Primary arthrodesis versus open reduction and internal fixation following intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a weight-bearing CT analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare primary arthrodesis (PA) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs), based on clinical outcome and 2D and 3D geometrical analyses obtained from weight-bearing (WB) cone-beam CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 40 patients with surgically treated calcaneal fractures were included, consisting of 20 PA and 20 ORIF patients. Weight-bearing cone-beam CT-images of the left and right hindfoot and forefoot were acquired on a Planmed Verity cone-beam CT-scanner after a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Automated 2D and 3D geometric analyses, i.e., (minimal and average) talo-navicular joint space, calcaneal pitch (CP), and Meary's angle (MA), were obtained for injured and healthy feet. Clinical outcomes were measured using the EQ5D and FFI questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall, there were no differences in baseline patient characteristics apart from age (p < 0.005). The calcaneal pitch in 2D after treatment by ORIF (13.8° ± 5.6) was closer to the uninjured side (18.1° ± 5.5) compared to PA (10.9° ± 4.5) (p < 0.001). Meary's angle in 2D was closer to the uninjured side (8.7° ± 6.3) after surgery in the PA cohort (7.0° ± 5.8) compared to the ORIF cohort (15.5° ± 5.9) (p = 0.046). In 3D measurements, CP was significantly decreased for both cohorts after surgery (- 4.09° ± 6.2) (p = 0.001). MA was not significantly affected overall or between cohorts in 3D. Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the ORIF and PA cohorts. None of the radiographic measurements in 2D or 3D correlated with any of the clinical outcomes studied. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional WB CT imaging enables functional 2D and 3D analyses under natural load in patients with complex calcaneal fractures. Based on clinical outcome, both PA and ORIF appear viable treatment options. Clinical correlation with geometrical outcomes remains to be established.

Minifragment plating of the fibula in unstable ankle fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Only 6.4-17% of the load is transmitted through the fibula when weight-bearing. Plate fixation of distal fibular fractures using minifragments (≤ 2.8 mm) could lead to similar reduction with less implant removal (IR) rates, compared to small-fragment plates (3.5 mm). We hypothesized that the use of minifragment plates is at least similar in unscheduled secondary surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients with surgically treated distal fibular fractures between October 2015 and March 2021 were included. Patients treated with plate fixation using minifragments and patients treated with small-fragment plates were compared regarding the following outcomes: secondary dislocation, malreduction, implant malposition, nonunion, surgical site infections (SSI) and IR. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (54.2%) received a minifragment implant (≤ 2.8 mm) and 55 patients (45.8%) received a small-fragment implant (3.5 mm). There were no patients needing secondary surgery in the minifragment group compared to 9 patients following fixation using small-fragment implants (3 with secondary dislocation, 5 with malreduction and 1 with malposition, p = 0.001). SSI rates were 3.1% for minifragment and 9.1% for small-fragment implants (p = 0.161). Implant removal was performed significantly less often following use of minifragment implants (17.8% and 53.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, minifragment plate fixation for distal fibular fractures is an adequate fixation method offering stable fixation with significant lower need for implant removal and comparable complications to small-fragment plates, although an adequately powered randomized controlled study is needed for implementation in a clinical setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Correction to: Routine versus on demand removal of the syndesmotic screw; a protocol for an international randomised controlled trial (RODEO-trial).

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Routine versus on demand removal of the syndesmotic screw; a protocol for an international randomised controlled trial (RODEO-trial).

BACKGROUND: Syndesmotic injuries are common and their incidence is rising. In case of surgical fixation of the syndesmosis a metal syndesmotic screw is used most often. It is however unclear whether this screw needs to be removed routinely after the syndesmosis has healed. Traditionally the screw is removed after six to 12 weeks as it is thought to hamper ankle functional and to be a source of pain. Some studies however suggest this is only the case in a minority of patients. We therefore aim to investigate the effect of retaining the syndesmotic screw on functional outcome. DESIGN: This is a pragmatic international multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with an acute syndesmotic injury for which a metallic syndesmotic screw was placed. Patients will be randomised to either routine removal of the syndesmotic screw or removal on demand. Primary outcome is functional recovery at 12 months measured with the Olerud-Molander Score. Secondary outcomes are quality of life, pain and costs. In total 194 patients will be needed to demonstrate non-inferiority between the two interventions at 80% power and a significance level of 0.025 including 15% loss to follow-up. DISCUSSION: If removal on demand of the syndesmotic screw is non-inferior to routine removal in terms of functional outcome, this will offer a strong argument to adopt this as standard practice of care. This means that patients will not have to undergo a secondary procedure, leading to less complications and subsequent lower costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR5965), Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02896998 ) on July 15th 2016.

Safety in the operating room during orthopedic trauma surgery-incidence of adverse events related to technical equipment and logistics.

BACKGROUND: Safety in the operating room is widely debated. Adverse events during surgery are potentially dangerous for the patient and staff. The incidence of adverse events during orthopedic trauma surgery is unknown. Therefore, we performed a study to quantify the incidence of these adverse events. Primary objective was to determine the incidence of adverse events related to technical equipment and logistics. The secondary objective was to evaluate the consequences of these adverse events. METHODS: We completed a cross-sectional observational study to assess the incidence, consequences and preventability of adverse events related to technical equipment and logistics during orthopedic trauma surgery. During a 10 week period, all orthopedic trauma operations were evaluated by an observer. Six types of procedures were differentiated: osteosynthesis; arthroscopy; removal of hardware; joint replacement; bone grafting and other. Adverse events were divided in six categories: staff dependent factors; patient dependent factors; anaesthesia; imaging equipment; operation room equipment and instruments and implants. Adverse events were defined as any factor affecting the surgical procedure in a negative way. RESULTS: Hundred-fifty operative procedures were included. In 54% of the procedures, at least one adverse event occurred. In total, 147 adverse events occurred, with a range of 1-5 per procedure. Most adverse events occurred during joint replacement procedures. Thirty-seven percent of the incidents concerned defect, incorrect connected or absent instruments. In 36% of the procedures adverse events resulted in a prolonged operation time with a median prolongation of 10.0 min. CONCLUSION: In more than half of orthopedic trauma surgical procedures adverse events related to technical equipment and logistics occurred, most of them could easily be prevented. These adverse events could endanger the safety of the patient and staff and should therefore be reduced. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

C-reactive protein kinetics and its predictive value in orthopedic (trauma) surgery: A systematic review.

In Orthopedic Trauma Surgery (OTS), C-reactive- protein (CRP) is a widely used marker for the diagnosis of postoperative wound infections (POWI's) and other complications. The aim of this systematic review was to describe specific CRP kinetics and to evaluate the diagnostic value of CRP for te detection of post-operative complications in OTS. The same pattern is reported consistently, where the highest levels of CRP are found at post-operative-day two or three, returning to normal in three weeks. Amplitude varies per procedure. Persistently high CRP levels or secondary increases may indicate complications. A low CRP may be used to rule out complications.

Systematic CT evaluation of reduction and hardware positioning of surgically treated calcaneal fractures: a reliability analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Up to date, there is a lack of reliable protocols that systematically evaluate the quality of reduction and hardware positioning of surgically treated calcaneal fractures. Based on international consensus, we previously introduced a 23-item scoring protocol evaluating the reduction and hardware positioning in these fractures based on postoperative computed tomography. The current study is a reliability analysis of the described scoring protocol. METHODS: Three raters independently and systematically evaluated anonymized postoperative CT scans of 102 surgically treated calcaneal fractures. A selection of 25 patients was scored twice by all individual raters to calculate intra-rater reliability. The scoring protocol consisted of 23 items addressing quality of reduction and hardware positioning. Each of these four-option questions was answered as: 'optimal', 'suboptimal (but not needing revision)', 'not acceptable (needing revision)' or 'not judgeable'. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC's) to calculate inter- and intra-rater reliability. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of the overall 23-item protocol was good (ICC 0.66, 95% CI 0.64-0.69). Individual items that scored an inter-rater ICC ≥0.60 included evaluation of the calcaneocuboid joint, the posterior talocalcaneal joint, the anterior talocalcaneal joint, the position of the plate and sustentaculum screws and screws protruding the tuber and medial wall. The intra-rater reliability for the overall protocol was good for all three individual raters with ICC's between 0.60 and 0.70. CONCLUSION: Our scoring protocol for the radiological evaluation of operatively treated calcaneal fractures is reliable in terms of inter- and intra-rater reliability.

Effects of intra-operative fluoroscopic 3D-imaging on peri-operative imaging strategy in calcaneal fracture surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies demonstrated that intra-operative fluoroscopic 3D-imaging (3D-imaging) in calcaneal fracture surgery is promising to prevent revision surgery and save costs. However, these studies limited their focus to corrections performed after 3D-imaging, thereby neglecting corrections after intra-operative fluoroscopic 2D-imaging (2D-imaging). The aim of this study was to assess the effects of additional 3D-imaging on intra-operative corrections, peri-operative imaging used, and patient-relevant outcomes compared to 2D-imaging alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this before-after study, data of adult patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a calcaneal fracture between 2000 and 2014 in our level-I Trauma center were collected. 3D-imaging (BV Pulsera with 3D-RX, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) was available as of 2007 at the surgeons' discretion. Patient and fracture characteristics, peri-operative imaging, intra-operative corrections and patient-relevant outcomes were collected from the hospital databases. Patients in whom additional 3D-imaging was applied were compared to those undergoing 2D-imaging alone. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients were included of whom 107 (46%) were operated with the use of 3D-imaging. No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics. The median duration of surgery was significantly longer when using 3D-imaging (2:08 vs. 1:54 h; p = 0.002). Corrections after additional 3D-imaging were performed in 53% of the patients. However, significantly fewer corrections were made after 2D-imaging when 3D-imaging was available (Risk difference (RD) -15%; 95% Confidence interval (CI) -29 to -2). Peri-operative imaging, besides intra-operative 3D-imaging, and patient-relevant outcomes were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Intra-operative 3D-imaging provides additional information resulting in additional corrections. Moreover, 3D-imaging probably changed the surgeons' attitude to rely more on 3D-imaging, hence a 15%-decrease of corrections performed after 2D-imaging when 3D imaging was available. No substantiation for cost reduction was found through reduction in peri-operative imaging or in terms of improved patient-relevant outcomes.

Acute syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures: A review.

Ankle fractures are among the most common fracture types, and 10% of all ankle fractures lead to accessory syndesmotic injury. An injury that is challenging in every respect is syndesmotic instability. Since the range of diagnostic techniques and the therapeutic options is extensive, it still is a controversial subject, despite the abundance of literature. This review aimed to summarize the current knowledge on syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures and to formulate some recommendations for clinical practice. Chronic instability and the operative osseous treatment of ankle fractures are not part of this review.

Cost-effectiveness of on-demand removal of syndesmotic screws.

PURPOSE: Syndesmotic screw removal following acute syndesmotic injury is a commonly performed procedure. However, recent studies suggest that the removal does not result in improved patient reported outcome, while the procedure has proved not to be without complications. The aim of this study was to present a health-economic evaluation of on-demand removal (ODR) compared to routine removal (RR) of the syndesmotic screw. METHODS: Data were collected from the RODEO trial, a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing functional outcome of ODR with RR. Economic evaluation resulted in total costs, costs (in Euro) per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and costs per point improvement on the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). This included both direct and indirect costs. RESULTS: Total costs for ODR were significantly lower with a mean difference of 3160 euro compared to RR (p < 0.001). The difference in QALY was not significant. The difference in OMAS at 12 months was 1.79 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €-1763 (p = 0.512). The ICER was well below the willingness to pay. Although unit costs might vary between hospitals and countries, these results provide relevant data of cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The clinical effectiveness of both ODR and RR can be considered equal. The costs are lower for patients treated with ODR, which leads to the conclusion that ODR is cost-effective.

Closing the medullary canal after retrograde nail removal using a bioabsorbable bone plug: technical tip.

We describe a simple technique for closure of the intra-articular opening after the removal of a retrograde femur nail. With the use of a gelatine bioabsorbable bone plug the medullary canal is closed, reducing leakage of blood and cancellous bone particles from the bone into the knee joint.

Determinants of outcome in operatively and non-operatively treated Weber-B ankle fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of ankle fractures is often based on fracture type and surgeon's individual judgment. Literature concerning the treatment options and outcome are dated and frequently contradicting. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical and functional outcome after AO-Weber B-type ankle fractures in operatively and conservatively treated patients and to determine which factors influenced outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in patients with a AO-Weber B-type ankle fracture. Patient, fracture and treatment characteristics were recorded. Clinical and functional outcome was measured using the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS) and a Visual Analog Score (VAS) for overall satisfaction (range 0-10). RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were treated conservatively and 103 underwent operative treatment. The majority was female. Most conservatively treated fractures were AO-Weber B1.1 type fractures. Fractures with fibular displacement (mainly AO type B1.2 and Lauge-Hansen type SER-4) were predominantly treated operatively. The outcome scores in the non-operative group were OMAS 93, AOFAS 98, and VAS 8. Outcome in this group was independently negatively affected by age, affected side, BMI, fibular displacement, and duration of plaster immobilization. In the surgically treated group, the OMAS, AOFAS, and VAS scores were 90, 97, and 8, respectively, with outcome negatively influenced by duration of plaster immobilization. CONCLUSION: Treatment selection based upon stability and surgeon's judgment led to overall good clinical outcome in both treatment groups. Reducing the cast immobilization period may further improve outcome.

The primary arthrodesis for severely comminuted intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Although open reduction and internal fixation via the extended lateral approach is currently considered gold-standard, severely comminuted calcaneal fractures might not be amendable for reconstruction. The primary aim of the current review study was to assess the functional outcome of the primary arthrodesis in the management of comminuted displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. METHODS: The literature was searched for studies published between January 1st 1990 and December 1st 2010, to identify studies in which a primary arthrodesis was utilized for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures between. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Coleman Methodology Score. RESULTS: Seven case series and one abstract were identified, reporting on 120 patients with 128 severely comminuted calcaneal fractures. Average follow-up time was 28 months and union rate 97%. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified AOFAS score in seven studies; with a weighted average of 77.4 (range 72.4-88). One study reported a 75% good to excellent outcome on the Paley score. Three studies reported on return to work, ranging from 75 to 100%. Overall reported wound complications occurred in 19.4%. The average Coleman Methodology Score was 56 (range 38-68) points. CONCLUSIONS: The primary arthrodesis for the treatment of Sanders type-IV comminuted displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures provides overall good results considering the severe nature of the injury. Therefore, in the process of choosing the best treatment modality for a severely comminuted calcaneal fracture, the primary arthrodesis should receive full consideration.

Surgeon-performed ultrasound as preoperative localization study in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is the treatment of choice for single-gland primary hyperparathyroidism. However, the exact location of the abnormal gland has to be established. Sestamibi scintigraphy, computed tomography and ultrasound (US) are commonly used modalities. We describe our experience in a non-academic center with surgeon-performed US (S-US) of the neck as preoperative localization study in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). METHODS: Patients with a biochemically proven diagnosis of PHPT and preoperative S-US were included. Data were recorded prospectively. Perioperative gland location was compared to the preoperative S-US to determine sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates. RESULTS: Two of the 50 patients who underwent S-US were not subjected to surgery. In 85% of the patients analyzed by S-US, the appropriate abnormal gland(s) were identified. In 11%, no gland was identified, but abnormal glands were found during surgery. Sensitivity of S-US in our hospital is 85%, with a positive predictive value of 97%. CONCLUSIONS: We achieved a satisfactory sensitivity rate. S-US provides anatomic information to the surgeon which enables a more detailed operation planning, and it is a valuable diagnostic modality for patients with PHPT in our opinion. We hope that our data encourage other centers to implement this technique as well.

To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Syndesmotic positioning screws are frequently placed in unstable ankle fractures. Many facets of adequate placement techniques have been the subject of various studies. Whether or not the syndesmosis screw should be removed prior to weight-bearing is still debated. In this study, the recent literature is reviewed concerning the need for removal of the syndesmotic screw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of the Cochrane Library, Pubmed Medline and EMbase from January 2000 to October 2010. RESULTS: A total of seven studies were identified in the literature. Most studies found no difference in outcome between retained or removed screws. Patients with screws that were broken, or showed loosening, had similar or improved outcome compared to patients with removed screws. Removal of the syndesmotic screws, when deemed necessary, is usually not performed before 8-12 weeks. CONCLUSION: There is paucity in randomized controlled trials on the absolute need for removal of the syndesmotic screw. However, current literature suggests that it might be reserved for intact screws that cause hardware irritation or reduced range of motion after 4-6 months.

Demographics and outcome of metatarsal fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Although metatarsal fractures are amongst the most common injuries of the foot, this is the first study on outcome after metatarsal fractures. METHOD: All consecutive patients with metatarsal fractures treated between January 2006 and September 2008 were re-evaluated. Patients aged 16 to 75 were sent a questionnaire consisting of the American Orthopaedic Foot Ankle Society midfoot score and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Four-hundred metatarsal fractures were identified in 322 patients. The fifth metatarsal was involved in more than 50% of patients. Most fractures were caused by an inversion injury or fall from height (75%). Out of 247 patients between 16 and 75 years, a total of 166 patients (67.2%) returned the questionnaire with a median follow-up of 33 months. All patients were treated conservatively. The median AOFAS score was 100 points (P(25)-P(75), 87-100), the median VAS was 9 points (P(25)-P(75), 8-10). The AOFAS and VAS scores correlated negatively with the body mass index (BMI) (R (s) = -0.409 and -0.305; p < 0.001). Patients with diabetes reported lower VAS (p = 0.010) and AOFAS scores (p = 0.020). Females reported a lower AOFAS score (p = 0.034). An increase in dislocation (>2 mm) resulted in a decrease in VAS score (p = 0.017). Multivariable analysis indicated that the VAS score was significantly affected by BMI and dislocation >2 mm (p = 0.013). The AOFAS score was affected by BMI (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: This is the first investigation using two validated outcome scoring systems to determine functional outcome in metatarsal fractures. Overall outcome in metatarsal fractures is high, as almost all fractures healed without complaints at 33 months. Outcome is dependent on BMI, diabetes, gender, and dislocation at the fracture site.

The role of external fixation in the management of infected avascular necrosis after traumatic talus fractures.

PURPOSE: Avascular necrosis (AVN) after fractures of the talus is a distinct and challenging clinical entity that is associated with poor outcomes. Although several articles are published on the management of posttraumatic AVN of the talus, very little is known about the management of infected AVN after talus fractures. Therefore, three cases of infected AVN were treated successfully by extensive debridement, external fixation and arthrodesis. METHODS: Three cases of infected AVN of the talus were encountered after a mean of 3 months (range 2-6 months) after initial reconstructive surgery. Suspected infection was confirmed by positron emission tomography scan (PET-CT). Management involved extensive debridement, PMMA cement if necessary and final fusion using medial external fixator, accompanied by culture guided antibiotics. Functional outcome was assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot score (AOFAS). Quality of life (QOL) was measured by the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). RESULTS: After a mean follow up of 24 months (range 13-29), FFI index scores ranged from poor to good (23, 50, 56) with similar AOFAS scores indicating poor to fair functional outcome (38, 41, 71). The EQ-5D score was 0.78. Overall patient satisfaction was high with a mean VAS of 8.3 (range 8-9). CONCLUSION: Infected talar AVN is a rare condition associated with severe long-term morbidity in term of joint function. The authors recommend extensive debridement and arthrodesis by means of external fixation, followed by post-operative culture-guided antibiotics for the treatment of infected avascular necrosis of traumatic talar fractures. Shared decision-making and expectation management are of crucial importance and may lead to high patient satisfaction despite low functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Retrospective case series.

Systematic review: Diagnostics, management and outcome of fractures of the posterior process of the talus.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the posterior process of the talus are rare and frequently overlooked, possibly leading to pseudo-arthrosis and chronic pain. To gain more insight into the diagnosis, treatment and outcome of fractures of the posterior process of the talus (PPTF), a systematic review of the current literature was performed to provide recommendations for the management of PPTF. METHODS: A literature search in the electronic databases of PubMed, EMbase, Google Scholar and Cochrane library was performed in January 2020 to identify all clinical studies on PPTF with more than three patients. Amongst other variables, the type of study, number of patients, mechanism of injury, type of fracture (anatomy), imaging modality, treatment, postoperative protocol, outcomes, complications and duration of follow-up were noted for systematic analysis of the available evidence, adherent to the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Seven original studies were included with a total of 66 patients. More than one third of patients presented with a (sub)talar joint dislocation (n = 25, 37.9%) and 51.5% sustained associated ipsilateral lower extremity fractures (n = 34). Delayed diagnosis occurred in 36.4% of patients (n = 24). Out of 48 patients with outcome data available, 41.7% (n = 20) reported impaired function. In the non-operative group, 64.7% (n = 11) had impaired functional outcome, compared to 33.3% (n = 6) in the ORIF group, and 30.8% (n = 4) in the fragment excision group (p < 0.001). One third of the patients developed one or more complications (n = 25, 37.9%), mostly found in the non-operatively treated group (73.7%, n = 14) compared to ORIF (25.0%, n = 8, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Early recognition and timely treatment is warranted in order to achieve pre-injury functional outcome and reduce morbidity. Given the significantly higher complication rate and lower return to the previous level of functionality reported after non-operative treatment, ORIF is recommended if there is (even minimal) displacement, articular involvement or if the fracture extends into the talus body.

Risk factors for surgical site infections with the Sinus Tarsi Approach in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures; a prospective cohort study with a minimum of one year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, the sinus tarsi approach (STA) has gained interest over the extensile lateral approach (ELA) in the operative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF's), mainly because of the lower rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). However, most studies are small and retrospective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of SSIs of the STA in a large, prospective series of patients and to identify predictors for SSIs. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, all consecutive patients who were operatively treated for a DIACF in our Level 1 trauma center between August 2012 and January 2019 were included and followed for at least one year. All operative procedures were performed by two specialized foot and ankle trauma surgeons using the STA. Using multinomial logistic regression, risk factors for SSIs were identified. RESULTS: A total of 237 calcaneal fractures in 214 patients were included, of which 179 underwent open reduction and internal fixation and 58 a primary arthrodesis. Most patients were male (73.6%) and the mean age was 45.9 years. There were 16 patients that developed a SSI (6.8%), of which 9 (3.8%) were deep and 7 (3%) were superficial infections. The multivariate analysis pointed out that surgery within one week after injury increased the chance of a SSI, as well as an ASA of 2 or higher and more than 150 cc of blood loss during the procedure. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the low risk of SSI in DIACFs treated via STA. Significant predictors for SSIs were surgery within one week after injury, ASA of 2 or higher and blood loss > 150cc.

Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures by ligamentotaxis: current concepts' review.

INTRODUCTION: A large variety of therapeutic modalities for calcaneal fractures have been described in the literature. No single treatment modality for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures has proven superior over the other. This review describes and compares the different percutaneous distractional approaches for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. The history, technique, anatomical and fracture considerations, limitations and the results of different distractional approaches reported in the literature are reviewed. METHOD: Literature review on different percutaneous distractional approaches for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. RESULTS: Eight studies in which application of a distraction technique was used for the treatment of calcaneal fractures were identified. Because of the use of different classification, techniques, and outcome scoring systems, a meta-analysis was not possible. A literature review reveals overall fair to poor result in 10-29% of patients. Ten up to 26% of patients are unable to return to work after percutaneous treatment of their fracture. A secondary arthrodesis has to be performed in 2-15% of the cases. Infectious complications occur in 2-15%. Some loss of reduction is reported in 4-67%. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous distractional reduction and fixation appears to be a safe technique with overall good results and an acceptable complication rate, compared with other treatment modalities for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. A meta-analysis, based on Cochrane Library criteria is not possible, because of a lack of level 1 and 2 trials on this subject.