Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 41(1): 28-33, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018236

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: There is a paucity of pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) literature. The objective of this study was to characterize differences in management of pediatric HS patients by dermatology versus non-dermatology clinicians. METHODS: We examined a retrospective cohort of 195 pediatric patients with HS seen at our institution (3/1/19-3/1/20). Two-sample t-tests and two-proportion z-tests were performed. RESULTS: A total of 76.1% of subjects were seen by dermatology at least once, and of these, 79.1% were referred. HS diagnosis was most often made by dermatology (36.6%), followed by pediatrics (21.6%). Patients managed by dermatology were significantly more likely to have used standard of care therapies (p < .001). Of dermatology-managed patients, 19.7% were currently prescribed a biologic, as compared with zero patients not managed by dermatology. Those managed by dermatology were less likely to undergo surgical excision (13.3% vs. 25.5%, p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support increased likelihood of treatment escalation with medical management by dermatologists. Relatively high utilization of referral to dermatology exists, but with only moderate patient adherence. There is a need for improved access to dermatologic care and prospective studies to determine whether differences in specialty management translate to improved patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Hidradenitis Supurativa , Humanos , Niño , Hidradenitis Supurativa/diagnóstico , Hidradenitis Supurativa/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Cooperación del Paciente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA