RESUMEN
Background Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is a safe, minimally invasive angiographic procedure that effectively treats benign prostatic hyperplasia; however, PAE-related patient radiation exposure and associated risks are not completely understood. Purpose To quantify radiation dose and assess radiation-related adverse events in patients who underwent PAE at multiple centers. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients undergoing PAE for any indication performed by experienced operators at 10 high-volume international centers from January 2014 to May 2021. Patient characteristics, procedural and radiation dose data, and radiation-related adverse events were collected. Procedural radiation effective doses were calculated by multiplying kerma-area product values by an established conversion factor for abdominopelvic fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Relationships between cumulative air kerma (CAK) or effective dose and patient body mass index (BMI), fluoroscopy time, or radiation field area were assessed with linear regression. Differences in radiation dose stemming from radiopaque prostheses or fluoroscopy unit type were assessed using two-sample t tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results A total of 1476 patients (mean age, 69.9 years ± 9.0 [SD]) were included, of whom 1345 (91.1%) and 131 (8.9%) underwent the procedure with fixed interventional or mobile fluoroscopy units, respectively. Median procedure effective dose was 17.8 mSv for fixed interventional units and 12.3 mSv for mobile units. CAK and effective dose both correlated positively with BMI (R2 = 0.15 and 0.17; P < .001) and fluoroscopy time (R2 = 0.16 and 0.08; P < .001). No radiation-related 90-day adverse events were reported. Patients with radiopaque implants versus those without implants had higher median CAK (1452 mGy [range, 900-2685 mGy] vs 1177 mGy [range, 700-1959 mGy], respectively; P = .01). Median effective dose was lower for mobile than for fixed interventional systems (12.3 mSv [range, 8.5-22.0 mSv] vs 20.4 mSv [range, 13.8-30.6 mSv], respectively; P < .001). Conclusion Patients who underwent PAE performed with fixed interventional or mobile fluoroscopy units were exposed to a median effective radiation dose of 17.8 mSv or 12.3 mSv, respectively. No radiation-related adverse events at 90 days were reported. © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Mahesh in this issue.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Hiperplasia Prostática , Exposición a la Radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy of iliofemoral venous stenting in women of childbearing age treated for post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and assessed the influence of pregnancy on stent occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on women of childbearing age who underwent endovascular stenting for PTS due to chronic iliocava occlusion across 15 centers from 2009 to 2020. The study assessed pregnancy rates, primary patency rates, secondary patency rates, and clinical efficacy using the Villalta score for PTS severity and the Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire - version 20 (CIVIQ-20), 6-12 months after the procedure. The impact of pregnancy on stent occlusion was analyzed using classical and multi-state survival analyses. Prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin or fondaparinux was administered to patients during pregnancy until 6 weeks post-partum. RESULTS: In total, 211 women with PTS underwent endovascular stenting, with a median age of 31 years (range: 16-42). Following recanalization, significant improvements were observed in the Villalta score (p < 0.0001) and the CIVIQ-20 score (p < 0.0001). Thirty-seven (17.6%) women became pregnant and 49 (23.2%) experienced stent occlusions. The 1-year and 5-year occlusion-free survival probabilities were 80.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.1-86.4%) and 66.6% (95% CI: 57.4-77.4%), respectively. There was no significant association between pregnancy and stent occlusion-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.00 [95% CI: 0.11-8.92], p = 0.9930). CONCLUSION: Iliofemoral venous stenting in women of childbearing age was an effective treatment for post-thrombotic syndrome, and it did not increase the risk for stent occlusion during pregnancy when accompanied by appropriate anticoagulation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrates that pregnancy following iliofemoral venous stenting for post-thrombotic syndrome does not elevate the risk for stent occlusion. KEY POINTS: ⢠The severity of post-thrombotic syndrome and the quality of life, as measured using the Villalta score and Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire - version 20, respectively, showed significant improvements 6-12 months after iliofemoral venous stenting. ⢠The occurrence of pregnancy after recanalization in women of childbearing age did not lead to a significant increase in the risk for stent occlusion.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Síndrome Postrombótico , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Postrombótico/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Postrombótico/terapia , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad Crónica , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite improved patency with newer-generation nitinol stents, one-half of patients will require secondary interventions for in-stent restenosis (ISR). The best treatment strategy remains unclear. This study aimed to compare drug-coated balloons (DCBs) used alone or in association with excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) to simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of femoropopliteal-ISR. METHODS: The INTACT trial is a multicenter, prospective, triple-arm randomized trial conducted across 14 centers from December 2015 to November 2019. Patients Rutherford Class 2-5 with ISR≥70% were followed-up for 18 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was recurrent ISR>70% by duplex ultrasound analysis. The primary safety endpoint was major adverse events (MAEs) defined as death, major amputation, or target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Around 134 subjects were randomized to PTA alone (n=41), PTA+DCB (n=43) or PTA+ELA+DCB (n=50). Procedural success was similar (p=.74), as was clinical success (p=.17). The number of recurrent ISR>70% decreased after PTA+ELA+DCB (30.0%; p=.04) and PTA+DCB (30.2%; p=.05) compared to PTA alone (51.2%). Primary patency was higher after PTA+ELA+DCB (log-rank p=.04) and PTA+DCB (log-rank p=.02) compared to PTA alone at 12 months (78.7% and 70.4% vs 61.5%) and 18 months (61.6% and 67.7% vs 37.3%). Freedom from MAEs was lower after PTA+DCB (27.9%) compared to PTA alone (53.7%; p=.02) but did not differ with PTA+ELA+DCB (40.0%). It was primarily driven by TLR; 2 major amputations occurred after PTA+ELA+DCB (4.0%; p=.18). CONCLUSION: This independent study demonstrated a decrease in recurrent ISR>70% and increase in primary patency up to 18 months after PTA+ELA+DCB and PTA+DCB compared to PTA alone in the treatment of FP-ISR. It did not show an increase in MAEs but could have lacked power. CLINICAL IMPACT: This multicenter, prospective, triple-arm randomized, controlled trial focuses on the results of adjunctive therapies, such as excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) and/or drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in femoropopliteal lesions in 134 patients. It has the originality of being an independent study funded by a grant from the French Ministry of Health. This study confirms a significant decrease in recurrent ISR >70% and increase in primary patency up to 18 months after the use of ELA+DCB and DCBs compared to simple percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of femoropopliteal ISR without an increase in major adverse events.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To report 36-month outcomes and subgroup analysis of the ABRE study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the Abre venous self-expanding stent system for the treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction disease. METHODS: The ABRE study was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study that enrolled and implanted Abre venous stents in 200 participants (mean age 51.5 years [SD ± 15.9], 66.5% women) with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction at 24 global sites. Outcomes assessed through 36 months included patency, major adverse events, stent migration, stent fracture, and quality-of-life changes. Adverse events and imaging studies were adjudicated by independent clinical events committee and core laboratories, respectively. RESULTS: Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency through 36 months by Kaplan-Meier estimates were 81.6%, 84.8%, and 86.3%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of major adverse events through 36 months was 10.2%, mainly driven by 12 thrombosis events. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a primary patency of 76.5% in the acute deep vein thrombosis group, 70.4% in the postthrombotic syndrome group, and 97.1% in the nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion group through 36 months. The overall mean lesion length was 112.4 mm (SD ± 66.1). There were no stent fractures or migrations in this study. Quality of life and venous functional assessments demonstrated significant improvements from baseline to 36 months across all patient subsets. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the ABRE study demonstrated sustained patency with a good safety profile after implantation of a dedicated venous stent in patients with symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction disease.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Vena Femoral , Vena Ilíaca , Diseño de Prótesis , Calidad de Vida , Stents , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Vena Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Femoral/fisiopatología , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Síndrome de May-Thurner/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de May-Thurner/terapia , Síndrome de May-Thurner/fisiopatología , Síndrome Postrombótico/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome Postrombótico/fisiopatología , Síndrome Postrombótico/etiología , Síndrome Postrombótico/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/fisiopatología , Trombosis de la Vena/terapiaRESUMEN
Genicular artery embolization (GAE) is an emerging, minimally invasive therapy to address the global burden of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and the unmet needs for medically refractory disease. Although total knee arthroplasty has been a standard intervention for severe cases, GAE is developing into a promising alternative, particularly for patients ineligible for or unwilling to undergo surgery. GAE targets the inflammatory cascade underlying OA pathophysiology by arresting neoangiogenesis and preventing pathological neoinnervation, offering potential pain relief. Although early studies have established safety and short-term effectiveness, ensuing studies are needed to validate long-term safety, durability, and comparative effectiveness and to optimize patient selection, embolic agent selection, and administration techniques. Standardized reporting guidelines are therefore essential to enhance transparency and reproducibility across clinical trials, facilitating data aggregation and comparison. This Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR)-endorsed reporting standards consensus document provides a framework to harmonize future research efforts and to improve the interpretation of outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Embolización Terapéutica , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Humanos , Embolización Terapéutica/normas , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/terapia , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Radiografía Intervencional/normasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the baseline characteristics of French patients referred with acute limb ischaemia (ALI), and their clinical management and outcome (death, amputation). METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study used the National Health Data System. All adults hospitalised for ALI who underwent revascularisation with an endovascular or open surgical approach between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 were included and followed up until death or the end of the study (31 December 2021). A one year look back period was used to capture patients' medical history. The risks of death, and major and minor amputations were described using Kaplan-Meier and Aalen-Johansen estimators. A Cox model was used to report the adjusted association between groups and risk of death and Fine-Gray models for the risk of amputations considering the competing risk of death. RESULTS: Overall, 51 390 patients (median age 70 years, 69% male) were included and had a median follow up of 2.7 years: 39 411 (76.7%) were treated with an open approach and 11 979 (23.3%) with a percutaneous endovascular approach. The preferred approach for the revascularisation varied between French regions. The one year overall survival was 78.0% and 85.2% in the surgery and endovascular groups, respectively. The surgery group had a higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% CI 1.12 - 1.21), a higher risk of major amputation (sub-distribution HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10 - 1.30) and lower risk of minor amputation (sub-distribution HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 - 0.71) than the endovascular group. Diabetes and dialysis increased the risk of major amputation by 52% and 78%, respectively. Subsequent ALI was the third most common cause of hospital re-admission within one year. CONCLUSION: ALI remains a condition at high risk of death and amputation. Individual risk factors and ALI severity need to be considered to choose between approaches. Continued prevention efforts, improved management, and access to the most suitable approach are necessary.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A clear patency benefit of a drug-eluting stent (DES) over bare metal stents (BMSs) for treating peripheral artery disease of the femoropopliteal segment has not been definitively demonstrated. The EMINENT study (Trial Comparing Eluvia Versus Bare Metal Stent in Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery) was designed to evaluate the patency of the Eluvia DES (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA), a polymer-coated paclitaxel-eluting stent, compared with BMSs for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions. METHODS: EMINENT is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter European study with blinded participants and outcome assessment. Patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (Rutherford category 2, 3, or 4) of the native superficial femoral artery or proximal popliteal artery with stenosis ≥70%, vessel diameter of 4 to 6 mm, and total lesion length of 30 to 210 mm were randomly assigned 2:1 to treatment with DES or BMS. The primary effectiveness outcome was primary patency at 12 months, defined as independent core laboratory-assessed duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.4 in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization or surgical bypass of the target lesion. Primary sustained clinical improvement was a secondary outcome defined as a decrease in Rutherford classification of ≥1 categories compared with baseline without a repeat target lesion revascularization. Health-related quality of life and walking function were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 775 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with DES (n=508) or commercially available BMSs (n=267). Baseline clinical, demographic, and lesion characteristics were similar between the study groups. Mean lesion length was 75.6±50.3 and 72.2±47.0 mm in the DES and BMS groups, respectively. The 12-month incidence of primary patency for DES treatment (83.2% [337 of 405]) was significantly greater than for BMS (74.3% [165 of 222]; P<0.01). Incidence of primary sustained clinical improvement was greater among patients treated with the DES than among those who received a BMS (83.0% versus 76.6%; P=0.045). The health-related quality of life dimensions of mobility and pain/discomfort improved for the majority of patients in both groups (for 66.4% and 53.6% of DES-treated and for 64.2% and 58.1% of BMS-treated patients, respectively) but did not differ significantly. At 12 months, no statistical difference was observed in all-cause mortality between patients treated with the DES or BMS (2.7% [13 of 474] versus 1.1% [3 of 263]; relative risk, 2.4 [95% CI, 0.69-8.36]; P=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: By demonstrating superior 1-year primary patency, the results of the EMINENT randomized study support the benefit of using a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent as a first-line stent-based intervention for patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease attributable to femoropopliteal lesions. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02921230.
Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/patología , Arteria Femoral/patología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/patología , Stents , Paclitaxel , Polímeros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endovascular renal denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, but its efficacy in patients with true resistant hypertension has not been shown. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation in patients with hypertension resistant to three or more antihypertensive medications. METHODS: In a randomised, international, multicentre, single-blind, sham-controlled trial done at 28 tertiary centres in the USA and 25 in Europe, we included patients aged 18-75 years with office blood pressure of at least 140/90 mm Hg despite three or more antihypertensive medications including a diuretic. Eligible patients were switched to a once daily, fixed-dose, single-pill combination of a calcium channel blocker, an angiotensin receptor blocker, and a thiazide diuretic. After 4 weeks of standardised therapy, patients with daytime ambulatory blood pressure of at least 135/85 mm Hg were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer (stratified by centres) to ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to randomisation. Addition of antihypertensive medications was allowed if specified blood pressure thresholds were exceeded. The primary endpoint was the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 2 months in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02649426. FINDINGS: Between March 11, 2016, and March 13, 2020, 989 participants were enrolled and 136 were randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=69) or a sham procedure (n=67). Full adherence to the combination medications at 2 months among patients with urine samples was similar in both groups (42 [82%] of 51 in the renal denervation group vs 47 [82%] of 57 in the sham procedure group; p=0·99). Renal denervation reduced daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure more than the sham procedure (-8·0 mm Hg [IQR -16·4 to 0·0] vs -3·0 mm Hg [-10·3 to 1·8]; median between-group difference -4·5 mm Hg [95% CI -8·5 to -0·3]; adjusted p=0·022); the median between-group difference was -5·8 mm Hg (95% CI -9·7 to -1·6; adjusted p=0·0051) among patients with complete ambulatory blood pressure data. There were no differences in safety outcomes between the two groups. INTERPRETATION: Compared with a sham procedure, ultrasound renal denervation reduced blood pressure at 2 months in patients with hypertension resistant to a standardised triple combination pill. If the blood pressure lowering effect and safety of renal denervation are maintained in the long term, renal denervation might be an alternative to the addition of further antihypertensive medications in patients with resistant hypertension. FUNDING: ReCor Medical.
Asunto(s)
Desnervación/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Hipertensión/terapia , Arteria Renal/inervación , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ultrasónicos/métodos , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Simple Ciego , Inhibidores de los Simportadores del Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The indication of percutaneous renal transluminal angioplasty (PTRA) in fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is mainly based on renal artery stenosis (RAS) due to atherosclerosis criteria, which are not specific to FMD. Consequently, the selection of patients who could benefit from this treatment and its effectiveness remain uncertain. The aims of this study were to: (1) report the effects of PTRA guided by trans-stenotic pressure measurements on hypertension 7 months after treatment; (2) assess the impact of pressure measurement to guide treatment efficacy in comparison to visual angiographic parameters; and (3) evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of the stenosis measurement using a 4F catheter in comparison to a pressure guidewire. METHODS: This prospective multi-centric study analyzed 24 patients with hypertension with RAS due to FMD that required PTRA. Clinical, duplex ultrasound, and angiographic indices were collected, and patients were followed up for 7 months (±1 month). Angiographic indices were measured twice both by a pressure guidewire and a 4F catheter. Assessment of procedural and clinical success of angioplasty was performed for all patients. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (96%) had procedural success (considered as a post-PTRA translesional systolic gradient ≤10 mmHg or reduced by at least 80%) with a significant decrease in the systolic gradient after angioplasty (26.50 mmHg; [interquartile range, 16.75-38.75] vs 0.00 [interquartile range, 0.00-2.00]; P < .01). Three patients (12%) had complications, including two renal artery dissections and one partial renal infarction. Twenty-one patients (88%) were clinical responders to angioplasty at follow-up. Visual stenosis assessment showed a poor correlation with systolic gradient measurement before and after PTRA (R from -0.05 to 0.41; P = 0.06-0.82). High correlations were found between pressure measurements made by a 4F catheter and guidewire (R from 0.64 to 0.89; P ≤ .003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients selected by clinical indicators and duplex ultrasound, reaching a translesional systolic gradient ≤10 mmHg or reduced by at least 80% after angioplasty, promotes a high success rate for PTRA in hypertension due to FMD RAS.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Presión Arterial , Displasia Fibromuscular/terapia , Hipertensión Renovascular/terapia , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/terapia , Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Adulto , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Femenino , Displasia Fibromuscular/complicaciones , Displasia Fibromuscular/diagnóstico , Displasia Fibromuscular/fisiopatología , Francia , Humanos , Hipertensión Renovascular/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Renovascular/etiología , Hipertensión Renovascular/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Estudios Prospectivos , Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/etiología , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Transductores de Presión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color , Dispositivos de Acceso VascularRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization technique for the management of hemorrhoidal bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pubmed, cochrane, and scopus databases was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Clinical studies reporting on catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization for rectal bleeding were analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (n = 362) were identified. The mean maximum follow-up duration was 12.1 months (SD, 7.31; range, 1-28; median, 12), and the mean length of hospital stay was 1.5 days (SD, 1.1; range, 0-2.5). The mean technical success was 97.8% (SD, 3.5), and the mean clinical success was 78.9% (SD, 10.5). A statistically significant reduction in the french bleeding score before and after embolization was noted (P = .004). In subgroup analysis, when the coils-only group was compared with the coils and particles group, the average rebleeding rate was 21.5% (n = 111; SD, 18.2; range, 0%-44%) versus 10.05% (N = 108; SD, 4.8; range, 5%-15.7%), respectively (P < .0001). No bowel ischemia/necrosis or anorectal complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The current preliminary clinical evidence suggests that catheter-directed hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of hemorrhoidal bleeding. The standardization of the technique and the generation of higher level evidence will be required to compare this minimally invasive procedure with more invasive surgical options for patients with grades I-III hemorrhoids and chronic bleeding.
Asunto(s)
Hemorreoidectomía , Hemorroides , Catéteres , Hemorroides/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorroides/cirugía , Humanos , Ligadura , Recto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of EASYX, a new nonadhesive precipitating liquid embolic agent based on a polyvinyl alcohol ether polymer labeled with iodine molecules, for peripheral embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label prospective multicenter study was conducted on 50 consecutive patients treated with embolization using EASYX in 3 academic hospitals from April 2018 to July 2019. Indications for embolization were symptomatic varicocele (n = 15), type II endoleak (n = 8), acute hemorrhage (n = 16), portal vein embolization (PVE; n = 9), or angiomyolipoma (AML; n = 2). Patient characteristics, technical and clinical success rates, pain at injection, and satisfaction of the interventional radiologists were assessed. Follow-up imaging was performed using ultrasound for varicoceles (at 1 month) and computed tomography (CT) for the other indications (at 3 or 6 months). RESULTS: The immediate technical success rate was 98%. The clinical success rates were 100% for acute hemorrhage and type II endoleaks, 89% for PVE, 86% for varicoceles, and 50% for AMLs. Patients who underwent PVE showed significant hypertrophy of the future liver remnant at follow-up (P < .001), and 55.6% of patients proceeded to hepatectomy. The absence of artifacts on imaging allowed improved monitoring of the aneurysmal sac in patients with type II endoleaks. The satisfaction rate of the interventional radiologists was >90% for 5 of 7 items. CONCLUSIONS: EASYX as a novel copolymer liquid embolic agent was safe and efficient for peripheral embolization. The absence of tantalum allowed reduced CT artifacts on imaging follow-up, which was especially useful in patients with type II endoleaks.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Vena Porta , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A questionnaire regarding splenic embolization in trauma was submitted to an international sample of IR faculty members, to compare their practice to the available recommendations. METHODS: A 21 multiple-choice questionnaire was sent to an international cohort of 96 IR faculty. Questions included the initial patient evaluation, embolization materials and techniques, post-procedure management, availability of an institutional protocol, and use of guidelines. RESULTS: For each question, there were from a minimum of 45 to a maximum of 52 responders: 94% require a CT with contrast prior to embolization, and 87% use the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) scale to grade the splenic injuries. Embolization is performed across all values of the AAST scale. Of the patients with injuries of grade III or greater, embolization is primarily done for those patients who are hemodynamically stable. Unstable patients are embolized less frequently and primarily in cases in which the injuries are of a lower grade. Coils are the preferred material for proximal embolization (69%). Particles/Gelfoam is the preferred material for distal embolization (38%). In total, 63% administer intravenous antibiotics before the procedure and 15% administer intra-arterial antibiotics during the procedure. After embolization, follow-up imaging is recommended by 87%, antibiotics are administered regularly by 33%, clinical follow-up is recommended by 73%, and vaccination against encapsulated organisms is routinely recommended by 39%. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability among a heterogeneous cohort of respondents. Available recommendations may not be sufficiently addressing the practice of splenic embolization.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Embolización Terapéutica , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Bazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Bazo/lesiones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To study the subscore improvement in International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) after prostatic artery embolization (PAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was carried out with follow-up from December 2013 to July 2019 in 37 consecutive patients (66.0 ± 8.8 years old) who underwent PAE, comparing resultant scores before and after PAE. IPSS were divided into storage (IPSS-s) subscores and voiding (IPSS-v) subscores. The changes between IPSS-s and IPSS-v at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months' follow-up as well as the last follow-up were compared with baseline scores. The changes in percentages of IPSS-s and IPSS-v and the changes in average IPSS-s-to-total IPSS ratios (IPSS-s/IPSS-t) and IPSS-v-to-IPSS-t ratios (IPSS-v/IPSS-t) were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the study population, consisting of 37 patients, IPSS-t significantly decreased from 16.5 ± 7.2 at baseline to 8.3 ± 5.7 at the last follow-up (4 years later) (P < .0001). Additionally, the changes in IPSS-v symptoms were greater than the changes in IPSS-s symptoms at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months' follow-up, reaching a statistical significance at 6 months with a decrease of 72.9% ± 42.4% for IPSS-v and a decrease of 50.1% ± 52.2% for IPSS-s (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: PAE can successfully reduce both IPSS-s and IPSS-v with predominant IPSS-v reduction. The improvements in both subscores were sustained for up to 4 years of follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/terapia , Próstata/irrigación sanguínea , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Anciano , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/fisiopatología , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperplasia Prostática/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , UrodinámicaRESUMEN
This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 3 patients (mean age, 61 y ± 8.6) who underwent repeat prostatic artery (PA) embolization (PAE; rPAE) because of clinical failure after PAE. Revascularization of the central gland through a recanalized PA was the most frequent pattern observed (5 of 7; 71.4%), followed by revascularization through penile collateral vessels (2 of 7; 28.6%). Technical success during rPAE was achieved in 5 hemiprostates (83.3%). Clinical success at 6 months after rPAE was achieved in 2 of 3 patients (66.6%). Implications of these findings could be valuable to those performing PAE.
Asunto(s)
Arterias , Embolización Terapéutica , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/terapia , Próstata/irrigación sanguínea , Hiperplasia Prostática/terapia , Anciano , Arterias/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Síntomas del Sistema Urinario Inferior/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico por imagen , Hiperplasia Prostática/fisiopatología , Retratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To summarize the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation's Research Consensus Panel development of a research agenda on prostate artery embolization (PAE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PAE for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms has been shown to be safe and effective in decreasing symptoms and prostate size. Lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PAE in the United States has prevented inclusion in American Urologic Association guideline recommendations for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia. Recognizing the need for well-designed trials, the SIR Foundation funded a Research Consensus Panel to prioritize a research agenda. The panel included interventional radiologists, urologists, SIR Foundation leadership, and industry representatives. The goal of the meeting was to discuss weaknesses with current data and study design for development of US trials to report long-term outcomes data. RESULTS: Final consensus on a research design could not be made because the group was split on 3 research designs: (i) RCT of PAE versus sham with crossover of the sham group. (ii) RCT of PAE versus simple prostatectomy. (iii) RCT of PAE versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate/thulium laser enucleation of the prostate. The panel recommended a nonindustry-funded registry to obtain real-world data. CONCLUSIONS: Level 1 data are required to be included in the American Urologic Association guidelines for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Because of concerns with all 3 study designs, the panel did not reach a consensus. Further meetings are planned with the panel to select among these research designs.
Asunto(s)
Arterias , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Embolización Terapéutica/normas , Próstata/irrigación sanguínea , Consenso , Humanos , Masculino , Participación de los InteresadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early studies suggest that radiofrequency-based renal denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with moderate hypertension. We investigated whether an alternative technology using endovascular ultrasound renal denervation reduces ambulatory blood pressure in patients with hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications. METHODS: RADIANCE-HTN SOLO was a multicentre, international, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial done at 21 centres in the USA and 18 in Europe. Patients with combined systolic-diastolic hypertension aged 18-75 years were eligible if they had ambulatory blood pressure greater than or equal to 135/85 mm Hg and less than 170/105 mm Hg after a 4-week discontinuation of up to two antihypertensive medications and had suitable renal artery anatomy. Patients were randomised (1:1) to undergo renal denervation with the Paradise system (ReCor Medical, Palo Alto, CA, USA) or a sham procedure consisting of renal angiography only. The randomisation sequence was computer generated and stratified by centres with randomised blocks of four or six and permutation of treatments within each block. Patients and outcome assessors were blinded to randomisation. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 2 months in the intention-to-treat population. Patients were to remain off antihypertensive medications throughout the 2 months of follow-up unless specified blood pressure criteria were exceeded. Major adverse events included all-cause mortality, renal failure, an embolic event with end-organ damage, renal artery or other major vascular complications requiring intervention, or admission to hospital for hypertensive crisis within 30 days and new renal artery stenosis within 6 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02649426. FINDINGS: Between March 28, 2016, and Dec 28, 2017, 803 patients were screened for eligibility and 146 were randomised to undergo renal denervation (n=74) or a sham procedure (n=72). The reduction in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure was greater with renal denervation (-8·5 mm Hg, SD 9·3) than with the sham procedure (-2·2 mm Hg, SD 10·0; baseline-adjusted difference between groups: -6·3 mm Hg, 95% CI -9·4 to -3·1, p=0·0001). No major adverse events were reported in either group. INTERPRETATION: Compared with a sham procedure, endovascular ultrasound renal denervation reduced ambulatory blood pressure at 2 months in patients with combined systolic-diastolic hypertension in the absence of medications. FUNDING: ReCor Medical.
Asunto(s)
Desnervación/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Hipertensión/cirugía , Riñón/inervación , Riñón/cirugía , Arteria Renal/inervación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía/instrumentación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transarterial embolization (PTAE) for the treatment of spontaneous soft-tissue hematomas (SSTHs) and identify variables predictive of short-term outcome. Materials and Methods Between 2011 and 2017, the outcome was retrospectively analyzed for 112 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 72 years ± 14; range, 28-92 years), including 65 women (mean age, 73 years ± 12.7; range, 39-92 years) and 47 men (mean age, 70 years ± 14.9; range, 28-91 years), with SSTH treated with PTAE. Thirty-day mortality, technical and clinical success, simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II, anticoagulation, embolic agent, hematoma volume and location, serum hemoglobin level, hemodynamic instability, and presence of active bleeding at CT and/or angiography were recorded. Clinical success was defined as cessation of bleeding as determined by hemodynamic stability and/or serum hemoglobin level stabilization after PTAE. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed by using a Cox model to identify variables associated with time to death. Results Mortality rate was 26.8% (30 of 112 patients), angiographic success rate was 95.5% (107 of 112 patients), and clinical success rate was 83% (93 of 112 patients). For surviving patients, mean SAPS II was 19.6 ± 7.1 (range, 13-31) and mean hematoma volume was 862 cm3 ± 618 (range, 238-1887 cm3). For deceased patients, mean SAPS II was 42 ± 13.2 (range, 18-63) and mean hematoma volume was 1419 cm3 ± 788 (range, 251-3492 cm3). SAPS II (P < .001), hematoma volume (P = .01), and retroperitoneal location (P = .01) were independently associated with fatal outcome. Conclusion Percutaneous transarterial embolization is effective for the emergency treatment of spontaneous soft-tissue hematomas. Simplified acute physiology score II, hematoma volume, and retroperitoneal location are predictors of short-term outcome. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Hematoma/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Hematoma/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculares/mortalidad , Enfermedades Musculares/terapia , Espacio Retroperitoneal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to estimate the accuracy of dual-phase C-arm cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases, as compared with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 2014 and December 2016, 49 consecutive patients referred for intra-arterial treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastases were enrolled in a single-center observational study. All patients were examined with MDCT and with dual-phase C-arm cone beam computed tomography performed after iodine injection in the proper hepatic artery before intra-arterial treatment. Two blinded observers independently reviewed all examinations. Diagnostic accuracy was determined using both a six-cell matrix method and a "worst-case scenario." RESULTS: Readers identified at MDCT 264 colorectal liver metastases and 43 other liver lesions. The early and late arterial phase showed 240 and 277 liver lesions respectively. A certainty of the diagnosis was obtained in 63% and 85% at the early (EAP) and late arterial phase (LAP), respectively. Streak artifacts or liver segment truncation, or inadequate enhancement was responsible for the inability to see or to correctly adjudicate a lesion to a diagnosis in 27% and 15% of the cases at the EAP and LAP. The "worst-case scenario" yielded a Se and Sp of 58% and 51%, respectively, at EAP and 84% and 70%, respectively, at LAP. CONCLUSION: On CBCT, EAP showed limited accuracy. LAP provided the best tumor detectability. KEY POINTS: ⢠The early arterial phase (EAP) yielded poor accuracy: Se = 58% and Sp = 51% (p < 0.0001). ⢠The late arterial phase (LAP) phase yielded good accuracy: Se = 84% and Se = 70% (p = 0.02). ⢠The probability of a correct diagnosis at the EAP was 60%.
Asunto(s)
Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Femenino , Arteria Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico Espiral/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine whether intraprocedural C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) parenchymal blood volume (PBV) can predict the response of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) 2 months after irinotecan drug-eluting bead (DEBIRI) chemoembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center observational study was compliant with the Helsinki Declaration and approved by our institutional review board. Thirty-four consecutive CRCLM patients referred for DEBIRI chemoembolization were enrolled between March 2015 and December 2016. Tumor size was assessed at baseline and 2 months after DEBIRI chemoembolization by multidetector CT (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST 1.0), and PBV was measured before and after DEBIRI chemoembolization. Two independent readers reviewed all data. We determined the potential correlation (Spearman's rank correlation) between intraprocedural PBV values and tumor response at 2 months. The relationship between tumor response and PBV was studied using a mixed model. A logistic regression model was applied to study the relationship between patient "Responder/Non-responder" and PBV. RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between baseline PBV or the percent change of PBV and the 2-month tumor response (rho = - 0.8587 (p = 0.00001) and rho = 0.8027 (p = 0.00001), respectively). The mixed model showed that an increase of 1 ml/1000 ml in PBV of a tumor before DEBIRI chemoembolization led to a 0.54 mm decrease in diameter (p < 0.005). A 1% decrease in PBV after DEBIRI chemoembolization resulted in tumor shrinkage of 0.75 mm (p < 0.005). The logistic regression model showed that patients with a 1% smaller mean decrease of PBV after DEBIRI chemoembolization had a 10% lower likelihood of achieving disease control (OR = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.81-1; p = 0.0493). CONCLUSION: Intraprocedural PBV may predict tumor response to DEBIRI chemoembolization. KEY POINTS: ⢠There is a strong relationship between the parenchymal blood volume (PBV) of colorectal liver metastases before DEBIRI chemoembolization and tumor response at 2 months. ⢠Higher PBV values before DEBIRI chemoembolization correlate with greater tumor shrinkage, but only if the PBV decreases by more than 70% after DEBIRI chemoembolization. ⢠Each increase of 1% in the mean decrease of PBV after DEBIRI chemoembolization resulted in a 10% lower likelihood of achieving disease control (OR = 0.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.81-1; p = 0.0493).
Asunto(s)
Determinación del Volumen Sanguíneo/métodos , Volumen Sanguíneo/fisiología , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/secundario , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate if synovial inflammation and hypervascularization are present in a dog model of knee osteoarthritis and can be detected on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI), and quantitative digital subtraction angiography (Q-DSA) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six dogs underwent MRI and angiography of both knees before and 12 weeks after right knee anterior cruciate ligament injury. Synovial vascularity was evaluated on CE-MRI, DCE-MRI, and Q-DSA by 2 independent observers. Synovial inflammation and vascularity were histologically scored independently. Cartilage lesions and osteophytes were analyzed macroscopically, and cartilage volumetry was analyzed by MRI. Vascularity and osteoarthritis markers on imaging were compared before and after osteoarthritis generation, and between the osteoarthritis model and the control knee, using linear mixed models accounting for within-dog correlation. RESULTS: In all knees, baseline imaging showed no abnormalities. Control knees did not develop significant osteoarthritis changes, synovial inflammation, or hypervascularization. In osteoarthritis knees, mean synovial enhancement score on CE-MR imaging increased by 13.1 ± 0.59 (P < .0001); mean synovial inflammation variable increased from 47.33 ± 18.61 to 407.97 ± 18.61 on DCE-MR imaging (P < .0001); and area under the curve on Q-DSA increased by 1058.58 ± 199.08 (P = .0043). Synovial inflammation, hypervascularization, and osteophyte formations were present in all osteoarthritis knees. Histology scores showed strong correlation with CE-MR imaging findings (Spearman correlation coefficient [SCC] = 0.742; P = .0002) and Q-DSA findings (SCC = 0.763; P < .0001) and weak correlation with DCE-MR imaging (SCC = -0.345; P = .329). Moderate correlation was found between CE-MR imaging and DSA findings (SCC = 0.536; P = .0004). CONCLUSIONS: In this early-stage knee osteoarthritis dog model, synovial inflammation and hypervascularization were found on imaging and confirmed by histology.