Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 59
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Nephrol ; : 1-12, 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38889694

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring treatment with renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a common complication after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the prevalence of RRT use and the associated outcomes in critically patients across the globe are not well described. Therefore, we describe the epidemiology and outcomes of patients receiving RRT for AKI in ICUs across several large health system jurisdictions. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis using nationally representative and comparable databases from seven health jurisdictions in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, Scotland, and the USA between 2006 and 2023, depending on data availability of each dataset. Patients with a history of end-stage kidney disease receiving chronic RRT and patients with a history of renal transplant were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 4,104,480 patients in the ICU cohort and 3,520,516 patients in the mechanical ventilation cohort were included. Overall, 156,403 (3.8%) patients in the ICU cohort and 240,824 (6.8%) patients in the mechanical ventilation cohort were treated with RRT for AKI. In the ICU cohort, the proportion of patients treated with RRT was lowest in Australia and Brazil (3.3%) and highest in Scotland (9.2%). The in-hospital mortality for critically ill patients treated with RRT was almost fourfold higher (57.1%) than those not receiving RRT (16.8%). The mortality of patients treated with RRT varied across the health jurisdictions from 37 to 65%. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of patients who receive RRT in ICUs throughout the world vary widely. Our research suggests that differences in access to and provision of this therapy are contributing factors.

2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 72(9): 1603-1607, 2021 05 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32227089

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of patients with severe pulmonary blastomycosis requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) are not well understood in the modern era. Limited historical case series reported 50-90% mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by blastomycosis. The objective of this large retrospective cohort study was to describe the risk factors and outcomes of patients with severe pulmonary blastomycosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2006-2014. Patients aged >18 years with a diagnosis of blastomycosis who received MV were included. RESULTS: There were 1848 patients with a diagnosis of blastomycosis included in the study. Of these, 219 (11.9%) underwent MV with a mortality rate of 39.7% compared with 2.5% in patients not requiring ventilatory support (P < .01). The median (IQR) time to death for patients requiring MV was 12 (8-16) days. The median length of hospital stay for survivors of MV was 22 (14-37) days. The rate of MV was higher for patients treated in teaching hospitals (63.4% vs 57.2%, P = .05) and lower for those receiving care at a rural hospital (12.3% vs 17.2%, P = .04). In a multivariate model, female gender was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.06-3.20; P = .03) as was increasing patient age (10-year age increase OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33-2.02; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest published cohort of patients with blastomycosis, mortality for patients on MV is high at ~40%, 16-fold higher than those without MV.


Asunto(s)
Blastomicosis , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Adolescente , Blastomicosis/epidemiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Respiración Artificial , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/epidemiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 36(4): 1088-1094, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32562577

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The impact of household income, a surrogate of socioeconomic status, on hospital readmission rates for patients with decompensated cirrhosis has not been well characterized. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database from 2012 to 2014 was used to study the association of lower median household income on 30-, 90-, and 180-day hospital readmission rates for patients with decompensated cirrhosis. RESULTS: From the 42 679 001 hospital admissions contained in the sample, there were 82 598 patients with decompensated cirrhosis who survived a hospital admission in the first 6 months of the year. During a uniform 6-month follow-up period, 25 914 (31.4%), 39 928 (48.3%), and 47 496 (57.5%) patients were readmitted at 30, 90, and 180 days, respectively. After controlling for demographic and clinical confounders, patients residing in the three lowest income quartiles were significantly more likely to be readmitted at 30 days than those in the fourth quartile (first quartile, odds ratio [OR] 1.32 [95% confidence interval, CI, 1.17-1.47, P < 0.01]; second quartile, OR 1.25 [95% CI 1.13-1.38, P < 0.01]; and third quartile, OR 1.08 [95% CI 0.97-1.20, P = 0.07]). The association between lower socioeconomic status and the higher risk of readmissions persisted at 90 days (first quartile, OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.14-1.30, P < 0.01]) and 180 days (first quartile, OR 1.32 [95% CI 1.20-1.44, P < 0.01]). CONCLUSION: Patients with decompensated cirrhosis residing in the lowest income quartile had a 32% higher odds of hospital readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days compared with those in the highest income quartile.


Asunto(s)
Composición Familiar , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Riesgo , Clase Social , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 201(6): 681-687, 2020 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31948262

RESUMEN

Rationale: Whether critical care improvements over the last 10 years extend to all hospitals has not been described.Objectives: To examine the temporal trends of critical care outcomes in minority and non-minority-serving hospitals using an inception cohort of critically ill patients.Measurements and Main Results: Using the Philips Health Care electronic ICU Research Institute Database, we identified minority-serving hospitals as those with an African American or Hispanic ICU census more than twice its regional mean. We examined almost 1.1 million critical illness admissions among 208 ICUs from across the United States admitted between 2006 and 2016. Adjusted hospital mortality (primary) and length of hospitalization (secondary) were the main outcomes. Large pluralities of African American (25%, n = 27,242) and Hispanic individuals (48%, n = 26,743) were cared for in minority-serving hospitals, compared with only 5.2% (n = 42,941) of white individuals. Over the last 10 years, although the risk of critical illness mortality steadily decreased by 2% per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-0.98) in non-minority-serving hospitals, outcomes within minority-serving hospitals did not improve comparably. This disparity in temporal trends was particularly noticeable among African American individuals, where each additional calendar year was associated with a 3% (95% CI, 0.96-0.97) lower adjusted critical illness mortality within a non-minority-serving hospital, but no change within minority-serving hospitals (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.01). Similarly, although ICU and hospital lengths of stay decreased by 0.08 (95% CI, -0.08 to -0.07) and 0.16 (95% CI, -0.16 to -0.15) days per additional calendar year, respectively, in non-minority-serving hospitals, there was little temporal change for African American individuals in minority-serving hospitals.Conclusions: Critically ill African American individuals are disproportionately cared for in minority-serving hospitals, which have shown significantly less improvement than non-minority-serving hospitals over the last 10 years.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/tendencias , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultados de Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Hospitales/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos
5.
Crit Care Med ; 48(7): 962-967, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32345833

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Treatment in a disproportionately minority-serving hospital has been associated with worse outcomes in a variety of illnesses. We examined the association of treatment in disproportionately minority hospitals on outcomes in patients with sepsis across the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. Disproportionately minority hospitals were defined as hospitals having twice the relative minority patient population than the surrounding geographical mean. Minority hospitals for Black and Hispanic patient populations were identified based on U.S. Census demographic information. A multivariate model employing a validated algorithm for mortality in sepsis using administrative data was used. SETTING: The National Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2014. PATIENTS: Patients over 18 years of age with sepsis. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 4,221,221 patients with sepsis were identified. Of these, 612,217 patients (14.5%) were treated at hospitals disproportionately serving the black community (Black hospitals), whereas 181,141 (4.3%) were treated at hospitals disproportionately serving the Hispanic community (Hispanic hospitals). After multivariate analysis, treatment in a Black hospital was associated with a 4% higher risk of mortality compared to treatment in a nonminority hospital (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05; p < 0.01). Treatment in a Hispanic hospital was associated with a 9% higher risk of mortality (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07-1.11; p < 0.01). Median hospital length of stay was almost 1 day longer at each of the disproportionately minority hospitals (nonminority hospitals: 5.9 d; interquartile range, 3.1-11.0 d vs Hispanic: 6.9 d; interquartile range, 3.6-12.9 d and Black: 6.7 d, interquartile range, 3.4-13.2 d; both p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sepsis regardless of race who were treated in disproportionately high minority hospitals suffered significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria/etnología , Salud de las Minorías/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/etnología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 54(1): 90-95, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30829905

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Hospital readmission rates following a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) insertion after an episode of esophageal variceal bleeding (EVB) has not been well studied. We aimed to address this gap in knowledge on a population level. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was used to study the readmission rates for patients with decompensated cirrhosis who had a TIPS insertion performed for EVB. The NRD is a national database that tracks patients longitudinally for hospital readmissions. A propensity score matching model was created to match patients who received TIPS with those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 42,679,001 hospital admissions from the 2012 to 2014 NRD sample were analyzed. There were 33,934 patients with EVB who met inclusion criteria for the study, of whom, 1527 (4.5%) received TIPS after EVB and were matched with 1527 patients with EVB who did not undergo TIPS. With a uniform follow-up of 3 months, patients with TIPS were less likely to be readmitted to hospital with a recurrent EVB [odds ratio (OR): 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-0.47, P<0.01], although were more likely to be readmitted with hepatic encephalopathy (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.31-2.11, P<0.01). At 3 months, there was no difference in all cause hospital readmission rate between the 2 groups (OR: 38.8%; 95% CI: 38.1-44.9 TIPS vs. OR: 41.5%; 95% CI: 34.1-43.3 non-TIPS: P=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: In this large nationally representative study, TIPS insertion after an episode of EVB was associated with a significantly lower risk of 3-month readmission for recurrent EVB compared with patients who did not receive TIPS. Although those receiving TIPS had a higher rate of hepatic encephalopathy the overall readmission remained unchanged.


Asunto(s)
Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/etiología , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/cirugía , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Encefalopatía Hepática/epidemiología , Encefalopatía Hepática/etiología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recurrencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
7.
J Intensive Care Med ; 35(10): 1002-1007, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30295138

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The impact of chronic exposure to air pollution on mortality in patients with sepsis is unknown. We attempted to quantify the relationship between air pollution, notably excess ozone, and particulate matter (PM), with in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis nationwide. METHODS: The 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was linked with ambient air pollution data from the Environmental Protection Agency for both 8-hour ozone exposure and annual mean 2.5-micron PM (PM2.5) pollution levels. A validated severity of illness model for sepsis using administrative data was used to control for sepsis severity. RESULTS: The records of 8 023 590 hospital admissions from the 2011 NIS sample were analyzed. Of these, there were 444 928 patients who met the Angus definition of sepsis, treated in hospitals for which air pollution data were available. The cohort had an overall mortality of 11.2%. After adjustment for severity of sepsis, increasing exposure to ozone pollution was associated with increased risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04 for each 0.01 ppm increase, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.05; P < .01). Particulate matter was not associated with mortality (OR: 0.99 for each 5 µg/m3 increase, 95% CI: 0.97-1.01; P = .28). When stratified by sepsis source, ozone pollution had a higher impact on patients with pneumonia (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.08; P < .01) compared to those patients without pneumonia (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Exposure to increased levels of ozone but not particulate air pollution was associated with higher risk of mortality in patients with sepsis. This association was strongest in patients with pneumonia but persisted in all sources of sepsis. Further work is needed to understand the relationship between ambient ozone air pollution and sepsis outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Ozono/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Anciano , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ozono/análisis , Material Particulado/análisis , Neumonía/complicaciones , Neumonía/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/etiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos
8.
Int Orthop ; 44(3): 471-476, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31919568

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to evaluate if the use of CA-THA was associated with lower complications in the first 90 days following THA compared with conventional THA. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients who underwent THA between 2012 and 2014. The primary outcome was arthroplasty-related complications within the first 90 days following THA. Multivariate models predicting the risk of complications, readmission, and revision-related readmission within 90 days of discharge were created. RESULTS: A total of 309,252 patients with a minimum 90-day follow-up following elective primary THA were identified. After controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, indication, income, and type of insurance, the use of CA during THA resulted in a 12% reduced odds of 90-day complications (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-0.99, p = 0.04). DISCUSSION: The use of CA-THA resulted in lower 90-day complication rates and readmission rates compared with traditional THA after controlling for confounding variables. There was no significant difference in the rates of revision surgery between the groups within the first 90 days.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Artropatías/cirugía , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Artropatías/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Técnicas Estereotáxicas , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Liver Int ; 39(7): 1256-1262, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30809903

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There have been improving survival trends after in-hospital cardiac arrest for the general population, but there is limited information on the outcomes of hospitalized patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) who undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We aimed to examine survival to hospital discharge after receipt of in-hospital CPR in patients with ESLD using a nationally representative sample. METHODS: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2006 to 2014 to identify adult patients who underwent in-hospital CPR. Using multivariate modelling, we compared survival to hospital discharge for patients with ESLD to those without ESLD. We also compared outcomes of patients with ESLD to patients with metastatic cancer. RESULTS: A total of 177 533 patients underwent in-hospital CPR, of which 1474 (0.8%) had ESLD. Patients with ESLD had lower rates of survival to hospital discharge compared to patients without ESLD (10.7% vs 28.6%, P < 0.01). In multivariate modelling, ESLD was significantly associated with lower odds of survival to hospital discharge after in-hospital CPR (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.28-0.44, P < 0.01). Among survivors of in-hospital CPR, ESLD patients had a significantly lower chance of discharge to home compared to patients without ESLD (3.2% vs 8.0%, P < 0.05). Patients with ESLD also had lower rates of survival to hospital discharge compared to those with metastatic cancer (10.7% vs 15.5%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes are poor after in-hospital CPR in patients with ESLD and are worse than for patients with metastatic cancer. The current analysis can be used to inform goals of care discussions for patients with ESLD.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/mortalidad , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/complicaciones , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 33(5): 887-893, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30417258

RESUMEN

The use of machine learning (ML) in healthcare has enormous potential for improving disease detection, clinical decision support, and workflow efficiencies. In this commentary, we review published and potential applications for the use of ML for monitoring within the hospital environment. We present use cases as well as several questions regarding the application of ML to the analysis of the vast amount of complex data that clinicians must interpret in the realm of continuous physiological monitoring. ML, especially employed in bidirectional conjunction with electronic health record data, has the potential to extract much more useful information out of this currently under-analyzed data source from a population level. As a data driven entity, ML is dependent on copious, high quality input data so that error can be introduced by low quality data sources. At present, while ML is being studied in hybrid formulations along with static expert systems for monitoring applications, it is not yet actively incorporated in the formal artificial learning sense of an algorithm constantly learning and updating its rules without external intervention. Finally, innovations in monitoring, including those supported by ML, will pose regulatory and medico-legal challenges, as well as questions regarding precisely how to incorporate these features into clinical care and medical education. Rigorous evaluation of ML techniques compared to traditional methods or other AI methods will be required to validate the algorithms developed with consideration of database limitations and potential learning errors. Demonstration of value on processes and outcomes will be necessary to support the use of ML as a feature in monitoring system development: Future research is needed to evaluate all AI based programs before clinical implementation in non-research settings.


Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Automático , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Adulto , Algoritmos , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Alarmas Clínicas , Cuidados Críticos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Delirio/diagnóstico , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Sistemas Especialistas , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Respiración Artificial , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Programas Informáticos , Análisis de Ondículas
11.
Crit Care Med ; 46(1): e81-e86, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29068858

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of critically ill patients who undergo interhospital transfer are not well understood. Physicians assume that patients who undergo interhospital transfer will receive more advanced care that may translate into decreased morbidity or mortality relative to a similar patient who is not transferred. However, there is little empirical evidence to support this assumption. We examined country-level U.S. data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database to examine whether, in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, interhospital transfer is associated with a mortality benefit. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis using complex survey design regression methods with propensity score matching. SETTING: The Nationwide Readmissions Database contains information about hospital admissions from 22 States, accounting for roughly half of U.S. hospitalizations; the database contains linkage numbers so that admissions and transfers for the same patient can be linked across 1 year of follow-up. PATIENTS: From the 2013 Nationwide Readmission Database Sample, 14,325,172 hospital admissions were analyzed. There were 61,493 patients with sepsis and on mechanical ventilation. Of these, 1,630 patients (2.7%) were transferred during their hospitalization. A propensity-matched cohort of 1,630 patients who did not undergo interhospital transfer was identified. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The exposure of interest was interhospital transfer to an acute care facility. The primary outcome was hospital mortality; the secondary outcome was hospital length of stay. The propensity score included age, gender, insurance coverage, do not resuscitate status, use of renal replacement therapy, presence of shock, and Elixhauser comorbidities index. After propensity matching, interhospital transfer was not associated with a difference in in-hospital mortality (12.3% interhospital transfer vs 12.7% non-interhospital transfer; p = 0.74). However, interhospital transfer was associated with a longer total hospital length of stay (12.8 d interquartile range, 7.7-21.6 for interhospital transfer vs 9.1 d interquartile range, 5.1-17.0 for non-interhospital transfer; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sepsis requiring mechanical ventilation who underwent interhospital transfer did not have improved outcomes compared with a cohort with matched characteristics who were not transferred. The study raises questions about the risk-benefit profile of interhospital transfer as an intervention.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Web Semántica , Estados Unidos
12.
Crit Care Med ; 46(1): e76-e80, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29068859

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Interhospital transfer, a common intervention, may be subject to healthcare disparities. In mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, we hypothesize that disparities not disease related would be found between patients who were and were not transferred. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2006-2012. PATIENTS: Patients over 18 years old with a primary diagnosis of sepsis who underwent mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We obtained age, gender, length of stay, race, insurance coverage, do not resuscitate status, and Elixhauser comorbidities. The outcome used was interhospital transfer from a small- or medium-sized hospital to a larger acute care hospital. Of 55,208,382 hospitalizations, 46,406 patients met inclusion criteria. In the multivariate model, patients were less likely to be transferred if the following were present: older age (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.978-0.982), black race (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.89), Hispanic race (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90), South region hospital (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.88), teaching hospital (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.28-0.33), and do not resuscitate status (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.15-0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, we found significant disparities in race and geographic location not explained by medical diagnoses or illness severity.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/ética , Transferencia de Pacientes/ética , Racismo , Respiración Artificial/ética , Sepsis/etnología , Sepsis/terapia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Población Negra , Estudios de Cohortes , Ética Médica , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Órdenes de Resucitación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
13.
Hepatology ; 66(5): 1585-1591, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28660622

RESUMEN

Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) often have a high symptom burden. Historically, palliative care (PC) services have been underused in this population. We investigated the use of PC services in patients with ESLD hospitalized across the United States. We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to conduct a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis. All patients >18 years of age admitted with ESLD, defined as those with at least two liver decompensation events, were included in the analysis. A multivariate logistic regression model predicting referral to PC was created. We analyzed 55,208,382 hospitalizations from the 2006-2012 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, with 39,349 (0.07%) patients meeting study inclusion. PC consultation was performed in 1,789 (4.5%) ESLD patients. The rate of PC referral in ESLD increased from 0.97% in 2006 to 7.1% in 2012 (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with lower referral to PC were Hispanic race (odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.89; P < 0.01) and insurance coverage (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65-0.84; P < 0.01). Factors associated with increased referral to PC were age (per 5-year increase, OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08; P < 0.01), do-not-resuscitate status (OR, 16.24; 95% CI, 14.20-18.56; P < 0.01), treatment in a teaching hospital (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.39; P < 0.01), presence of hepatocellular carcinoma (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.71-2.33; P < 0.01), and presence of metastatic cancer (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.80-3.18; P < 0.01). PC referral was most common in west coast hospitals (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.53-2.14; P < 0.01) as well as large-sized hospitals (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22-1.82; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: From 2006 to 2012 the use of PC in ESLD patients increased substantially; socioeconomic, geographical, and ethnic barriers to accessing PC were observed. (Hepatology 2017;66:1585-1591).


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Cuidados Paliativos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
14.
J Intensive Care Med ; 33(10): 551-556, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28385107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Associations between low socioeconomic status (SES) and poor health outcomes have been demonstrated in a variety of conditions. However, the relationship in patients with sepsis is not well described. We investigated the association of lower household income with in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis across the United States. METHODS: Retrospective nationwide cohort analysis utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2011. Patients aged 18 years or older with sepsis were included. Socioeconomic status was approximated by the median household income of the zip code in which the patient resided. Multivariate logistic modeling incorporating a validated illness severity score for sepsis in administrative data was performed. RESULTS: A total of 8 023 590 admissions from the 2011 NIS were examined. A total of 671 858 patients with sepsis were included in the analysis. The lowest income residents compared to the highest were younger (66.9 years, standard deviation [SD] = 16.5 vs 71.4 years, SD = 16.1, P < .01), more likely to be female (53.5% vs 51.9%, P < .01), less likely to be white (54.6% vs 76.6%, P < .01), as well as less likely to have health insurance coverage (92.8% vs 95.9%, P < .01). After controlling for severity of sepsis, residing in the lowest income quartile compared to the highest quartile was associated with a higher risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.08, P < .01). There was no association seen between the second (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05, P = .14) and third (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-1.01, P = .40) quartiles compared to the highest. CONCLUSION: After adjustment for severity of illness, patients with sepsis who live in the lowest median income quartile had a higher risk of mortality compared to residents of the highest income quartile. The association between SES and mortality in sepsis warrants further investigation with more comprehensive measures of SES.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Renta , Sepsis/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Clase Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
J Arthroplasty ; 33(5): 1567-1571.e2, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29395718

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to be one of the most common reasons for revision THA. The purpose of this study is to measure the current rate of dislocation following THA in the United States. A secondary goal is to identify patients at highest risk of instability after THA. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify cases of elective primary THA between 2012 and 2014. All readmissions associated with dislocations were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the time to dislocation in the study population. A multivariate logistic regression was modeled to assess risk factors associated with readmission for dislocation. RESULTS: A total of 207,285 THAs were identified between 2012 and 2014. Of the total, 2842 dislocation-associated readmissions (1.4%) were identified, at a median of 40 days post-THA. A history of spinal fusion was the strongest independent predictor of dislocation (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-3.04; P < .0001). Parkinson's disease was also significantly associated with dislocation (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.05-2.51; P = .03), as well as dementia (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.13-3.39; P = .02), depression (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.43; P < .0001), and chronic lung disease (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33; P = .001). Inflammatory arthritis and avascular necrosis were independent risk factors for dislocation (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.25-1.97; P < .0001; OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.45-1.93; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: THA is a highly effective procedure with a low overall rate of instability. A history of spinal fusion was the most significant independent risk factor for dislocation within the first 6 months following THA.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Luxaciones Articulares/etiología , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Reoperación , Anciano , Artritis/fisiopatología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/fisiopatología , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Osteoartritis/complicaciones , Readmisión del Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral , Fusión Vertebral , Estados Unidos
16.
J Intensive Care Med ; 32(9): 535-539, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26893318

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe patient characteristics and trends in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the United States from 2006 to 2011. METHODS: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to isolate all patients aged 18 years who had a discharge International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis of ARDS, with and without procedure codes for ECMO, between 2006 and 2011. RESULTS: We examined a total of 47 911 414 hospital discharges, representing 235 911 271 hospitalizations using national weights. Of the 1 479 022 patients meeting the definition of ARDS (representing 7 281 206 discharges), 775 underwent ECMO. There was a 409% relative increase in the use of ECMO for ARDS in the United States between 2006 and 2011, from 0.0178% to 0.090% ( P = .0041). Patients treated with ECMO had higher in-hospital mortality (58.6% vs 25.1%, P < .0001) and longer hospital stays (15.8 days vs 6.9 days, P < .0001). They were also younger (47.9 vs 66.4 years, P < .0001) and more likely to be male (62.2% vs 49.6%, P < .0001). The median time to initiate ECMO from the time of admission was 0.5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 4.9 days). CONCLUSION: There has been a dramatic increase in ECMO use for the treatment of ARDS in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/tendencias , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
17.
J Intensive Care Med ; 32(10): 588-592, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27279084

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The outcome of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) who undergo mechanical ventilation is not well known. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 2006 to 2012 was used to isolate patients with a diagnosis of PAH who also underwent invasive (MV) and noninvasive (NIMV) mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The hospital records of 55 208 382 patients were studied, and there were 21 070 patients with PAH, of whom 1646 (7.8%) received MV and 834 (4.0%) received NIMV. Those receiving MV had higher mortality (39.1% vs 12.6%, P < .001) and longer hospital stays (11.9 days, interquartile range [IQR] 6.1-22.2 vs 6.7 days, IQR 3.4-11.9, P < .001) than those undergoing NIMV. Of the patients treated with MV, 4.4% also used home oxygen therapy and had similar overall mortality to those who did not use home oxygen (35.3% vs 39.1%, P = .46). Similarly, there was no relationship between home oxygen use and mortality in patients treated with NIMV (10.6% vs 12.6%, P = .48). Notably, more patients treated with NIMV used home oxygen than those treated with MV (14.4% vs 4.4%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with PAH who undergo invasive mechanical ventilation have an in-hospital mortality of 39.1%. Future work may help identify the types of patients who benefit most from advanced respiratory support in a critical care setting.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hipertensión Pulmonar/mortalidad , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/mortalidad , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
J Emerg Med ; 52(5): 615-621, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27899206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Thrombolysis for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) has received significant attention in the literature over the past 10 years. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to examine the trend in thrombolysis use in the United States from 2006 to 2011. Secondary objectives include examining patient and hospital characteristics associated with receiving thrombolysis and rates of complications associated with thrombolysis. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2006 to 2011 to identify patients with a diagnosis of PE who received or did not receive thrombolytic agents. RESULTS: Examining the records of 47,911,414 hospital discharges identified a cohort of 1,317,329 patients with PE; of these patients, 10,617 received thrombolysis. During the study period, there was a 30% relative increase in the use of thrombolysis, from 0.68% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.73%) to 0.89% (95% CI 0.83-0.95%; p < 0.01). After controlling for all factors in the model, factors associated with decreased access to thrombolysis were increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 0.981 [95% CI 0.980-0.982]; p < 0.01), female sex (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.75-0.81]; p < 0.01), Black race (OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.81-0.91]; p < 0.01), Hispanic race (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.71-0.86]; p < 0.01), other race (OR 0.72 [95% CI 0.59-0.88]; p = 0.02), and rural hospital location (OR 0.48 [95% CI 0.43-0.52]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of thrombolysis increased between 2006 and 2011 in the United States. Patients who receive thrombolysis tend to be white men, live in higher-income ZIP codes, and receive the therapy at large academic teaching hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Trombolítica/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Fibrinolíticos/farmacología , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
J Emerg Med ; 50(3): 371-5, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26416134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Moxifloxacin can be used in the treatment of tuberculosis, its effect on the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis is not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To identify patients from the St. Paul's Hospital emergency department (ED) treated with moxifloxacin who also had sputum sent for investigation of possible tuberculosis and the impact on sensitivity of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smears and time to initiation of tuberculosis treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study on patients that were prescribed moxifloxacin in the ED during a 5-year period and had samples collected for pulmonary tuberculosis. All AFB samples obtained throughout the hospital in patients not exposed to moxifloxacin during the same time period were also examined. RESULTS: Two-thousand six hundred and seventy-three patients who were admitted to St. Paul's Hospital through the ED received moxifloxacin during the study period. 273 (10.2%) of these patients were subsequently investigated for tuberculosis, with 9 positive cases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (3.3%). One-thousand three hundred and sixty-nine patients not exposed to moxifloxacin were screened for tuberculosis with 33 active cases (2.4%). The false-negative rate for AFB smears in the exposed group was 85.2% vs. 53.8% in the unexposed group (relative risk of false-negative AFB = 1.55; 95% CI 1.24-2.03). Time to initiation of anti-tuberculosis therapy was significantly delayed in the exposed group, with median time to initiation of 14 days vs. 2 days (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to moxifloxacin is associated with significantly increased rates of false-negative AFB smears and was associated with a significant delay in the initiation of anti-tuberculosis therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Moxifloxacino , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/efectos de los fármacos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA