Clinical Outcomes of Thermal Ablation Re-Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Multicenter Study from the Italian Minimally Invasive Treatments of the Thyroid Group.

Background: Thermal ablation (TA) is an established therapeutic option alternative to surgery in patients with solid benign thyroid nodules causing local symptoms. However, a variable part of thyroid nodules remain viable after these nonsurgical treatments, and as many as 15% of nodules treated with TA may require a second treatment over time. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of TA re-treatment on symptomatic benign thyroid nodules where the volume decreased by <50% after the first procedure ( = technique inefficacy). Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent re-treatment with TA for benign thyroid nodules, whose volume decreased by <50% after initial treatment. The primary aim was to evaluate volume and volume reduction ratio (VRR) over time and compare the 6- and 12-month VRR after first versus second treatment. The secondary aim was to identify protective or risk factors for technique inefficacy, regrowth, and further treatments, expressed as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence interval [CI], after adjustment for sex, age, nodule volume, structure and function, nodule regrowth or symptom relapse, technique used and if the same technique was used for the first and second TA and time between them. Results: We included 135 patients. Re-treatment led to VRR of 50% and 52.2% after 6 and 12 months. VRR after re-treatment was greater than after first treatment in small and medium size nodules (<30 mL), while there were no differences for large nodules (>30 mL). After re-treatment technique inefficacy rate was 51.9%, regrowth rate was 12.6%, and further treatment rate was 15.6%. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was protective toward technique inefficacy (HR = 0.40 [CI 0.24-0.65]) and need of further treatments (HR = 0.30 [CI 0.12-0.76]). Large nodule volume (>30 mL) was associated with increased risk of re-treatment (HR = 4.52 [CI 1.38-14.82]). Conclusions: This is the first study evaluating the outcomes of re-treatment on symptomatic benign thyroid nodules with a VRR <50% after the initial TA treatment. Best results were seen in small and medium nodules (<30 mL) and after RFA. Prospective confirmatory studies are needed.

Mutations in the C7orf11 (TTDN1) gene in six nonphotosensitive trichothiodystrophy patients: no obvious genotype-phenotype relationships.

Trichothiodystrophy (TTD) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder whose defining feature is brittle hair. Associated clinical symptoms include physical and mental retardation of different severity, ichthyosis, premature aging, and, in half of the patients, photosensitivity. Recently, C7orf11 (TTDN1) was identified as the first disease gene for the nonphotosensitive form of TTD, being mutated in two unrelated cases and in an Amish kindred. We have evaluated the involvement of TTDN1 in 44 unrelated nonphotosensitive TTD cases of different geographic origin and with different disease severity. Mutations were found in six patients, five of whom are homozygous and one of whom is a compound heterozygote. All five identified mutations are deletions that have not been described before. Three are deletions of a few bases, resulting in frameshifts and premature termination codons. The other two include the whole TTDN1 gene, suggesting that TTDN1 is not essential for cell proliferation and viability. The severity of the clinical features does not correlate with the type of mutation, indicating that other factors besides TTDN1 mutations influence the severity of the disorder. Since only a small proportion of the analyzed cases were mutated in TTDN1, the nonphotosensitive form of TTD is genetically heterogeneous. Mutations in TTDN1 do not affect the response to ultraviolet (UV) light or the steady state level of the repair/transcription factor IIH (TFIIH), which is central to the onset of the photosensitive form of TTD.

A fast method to detect cell surface expression of thyrotropin receptor (TSHr): the microchip flow cytometry analysis.

Loss-of-function mutations of the thyrotropin receptor (TSHr) may be responsible for congenital hypothyroidism or isolated hyperthyreotropinemia. To study cell surface expression of inactivating TSHr mutations detected in patients with isolated hyperthyreotropinemia (L252P, Q8fsX62, P27T, E34K, R46P, D403N, W488R, and M527T), we used the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer to perform microchip flow cytometry analysis. The previously described TSHr inactivating mutation T477I was used as control. The level of receptor expression in COS-7 cells transfected with the T477I measured by binding assay was four times lower with respect to the wild-type TSHr. The very low expression of T477I was confirmed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis and by microchip flow cytometry analysis, suggesting that this method can be a reliable system to measure receptor cell surface expression. Other inactivating TSHr mutations were expressed in COS-7 cells for binding studies, FACS analysis, and microchip flow cytometry analysis. Binding studies showed that L252P, Q8fsX62, P27T, E34K, R46P, D403N, W488R, and M527T mutants had a low expression at the cell surface, as demonstrated by Bmax values. Data obtained by binding studies were in good agreement with data obtained by FACS analysis and microchip flow cytometry analysis. In conclusion, the low number of cells required for analysis and the ease of use make the microchip flow cytometry analysis a very reliable and favorable system to study cell surface expression of TSHr mutations.

Relationship between longitudinal behaviour of some markers of eye autoimmunity and changes in ocular findings in patients with Graves' ophthalmopathy receiving corticosteroid therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether variations over time of TSH-receptor antibodies (TRAb) and antibodies against G2s (G2sAb) and extraocular muscles (EMAb) can predict worsening of ophthalmopathy in Graves' patients treated with intravenous glucocorticoid (IVGC) therapy. PATIENTS: Of 65 consecutive patients with treated Graves' disease and severe and active ophthalmopathy (GO) chosen to undergo IVGC treatment, only 57 patients, persistently euthyroid under methimazole therapy, were studied longitudinally for ocular parameters, TRAb, G2sAb and EMAb before therapy, at the end of therapy and, subsequently, every month for 21 months. MEASUREMENTS: TRAb was detected by radioimmunoassay (RIA), G2sAb by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and EMAb by indirect immunofluorescence. RESULTS: Forty-three out of 57 patients (75.4%, group 1) responded positively to therapy [improvement in diplopia and decrease in proptosis and clinical activity score (CAS)] but 14 (24.6%) did not (group 2). During follow-up after IVGC therapy, 12 out of 43 patients in group 1 (28%) showed a worsening in GO (group 1a), while 31 (72%) had stable ocular conditions or further improvement (group 1b). At the start of the study, TRAb, G2sAb and EMAb were not significantly different among the three groups. At the end of IVGC therapy TRAb levels decreased significantly with respect to starting values in all three groups of patients, whereas G2sAb and EMAb decreased significantly in groups 1a and 1b but not in group 2. During the subsequent follow-up, 10 patients in group 1a one/two months before and all 12 patients at the time of GO worsening showed an increase in G2sAb and EMAb but not in TRAb, which were consistently absent or present at low titre in all patients in this group. In group 1b TRAb, G2sAb and EMAb further decreased or became negative during the follow-up period. In all patients, TRAb were positively correlated with both CAS and proptosis only at the start of the study; by contrast, a significant correlation between both G2sAb and EMAb and diplopia was observed in groups 1a and 1b at all the times during the study, except one/two months before the worsening of GO in group 1a. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that TRAb, G2sAb and EMAb can be considered sensitive markers of Graves' ophthalmopathy during the initial stages of ophthalmopathy, but that only G2sAb and EMAb seem to be good predictive markers of the outcome in patients after corticosteroid therapy. Thus, taking into account the cost/benefit ratio, a longitudinal evaluation of either EMAb or G2sAb could be useful in monitoring the intravenous glucocorticoid therapy in patients with severe and active ophthalmopathy to predict a possible worsening of Graves' ophthalmopathy.