Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) associated with left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) cardiomyopathy. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyze the clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics of VAs in a group of patients with LVNC. METHODS: Forty-two nonrelated patients with LVNC and VAs were included that were evaluated at the Inherited Cardiac Disease Unit of the University Hospital Virgen Arrixaca (Murcia-Spain) (ERN Guard-Heart Centre, European Reference Network for Rare and Low Prevalence Complex Diseases of the Heart). RESULTS: Thirteen patients (30.9%) had isolated LVNC, 27 (64.3%) had LVNC associated with dilated cardiomyopathy, and 2 (4.8%) had LVNC associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Among isolated LVNC individuals, 9 (69.2%) had premature ventricular complexes (PVCs)/nonsustained ventricular tachycardias (VTs), and 4 (30.8%) VTs (1 VT degenerating in ventricular fibrillation). In the dilated cardiomyopathy group, 11 (40.7%) patients had PVCs, 14 (51.9%) VTs, and 2 (7.4%) ventricular fibrillation. In the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy group, one patient had PVCs and the other VTs. Endocardial mapping and ablation were performed in 19 patients (45.2%): 7 ventricular outflow tracts (4 right ventricular outflow tract, 1 left coronary cusp, and 2 right coronary cusp), 2 in the left ventricular summit, 5 related to Purkinje potentials at the mid inferoseptal area, and 5 associated with endocardial scar localized in the basal anterolateral and inferolateral segments. Epicardial ablation was performed in 3 cases. CONCLUSION: The substrate of VAs in LVNC cardiomyopathy is heterogeneous, with origin in ventricular outflow tracts, Purkinje system related, and resembling scar patterns in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Real-life behaviour of direct oral anticoagulants in a Spanish cohort with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Refase Registry.

Aim: To analyse the effectiveness and safety of DOAC (direct oral anticoagulants) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients attending clinical practice.Methods: Retrospective study of AF patients who started treatment with DOAC from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016 in three Spanish hospitals. Mean follow-up was 1.6 years. The primary outcomes were rates of all-cause death, ischaemic stroke, and bleeding. These outcomes were also studied depending on correct dosage adjustment and standard/adjusted dose.Results: The study included 2494 patients (age = 76.0 ± 9.5 years, CHA2DS2-VASc = 4.0 ± 1.6). The most prescribed DOAC was rivaroxaban (41.1%). Patients taking dabigatran were the youngest (mean age = 73.1 ± 10.3 years), with better kidney function (mean CrCl = 80.6 ± 35.8 ml/min) and lower CHA2DS2-VASc (3.7 ± 1.4) and HAS-BLED (2.1 ± 0.9) scores. Patients taking apixaban were the oldest, and had the highest CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores (4.3 ± 1.6 and 2.6 ± 0.9, respectively). Rates of stroke/major bleeding/intracranial bleeding were 1.8/3.0/0.3 events per 100 patient-years, respectively, with no differences among DOAC. Based on dose adjustment according to technical data, it was observed that 517 patients (23.5%) received DOAC doses inconsistent with labelling (p < .001) and, within this group, under-dosed patients had a higher death rate although it did not reach a significant result after multivariate adjustment.Conclusions: The results of safety and efficacy are very similar to those of other previously published national registries. There were no differences among the different types of DOAC regarding outcomes. However, it was found that people taking the adjusted dose of the drug seemed to have a higher risk of death. A non-negligible proportion of patients received DOAC doses inconsistent with labelling (mostly underdose).