Racial disparities in use of syringe service programs in King County, WA: a comparison of two cross-sectional surveys.

BACKGROUND: Syringe service programs (SSPs) provide tools to people who inject drugs (PWID) to prevent overdose, reduce the risk of HIV and HCV infection, and reduce injection frequency. While effective, previous research suggests that SSPs may not adequately reach some marginalized or particularly vulnerable subpopulations of PWID. METHODS: To identify disparities in SSP use, data from two cross-sectional surveys conducted in King County, Washington were compared: a survey of SSP clients and a community survey of PWID in King County. It was hypothesized that Black PWID, women, and gender minorities would be underrepresented in the SSP survey relative to the general population of PWID. RESULTS: SSP clients identified as White at a significantly higher rate than the community sample of PWID (p = 0.030). Black (p < 0.001), American Indian/Alaska Native (p < 0.001), Latinx/Hispanic (p = 0.009), and Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander PWID (p = 0.034) were underrepresented in the SSP client survey. The gender of SSP clients was similar to the distribution seen in the community sample of PWID (p = 0.483). CONCLUSIONS: Black PWID are underrepresented in Seattle-area SSPs, consistent with studies in other large US cities. Both nationally and in Seattle, overdose deaths have been increasing among Black PWID, and harm reduction strategies are vital to reversing this trend. SSPs should explore and test ways to be more accessible to minority populations.

Field evaluation of a dual rapid Human Immunodeficiency Virus and treponemal syphilis rapid test in community-based clinics in Los Angeles and New York.

INTRODUCTION: Dual human immunodeficiency virus/syphilis rapid diagnostic devices can play an important role in prevention efforts. The field performance of the INSTI Multiplex HIV-1/HIV-2/Syphilis Antibody Test (Multiplex) was evaluated. METHODS: Fingerstick whole blood was tested using the rapid test. A fourth-generation HIV laboratory assay and treponemal-specific laboratory assays were used as reference. Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) was used to stratify treponemal results. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: Overall, 274 patients participated. Sensitivity of the Multiplex for detection of HIV was 98.8% (95% CI, 93.4-100%), and specificity was 100% (95% CI, 98.1-100%). Sensitivity for detection of syphilis antibodies was 56.8% (95% CI, 44.7-68.2%), and specificity was 98.5% (95% CI, 95.7-99.7%). Sensitivity for treponemal antibodies improved with increasing RPR and was 100% (95% CI, 78.2-100%) among samples with RPR titers ≥1:8. CONCLUSIONS: The Multiplex showed excellent performance for detection of HIV antibodies and increasing sensitivity for detection of treponemal antibody with increasing RPR titer.

Comparing mail-in self-collected specimens sent via United States Postal Service versus clinic-collected specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in extra-genital sites.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the concordance between clinic-collected extra-genital specimens and self-collected mailed-in extra-genital specimens among participants seeking sexually transmitted infection testing at a free clinic in Hollywood, CA. METHODS: A convenience sample of 210 men who have sex with men were enrolled between February 29, 2016 and December 21, 2016 and received mail-in testing kits for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG). All testing was performed using the GeneXpert® CT/NG (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). RESULTS: From the 210 mail-in kits distributed, 149 mail-in kits (71.0%) were returned to the laboratory, resulting in 145 pairs (clinic-collected and mail-in) of rectal test results and 148 pairs of pharyngeal test results for both CT and NG detection. The concordance was 95.0% for all CT rectal tests, 99.3% for all CT pharyngeal tests, 95.7% for all NG rectal tests, and 97.2% for all NG pharyngeal tests. CONCLUSION: Roughly two-thirds of mail-in test kits were returned and concordance was generally high, however more than one-third of positive results were missed in mail-in samples. The prevalence of potential false-negative results among mail-in samples warrants caution when implementing mail-in STI testing strategies.