Amifostine, in a reduced dose, protects against severe diarrhea associated with weekly fluorouracil and folinic acid chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a pilot study.

Fifty-two consecutive patients with advanced colorectal cancer who developed persistent diarrhea following chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil despite dose reduction were treated with amifostine 800, 500 or 150 mg/m(2). The administered dose of 5-fluorouracil was significantly greater during amifostine treatment. Amifostine 800 mg/m(2) was associated with complete elimination of diarrhea, but 76.3% of patients developed infusion-related hypotension. At a dose of 500 mg/m(2), diarrhea was significantly reduced and milder compared with baseline and the incidence of hypotension was 54.2%. At the lowest dose of amifostine, 17.1% of patients developed Grade 1 diarrhea, a significant reduction over baseline, and hypotension occurred in 25.2% of patients. Treatment with amifostine also improved mucositis but had no effect on the relatively mild nausea and vomiting due to 5-fluorouracil. In this study, amifostine reduced the incidence and severity of diarrhea associated with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, with acceptable efficacy at a reduced dose that offered better tolerability.

A phase II study of the docetaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy regimen in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The efficacy of the docetaxel-carboplatin combination chemotherapy was studied in various phase II studies. Based on these data we aimed to test the regimen in previously untreated patients with advanced advanced non-smoking lung cancer (NSCLC) with docetaxel 80 mg/m2 a standard dose of carboplatin at AUC = 5, in an attempt to define the efficacy and tolerability of the combination in an open-label phase II study. Patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC stage IIIB and IV were candidates for the present study. Docetaxel was administered at 80 mg/m2 over 1 h by intravenous (IV) infusion followed by carboplatin AUC = 5 in 30 min IV infusion, both on day 1, and recycled every 21 days. Sixty patients received 263 courses of therapy in total; 231/263 (88%) were administered according to the planned doses, and 48/60 (80%) patients received chemotherapy without decrement of the dose; 32/263 (12%) of the courses were administered with a 10%-30% dose reduction. Complete responses (CR) were seen in 5 patients (8.3%) and partial responses (PR) in 16 patients (26.7%) for an overall response rate of 35%. Median duration of response was 7.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI)-7.1-7.9], time to progression (TIP) 11.5 months (95% CI-8.2-14.8), median overall survival (OS) 15.0 months (95% CI-10.8-19.2). One-year survival was 61.7%. Toxicity was acceptable; it was calculated according to the administered cycles and was mainly neutropenia: grade 3, 9% and grade 4, 2%; anemia: grade 3, 8%; nausea and vomiting: grade 3, 8%. The outpatient regimen of docetaxel-carboplatin is effective with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

A phase I-II study of docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (DIP) combination chemotherapy regimen in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

In an attempt to develop more effective chemotherapy regimens in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we evaluated docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (DIP) based on our previous experience with paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin. Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages III-IV), WHO-PS< or =2, no prior chemotherapy and unimpaired hematopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered in successive dose levels (DLs) and included docetaxel (80-100 mg/m2 day 1), ifosfamide (4-5 g/m2) and cisplatin (80-100 mg/m2), both divided over days 1 and 2 every 21 days. G-CSF (lenograstin) was administered from days 4-13. Fifty-five patients were accrued (phase I: 15; phase II: 40) and all are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age = 58 (40-72); PS = 1 (0-2); gender = 48 males, 7 females; stages IIIA = 8, IIIB = 19, IV = 28; and histologies were adenocarcinoma (29), squamous (20), large cell (6). Metastatic sites at diagnosis included lymph nodes (33), bone (8), liver (6), brain (6), lung nodules (9), adrenals (7) and soft tissue (1). The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at DL4 (Docetaxel: 100 mg/m2-Ifosfamide: 5 g/m2-Cisplatin: 100 mg/m2) consisting of 2 cases of febrile neutropenia (FN), and DL3 (Docetaxel: 100 mg/m2-Ifosfamide: 5 g/m2-Cisplatin: 80 mg/m2) was considered as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended for further phase II testing. Among evaluable patients in phase II, 31/46 (67%; CI = 54-81%) responded; 4 were complete responses, 27 partial responses, 12 with stable disease and 3 with progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (2-21+), median time to progression (TTP) 8 months (1-23+) and median overall survival (OS) 13 months (2-23+). The 1-year survival was 57%. Grade (Gr) 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia 39/46 with 27 developing Gr4 (< or =7 days) and 20% FN managed successfully with broad-spectrum antibiotics, thrombocytopenia Gr3 3/46-Gr4 1/46, no Gr3 neuropathy, Gr1-2 CNS toxicity in 12, no renal toxicity, 15 Gr2 myalgias, 17 Gr2 diarrhea and 10 Gr3 vomiting. In the present phase I-II study, DIP appears highly active and tolerable in advanced NSCLC in the outpatient setting. Randomized comparisons to current standard 2-drug regimens will be warranted.

Isolated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (carcinomatous meningitis) after taxane-induced major remission in patients with advanced breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the incidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC), as the first site of systemic progression, in breast cancer patients after having obtained a major response (CR or near CR) to first-line taxane-based chemotherapy and compare these findings in retrospect with a matched-pair group of historical control patients from our database treated with nontaxane regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven breast cancer having either metastatic disease or high-risk locoregional disease that were entered into treatment protocols with first-line taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus anthracyclines or mitoxantrone combinations and developed LMC as the first evidence of progression after major response (CR or >80% PR) were analyzed in the present study (n = 155), and compared, as regards the incidence of LMC, to a matched-pair retrospective group of 155 patients treated with nontaxane regimens in our unit. RESULTS: Seven patients with a median age of 54 years (range 40-70) developed LMC as their first evidence of progression after taxane-based regimens with a median interval of 6 months (range 2-18) from start of treatment to diagnosis of LMC. Five patients received intrathecal (i.t.) methotrexate treatment and whole brain radiotherapy (RT), while 1 patient received i.t. methotrexate and RT to the lumbar spine. Two patients responded to treatment for LMC, while 2 achieved stable disease and 3 progressed. Two patients had elevated cerebrospinal fluid tumor markers (more than serum marker levels) that proved useful in monitoring response to treatment. Median survival after LMC was 3.6 months (range 1-17+) and correlated positively to the interval from the initiation of taxane-based therapy to LMC (r = 0.84, p = 0.019). Seven out of 86 responders (8.13%) in the taxane group versus 1 out of 72 responders (1.4%) in the non-taxane-treated group developed LMC as the first sign of progression after a major response to first-line chemotherapy (p < 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: LMC after a major response to front-line taxane-based regimens represents a grave disease manifestation and its incidence appears increased, but not significantly so, when compared retrospectively to non-taxane-treated patients. Prospective evaluation of the incidence of LMC after taxane versus non-taxane-based treatment from large randomized multi-institutional trials is warranted and identification of potential prognostic factors might help to identify patients requiring appropriate prophylactic therapy.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis after major remission to taxane-based front-line therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

AIM: To determine the incidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC), as the first manifestation of systemic progression, in breast cancer patients after obtaining a major response (complete response, CR or >80% partial response, PR) to first-line taxane-based chemotherapy treated between 1996 and 2000 in our Medical Oncology Unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven breast cancer having either metastatic disease, or high-risk locoregional disease that were entered into treatment protocols with first-line taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) plus anthracyclines or mitoxantrone combinations and developed LMC as the first evidence of progression after major response (CR or >80% PR) were analyzed in the present study (n = 155). RESULTS: Seven patients with a median age of 54 (range: 40-70) years developed LMC as their first evidence of progression after taxane-based regimens with a median interval of 6 months (range: 2-18) from start of treatment to diagnosis of LMC. Five patients received intrathecal (i.t.) methotrexate treatment and whole brain radiotherapy (RT), while one patient received i.t. methotrexate and RT to lumbar spine. Two patients responded to treatment for LMC, while two achieved stable disease and three progressed. Two patients had elevated cerebrospinal fluid tumor markers (more than serum marker levels) that proved useful in monitoring response to treatment. Median survival after LMC was 3.6 months (range: 1-31+) and correlated positively to the interval from the initiation of taxane-based therapy to LMC (r = 0.84, P = 0.019). Seven out of 86 responders (8.1%; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-13.9) developed LMC as the first sign of progression after a major response to first-line chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: LMC after a major response to front-line taxane-based regimens represents a grave disease manifestation and its incidence appears increased when compared in retrospect to non-taxane-treated patients. Prospective evaluation of the incidence of LMC after taxane versus non-taxane-based treatment from large randomized multiinstitutional trials is warranted and identification of potential prognostic factors might help identify patients requiring appropriate prophylactic therapy.