Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Psych J ; 4(4): 226-30, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26663628

RESUMEN

Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a disease occurring when antibodies produced by the body's own immune system attack NMDA-type glutamate receptors in the brain. Most anti-NMDAR encephalitis cases are associated with paraneoplastic syndrome. We analyze the case of a 15-year-old girl who was hospitalized in a child psychiatry clinic in Riga, Latvia, with de novo acute polymorphic psychotic disorder gradually progressing to a catatonic state. The patient received antipsychotic and electroconvulsive therapy with no beneficial effect. The council of doctors discussed differential diagnoses of schizophrenia-induced catatonia and the autoimmune limbic encephalitis-induced catatonic condition. When the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR autoimmune encephalitis was finally confirmed by repeated immunological assays (specific immunoglobulin [Ig] G and IgM in her blood serum and cerebrospinal fluid), and a paraneoplastic process was ruled out, she was started on immunomodulating therapy (methylprednisolone, Ig, plasmapheresis, rituximab), which changed the course of her disease. On immunomodulating treatment, her physical and mental health have gradually improved to almost complete reconvalescence. Psychiatrists should consider anti-NMDAR encephalitis as a differential diagnosis in first-episode psychosis patients presenting with disorientation, disturbed consciousness, pronounced cognitive deficits, movement disorder, dysautonomia, or rapid deterioration, and test for specific IgG NR1 autoantibodies, even if there are no specific findings on routine neuroimaging, electroencephalography (EEG), or cerebrospinal fluid tests.


Asunto(s)
Encefalitis Antirreceptor N-Metil-D-Aspartato/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Receptores de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/inmunología , Adolescente , Encefalitis Antirreceptor N-Metil-D-Aspartato/tratamiento farmacológico , Encefalitis Antirreceptor N-Metil-D-Aspartato/psicología , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Catatonia/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Tardío , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Ácido Glutámico/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Letonia , Receptores de Glutamato
2.
Eur J Paediatr Neurol ; 19(4): 435-45, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25823975

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Assess perampanel's efficacy and safety as adjunctive therapy in adolescents (ages 12-17) with drug-resistant partial seizures. METHODS: Adolescent patients enrolled in multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III core studies (studies 304, 305, or 306) completed 19-week, double-blind phase (6-week titration/13-week maintenance) with once-daily perampanel or placebo. Upon completion, patients were eligible for the extension (study 307), beginning with 16-week, blinded conversion, during which placebo patients switched to perampanel. Patients then entered the open-label treatment. RESULTS: Of 1480 patients from the core studies, 143 were adolescents. Pooled adolescent data from these core studies demonstrated median percent decreases in seizure frequency for perampanel 8 mg (34.8%) and 12 mg (35.6%) were approximately twice that of placebo (18.0%). Responder rates increased with perampanel 8 mg (40.9%) and 12 mg (45.0%) versus placebo (22.2%). Adolescents receiving concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) had smaller reductions in seizure frequency (8 mg:31.6%; 12 mg:26.8%) than those taking non-inducing AEDs (8 mg:54.6%; 12 mg:52.7%). Relative to pre-perampanel baseline, seizure frequency and responder rates during the extension (Weeks 1-52) improved with perampanel. Most commonly reported adverse events in adolescents during the core studies were dizziness (20.4%), somnolence (15.3%), aggression (8.2%), decreased appetite (6.1%), and rhinitis (5.1%). Dizziness (13.2%), somnolence (11.6%), and aggression (6.6%) most often led to perampanel interruption/dose adjustment during the extension. SIGNIFICANCE: Data demonstrated adjunctive perampanel treatment in adolescents with drug-resistant partial seizures produced better seizure control versus placebo, sustained seizure frequency improvements, and a generally favorable safety profile. Results were comparable to the overall study population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: Study 304: NCT00699972; 305: NCT00699582; 306: NCT00700310; Study 307: NCT00735397.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia Refractaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsias Parciales/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Nitrilos , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA