Phase I/II study protocol to assess safety and efficacy of adoptive cell therapy with anti-PD-1 plus low-dose pegylated-interferon-alpha in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to standard of care treatments: the ACTME trial.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy does not lead to long-lasting clinical responses in approximately 60% of patients with metastatic melanoma. These refractory patients, however, can still respond to treatment with tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and interferon-alpha (IFNa). A combination of TIL, pegylated-interferon-alpha (PEG-IFNa) and anti-PD-1 is expected to provide a safe, feasible and effective therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma, who are refractory to standard of care treatment options. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients are treated in two phases. In phase I, the safety of the combination TIL and anti-PD-1 is assessed (cohort 1) according to CTCAE 4.03 criteria. Subsequently, the safety of cotreatment with PEG-IFNa is tested in cohort 2. The efficacy will be evaluated in the second phase of the trial. Efficacy is evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 and immune-related response criteria. Clinical and immunological parameters will be evaluated for their relation with clinical responsiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval of the trial was obtained from the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects in the Netherlands. The trial results will be shared with the scientific community at (inter)national conferences and by publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03638375; Pre-results.

Everolimus in Patients With Advanced Follicular-Derived Thyroid Cancer: Results of a Phase II Clinical Trial.

Background: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) upregulation has been reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of thyroid tumors, and treatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus has shown promising results in endocrine tumors. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial to determine the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with advanced follicular-derived thyroid cancer. Patients and Methods: Twenty-eight patients with progressive metastatic or locally advanced radioactive refractory differentiated thyroid cancer and 7 patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer were included and received everolimus 10 mg orally once daily. The primary endpoint was disease control rate [complete (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) > 24 weeks]. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and mutational and pharmacokinetic-related outcomes. Results: Median follow-up duration was 38 months (2-64). Seventeen patients (65%) showed SD, of which 15 (58%) showed SD >24 weeks. No CR or PR was observed. Median PFS and OS were 9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4 to 14] and 18 (95% CI: 7 to 29) months, respectively. Survival was negatively influenced by the presence of bone metastases. Toxicity was predominantly grade 1/2 and included anemia (64%), cough (64%), stomatitis (61%), and hyperglycemia (61%). Duration of SD was related to everolimus exposure. The presence of somatic gene variants related to mTOR signaling did not clearly stratify for responses. Conclusion: Everolimus has clinically relevant antitumor activity in patients with advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. Given the observed disease control rate and the relatively low toxicity profile, further investigation of everolimus in sequential or combination therapy in these patients is warranted.