The role of GTP hydrolysis by EF-G in ribosomal translocation.

Translocation of transfer RNA (tRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) through the ribosome is catalyzed by the GTPase elongation factor G (EF-G) in bacteria. Although guanosine-5'-triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis accelerates translocation and is required for dissociation of EF-G, its fundamental role remains unclear. Here, we used ensemble Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) to monitor how inhibition of GTP hydrolysis impacts the structural dynamics of the ribosome. We used FRET pairs S12-S19 and S11-S13, which unambiguously report on rotation of the 30S head domain, and the S6-L9 pair, which measures intersubunit rotation. Our results show that, in addition to slowing reverse intersubunit rotation, as shown previously, blocking GTP hydrolysis slows forward head rotation. Surprisingly, blocking GTP hydrolysis completely abolishes reverse head rotation. We find that the S13-L33 FRET pair, which has been used in previous studies to monitor head rotation, appears to report almost exclusively on intersubunit rotation. Furthermore, we find that the signal from quenching of 3'-terminal pyrene-labeled mRNA, which is used extensively to follow mRNA translocation, correlates most closely with reverse intersubunit rotation. To account for our finding that blocking GTP hydrolysis abolishes a rotational event that occurs after the movements of mRNA and tRNAs are essentially complete, we propose that the primary role of GTP hydrolysis is to create an irreversible step in a mechanism that prevents release of EF-G until both the tRNAs and mRNA have moved by one full codon, ensuring productive translocation and maintenance of the translational reading frame.

Mutations in domain IV of elongation factor EF-G confer -1 frameshifting.

A recent crystal structure of a ribosome complex undergoing partial translocation in the absence of elongation factor EF-G showed disruption of codon-anticodon pairing and slippage of the reading frame by -1, directly implicating EF-G in preservation of the translational reading frame. Among mutations identified in a random screen for dominant-lethal mutations of EF-G were a cluster of six that map to the tip of domain IV, which has been shown to contact the codon-anticodon duplex in trapped translocation intermediates. In vitro synthesis of a full-length protein using these mutant EF-Gs revealed dramatically increased -1 frameshifting, providing new evidence for a role for domain IV of EF-G in maintaining the reading frame. These mutations also caused decreased rates of mRNA translocation and rotational movement of the head and body domains of the 30S ribosomal subunit during translocation. Our results are in general agreement with recent findings from Rodnina and coworkers based on in vitro translation of an oligopeptide using EF-Gs containing mutations at two positions in domain IV, who found an inverse correlation between the degree of frameshifting and rates of translocation. Four of our six mutations are substitutions at positions that interact with the translocating tRNA, in each case contacting the RNA backbone of the anticodon loop. We suggest that EF-G helps to preserve the translational reading frame by preventing uncoupled movement of the tRNA through these contacts; a further possibility is that these interactions may stabilize a conformation of the anticodon that favors base-pairing with its codon.