Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 3966, 2021 06 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34172732

RESUMEN

Observed SARS-CoV-2 infections and deaths are low in tropical Africa raising questions about the extent of transmission. We measured SARS-CoV-2 IgG by ELISA in 9,922 blood donors across Kenya and adjusted for sampling bias and test performance. By 1st September 2020, 577 COVID-19 deaths were observed nationwide and seroprevalence was 9.1% (95%CI 7.6-10.8%). Seroprevalence in Nairobi was 22.7% (18.0-27.7%). Although most people remained susceptible, SARS-CoV-2 had spread widely in Kenya with apparently low associated mortality.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Teorema de Bayes , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Epidemias , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Kenia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismo , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/metabolismo , Adulto Joven
2.
Science ; 371(6524): 79-82, 2021 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33177105

RESUMEN

The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Africa is poorly described. The first case of SARS-CoV-2 in Kenya was reported on 12 March 2020, and an overwhelming number of cases and deaths were expected, but by 31 July 2020, there were only 20,636 cases and 341 deaths. However, the extent of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in the community remains unknown. We determined the prevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G among blood donors in Kenya in April-June 2020. Crude seroprevalence was 5.6% (174 of 3098). Population-weighted, test-performance-adjusted national seroprevalence was 4.3% (95% confidence interval, 2.9 to 5.8%) and was highest in urban counties Mombasa (8.0%), Nairobi (7.3%), and Kisumu (5.5%). SARS-CoV-2 exposure is more extensive than indicated by case-based surveillance, and these results will help guide the pandemic response in Kenya and across Africa.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Donantes de Sangre , COVID-19/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Humanos , Kenia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Adulto Joven
3.
Afr J Lab Med ; 6(1): 585, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28879153

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Kenya National Blood Transfusion Service (KNBTS) is mandated to provide safe and sufficient blood and blood components for the country. In 2013, the KNBTS National Testing Laboratory and the six regional blood transfusion centres were enrolled in the Strengthening Laboratory Management Toward Accreditation (SLMTA) programme. The process was supported by Global Communities with funding from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. METHODS: The SLMTA implementation at KNBTS followed the standard three-workshop series, on-site mentorships and audits. Baseline, midterm and exit audits were conducted at the seven facilities, using a standard checklist to measure progress. Given that SLMTA was designed for clinical and public health laboratories, key stakeholders, guided by Global Communities, tailored SLMTA materials to address blood transfusion services, and oriented trainers, auditors and mentors on the same. RESULTS: The seven facilities moved from an average of zero stars at baseline to an average of three stars at the exit audit. The average baseline audit score was 38% (97 points), midterm 71% (183 points) and exit audit 79% (205 points). The Occurrence Management and Process Improvement quality system essential had the largest improvement (at 67 percentage points), from baseline to exit, whereas Facilities and Safety had the smallest improvement (at 31 percentage points). CONCLUSION: SLMTA can be an effective tool for preparing a blood transfusion service for accreditation. Key success factors included customising SLMTA to blood transfusion activities; sensitising trainers, mentors and auditors on operations of blood transfusion service; creating SLMTA champions in key departments; and integrating other blood transfusion-specific accreditation standards into SLMTA.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA