Cultural competence and cultural safety in Canadian schools of nursing: a mixed methods study.

Cultural competence and cultural safety are essential knowledge in contemporary nursing care. Using a three-phase, mixed methods sequential triangulation design, this study examines the extent to which Anglophone Schools of Nursing in Canada have integrated cultural competence and/or cultural safety into the undergraduate nursing curricula. Factors that influence successful integration are identified through the lens of Donabedian's structure, process, and outcome model. Results suggest that several facilitating factors are present, such as leadership, partnerships and linkages, and educational supports for students. Of particular concern is the lack of policies to recruit and retain Aboriginal faculty, financial resources, and outcome evaluation indicators. A conceptual model of integration is offered to explain how Schools of Nursing function to support the implementation of these concepts into their curriculum. This study provides theoretical and practical implications for initiation and improvement of cultural competence and/or cultural safety integration strategies in Schools of Nursing.

The patient's voice: an exploratory study of the impact of a group self-management support program.

BACKGROUND: Given the potential value of self-management support programs for people with chronic diseases, it is vital to understand how they influence participants' health attitudes and behaviours. The Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP), the most well-known and widely studied such program, is funded in many provinces and jurisdictions throughout Canada. However, there is little published evidence on its impact in the Canadian health-care system. We studied participants' reactions and perceived impacts of attending the Stanford program in one Ontario health region so we could assess its value to the health region. The study asked: What are participants' reactions and perceived impacts of attending the Stanford CDSMP? METHODS: This mixed methods exploratory study held four focus groups approximately one year after participants attended a Stanford program workshop. At the beginning of each session, participants filled out a survey on the type and frequency of community and health resources used for their self-management. During the sessions, a moderator guided the discussion, asking about such things as long-term impact of the program on their lives and barriers to self-management of their chronic conditions. RESULTS: Participants perceived diverse effects of the workshop: from having a profound impact on one area to affecting all aspects of their lives. A change in physical activity patterns was the most prominent behaviour change, noted by over half the participants. Other recurrent effects included an improved sense of social connection and better coping skills. Barriers to self-management were experienced by almost all participants with several dominant themes emerging including problems with the health system and patient-physician interaction. Participants reported a wide variety of resources used in their self-management, and in some cases, an increase in use was noted for some resources. CONCLUSIONS: Self-management support is, at its core, a complex and patient-centred concept, so a diversity of outcomes to match the diversity of participants should be expected. As these interventions move into different target populations and communities, it is essential that we continue to explore through multiple research methods, the effects, and their meaning to participants, ensuring the optimal investment of resources for the very individuals these interventions aim to serve.

Family physicians' reactions to performance assessment feedback.

OBJECTIVE: To explore and describe family physicians' personal and professional responses to performance assessment feedback. DESIGN: Qualitative study using one-on-one semistructured interviews after feedback on performance. SETTING: Fee-for-service family practices in eastern Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Eight physicians out of 25 physicians in the control group of a previous randomized controlled trial who received performance assessment feedback were purposefully selected using maximum variation sampling to represent various levels of performance. Five female physicians (2 part-time and 3 full-time) and 3 male physicians (all full-time) were interviewed. These physicians had practised family medicine for an average of 18.5 years (range 9 to 32 years). METHOD: Semistructured one-on-one interviews were conducted to determine what physicians thought and felt about their private feedback sessions and to solicit their opinions on performance assessment in general. Information was analyzed using an open coding style and a constant comparative method of analysis. MAIN FINDINGS: Two major findings were central to the core elements of medical professionalism and perceived accountability. Physicians indicated that the private feedback they received was a valuable and necessary part of medical professionalism; however, they were reluctant to share this feedback with patients. Physicians described various layers of accountability from the most important inner layer, patients, to the least important outer layer, those funding the system. CONCLUSION: Performance feedback was viewed as important to family physicians for maintaining medical professionalism and accountability.

Models of primary care service delivery in Ontario: why such diversity?

A surprisingly large and ever-growing number of alternative models of primary care service delivery have been developed in Ontario. The models are relatively poorly understood, and it is unclear why there are so many of them. What needs of providers and of government as payer are they attempting to address? Through a literature review and interviews with key informants, we sought to explain why there are so many models.

Upholding the principles of primary care in preceptors' practices.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family medicine preceptorships are crucial to educating future physicians, but there is a lack of research on how well preceptors are following the principles of primary care. This study used the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT)-Provider Edition to determine how well medical preceptors provide quality medical care. METHODS: A total of 134 family medicine preceptors in the Maritime provinces of Canada answered questions about their practice behaviors, along with background information about themselves, their practice, and their practice population. RESULTS: The highest scores were for "coordination: integration of care," and the lowest were for "cultural competence." PCAT scores improved with the number of patients seen weekly. Scores for first contact accessibility were higher for females and for those with 11-20 years experience as a preceptor, who saw more patients weekly, and in urban centers. "Longitudinality: relationship" scores were higher among those with at least 11 years of practice experience and who saw more patients weekly. "Community orientation" scores were higher for preceptors who saw more patients weekly and accepted new patients. "Cultural competence" scores were higher for preceptors with a culturally diverse practice population and who accepted new patients. "Coordination: integration of care" scores were higher among rural practices. "Coordination: medical records continuity" scores were higher in practices with less than 5 years' experience. CONCLUSIONS: Maritime preceptors report providing quality primary care, and the PCAT can be used to benchmark the quality of primary care provided by preceptors.

Patient perspectives on discharge from specialist type 2 diabetes care back to primary care: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Timely access to specialist care remains a barrier for both patients with type 2 diabetes and their primary care physicians. To improve access to specialists for new patients, an efficient and appropriate discharge process is required. Consideration of patient perspectives is central to developing a smooth care transition, and currently, research in this area is limited. The aim of this study was to explore patients' expectations and experiences surrounding discharge from a specialized diabetes centre back to primary care. METHODS: A qualitative approach was used involving data from one-to-one semistructured interviews. Participants were 12 patients with type 2 diabetes who had been discharged from the Tertiary Care Diabetes Referral Centre in Ottawa, Canada. RESULTS: Participants were uncertain in their initial expectations of specialist care duration. Patients expressed that an explicit discussion of the discharge process had not occurred, and many were unclear about the reason for discharge and plans for appropriate primary care physician follow up. Patients' psychological preparedness for discharge existed on a spectrum from low to high readiness. Many articulated a desire for improved communication surrounding the discharge plan, and some wished to have input into the discharge decision. Although most described their primary care physician positively, some expressed concern over cessation of specialist care. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to prepare patients for discharge from care, and to recognize that individual patients have varying needs and preferences. Further research is warranted to develop effective interventions for improving the discharge process for patients.

Building access to specialist care through e-consultation.

BACKGROUND: Limited access to specialist care remains a major barrier to health care in Canada, affecting patients and primary care providers alike, in terms of both long wait times and inequitable availability. We developed an electronic consultation system, based on a secure web-based tool, as an alternative to face-to-face consultations, and ran a pilot study to evaluate its effectiveness and acceptability to practitioners. METHODS: In a pilot program conducted over 15 months starting in January 2010, the e-consultation system was tested with primary care providers and specialists in a large health region in Eastern Ontario, Canada. We collected utilization data from the electronic system itself (including quantitative data from satisfaction surveys) and qualitative information from focus groups and interviews with providers. RESULTS: Of 18 primary care providers in the pilot program, 13 participated in focus groups and 9 were interviewed; in addition, 10 of the 11 specialists in the program were interviewed. Results of our evaluation showed good uptake, high levels of satisfaction, improvement in the integration of referrals and consultations, and avoidance of unnecessary specialist visits. A total of 77 e-consultation requests were processed from 1 Jan. 2010 to 1 Apr. 2011. Less than 10% of the referrals required face-to-face follow-up. The most frequently noted benefits for patients (as perceived by providers) included improved access to specialist care and reduced wait times. Primary care providers valued the ability to assist with patient assessment and management by having access to a rapid response to clinical questions, clarifying the need for diagnostic tests or treatments, and confirming the need for a formal consultation. Specialists enjoyed the improved interaction with primary care providers, as well as having some control in the decision on which patients should be referred. INTERPRETATION: This low-cost referral system has potential for broader implementation, once payment models for physicians are adapted to cover e-consultation.

An innovative medical and dental hygiene clinic for street youth: results of a process evaluation.

Canada has a noteworthy reputation for high quality health care. Nonetheless, street youth are one of our most vulnerable yet underserved populations. Consequently, a medical and dental clinic was created in downtown Ottawa, Ontario to respond to their needs. The purpose of this study is to describe a process evaluation of the clinic during its first year of operation with a focus on program fidelity, dose, reach, and satisfaction. A mixed methods approach was used involving interviews with providers, focus groups with street youth, analysis of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data, and supplemental information such as document reviews. The evaluation identified areas that were working well along with challenges to program implementation. Areas of concerns and possible solutions were presented to the management team that then helped to plan and make improvements to the clinic. Our evaluation design and working relationship with clinic management promoted the integration of real-time evidence into program improvements.

Why do family physicians fail to detect renal impairment?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate why many patients with renal impairment (30.7%) were not recognized by their family physicians despite an earlier educational intervention on detecting renal impairment; and to determine whether certain factors related to physicians, patients, or the intervention itself were associated with whether renal impairment was detected. DESIGN: Qualitative approach using grounded theory. SETTING: A Health Service Organization in Ottawa, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: A purposeful sample of six family physicians. METHODS: In semistructured interviews, participants were asked to describe the workup ordered and their decision-making processes for patients in whom they had recently detected renal impairment. They were also asked to evaluate the six components of an educational intervention designed to help them to detect renal impairment. Finally, one patient's chart was reviewed (a chart containing a laboratory report noting an abnormal result for kidney function and having no indication that renal impairment had been recognized) to identify reasons for lack of detection. RESULTS: Most physicians did not investigate every patient with renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate of < 78 mL/min) in the same way because they took individual patient factors into consideration. Reasons for not detecting renal impairment were "managed differently" or "missed," with the former being the most common. The educational intervention physicians remembered most often was chart rounds, and these were viewed as helpful. "Missed" cases were more often deliberately managed differently than unintentionally not detected. CONCLUSION: Physicians used various approaches to detect and manage renal impairment despite interventions that recommended a consistent procedure.