Soluble mediators in packed red blood cells augment lipopolysaccharide-induced monocyte interleukin-1ß production.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Soluble mediators in packed red-blood-cell (PRBC) units have been hypothesized as a mechanism associated with transfusion-related immune modulation. Soluble mediators including damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are known to activate inflammasomes. Inflammasome complexes maturate caspase-1 and interleukin (IL)-1ß. We assessed whether PRBC supernatants (SN) modulated IL-1ß driven inflammation and whether macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) was a contributing factor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Isolated monocytes were incubated with PRBC-SN in an in vitro transfusion model. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was added in parallel to model a bacterial infection. Separately, recombinant MIF was used in the model to assess its role in IL-1ß driven inflammation. IL-1ß and caspase-1 were quantified in the PRBC-SN and culture SN from the in vitro model. RESULTS: PRBC-SN alone did not induce IL-1ß production from monocytes. However, PRBC-SN alone increased caspase-1 production. LPS alone induced both IL-1ß and caspase-1 production. PRBC-SN augmented LPS-driven IL-1ß and caspase-1 production. Recombinant MIF did not modulate IL-1ß production in our model. CONCLUSIONS: Soluble mediators in PRBC modulate monocyte IL-1ß inflammation, which may be a contributing factor to adverse effects of transfusion associated with poor patient outcomes. While MIF was present in PRBC-SN, we found no evidence that MIF was responsible for IL-1ß associated immune modulation.

No evidence for widespread Babesia microti transmission in Australia.

BACKGROUND: A fatal case of autochthonous Babesia microti infection was reported in Australia in 2012. This has implications for Australian public health and, given that babesiosis is transfusion transmissible, has possible implications for Australian blood transfusion recipients. We investigated the seroprevalence of antibodies to B. microti in Australian blood donors and in patients with clinically suspected babesiosis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma samples (n = 7,000) from donors donating in at-risk areas and clinical specimens from patients with clinically suspected babesiosis (n = 29) were tested for B. microti IgG by immunofluorescence assay (IFA). IFA initially reactive samples were tested for B. microti IgG and IgM by immunoblot and B. microti DNA by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Although five donors were initially reactive for B. microti IgG by IFA, none was confirmed for B. microti IgG (zero estimate; 95% confidence interval, 0%-0.05%) and all were negative for B. microti DNA. None of the patient samples had B. microti IgG, IgM, or DNA. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide evidence for widespread exposure to B. microti in Australian blood donors at local theoretical risk, nor does it provide evidence of B. microti infection in Australian patients with clinically suspected babesiosis. Given that confirmed evidence of previous exposure to B. microti was not seen, these data suggest that transmission of this pathogen is currently uncommon in Australia and unlikely to pose a risk to transfusion safety at present.