A technical and clinical digital approach to the altered cast technique with an intraoral scanner and polyvinyl siloxane impression material.

This technique digitalizes the clinical and laboratory steps of fabricating removable partial dentures (RPDs) with the altered cast technique. An intraoral scanner was used to capture the mandibular Kennedy class II partially edentulous arch. An RPD framework was fabricated digitally and then combined with a custom tray with a wax occlusal rim. A conventional polyvinyl siloxane altered cast impression was made and then digitalized both intraorally and extraorally, followed by a digital interocclusal record. The resulting scan was modified to produce an additively manufactured cast. The teeth and gingival components were then designed and fabricated with a combination of additive and subtractive manufacturing, followed by the conventional acrylic resin pour technique. The definitive prosthesis was completed with minimal conventional techniques and without the use of gypsum, prefabricated teeth, or a physical articulator. The technique reduces the number of appointments and achieves the functional extension of the prosthesis through border molding, which is not possible with intraoral scanning.

"Just Engage in It or Not, You Get Out What You Put In": Student and Staff Experiences of Feedback and Feedforward in Workplace-Based Learning Environments.

Feedback is central to student learning in the veterinary workplace. Feedforward, a related concept, is used to describe the way information about a student's performance may be used to improve their future performance. Feedback and feedforward practices are diverse, with varied student and staff understandings of the nature and purpose of feedback (feedback literacy). This study compared the practices of feedback and feedforward in a range of programs in one institution during student transitions from the classroom to workplace-based learning environments. The study adopted a broad inter-professional approach to include health care programs and social work and theater and performance studies. Profession-specific focus groups were conducted with contribution from 28 students and 31 staff from five different professions. Thematic analysis revealed that students and staff shared an understanding of the feedback and feedforward concepts, and both groups recognized the importance of emotional and relational aspects of the process. Students and staff across all professions recognized the impact of time constraints on the feedback process, although this was particularly highlighted in the health science professions. Social work and theater and performance studies students demonstrated a more nuanced understanding of the emotional and relational aspects of feedback and feedforward. Overall, the approach highlights similarities and differences in practices and experiences in different workplace contexts, creating opportunities for cross-disciplinary learning, which may have relevance more widely in higher education programs with workplace-based elements. The study underpinned the development of the LeapForward feedback training resource (https://bilt.online/the-leapforward-project/).

Impact of Removable Partial Dentures on Masticatory Performance in Partial Edentulism: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Removable partial dentures (RPDs) are widely used in clinical dental practice as a cost-effective treatment to restore the oral function. Clear understanding of the effect of partial dentures on masticatory performance is important for clinical decision making in prosthodontics. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the impact of RPDs on masticatory performance (MP) of partially edentulous subjects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic database and hand searches were conducted to explore clinical trials reporting the evidence of the effect of metal and acrylic based removable partial dentures on mastication. The validated objective and subjective measures of assessment of mastication were included. The article selection, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were conducted by two reviewers independently. RESULTS: Out of 11200 studies, one randomised control trial and 23 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Positive impact on different parameters of masticatory function after RPD treatment, was reported in 14 studies. Subjective evaluation of chewing ability (CA) displayed an improvement in 83.3% of studies, while improvement was evidenced only in 69.5% of studies upon objective evaluation. Majority of the studies were reporting data on free end saddles. Out of the 13 studies associated with bilateral free end saddle dentures, 9 studies showed a positive effect on masticatory efficiency. Various factors were found to have an impact on the masticatory performance (MP) of RPDs. Conclusion Subjective evaluation displays higher positive impact of RPDs in MP than objective evaluation. Assessment of patients' perspectives is important in clinical decision making. Multiple factors affect the MP with RPD treatment.

Survival of Single-Unit Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal (PFM) and Metal Crowns Placed by Students at an Australian University Dental Clinic over a Five-Year Period.

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the survival rate of single-unit porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) and metal crowns placed by dental students at an Australian university undergraduate dental clinic over a five-year period. Complications and the incidences of crown failures were recorded. Clinical records pertaining to single-unit PFM and metal crowns inserted over a five-year period were reviewed, including patient-related, tooth-related, and procedural factors for each crown. Crowns were evaluated as surviving, surviving with complications, or failed. Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis was used to estimate survival rate., This study is based on a sample of 232 (78.4%) PFM crowns and 64 (21.6%) metal crowns inserted between 2014 and 2018. Cumulatively, 224 (75.7%) were surviving, 48 (16.2%) were surviving but previously had complications, and 24 (8.1%) failed. The 5-year cumulative survival rate of all PFM and metal crowns was 83.9% (0.839 ± 0.038, Kaplan-Meier). The average survival time for all crowns was 4.432 ± 0.089 years. Comparatively, PFM crowns had a higher survival rate at 1 year (0.972 ± 0.010) and 2 years (0.919 ± 0.017), compared to metal crowns at 1 year (0.964 ± 0.011) and 2 years (0.894± 0.018). The survival rate of metal crowns remained constant from 2 years to 4 years and thereafter, whereas there was a continued decline in the survival rate of PFM crowns to 83.2% (0.832 ± 0.038) at 4 years and thereafter. Crowns placed on premolars had the highest cumulative survival rate whereas those placed on molars exhibited the lowest survival rate for the duration of the study period. Despite single-unit PFM crowns having a higher 1- and 2-year survival rate compared to metal crowns, metal crowns had a higher survival rate at 4 years and thereafter. Survival rates are comparable to previous studies.

An investigation into the prevalence of combination syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of Combination Syndrome, and to investigate if provision of a mandibular removable partial denture has any influence on the prevalence of Combination Syndrome. METHOD: Patients attending Kings College London Dental Institute, Guys Hospital who wore maxillary conventional complete dentures opposing mandibular anterior teeth only, with or without mandibular partial dentures were examined by one examiner. Oral health, residual alveolar ridge and denture quality were assessed. Features putatively associated with Combination Syndrome were recorded. Patient ratings of dentures were recorded. RESULTS: 99 patients were recruited who were wearing maxillary removable complete dentures opposing only mandibular anterior teeth. Of these, 64 patients wore mandibular removable partial dentures and 35 patients did not. Only 8 patients displayed two features of Combination Syndrome and 38 patients displayed one feature of Combination Syndrome, excessive resorption of the anterior maxillary sextant. These findings are not compatible with previous research which suggested that the five features of Combination Syndrome were prevalent in patients wearing maxillary complete dentures opposing mandibular anterior teeth. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supporting the existence of Combination Syndrome was not discovered in this research. Prevalence of Combination Syndrome appeared to be low or non-existent. Patient treatment modalities and teaching in relation to Combination Syndrome may need to be modified.

Predoctoral teaching in intravenous conscious sedation: ten years at Glasgow dental school.

Supervised clinical practice in intravenous conscious sedation was introduced into the predoctoral dental curriculum at Glasgow Dental School and Hospital, United Kingdom, with the appointment of two full-time academic staff members in 2001. This article reviews the student experience gained in the succeeding ten years. All students administered intravenous sedation to patients during the course as well as assisting with intravenous sedation provided by their peers. The experience was variable, mainly as a result of student and patient attendance. Adverse weather and increasing student numbers also affected student experience. This study demonstrated that it is possible to provide supervised clinical sedation practice for students as part of a predoctoral dental curriculum.

Which is the most effective drug or method of sedation used for anxious children? What are the most effective techniques for the use of conscious sedation behaviour management in paediatric dentistry?

DATA SOURCES: Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Dissertation Abstracts, SIGLE, the World Wide Web (Google) and the Community of Science Database were searched for relevant trials and references. Reference lists from relevant articles were scanned and the authors contacted to identify trials and obtain additional information. There were no language restrictions. Trials pre-1966 were not searched. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected if they met the following criteria: randomised controlled trials of conscious sedation comparing two or more drugs/techniques/placebo undertaken by the dentist or one of the dental team in anxious children up to 16 years of age. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Information regarding methods, participants, interventions and outcome measures and results was independently extracted, in duplicate, by two authors. Specialist advice was sought to categorise interventions. Authors of trials were contacted for details of randomisation and withdrawals and a quality assessment was carried out not using any formal scoring system. The Cochrane Oral Health Group statistical guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies were included with 2345 subjects in total. Overall quality of studies was found to be disappointing with poor reporting, often the main problem. Data reported could not easily be aggregated into groups to facilitate description of results. Meta-analysis of the available data was also not possible for the same reason. The variety of differing drug regimens compared made it difficult to isolate groups of studies that were sufficiently similar in design to allow sensible comparison. Where groups of studies could be isolated, the differing outcome measures used made their meta-analysis impossible. CONCLUSIONS: Authors were not able to reach any definitive conclusion on which was the most effective drug or method of sedation used for anxious children. A list of proposed areas of study was described.