Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(3): 403-410, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29055155

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar psoriasis is a variant of psoriasis vulgaris which can severely impair quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study were to assess the efficacy and impact on quality of life and work productivity of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis were randomized to either apremilast 30 mg bid or placebo for 16 weeks. At Week 16, all patients received apremilast 30 mg bid until Week 32. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a Palmoplantar Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (PPPGA) of 0/1 at Week 16. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who achieved a PPPGA of 0/1 at Week 16 between patients randomized to apremilast (14%) and placebo (4%; P = 0.1595). After 32 weeks of treatment with apremilast, 24% of patients achieved a PPGA of 0/1. In addition, apremilast was superior to placebo in achieving Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPPASI) 75 (apremilast: 22%; placebo: 8%; P = 0.0499), in improving PPPASI (apremilast: -7.4 ± 7.1; placebo: -3.6 ± 5.9; P = 0.0167), Dermatology Life Quality Index score (apremilast: -4.3 ± 5.1; placebo: -0.8 ± 4.5; P = 0.0004) and in reducing activity impairment (apremilast: -11.0 ± 22.3; placebo: 2.5 ± 25.5; P = 0.0063). CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of a significant difference between apremilast and placebo in proportion of patients achieving a PPPGA of 0/1, the presence of significant differences observed for several secondary endpoints suggests that apremilast may have a role in the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis.


Asunto(s)
Dermatosis del Pie/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatosis de la Mano/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa 4/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Método Doble Ciego , Eficiencia , Femenino , Dermatosis del Pie/fisiopatología , Dermatosis de la Mano/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos , Psoriasis/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Trabajo
2.
Br J Dermatol ; 161(5): 1180-9, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19466959

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy utilizing agents with complementary mechanisms of action is recommended by acne guidelines to help simultaneously target multiple pathogenic factors. A unique, topical, fixed-dose combination gel with adapalene 0.1% and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2.5% has recently been developed for the once-daily treatment of acne. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1%-BPO 2.5% fixed-dose combination gel (adapalene-BPO) relative to adapalene 0.1% monotherapy (adapalene), BPO 2.5% monotherapy (BPO), and the gel vehicle (vehicle) in a large population for the treatment of acne vulgaris. METHODS: In total, 1670 subjects were randomized in a double-blind controlled trial to receive adapalene-BPO, adapalene, BPO or vehicle for 12 weeks (1 : 1 : 1 : 1 randomization). Evaluations included success rate (subjects 'clear' or 'almost clear'), percentage change in lesion count from baseline, cutaneous tolerability and adverse events. RESULTS: Adapalene-BPO was significantly more effective than corresponding monotherapies, with significant differences in percentage lesion count change observed as early as 1 week. Cutaneous tolerability profile was similar to adapalene. Adverse events were more frequent with the combination therapy (mainly due to an increase in mild-to-moderate dry skin), occurred early in the study, and were transient. CONCLUSIONS: Adapalene-BPO provides significantly greater and synergistic efficacy and a faster onset of action with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of acne vulgaris when compared with the corresponding vehicle and the adapalene and BPO monotherapies.


Asunto(s)
Acné Vulgar/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Peróxido de Benzoílo/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Naftalenos/uso terapéutico , Adapaleno , Administración Cutánea , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Peróxido de Benzoílo/efectos adversos , Niño , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Geles/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Naftalenos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA