HIV-1 Nef compensates for disorganization of the immunological synapse by inducing trans-Golgi network-associated Lck signaling.

The Nef protein of HIV-1 facilitates viral replication and disease progression in vivo. Nef disturbs the organization of immunological synapses between infected CD4(+) T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting B-lymphocytes to interfere with TCR proximal signaling. Paradoxically, Nef enhances distal TCR signaling in infected CD4(+) T lymphocytes, an effect thought to be involved in its role in AIDS pathogenesis. Using quantitative confocal microscopy and cell fractionation of Nef-expressing cells and HIV-1-infected primary human T lymphocytes, we found that Nef induces intracellular compartmentalization of TCR signaling to adjust TCR responses to antigenic stimulation. Nef reroutes kinase-active pools of the TCR signaling master switch Lck away from the plasma membrane (PM) to the trans-Golgi network (TGN), thereby preventing the recruitment of active Lck to the immunological synapse after TCR engagement and limiting signal initiation at the PM. Instead, Nef triggers Lck-dependent activation of TGN-associated Ras-Erk signaling to promote the production of the T lymphocyte survival factor IL-2 and to enhance virus spread. Overexpression of the Lck PM transporter Unc119 restores Nef-induced subversions of Lck trafficking and TCR signaling. Nef therefore hijacks Lck sorting to selectively activate TGN-associated arms of compartmentalized TCR signaling. By tailoring T-lymphocyte responses to antigenic stimulation, Nef optimizes the environment for HIV-1 replication.

HIV-1 Nef disrupts membrane-microdomain-associated anterograde transport for plasma membrane delivery of selected Src family kinases.

HIV-1 Nef, an essential factor in AIDS pathogenesis, boosts virus replication in vivo. As one of its activities in CD4(+) T-lymphocytes, Nef potently retargets the Src family kinase (SFK) Lck but not closely related Fyn from the plasma membrane to recycling endosomes and the trans-Golgi network to tailor T-cell activation and optimize virus replication. Investigating the underlying mechanism we find Lck retargeting involves removal of the kinase from membrane microdomains. Moreover, Nef interferes with rapid vesicular transport of Lck to block anterograde transport and plasma membrane delivery of newly synthesized Lck. The sensitivity of Lck to Nef does not depend on functional domains of Lck but requires membrane insertion of the kinase. Surprisingly, the short N-terminal SH4 domain membrane anchor of Lck is necessary and sufficient to confer sensitivity to Nef-mediated anterograde transport block and microdomain extraction. In contrast, the SH4 domain of Fyn is inert to Nef-mediated manipulation. Nef thus interferes with a specialized membrane microdomain-associated pathway for plasma membrane delivery of newly synthesized Lck whose specificity is determined by the affinity of cargo for these sorting platforms. These results provide new insight into the mechanism of Nef action and the pathways used for SFK plasma membrane delivery.

Lentiviral Nef proteins utilize PAK2-mediated deregulation of cofilin as a general strategy to interfere with actin remodeling.

Nef is an accessory protein and pathogenicity factor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) which elevates virus replication in vivo. We recently described for HIV type 1(SF2) (HIV-1(SF2)) the potent interference of Nef with T-lymphocyte chemotaxis via its association with the cellular kinase PAK2. Mechanistic analysis revealed that this interaction results in deregulation of the actin-severing factor cofilin and thus blocks the chemokine-mediated actin remodeling required for cell motility. However, the efficiency of PAK2 association is highly variable among Nef proteins from different lentiviruses, prompting us to evaluate the conservation of this actin-remodeling/cofilin-deregulating mechanism. Based on the analysis of a total of 17 HIV-1, HIV-2, and SIV Nef proteins, we report here that inhibition of chemokine-induced actin remodeling as well as inactivation of cofilin are strongly conserved activities of lentiviral Nef proteins. Of note, even for Nef variants that display only marginal PAK2 association in vitro, these activities require the integrity of a PAK2 recruitment motif and the presence of endogenous PAK2. Thus, reduced in vitro affinity to PAK2 does not indicate limited functionality of Nef-PAK2 complexes in intact HIV-1 host cells. These results establish hijacking of PAK2 for deregulation of cofilin and inhibition of triggered actin remodeling as a highly conserved function of lentiviral Nef proteins, supporting the notion that PAK2 association may be critical for Nef's activity in vivo.

Inhibition of T-cell receptor-induced actin remodeling and relocalization of Lck are evolutionarily conserved activities of lentiviral Nef proteins.

Nef, an important pathogenicity factor of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), elevates virus replication in vivo. Among other activities, Nef affects T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling via several mechanisms. For HIV-1 Nef these include alteration of the organization and function of the immunological synapse (IS) such as relocalization of the Lck kinase, as well as early inhibition of TCR/CD3 complex (TCR-CD3)-mediated actin rearrangements and tyrosine phosphorylation. Although most SIV and HIV-2 Nef alleles (group 2) potently downregulate cell surface TCR-CD3, this activity was lost in the viral lineage that gave rise to HIV-1 and its SIV counterparts (group 1). To address the contribution of TCR-CD3 downregulation to Nef effects on TCR signal initiation, we compared the activities of 18 group 1 and group 2 Nef proteins, as well as SIV Nef mutants with defects in TCR-CD3 downmodulation. We found that alteration of Lck's subcellular localization is largely conserved and occurs independently of actin remodeling inhibition or TCR-CD3 downregulation. Surprisingly, Nef proteins of both groups also strongly reduced TCR-induced actin remodeling and tyrosine phosphorylation on TCR-stimulatory surfaces and TCR-CD3 downmodulation competence by group 2 Nef proteins only slightly elevated these effects. Furthermore, Nef proteins from HIV-1 and SIV reduced conjugation between infected primary human T lymphocytes and Raji B cells and potently prevented F-actin polarization at the IS independently of their ability to downmodulate TCR-CD3. These results establish alterations of early TCR signaling events at the IS, including F-actin remodeling and relocalization of Lck, as evolutionary conserved activities of highly divergent lentiviral Nef proteins.

A Conserved GPG-Motif in the HIV-1 Nef Core Is Required for Principal Nef-Activities.

To find out new determinants required for Nef activity we performed a functional alanine scanning analysis along a discrete but highly conserved region at the core of HIV-1 Nef. We identified the GPG-motif, located at the 121-137 region of HIV-1 NL4.3 Nef, as a novel protein signature strictly required for the p56Lck dependent Nef-induced CD4-downregulation in T-cells. Since the Nef-GPG motif was dispensable for CD4-downregulation in HeLa-CD4 cells, Nef/AP-1 interaction and Nef-dependent effects on Tf-R trafficking, the observed effects on CD4 downregulation cannot be attributed to structure constraints or to alterations on general protein trafficking. Besides, we found that the GPG-motif was also required for Nef-dependent inhibition of ring actin re-organization upon TCR triggering and MHCI downregulation, suggesting that the GPG-motif could actively cooperate with the Nef PxxP motif for these HIV-1 Nef-related effects. Finally, we observed that the Nef-GPG motif was required for optimal infectivity of those viruses produced in T-cells. According to these findings, we propose the conserved GPG-motif in HIV-1 Nef as functional region required for HIV-1 infectivity and therefore with a potential interest for the interference of Nef activity during HIV-1 infection.

Nef does not inhibit F-actin remodelling and HIV-1 cell-cell transmission at the T lymphocyte virological synapse.

Nef, a HIV-1 pathogenesis factor, elevates virus replication in vivo and thus progression to AIDS by incompletely defined mechanisms. As one of its biological properties, Nef enhances the infectivity of cell-free HIV-1 particles in single round infections, however it fails to provide a significant and amplifying growth advantage for HIV-1 on such virus producing cells. A major difference between HIV-1 cell-free single round infections and virus replication kinetics on T lymphocytes consists in the predominant role of cell-associated virus transmission rather than cell-free infection during multiple round virus replication. HIV-1 cell-to-cell transmission occurs across close cell contacts also referred to as virological synapse (VS) and involves polarization of the F-actin cytoskeleton, formation of F-actin rich membrane bridges as well as virus budding to cell-cell contacts. Since Nef potently interferes with triggered actin remodelling in several cell systems to reduce e.g. cell motility and signal transduction, we set out here to address whether Nef also affects organization and possibly function of the T lymphocyte VS. We find that in addition to increasing infectivity of cell-free virions, Nef can also moderately enhance single rounds of HIV-1 cell-cell transmission between Jurkat T lymphocytes. This occurs without affecting cell conjugation efficiencies or polarization of F-actin and HIV-1 p24Gag at the VS, identifying actin remodelling at the VS as an example of Nef-insensitive host cell actin rearrangements. However, Nef-mediated enhancement of single round cell-free infection or cell-to-cell transmission does not potentiate over multiple rounds of infection. These results suggest that Nef affects cell-free and cell-associated HIV-1 infection by the same mechanism acting on the intrinsic infectivity of HIV-1 particles. They further indicate that the high efficacy of cell-to-cell transmission can compensate such infectivity defects. Nef therefore selectively interferes with actin remodelling processes involved in antiviral host cell defense while actin driven processes that promote virus propagation remain unaltered.