ 18 receiving a parotidectomy or parotidectomy with neck dissection between 2005 and 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with unknown demographic variables were excluded. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 13,609 parotidectomy patients were analyzed, 11,243 (82.6%) without neck dissection and 2366 (17.4%) with neck dissection. Both length of surgery (mean minutes ± standard deviation [SD] = 335.9 ± 189.2 vs. 152.9 ± 99.0, p < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (mean days ± SD = 3.90 ± 4.76 vs. 1.04 ± 2.14, p < 0.001) were greater with dissection. 13.9% of parotidectomies with neck dissection and 3.5% without dissection (p < 0.001) had at least one complication, which remained significant after multivariable adjustment (Odds Ratio[OR] = 1.565 (95%CI = 1.279-1.914), p < 0.001). The increase in post-operative complications was predominately driven by an increased transfusion rate (7.4% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis also demonstrated no significant difference in rates of returning to the operating room (OR = 1.122 (95%CI 0.843-1.493), p > 0.05) or rates of readmission (OR = 1.007 (95%CI 0.740-1.369), p > 0.05). Parotidectomy with neck dissection was more likely to be inpatient (OR = 4.411 (95%CI 3.887-5.004), p < 0.001) and to be ASA class 3 (OR = 1.367 (95%CI 1.194-1.564), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide data demonstrates that parotidectomy with neck dissection is associated with increased rates of post-operative complications; however, neck dissection did not significantly impact readmission or reoperation rates. These findings indicate that neck dissection is a relatively safe addition to parotidectomy and provide novel evidence in the management of parotid malignancies.

Long-term complications and reconstruction failures in previously radiated breast cancer patients receiving salvage mastectomy with autologous reconstruction or tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction.

Salvage mastectomy (SM) is the standard of care for patients with local recurrence (LR) after breast conservation therapy (BCT), often with immediate reconstruction. Complications of reconstruction are a concern for these patients, and long-term data are limited. We sought to compare rates of complications requiring re-operation (CRR) and reconstruction failure (RF) between autologous reconstruction (AR) and tissue expander/implant reconstruction (TE/I). Patients with locally recurrent breast cancer after BCT, treated with SM and immediate AR or TE/I between 2000 and 2008, were identified. CRR was defined as unplanned return to operating room for wound infection, dehiscence, necrosis (including flap, skin, or fat), hematoma, or hernia (for AR) and extrusion, leak, or capsular contracture (for TE/I). RF was defined as conversion to another reconstruction technique or to flat chest wall. This study included 103 patients with 107 reconstructions. Median follow-up was 6.6 years. CRR and RF were significantly higher with TE/I (n = 34) compared to AR (n = 73) at 5 years (50.9% vs 25.5%; P = 0.02) and (42.1% vs 5.8%; P < 0.001). On univariate analysis (UVA), TE/I (HR = 2.14; P = 0.02) and diabetes (HR = 5.10; P = 0.007) were significant predictors for CRR. On UVA, TE/I (HR = 7.30; P < 0.001) and older age at reconstruction (HR = 1.03; P = 0.003) were significant predictors for RF. In this population of previously irradiated patients, TE/I was associated with significantly higher CRR and RF. Complications continue to occur up to 10 years after TE/I. AR should be considered in appropriately selected patients, though TE/I may remain a reasonable option in patients without high-risk factors for surgical complications.

Recursive partitioning analysis is predictive of overall survival for patients undergoing spine stereotactic radiosurgery.

Spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers excellent radiographic and pain control for patients with spine metastases. We created a prognostic index using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to allow better patient selection for spine SRS. Patients who underwent single-fraction spine SRS for spine metastases were included. Primary histologies were divided into favorable (breast/prostate), radioresistant (renal cell/sarcoma/melanoma) and other. Cox proportional hazards regression was done to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). RPA was performed to identify factors to classify patients into distinct risk groups with respect to OS. A total of 444 patients were eligible. Median dose was 16 Gy (range 8-18) in 1 fraction and median follow-up was 11.7 months. At time of analysis, 103 (23.1%) patients were alive. Median OS was 12.9 months. RPA identified three distinct classes. Class 1 was defined as KPS > 70 with controlled systemic disease (n = 142); class 3 was defined as KPS ≤ 70 and age < 54 years or KPS ≤ 70 age ≥ 54 years and presence of visceral metastases (n = 95); all remaining patients comprise class 2 (n = 207). Median overall survival was 26.7 months for class 1, 13.4 months for class 2, and 4.5 months for class 3 (p < 0.01). Our analysis demonstrates that there is considerably variability in survival among patients undergoing spine SRS. We created an objective risk stratification via RPA for spine SRS. Given the safety and efficacy of spine SRS and good survival in class 1 and 2 patients, this RPA can help clinicians identify patients who may benefit from upfront spine SRS.

Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy With Brachytherapy Boost and Disease Progression and Mortality in Patients With Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Cancer.

Importance: The optimal treatment for Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer is unknown. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of patients with Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer after definitive treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study in 12 tertiary centers (11 in the United States, 1 in Norway), with 1809 patients treated between 2000 and 2013. Exposures: Radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy, or EBRT plus brachytherapy boost (EBRT+BT) with androgen deprivation therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was prostate cancer-specific mortality; distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival were secondary outcomes. Results: Of 1809 men, 639 underwent RP, 734 EBRT, and 436 EBRT+BT. Median ages were 61, 67.7, and 67.5 years; median follow-up was 4.2, 5.1, and 6.3 years, respectively. By 10 years, 91 RP, 186 EBRT, and 90 EBRT+BT patients had died. Adjusted 5-year prostate cancer-specific mortality rates were RP, 12% (95% CI, 8%-17%); EBRT, 13% (95% CI, 8%-19%); and EBRT+BT, 3% (95% CI, 1%-5%). EBRT+BT was associated with significantly lower prostate cancer-specific mortality than either RP or EBRT (cause-specific HRs of 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21-0.68] and 0.41 [95% CI, 0.24-0.71]). Adjusted 5-year incidence rates of distant metastasis were RP, 24% (95% CI, 19%-30%); EBRT, 24% (95% CI, 20%-28%); and EBRT+BT, 8% (95% CI, 5%-11%). EBRT+BT was associated with a significantly lower rate of distant metastasis (propensity-score-adjusted cause-specific HRs of 0.27 [95% CI, 0.17-0.43] for RP and 0.30 [95% CI, 0.19-0.47] for EBRT). Adjusted 7.5-year all-cause mortality rates were RP, 17% (95% CI, 11%-23%); EBRT, 18% (95% CI, 14%-24%); and EBRT+BT, 10% (95% CI, 7%-13%). Within the first 7.5 years of follow-up, EBRT+BT was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (cause-specific HRs of 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46-0.96] for RP and 0.61 [95% CI, 0.45-0.84] for EBRT). After the first 7.5 years, the corresponding HRs were 1.16 (95% CI, 0.70-1.92) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.57-1.32). No significant differences in prostate cancer-specific mortality, distant metastasis, or all-cause mortality (≤7.5 and >7.5 years) were found between men treated with EBRT or RP (cause-specific HRs of 0.92 [95% CI, 0.67-1.26], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.70-1.14], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.80-1.44], and 1.34 [95% CI, 0.85-2.11]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer, treatment with EBRT+BT with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with significantly better prostate cancer-specific mortality and longer time to distant metastasis compared with EBRT with androgen deprivation therapy or with RP.

A multi-institutional comparison of outcomes of immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients treated with surgery and radiation therapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Patients who are chronically immunosuppressed have higher rates of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (cSCC-HN). This is the largest multi-institutional study to date investigating the effect of immune status on disease outcomes in patients with cSCC-HN who underwent surgery and received postoperative radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Patients from 3 institutions who underwent surgery and also received postoperative RT for primary or recurrent, stage I through IV cSCC-HN between 1995 and 2015 were included in this institutional review board-approved study. Patients categorized as immunosuppressed had chronic hematologic malignancy, human immunodeficiency/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or had received immunosuppressive therapy for organ transplantation ≥6 months before diagnosis. Overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: Of 205 patients, 138 (67.3%) were immunocompetent, and 67 (32.7%) were immunosuppressed. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (47.3% vs 86.1%; P < .0001) and progression-free survival (38.7% vs 71.6%; P = .002) were significantly lower in immunosuppressed patients at 2 years. The 2-year OS rate in immunosuppressed patients demonstrated a similar trend (60.9% vs 78.1%; P = .135) but did not meet significance. On multivariate analysis, immunosuppressed status (hazard ratio [HR], 3.79; P < .0001), recurrent disease (HR, 2.67; P = .001), poor differentiation (HR, 2.08; P = .006), and perineural invasion (HR, 2.05; P = .009) were significantly associated with locoregional recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressed patients with cSCC-HN had dramatically lower outcomes compared with immunocompetent patients, despite receiving bimodality therapy. Immune status is a strong prognostic factor that should be accounted for in prognostic systems, treatment algorithms, and clinical trial design. Cancer 2017;123:2054-2060. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

HSD3B1 and resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: a retrospective, multicohort study.

BACKGROUND: HSD3B1 (1245A>C) has been mechanistically linked to castration-resistant prostate cancer because it encodes an altered enzyme that augments dihydrotestosterone synthesis from non-gonadal precursors. We postulated that men inheriting the HSD3B1 (1245C) allele would exhibit resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS: In this multicohort study, we determined HSD3B1 genotype retrospectively in men treated with ADT for post-prostatectomy biochemical failure and correlated genotype with long-term clinical outcomes. We used data and samples from prospectively maintained prostate cancer registries at the Cleveland Clinic (Cleveland, OH, USA; primary study cohort) and the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA; post-prostatectomy and metastatic validation cohorts). In the post-prostatectomy cohorts, patients of any age were eligible if they underwent prostatectomy between Jan 1, 1996, and Dec 31, 2009 (at the Cleveland Clinic; primary cohort), or between Jan 1, 1987, and Dec 31, 2011 (at the Mayo Clinic; post-prostatectomy cohort) and were treated with ADT for biochemical failure or for non-metastatic clinical failure. In the metastatic validation cohort, patients of any age were eligible if they were enrolled at Mayo Clinic between Sept 1, 2009, and July 31, 2013, with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival according to HSD3B1 genotype. We did prespecified multivariable analyses to assess the independent predictive value of HSD3B1 genotype on outcomes. FINDINGS: We included and genotyped 443 patients: 118 in the primary cohort (who underwent prostatectomy), 137 in the post-prostatectomy validation cohort, and 188 in the metastatic validation cohort. In the primary study cohort, median progression-free survival diminished as a function of the number of variant alleles inherited: 6·6 years (95% CI 3·8-not reached) in men with homozygous wild-type genotype, 4·1 years (3·0-5·5) in men with heterozygous variant genotype, and 2·5 years (0·7 to not reached) in men with homozygous variant genotype (p=0·011). Relative to the homozygous wild-type genotype, inheritance of two copies of the variant allele was predictive of decreased progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 2·4 [95% CI 1·1-5·3], p=0·029), as was inheritance of one copy of the variant allele (HR 1·7 [1·0-2·9], p=0·041). Findings were similar for distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival. The effect of the HSD3B1 genotype was independently confirmed in the validation cohorts. INTERPRETATION: Inheritance of the HSD3B1 (1245C) allele that enhances dihydrotestosterone synthesis is associated with prostate cancer resistance to ADT. HSD3B1 could therefore potentially be a powerful genetic biomarker capable of distinguishing men who are a priori likely to fare favourably with ADT from those who harbour disease liable to behave more aggressively, and who therefore might warrant early escalated therapy. FUNDING: Prostate Cancer Foundation, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Defense, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, American Cancer Society, Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Research Programs Committee and Department of Radiation Oncology, Gail and Joseph Gassner Development Funds.

Use of systemic therapy with definitive radiotherapy for elderly patients with head and neck cancer: A National Cancer Data Base analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of systemic therapy along with definitive radiotherapy for elderly patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Patients who were 71 years old or older with stage III to IVB squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx treated with definitive radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Patterns of systemic therapy use before or during definitive radiotherapy were investigated. The association between systemic therapy use and overall survival was investigated with a multivariate, inverse probability-weighted propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Elderly patients treated between 2004 and 2012 (n = 4165) were identified, and 80.4% received systemic therapy. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 1.8-125 months), and the 3-year overall survival rate was 51.6% (95% confidence interval, 50.0%-53.2%). During the study period, there was an increase in the frequency of systemic therapy use from 64% in 2004 to 86% in 2012. The use of systemic therapy was associated with improved overall survival in the multivariate model (hazard ratio, 1.456; 95% confidence interval, 1.308-1.620; P < .0001). A threshold age above which the use of systemic therapy was not associated with improved overall survival in select patients was not identified. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the available prospective evidence, the majority of elderly patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy also receive systemic therapy. The use of systemic therapy is associated with improved overall survival and should be a patient-specific decision in all age groups. Cancer 2016;122:3472-3483. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Informed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent for clinical research includes 2 components: informed consent documents (ICDs) and informed consent conversations (ICCs). Readability software has been used to help simplify the language of the ICD, but to the authors' knowledge is rarely used to assess the language used during the ICC, which may influence the quality of informed consent. The current analysis was performed to determine whether length and reading levels of transcribed ICCs are lower than their corresponding ICDs for selected clinical trials, and to assess whether investigator experience affected the use of simpler language and comprehensiveness. METHODS: The current study was a prospective study in which ICCs were audiorecorded at 6 institutions when families were offered participation in pediatric phase I oncology trials. Word count, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Flesch Reading Ease score (FRES) of the ICCs were compared with corresponding ICDs, including the frequency with which investigators addressed 8 prespecified critical consent elements during the ICC. RESULTS: Sixty-nine unique physician/protocol pairs were identified. Overall, ICCs contained fewer words (4677 vs 6364 words; P = .0016) and had a lower FKGL (6 vs 9.7; P ≤ .0001) and a higher FRES (77.8 vs 56.7; P<.0001) compared with their respective ICDs, but were more likely to omit critical consent elements, such as voluntariness (55%) and dose-limiting toxicities (26%). Years of investigator experience was not correlated with reliably covering critical elements or decreased linguistic complexity. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians use more understandable language during ICCs than the corresponding ICD, but appear to less reliably cover elements critical to fully informed consent. Efforts focused at providing communication training for clinician-investigators should be made to optimize the synergy between the ICD and the ICC.

A cure is possible: a study of 10-year survivors of brain metastases.

Little is known on the natural history, recurrence patterns, neurocognitive outcomes and prognostic factors associated with survival in long-term survivors (≥10 years) from brain metastasis (BM). In this study, the records of 1953 patients who underwent treatment for BM with a potential for ≥10 years of follow-up were reviewed. Cox regression analysis identified factors predictive for overall survival (OS). The median age at brain metastasis diagnosis was 60 years and the median OS was 6.4 months. The 1-year OS rate was 29.9, 12.1 % at 2 years, 3.0 % at 5 years, and 1.3 % at 10 years. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse OS included gender (males, HR 1.2), multiple brain metastases (HR 1.3), no surgery (HR 1.8), and no stereotactic radiosurgery (HR 1.8) (p < 0.0001 each). Fifty-six patients (2.9 %) survived ≥5 years; 23 patients (1.2 %) survived ≥10 years and the median survival for ≥10 year survivors was 18.5 years. Six of the 10-year survivors had an intracranial recurrence, five occurred within 11 years from the first treatment. Presence of a solitary lesion or single lesion at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis was associated with improved survival. Eight of the ≥10 year survivors (34.8 %) had no neurological symptoms at last follow-up; none of the 10-year survivors were documented to have a neurologic death. Our study demonstrates that patients with favorable prognostic features should undergo multimodality treatment. Albeit rare, patients who are alive 10 years after treatment for their brain metastases may be considered cured from their intracranial disease.

Inferior outcomes in immunosuppressed patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with surgery and radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed patients have higher rates of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. OBJECTIVE: This study reviews the effect of immune status on disease characteristics and treatment outcomes. METHODS: Patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy between 2000 and 2011 were included. Immunosuppressed patients underwent prior organ transplantation or chemotherapy. Baseline variables were compared using χ(2) and unpaired t tests. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: In this study of 59 patients, 38 (64%) were immunocompetent and 21 (36%) were immunosuppressed. Most patients had recurrent tumors (63%) and node-positive disease (61%), which were well balanced between the groups. Poorly differentiated tumors (62% vs 21%; P = .009), lymphovascular invasion (29% vs 11%; P = .08), and extracapsular extension (57% vs 41%; P = .09) were more frequent in the immunosuppressed group. Two-year disease-free survival (45% vs 62%) and 2-year overall survival (36% vs 67%) were inferior for immunosuppressed patients. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include single institution, retrospective study with small sample size, and potential referral bias. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressed patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck more frequently present with high-risk pathologic features and inferior outcomes. Early multidisciplinary assessment and alternate management strategies merit prospective investigation.

Risk of Thromboembolism in Patients Receiving Immunotherapy-Based Combinations as Front-Line Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receive combination-based immunotherapy with either 2 immune-oncology checkpoint inhibitors (IO/IO) or an IO agent in combination with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF-R) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO/TKI). The rates of thromboembolism (TE) in these cohorts are not clearly described and can potentially impact decision-making between IO/IO and IO/TKI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective investigation of patients with treatment-naïve mRCC treated with IO-based combinations between January 2015 and April 2021 at the Cleveland Clinic. TE events, including venous and arterial, were identified in each group. Competing risk regression was done to identify factors associated with the development of TE following therapy, with all-cause mortality treated as a competing event. RESULTS: Of 180 patients identified, 77 (43%) received IO/TKI and 103 (57%) received IO/IO. Median age was 65 years, 75% were male, and 80% had clear cell histology. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. At a median follow-up of 22.0 months, 10.0% of all patients had a TE. The one-year incidence of TE was 8.1% (95% CI: 3.3%-15.8%) with IO/TKI and 9.8% (95% CI: 5.0%-16.5%) with IO/IO and was not significantly different between the 2 groups (HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.35%-2.28%). Occurrence of TE was associated with decreased overall survival regardless of IO/IO or IO/TKI therapy (HR 2.80, 95% CI: 1.57-5.02). There was no difference in incidence of TE based on patient age, gender, prior history of TE, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (IMDC) risk group, or Khorana score. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of TE is similar between IO/IO and IO/TKI regimens in treatment-naïve mRCC and is also associated with decreased overall survival. While risk of TE may not guide decision-making in choice of front-line mRCC therapy, careful attention should be given to the high risk of TE in this population.

Primary fit tracheoesophageal puncture in primary versus salvage laryngectomy: Short-term and long-term complications and functional outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Primary fit tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is widely preferred for individuals who have not undergone prior radiation. However, there is no consensus on the relative utility of primary-fit TEP in the setting of salvage laryngectomy. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted of individuals undergoing laryngectomy with primary fit TEP between 2012 and 2018. Multivariable analysis was conducted to compare short-term and long-term complications, as well as speech and swallowing outcomes, of those who underwent primary versus salvage laryngectomy. RESULTS: In this study, 134 patients underwent total laryngectomy with primary fit TEP. Aside from a higher rate of peristomal dehiscence (13.1% vs. 1.4%) found in the salvage group, there was no difference in incidence of all other complications, including pharyngocutaneous fistula formation. The groups had comparable speech and swallow outcomes. CONCLUSION: Primary fit TEP is a safe and effective surgical choice for individuals undergoing salvage laryngectomy who desire a voice prosthesis.

Evaluating the impact of the degree of extranodal extension on outcomes in locally advanced oral cavity cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evaluate whether extranodal extension (ENE) extent impacts outcomes in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). METHODS: From an institutional database, patients with OCSCC and pathologic ENE who received adjuvant treatment were included. Surgical slides were reviewed to confirm ENE extent. Multivariable Cox regression was used to relate patient/treatment characteristics with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). ENE was analyzed as both a dichotomous and continuous variable. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were identified. Between major (>2 mm) versus minor ENE (≤2 mm), there was no significant difference in DFS (HR 1.18, 95%CI 0.72-1.92, p = 0.51) or OS (HR 1.17, 95%CI 0.70-1.96, p = 0.55). There was no significant association between ENE as a continuous variable and DFS (HR 0.97 per mm, 95%CI 0.87-1.4, p = 0.96) or OS (HR 0.96 per mm, 95%CI 0.83-1.11, p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: No significant relationship was seen between ENE extent and DFS or OS in individuals with OCSCC.

Results of a questionnaire regarding practice patterns for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial radiation necrosis after SRS.

Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment option for patients with brain tumors, its increased use has raised concern for increased incidence of radiation necrosis (RN). No established standard or guidelines exists regarding non-invasive techniques to diagnose or treat RN. This study was conducted to assess current patterns of evaluation and treatment of RN among physicians who treat intracranial malignancies. A questionnaire consisting of 20 questions was sent to 3,041 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the Society for Neurologic Oncology (SNO). Questions addressed demographics, utilization of SRS, perceptions regarding RN diagnosis treatment, approach to steroid-refractory RN, and management of two clinical scenarios using Kwiksurvey© software. The survey response rate was 8.74 % (266/3,041). Most respondents practice in an academic and/or university setting (62 %) at a facility that performs SRS (94 %) with a variety of systems. The number of annual cases performed at the participant's institution varied from <50 to >400, with a wide degree of variability. Most respondents practice at an institution that performs 50-100 cases/year (28 %). The most common range of symptomatic RN seen in clinical practice was 1-5 % (61 %). Most respondents reported that asymptomatic RN occurs in 6-10 % (33 %). Favored non-invasive diagnostic mechanisms were clinical evaluation (37 %) and MRI (19 %). In response to a clinical scenario depicting an asymptomatic patient post-SRS for brain metastasis with an enlarging lesion and edema at the treatment site, most respondents felt the image represented RN or a combination of RN and tumor progression. Most (58 %) favored short-term follow-up with repeat MRI. Ninety-three percent of the respondents initiated steroids as a first-line approach if patient was to develop symptoms. Steroids were the preferred first therapy in symptomatic patients on initial follow-up (81 %). In steroid-refractory patients, most recommend surgical intervention (63 %). Most physicians who responded to this questionnaire believe that post-SRS RN is uncommon (≤10 % of cases). The approach to establish the diagnosis of RN is variable. Steroids are the most commonly utilized first-line treatment for suspected RN. Considerable variation exists in the management of steroid-refractory RN. Additional studies are required to establish guidelines for evaluation and treatment of RN.

A prospective study of quality of life including fatigue and pulmonary function after stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The study seeks to prospectively evaluate pulmonary function and quality of life (QOL) in medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: QOL was assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) and the UCSD Medical Center Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program Shortness-of-Breath Questionnaire before and after SBRT at 6 weeks, and every 3 months until 12 months. Clinical investigations included pulmonary functions tests and blood profile and chemistries. SBRT was delivered on a Novalis/BrainLab system. RESULTS: Twenty-one analyzable patients were enrolled between July 2008 to April 2009. There were 12 males (52.4 %), 14 patients (66.7 %) had Zubrod performance 1, the median age was 77 years (range 61-90), and 87 % was inoperable because of pulmonary impairment. Median tumor size was 3.0 cm (range 1-4.6). Median follow-up was 17.6 months. One-year local control was 100 %. There were no significant changes in the median total FACT-L scores: 109 at baseline compared to 112 at 1 year. Mean UCSD scores were not significant for the year. No significant changes in mean baseline compared to 1-year FEV1 and 6-min walks as % predicted were seen but a significant DLCO change (p = 0.012) was attributed to the decreased range in the standard deviations. CONCLUSIONS: Following SBRT, QOL is not significantly degraded. Pulmonary function is likewise not significantly impaired overall. Along with favorable survival results, these findings confirm that SBRT is appropriate for this patient population.

Reduced Risk of Corporal Tumors in Patients With Head and Neck Paragangliomas With p.Pro81Leu Mutations.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with head and neck paragangliomas who are positive for the SDHD p.Pro81Leu (P81L) mutation are thought to have a distinct phenotype from other SDHx mutations, but few studies have focused on this mutation. The objective of this study was to determine the hazard of developing a second primary, metastatic, or recurrent paraganglioma in SDHx patients with or without P81L. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 60 patients with head and neck paragangliomas and genetic testing, followed for a median of 9 years. SETTING: Single academic medical center. METHODS: Univariable Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated second primary and recurrent paragangliomas in patients with SDHD P81L, SDHx non-P81L, and nonhereditary paraganglioma. RESULTS: This series comprised 31 patients without SDHx, 14 with SDHD P81L, and 15 with other SDHx mutations. At a median 9 years of follow-up, corporal (not head and neck) second primary paragangliomas occurred in 31% of patients with SDHx non-P81L mutations, compared with 0% and 4% of patients with SDHD P81L and without SDHx mutations, respectively. Second corporal paragangliomas were more likely in patients with SDHx non-P81L mutations than in those without a mutation (hazard ratio = 5.461, 95% confidence interval: 0.596-50.030, p = .13). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report a lower likelihood of corporal tumors for patients with head and neck paragangliomas with SDH mutations positive for P81L. Larger studies are needed to determine if head and neck paraganglioma patients with P81L qualify for less intensive imaging surveillance to screen for second primary paragangliomas outside the head and neck.

Rates of osteoradionecrosis in resected oral cavity cancer reconstructed with free tissue transfer in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.

BACKGROUND: Resected oral cavity carcinoma defects are often reconstructed with osteocutaneous or soft-tissue free flaps, but risk of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is unknown. METHODS: This retrospective study included oral cavity carcinoma treated with free-tissue reconstruction and postoperative IMRT between 2000 and 2019. Risk-regression assessed risk factors for grade ≥2 ORN. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients (51% male, 28% current smokers, mean age 62 ± 11 years) were included. Median follow-up was 32.6 months (range, 1.0-190.6). Thirty-eight (25%) patients had fibular free flap for mandibular reconstruction, whereas 117 (76%) had soft-tissue reconstruction. Grade ≥2 ORN occurred in 14 (9.0%) patients, at a median 9.8 months (range, 2.4-61.5) after IMRT. Post-radiation teeth extraction was significantly associated with ORN. One-year and 10-year ORN rates were 5.2% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ORN risk was comparable between osteocutaneous and soft-tissue reconstruction for resected oral cavity carcinoma. Osteocutaneous flaps can be safely performed with no excess concern for mandibular ORN.

Margin Assessment Methods in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Recurrence: Tumor Bed vs Resection Specimen Sampling.

Importance: Positive margins and margin clearance are risk factors for recurrence in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), and these features are used to guide decisions regarding adjuvant radiation treatment. However, the prognostic value of intraoperative tumor bed vs resection specimen sampling is not well defined. Objective: To determine the prognostic implications of intraoperative margin assessment methods (tumor bed vs resection specimen sampling) with recurrence among patients who undergo surgical resection for OCSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective study of patients who had undergone surgical resection of OCSCC between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021, at a tertiary-level academic institution. Patients were grouped by margin assessment method (tumor bed [defect] or resection specimen sampling). Of 223 patients with OCSCC, 109 patients had localized tumors (pT1-T2, cN0), 154 had advanced tumors, and 40 were included in both cohorts. Disease recurrence after surgery was estimated by the cumulative incidence method and compared between cohorts using hazard ratios (HRs). Data analyses were performed from January 5, 2023, to April 30, 2023. Main Outcome and Measures: Recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: The study population comprised 223 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [12.0] years; 88 (39.5%) female and 200 [90.0%] White individuals) of whom 158 (70.9%) had defect-driven and 65 (29.1%) had specimen-driven margin sampling. Among the 109 patients with localized cancer, intraoperative positive margins were found in 5 of 67 (7.5%) vs 8 of 42 (19.0%) for defect- vs specimen-driven sampling, respectively. Final positive margins were 3.0% for defect- (2 of 67) and 2.4% for specimen-driven (1 of 42) margin assessment. Among the 154 patients with advanced cancer, intraoperative positive margins were found in 29 of 114 (25.4%) vs 13 of 40 (32.5%) for defect- and specimen-driven margins, respectively. Final positive margins were higher in the defect-driven group (9 of 114 [7.9%] vs 1 of 40 [2.5%]). When stratified by margin assessment method, the 3-year rates of local recurrence (9.7% vs 5.1%; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.51-3.66), regional recurrence (11.0% vs 10.4%; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.37-1.94), and distant recurrence (6.4% vs 5.0%; HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.36-3.35) were not different for defect- vs specimen-driven sampling cohorts, respectively. The 3-year rate of any recurrence was 18.9% in the defect- and 15.2% in the specimen-driven cohort (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.48-1.81). There were no differences in cumulative incidence of disease recurrence when comparing defect- vs specimen-driven cases. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this retrospective cohort study indicate that margin assessment methods using either defect- or specimen-driven sampling did not demonstrate a clear association with the risk of recurrence after OCSCC resection. Specimen-driven sampling may be associated with reduced surgical margin positivity rates, which often necessitate concurrent chemotherapy with adjuvant radiation therapy.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NTLR) Predicts Local Control Failure and Overall Survival after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) In Metastatic Sarcoma.

The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NTLR) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) recovery are prognostic across many cancers. We investigated whether NLTR predicts SBRT success or survival in a metastatic sarcoma cohort treated with SBRT from 2014 and 2020 (N = 42). Wilcox Signed Rank Test and Friedman Test compare NTLR changes with local failure vs. local control (N = 138 lesions). Cox analyses identified factors associated with overall survival. If local control was successful, NLTR change was not significant (p = 0.30). However, NLTR significantly changed in patients local failure (p = 0.027). The multivariable Cox model demonstrated higher NLTR before SBRT was associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.002). The optimal NTLR cut point was 5 (Youden index: 0.418). One-year overall survival in SBRT metastatic sarcoma cohort was 47.6% (CI 34.3%-66.1%). Patients with an NTLR above 5 had a one-year overall survival of 37.7% (21.4%-66.3%); patients with an NTLR below 5 had a significantly improved overall survival of 63% (43.3%-91.6%, p = 0.014). Since NTLR at the time of SBRT was significantly associated with local control success and overall survival in metastatic sarcoma treated with SBRT, future efforts to reduce tumor inhibitory microenvironment factors and improved lymphocyte recovery should be investigated.