Automatic software-based 3D-angular measurement for weight-bearing CT (WBCT) is valid.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare automatic software-based angular measurement (AM) with validated measurement by hand (MBH) regarding angle values and time spent for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT) generated datasets. METHODS: Five-hundred WBCT scans from different pathologies were included in the study. 1st - 2nd intermetatarsal angle, talo-1st metatarsal angle dorsoplantar and lateral, hindfoot angle, calcaneal pitch angle were measured and compared between MBH and AM. RESULTS: The pathologies were ankle osteoarthritis/instability, n = 147 (29%); Haglund deformity/Achillodynia, n = 41 (8%); forefoot deformity, n = 108 (22%); Hallux rigidus, n = 37 (7%); flatfoot, n = 35 (7%); cavus foot, n = 10 (2%); osteoarthritis except ankle, n = 82 (16%). The angles did not differ between MBH and AM (each p > 0.36). The time spent for MBH / AM was 44.5 / 1 s on average per angle (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: AM provided angles which were not different from validated MBH and can be considered as a validated angle measurement method. The time spent was 97% lower for AM than for MBH. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

EFAS Score - Validation of Danish Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS).

BACKGROUND: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in 13 languages. Currently, the Danish version completed data acquisition and underwent further validation. METHODS: The data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using classical test theory and item response theory. RESULTS: The internal consistency was confirmed in the Danish version (Cronbach's Alpha 0.88). The Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was 0.31 and is similar to other language versions. Between baseline and follow-up, 77.2% of patients showed an improvement on their EFAS score, with adequate responsiveness (effect size 1.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Danish EFAS Score version was successfully validated in patients with a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.net.

EFAS Score-Validation of Spanish and Estonian Versions by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS).

BACKGROUND: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in 11 languages (Dutch, English, German, Finnish, French, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Persian, Swedish, Turkish). From other languages under validation, the Spanish and Estonian versions completed data acquisition and underwent further validation. METHODS: The EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during the initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during the initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of the Spanish and Estonian versions (completed during the initial validation study in seven other languages). The data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using classical test theory and item response theory. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the scale was confirmed in the Spanish and Estonian versions (Cronbach's Alpha>0.8). Responsiveness was good, with moderate to large effect sizes in both languages, and evidence of a statistically significant positive association between the EFAS Score and patient-reported improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish and Estonian EFAS Score versions were successfully validated in orthopaedic ankle and foot surgery patients, with a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.net.

Surgical controversies and current concepts in Lisfranc injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Lisfranc injuries, not as rare as previously reported, range from ligamentous to complex fracture-dislocations. Anatomical studies have identified a complex of discrete structures, and defined the anatomical characteristics of the Lisfranc joint. SOURCES OF DATA: A narrative evidence-based review encompassed and analyzed published systematic reviews. Outcomes included clinical and surgical decision-making, including clinical-presentation, diagnosis, pathological-assessment, surgical-management techniques and indications, post-surgical care and comparative outcomes. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Better understanding of the Lisfranc complex anatomy aids surgical treatment and tactics. Prognosis is related to injury severity, estimated by the number of foot columns affected. Surgical outcome is determined by anatomical reduction for most fixation and fusion techniques. Appropriate treatment allows return to sport, improving outcome scores. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Identification of Lisfranc injuries may be improved by imaging modalities such as weight-bearing computer tomography. Recent evidence supports dorsal plate fixation as a result of better quality of reduction. In complex injuries, the use of combined techniques such as trans-articular screw and plate fixation has been associated with poorer outcomes, and fusion may instead offer greater benefits. GROWING POINTS: Open reduction is mandatory if closed reduction fails, highlighting the importance of understanding surgical anatomy. If anatomical reduction is achieved, acute arthrodesis is a safe alternative to open reduction internal fixation in selected patients, as demonstrated by comparable outcomes in subgroup analysis. AREAS FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: The current controversies in surgical treatment remain around techniques and outcomes, as randomized controlled trials are infrequent.

Autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis plus peripheral blood concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral lesions at the ankle as part of a complex surgical approach - 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess 5-year-follow-up (5FU) after Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis plus Peripheral Blood Concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral lesions at the ankle as part of a complex surgical approach. METHODS: In a prospective consecutive non-controlled clinical follow-up study, all patients with chondral lesion at the ankle treated with AMIC+PBC from July 17, 2016 to May 31, 2017 were included. Size and location of the chondral lesions, the Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) and the EFAS Score before treatment and at 5FU were analysed and compared with previous 2-year-follow-up (2FU). Peripheral Blood Concentrate (PBC) was used to impregnate a collagen I/III matrix (Chondro-Gide, Wolhusen, Switzerland) that was fixed into the chondral lesion with fibrin glue. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients with 136 chondral lesions were included in the study. The chondral lesions were located as follows (n (%)), medial talar shoulder only, 62 (46); lateral talar shoulder only, 42 (31); medial and lateral talar shoulder, 7 (10); tibia, 18 (13). The average for lesion size was 1.8 cm2, for VAS FA 45.7 and for EFAS Score 9.8. 2FU/5FU was completed in 105 (81 %)/104(81 %) patients with 112/111 previous chondral lesions. VAS FA improved to 79.8/84.2 and EFAS Score to 20.3/21.5 (2FU/5FU). No parameter significantly differed 2FU and 5FU. CONCLUSIONS: AMIC+PBC as part of a complex surgical approach led to improved and high validated outcome scores at 2FU/5FU. 2FU and 5FU did not differ.

Automatic software-based 3D-angular measurement for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT) provides different angles than measurement by hand.

BACKGROUND: Purpose of this study was to compare automatic software-based angular measurement (AM, Autometrics, Curvebeam, Warrington, PA, USA) with previously validated measurement by hand (MBH) regarding angle values and time spent for the investigator for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT). METHODS: Five-hundred bilateral WBCT scans (PedCAT, Curvebeam, Warrington, PA, USA) were included in the study. Five angles (1st - 2nd intermetatarsal angle, talo-metatarsal 1-angle (TMT) dorsoplantar and lateral projection, hindfoot angle, calcaneal pitch angle) were measured with MBH and AM on the foot/ankle (side with pathology). Angles and time spent of MBH and AM were compared (t-test, homoscedatic). RESULTS: The specific pathologies were ankle osteoarthritis/instability, n = 147 (29%); Haglund deformity/Achillodynia, n = 41 (8%); forefoot deformity, n = 108 (22%); Hallux rigidus, n = 37 (7%); flatfoot, n = 35 (7%); cavus foot, n = 10 (2%); osteoarthritis except ankle, n = 82 (16%). The angles differed between MBH and AM (each p < 0.001) except the calcaneal pitch angle (p = 0.05). The time spent for MBH / AM was 44.5 ± 12 s / 1 ± 0 s on average per angle (p < 0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: AM provided different angles as MBH and can currently not be considered as validated angle measurement method. The investigator time spent is 97% lower for AM (1 s per angle) than for MBH (44.5 s per angle). Cases with correct angles in combination with almost no time spent showed the real potential of AM. The AM system will have to become reliable (especially in diminishing positive and negative angle values as defined) and valid which has to be proven by planned studies in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Fiber-reinforced fixation implant for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis shows implant bio-integration at 1-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: A new bio-integrative fiber-reinforced implant (OSSIOfiber® Hammertoe Fixation Implant, OSSIO Ltd., Caesarea, Israel) was developed for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) correction-arthrodesis. The main purpose of this clinical study was to assess implant bio-integration at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: Twenty-four patients, previously treated for a Hammertoe deformity using the bio-integrative, fiber-reinforced implant, were enrolled in this follow-up study. One-year follow-up included clinical examination, patient reported outcomes, radiographs, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and bio-integration scoring. RESULTS: Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) radiographic fusion rate was 92% (n = 22). MRI was analyzed for 24 (100%) patients. In 100% of patients (n = 24), the border between implant and surrounding tissue was scored as partially visible. There were no cyst formation or fluid accumulation findings. Mild bone edema was detected in 29% (n = 7) and is attributed to the chronic distribution of forces due to chronic abnormal gait and pasture. None of the edema findings were considered as adverse implant-related finding. The mean bio-integration score was 7.71 ± 0.46. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates safe bio-integration of the newly developed fiber-reinforced implant at 1-year follow-up without negative side effects.

Semi-automatic software-based 3D-angular measurement for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT) in the foot provides different angles than measurement by hand.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare semi-automatic software-based angular measurement (SAM) with previously validated measurement by hand (MBH) regarding angle values and time spent for the investigator for Weight-Bearing CT (WBCT). METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, five-hundred bilateral WBCT scans (PedCAT, Curvebeam, Warrington, PA, USA) were included in the study. Five angles (1st - 2nd intermetatarsal angle (IM), talo-metatarsal 1-angle (TMT) dorsoplantar and lateral projection, hindfoot angle, calcaneal pitch angle) were measured with MBH and SAM (Bonelogic Ortho Foot and Ankle, Version 1.0.0-R, Disior Ltd, Helsinki, Finland) on the right/left foot/ankle. The angles and time spent of MBH and SAM were compared (t-test, homoscesdatic). RESULTS: The angles differed between MBH and SAM (mean values MBH/SAM; IM, 9.1/13.0; TMT dorsoplantar, -3.4/8.2; TMT lateral. -6.4/-1.1; hindfoot angle, 4.6/21.6; calcaneal pitch angle, 20.5/20.1; each p < 0.001 except the calcaneal pitch angle, p = 0.35). The time spent for MBH / SAM was 44.5 ± 12 s / 12 ± 0 s on average per angle (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SAM provided different angles as MBH (except calcaneal pitch angle) and can currently not be considered as validated angle measurement method (except calcaneal pitch angle). The investigator time spent is 73% lower for SAM (12 s per angle) than for MBH (44.5 s per angle). SAM might be an important step forward for 3D-angle measurement of WBCT when valid angles are provided.

Autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis plus peripheral blood concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral defects of the first metatarsophalangeal joint - 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the 5-year-follow-up (5FU) after Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis plus Peripheral Blood Concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral defects at the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP1). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective consecutive non-controlled clinical follow-up study, all patients with chondral lesion at MTP1 that were treated with AMIC+PBC from July 17, 2016 to May 31, 2017 were included. Size and location of the chondral lesions, the Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) and the EFAS Score before treatment and at 5FU were analysed and compared with previous 2-year-follow-up (2FU). Peripheral Blood Concentrate (PBC) was used to impregnate a collagen I/III matrix (Chondro-Gide, Wolhusen, Switzerland) that was fixed into the chondral lesion with fibrin glue. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-eight patients with 238 chondral defects were included. In 21 % of patients no deformities in the forefoot were registered. The average degree of osteoarthritis was 2.2. The chondral defect size was 1.0 cm2 on average. The most common location was metatarsal dorsal (33 %), and in most patients one defect was registered (74 %). Corrective osteotomy of the first metatarsal was performed in 79 %. 176 (89 %)/164 (83 %) patients completed 2FU/5FU. VAS FA/EFAS Score were preoperatively 46.8/11.9 and improved to 74.1/17.1 at 2FU and 75.0/17.3 at 5FU on average. No parameter significantly differed between 2FU and 5FU. CONCLUSIONS: AMIC+PBC as treatment for chondral defects at MTP1 as part of joint preserving surgery led to improved and high validated outcome scores at 2FU and 5FU. The results between 2FU and 5FU did not differ.

Fiber-reinforced fixation implant for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis shows advanced implant bio-integration at 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: A bio-integrative fiber-reinforced implant (OSSIOfiber® Hammertoe Fixation Implant, OSSIO Ltd., Caesarea, Israel) for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) correction-arthrodesis showed partial bio-integration at 1-year follow-up (1FU) in a previous study. The study was prolonged to assess the bio-integration at 2-year-follow-up (2FU). METHODS: Twenty-four patients with proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) correction-arthrodesis using the fiber-reinforced implant and analysed at 1FU, completed 2FU. Follow-up included clinical examination, patient reported outcomes, radiographs, MRI and bio-integration scoring. Results were compared between the 1FU and 2FU (paired t-test). RESULTS: Radiographs confirmed fusion in 96 % (n = 23) at 2FU (1FU, 92 % (n = 22)). Implant was no longer visible in 21 % (n = 5), partially visible in 33 % (n = 8), and fully visible in 46 % (n = 11)(1FU, fully visible 100 % (n = 24)). The border between implant and surrounding bone was scored not visible in 88 % (n = 21) and partially visible in 12 % (n = 3) (1FU, border partially visible 100 % (n = 24)). There were no cyst formation or fluid accumulation findings 1FU/2FU. Mild bone edema was detected in 4 % (n = 1) (1FU, 29 % (n = 7)). None of the edema findings were considered as adverse implant related. The mean bio-integration score was 9.71 ± 0.69 at 2FU (1FU, 7.71 ± 0.46). The parameters of border between implant and bone and bone edema further improved at the 2FU compared to the 1FU, total bio-integration score was also higher at 2FU than 1FU (each p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates 96 % PIPJ fusion rate and increased bio-integration from 1FU to 2FU, reaching advanced bio-integration of the fiber-reinforced implant at 2FU.

EFAS Score - Validation of Portuguese Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS).

BACKGROUND: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in ten languages (English, German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Swedish, Finnish, Turkish, Portuguese). From other languages under validation, the Portuguese version completed data acquisition and underwent further validation. METHODS: The Portuguese version of the EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of Portuguese version (completed during initial validation study in nine other languages). The data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using classical test theory and item response theory. RESULTS: The internal consistency was confirmed in the Portuguese version (Cronbach's Alpha 0.84). The Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was 0.27 and is similar to other language versions. Between baseline and follow-up, 69.4% of patients showed an improvement on their EFAS score, with adequate responsiveness (effect size 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: The Portuguese EFAS Score version was successfully validated in patients with a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.net.

Comparison of clinically used bilayer collagen membrane and trilayer collagen prototype fixation stability in chondral defects at the talus - An experimental human specimen study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this human specimen experimental study was to compare the fixation stability of clinically used bilayer collagen membrane with fibrin glue with trilayer collagen prototype without fibrin glue in chondral defects at the medial or lateral talar shoulder (both matrices from Geistlich Pharma AG, Wollhusen, Switzerland). METHODS: Eleven human specimens were used. The membranes were implanted in standardized chondral defects at the medial and lateral talar shoulder randomized. All tests were performed in load-control 15 kg. Range of motion ROM of each ankle was examined individually before testing. The average ROM was 10° dorsiflexion range 0°-20° and 30° plantarflexion range 20°-45°. 1,000 testing cycles with the defined ROM were performed. Two independent investigators, blinded to membrane and fixation type, visually assessed the membrane fixation integrity for peripheral detachment, area of defect uncovered, membrane constitution and delamination. RESULTS: The clinically used bilayer collagen membrane plus fibrin glue showed higher fixation stability than the trilayer prototype (all p < 0.05). No significant differences occurred between medial and lateral talar shoulder location (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The fixation stability of the trilayer collagen prototype without fibrin glue is lower than of the clinically used bilayer membrane with fibrin glue in chondral defects at the medial and lateral talar shoulder in an experimental human specimen test. Clinical use of trilayer collagen prototype without fibrin glue has to be validated by clinical testing to evaluate if the lower stability of fixation is still sufficient.

Minimal important change for the visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA).

BACKGROUND: Visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA) is a patient-reported outcome measure for foot and ankle disorders. The VAS-FA is validated into several languages and well adopted into use. Nonetheless, minimal important change (MIC) for the VAS-FA has not been estimated thus far. METHODS: The VAS-FA score was obtained from 106 patients undergoing surgery for various foot and ankle complaints. MIC was estimated using an anchor-based predictive method. RESULTS: The adjusted MIC was 6.8 for total VAS-FA score, and 9.3 for the Pain, 5.8 for the Function, and 5.7 for the Other complaints subscales. The VAS-FA score was found to separate improvement and deterioration in patients' foot and ankle condition. CONCLUSIONS: MIC was successfully defined for the VAS-FA in the current study. The VAS-FA can be used to evaluate foot and ankle patients' clinical foot and ankle status and its change. Further research on estimating disease-specific MICs is recommended.

EFAS Score -Validation of Persian Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS).

BACKGROUND: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in nine European languages (English, German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Swedish, Finnish, Turkish). From other languages under validation, the Persian version finished data acquisition and underwent further validation. METHODS: The Persian version of the EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of Persian version (completed during initial validation study in nine other languages). The data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using classical test theory and item response theory. RESULTS: The internal consistency was confirmed in the Persian version (Cronbach's Alpha 0.82). The Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) was 0.38 and is similar to other language versions. Between baseline and follow-up, 97% of patients showed an improvement on their EFAS score, with excellent responsiveness (effect size 1.93). CONCLUSIONS: The Persian EFAS Score version was successfully validated in patients with a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.co.

Weight-bearing radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography examinations in adult acquired flatfoot deformity.

BACKGROUND: Optimal characterization of Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) on two-dimensional radiograph can be challenging. Weightbearing Cone Beam CT (CBCT) may improve characterization of the three-dimensional (3D) structural details of such dynamic deformity. We compared and validated AAFD measurements between weightbearing radiograph and weightbearing CBCT images. METHODS: 20 patients (20 feet, right/left: 15/5, male/female: 12/8, mean age: 52.2) with clinical diagnosis of flexible AAFD were prospectively recruited and underwent weightbearing dorsoplantar (DP) and lateral radiograph as well as weightbearing CBCT. Two foot and ankle surgeons performed AAFD measurements at parasagittal and axial planes (lateral and DP radiographs, respectively). Intra- and Inter-observer reliabilities were calculated by Intraclass correlation (ICC) and Cohen's kappa. Mean values of weightbearing radiograph and weightbearing CBCT measurements were also compared. RESULTS: Except for medial-cuneiform-first-metatarsal-angle, adequate intra-observer reliability (range:0.61-0.96) was observed for weightbearing radiographic measurements. Moderate to very good interobserver reliability between weightbearing radiograph and weightbearing CBCT measurements were observed for the following measurements: Naviculocuneiform-angle (ICC:0.47), Medial-cuneiform-first-metatarsal-gapping (ICC:0.58), cuboid-to-floor-distance (ICC:0.68), calcaneal-inclination-angle(ICC:0.7), axial Talonavicular-coverage-angle(ICC:0.56), axial Talus-first-metatarsal-angle(ICC:0.62). Comparing weightbearing radiograph and weightbearing CBCT images, statistically significant differences in the mean values of parasagittal talus-first-metatarsal-angle, medial-cuneiform-first-metatarsal-angle, medial-cuneiform-to-floor-distance and navicular-to-floor-distance was observed (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Moderate to very good correlation was observed between certain weightbearing radiograph and weightbearing CBCT measurements, however, significant difference was observed between a number of AAFD measurements, which suggest that 2D radiographic evaluation could potentially underestimate the severity of AAFD, when compared to 3D weightbearing CT assessment.

Is there clinical evidence to support autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects in the talus? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature on clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OCL) and compare the studies' outcomes. METHODS: Pubmed and Embase were searched in January 2020 for articles concerning OCL surgery. Studies were included if they had a minimum 1-year follow-up and the primary measures were functional outcomes. The meta-analysis compared the Visual Analogic Score (VAS), the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), and the Foot Function Index (FFI) between baseline and follow-up of 1-2years, and 3-5years. A random effects model was used to evaluate outcome changes. RESULTS: The search returned 15 studies, with a total of 492 patients. The VAS improved 4.45 and 4.6 points from baseline to the 1-2year and 3-5yearfollow-up, respectively (p<0.001). AOFAS improved 31.59 and 32.47 points from baseline to the 1-2year and 3-5yearfollow-up, respectively (p<0.001). The FFI showed a significant improvement of 30.93 points from baseline to year 3-5 (p<0.001). A total of 6 patients with revision surgeries have been reported within the follow up period. It was not possible to correlate clinical features like lesion size, surgical approach, and bone marrow stimulation technique to the reported outcome. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of OCL via the AMIC procedure provided significant improvement in the functional outcome and pain scores when compared to the pre-operative values. Improvements were observed up to 5years post-operatively.

Combined weightbearing CT and MRI assessment of flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between Weightbearing CT (WBCT) markers of pronounced peritalar subluxation (PTS) and MRI findings of soft tissue insufficiency in patients with flexible Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD). We hypothesized that significant correlation would be found. METHODS: Retrospective comparative study with 54 flexible PCFD patients. WBCT and MRI variables deformity severity were evaluated, including markers of pronounced PTS, as well as soft tissue degeneration. A multiple regression analysis and partition prediction models were used to evaluate the relationship between bone alignment and soft tissue injury. P-values of less than .05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Degeneration of the posterior tibial tendon was significantly associated with sinus tarsi impingement (p = .04). Spring ligament degeneration correlated to subtalar joint subluxation (p = .04). Talocalcaneal interosseous ligament involvement was the only one to significantly correlate to the presence of subfibular impingement (p = .02). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated that WBCT markers of pronounced deformity and PTS were significantly correlated to MRI involvement of the PTT and other important restraints such as the spring and talocalcaneal interosseus ligaments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective comparative study.

Comparison Matrix-Associated Stem Cell Transplantation (MAST) with Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis plus Peripheral Blood Concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral lesions at the ankle-A clinical matched-patient analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare Matrix-Associated Stem Cell Transplantation (MAST) with Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis plus Peripheral Blood Concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral lesions at the ankle. METHODS: In a matched-patient clinical follow-up study, patients with chondral lesion at the ankle that were treated with MAST from April 1, 2009 to July 15, 2016, and patients that were treated with AMIC+PBC from July 17, 2016 to May 31, 2017 were included and compared. Size and location of the chondral lesions and the Visual-Analogue-Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS FA) before treatment and at follow-up were analysed. Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) was used for MAST and Peripheral Blood Concentrate (PBC) for AMIC+PBC to impregnate a collagen I/III matrix (Chondro-Gide, Wollhusen, Switzerland) that was fixed into the chondral lesion with fibrin glue. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients with 136 chondral lesions were included in both groups. The chondral lesions were located as follows (MAST/AMIC+PBC, n (%)), medial talar shoulder only, 59 (43)/62 (46); lateral talar shoulder only, 44 (32)/42 (31); medial and lateral talar shoulder, 7 (10)/7 (10); tibia, 19 (14)/18 (13). The lesion size was 1.6/1.8cm2 on average and VAS FA was 46.9/45.7 (MAST/AMIC+PBC). For MAST/AMIC+PBC groups, 107 (83%)/105 (81%) with 112/110 previous chondral lesions completed the defined 2-year-follow-up after 24.4/23.8 months on average. VAS FA improved to 82.3/79.8 (MAST/AMIC+PBC). No parameter significantly differed between MAST and AMIC+PBC groups. CONCLUSIONS: MAST and AMIC+PBC as part of a complex surgical approach led to improved and high validated outcome scores in 2-year-follow-up. MAST and AMIC+PBC showed similar results.

Results of more than 11,000 scans with weightbearing CT - Impact on costs, radiation exposure, and procedure time.

BACKGROUND: Weightbearing CT (WBCT) has been proven to more precisely measure bone position than conventional weightbearing radiographic series (R) and conventional CT (CT). The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of using WBCT instead of R and/or CT as the standard imaging modality, evaluating image acquisition time, radiation dose, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: All patients who obtained a WBCT as part of standard of care from July 1, 2013 until March 15, 2019 were included in the study. Image acquisition time (T), radiation dose (RD) per patient, and cost-effectiveness were analyzed and compared between the time period using WBCT (yearly average) and the parameters from 2012, i.e. before the availability of WBCT (RCT group). RESULTS: 11,009 WBCT scans were obtained from 4987 patients (4,987 scans (45%) before treatment; 6,022 scans (55%) at follow-up). On a yearly average, 1,957 WBCTs (bilateral scans) and an additional 10.6 CTs (bilateral feet and ankles) were obtained (WBCT group). In 2012, 1,850 Rs (bilateral feet, dorsoplantar and lateral, metatarsal head skyline view) and 254 CTs were obtained from 885 patients (RCT group). The mean yearly RD was 4.3/4.8uSv for the WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of .5uSv; a decrease of 10% for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly mean T was 114/493h in total (3.3/16.0min per patient) for WBCT/RCT groups (mean difference of 379h; a 77% decrease for the WBCT group; p<.01). Yearly cost-effectiveness was a mean profit of 43,959/-723 Euros for WBCT/RCT groups. CONCLUSIONS: 11,009 WBCT scans from 4,987 patients over a period of 5.6 years at a foot and ankle department resulted in 10% decreased RD, 77% decreased T, and increased financial profit (51 Euros per patient) for the institution.

EFAS Score - validation of Finnish and Turkish versions by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS).

BACKGROUND: The Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) developed, validated, and published the EFAS Score in seven European languages (English, German, French, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Swedish). From other languages under validation, the Finnish and Turkish versions finished data acquisition and underwent further validation. METHODS: The EFAS Score was developed and validated in three stages: 1) item (question) identification (completed during initial validation study), 2) item reduction and scale exploration (completed during initial validation study), 3) confirmatory analyses and responsiveness of Finnish and Turkish version (completed during initial validation study in seven other languages). The data were collected pre-operatively and post-operatively at a minimum follow-up of 3 months and mean follow-up of 6 months. Item reduction, scale exploration, confirmatory analyses and responsiveness were executed using classical test theory and item response theory. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the scale was confirmed in the Finnish and Turkish versions (Cronbach's Alpha >0.8). Responsiveness was good, with moderate to large effect sizes in both languages, and evidence of a statistically significant positive association between the EFAS Score and patient-reported improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The Finnish and Turkish EFAS Score versions were successfully validated in the orthopaedic ankle and foot surgery patients, including a wide variety of foot and ankle pathologies. All score versions are freely available at www.efas.co.