Analysis of Diagnostic Modalities in Hospital-admitted Patients Evaluated for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess the diagnostic performance of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), low-dose chest computed tomography (CT), and serological testing, alone and in combinations, as well as routine inflammatory markers in patients evaluated for COVID-19 during the first wave in early 2020. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of all patients who were admitted to the emergency department due to fever and/or respiratory symptoms. CT scans were rated using the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) suspicion score. True disease status (COVID-19 - positive vs. negative) was adjudicated by two independent clinicians. Receiver-operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves were calculated for inflammatory markers. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated for RT-PCR, CT, and serology alone, as well as the combinations of RT-PCR+CT, RT-PCR+serology, CT+serology, and all three modalities. RESULTS: Of 221 patients with a median age of 72 years, 113 were classified as COVID-19 positive. Among 180 patients from which data on CT and RT-PCR were available, RT-PCR had the highest sensitivity to detect COVID-19 (0.87; 95%CI=0.78-0.93). Notably, the addition of CT in the analysis increased sensitivity to 0.89 (95%CI=0.8-0.94), but lowered specificity from 1 (95%CI=0.96-1) to 0.9 (95%CI=0.83-0.95). The combination of RT-PCR, CT and serology (n=60 patients with complete dataset) yielded a sensitivity of 0.83 (95%CI=0.61-0.94) and specificity of 0.86 (95%CI=0.72-0.93). CONCLUSION: RT-PCR was the best single test in patients evaluated for COVID-19. Conversely, the routine performance of chest CT adds little sensitivity and decreases specificity.

Reduced adrenal stress response in patients on PCSK9 inhibitor therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment with proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), in addition to statin therapy, reduces LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c) in some patients to extremely low levels (i.e.< 20 mg/dl or < 0.52 mmol/l). There is concern that at such low levels, the physiologic role of cholesterol may be impaired, e.g. the adrenal cortisol stress response might be compromised. We therefore evaluated the effect of PCSK9i therapy on the cortisol response to ACTH in patients with LDL-c down to extremely low levels. METHODS: Nineteen patients on PCSK9i therapy and 18 controls matched for age, gender and comorbidities were included. The cortisol response to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) was tested after application of 250 µg ACTH. RESULTS: LDL-c levels ranged from 0.42 to 3.32 mmol/l (mean 1.38 ± 0.84 mmol/l) in the PCSK9i group and 0.81-4.82 mmol/l (mean 2.10 ± 0.97) in the control group. By analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), the PCSK9i group had significantly lower cortisol response compared to the control group (- 97.26 nmol/l, -178.60 to -15.93, p = 0.02) after 60 min. There was a significant positive correlation between the duration of PCSK9i treatment and cortisol levels (r = 0.59, p = 0.009). Extremely low LDL-c levels down to 0.42 mmol/l were not associated with lower stimulated cortisol levels. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on PCSK9i therapy showed a significantly lower cortisol response to ACTH. Stimulated cortisol levels were lower in the first months of PCSK9i treatment, suggesting an adaptive phenomenon. We conclude that the adrenal stress response in patients on PCSK9 inhibitor therapy is reduced.

Increased platelet-collagen interaction associated with double homozygosity for receptor polymorphisms of platelet GPIa and GPIIIa.

OBJECTIVE: There is considerable controversy regarding the clinical role of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the platelet glycoprotein receptor GPIa C807T and the Pl(A1/A2) of GPIIIa as cardiovascular risk factors. We hypothesized that two combined SNPs in their homozygous prothrombotic forms could clarify their pathophysiological impact. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified a family with a striking history of premature cardiovascular events and a high frequency of the prothrombotic form of the two SNPs. From this family, the platelets of a healthy, 27-year-old propositus with this double homozygosity were compared with three matched male neutral gene variant controls. The propositus had shortened PFA-100 closure times and an increased platelet aggregation response to collagen. Platelet deposition to collagen was augmented under the blood flow conditions of a high shear rate model (1600 s(-1)). Platelet adhesion on collagen monomers was induced in a static system, leading to the promotion of subsequent procoagulant activity. CONCLUSIONS: The combined homozygous prothrombotic SNPs of GPIa and GPIIIa are associated with an increased platelet-collagen interaction and procoagulant activity that can be readily demonstrated in several independent systems. Our patient may serve as a useful model for the functional consequences of two combined, potentially procoagulant, platelet SNPs.

An automated 'bio-intact' PTH assay: a step towards standardisation and improved correlation with parathyroid function in renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Most methods for the determination of parathyroid hormone (PTH) show cross-reactivity with N-truncated forms of PTH. The analytic and diagnostic value of a recently developed automated PTH test without this cross-reactivity was examined. METHODS: The PTH levels of 73 patients undergoing hemodialysis were compared using the 'bio-intact' PTH (Nichols Institute Diagnostics) and 3 'intact' PTH tests (from Nichols, Roche Elecsys and Diagnostics Corporation DPC). Further, the (non 1-84) PTH fragment and the PTH ratio (bio-intact PTH/(non 1-84) PTH) were calculated. All results were then correlated with biochemical bone markers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and bone collagen C-terminal telopeptides in serum). RESULTS: 'Bio-intact' PTH values were lower than the PTH results generated by the 'intact' PTH assays. Results of all PTH tests were closely correlated (r=0.96-0.98, p<0.01). Correlations with biochemical bone markers were high (r=0.31-0.63, p<0.01), but no significant association between the PTH ratio and all other tests (r=-0.2 to 0.03) was found. CONCLUSIONS: In stable hemodialysis patients, the different PTH tests show a similar correlation with the bone markers. It is however desirable to measure PTH with assays devoid of any cross-reaction for a better comparability. In this study, the PTH ratio was not correlated with biochemical bone markers; the use of this ratio requires further investigation.